The first Special Issue on code biology - A bird's-eye view

Origin of life: Drawing the big picture

Trying to provide a broad overview about the origin of life in Earth, the most significant transitions of life before cells are listed and discussed. The current approach emphasizes the symbiotic relationships that emerged with life. We propose a rational, stepwise scenario for the origin of life that starts with the origin of the first biomolecules and steps forward until the origins of the first cells. Along this path, we aim to provide a brief, though comprehensive theoretical model that will consider the following steps: (i) how nucleotides and other biomolecules could be made prebiotically in specific prebiotic refuges; (ii) how the first molecules of RNAs were formed; (iii) how the proto-peptidyl transferase center was built by the concatenation of proto-tRNAs; (iv) how the ribosome and the genetic code could be structured; (v) how progenotes could live and reproduce as "naked" ribonucleoprotein molecules; (vi) how peptides started to bind molecules in the prebiotic soup allowing biochemical pathways to evolve from those bindings; (vii) how genomes got bigger by the symbiotic relationship of progenotes and lateral transference of genetic material; (viii) how the progenote LUCA has been formed by assembling most biochemical routes; (ix) how the first virion capsids probably emerged and evolved; (x) how phospholipid membranes emerged probably twice by the evolution of lipid-binding proteins; (xi) how DNA synthesis have been formed in parallel in Bacteria and Archaea; and, finally, (xii) how DNA-based cells of Bacteria and Archaeabacteria have been constituted. The picture provided is conjectural and present epistemological gaps. Future research will help to advance into the elucidation of gaps and confirmation/refutation of current statements.

Organic Codes: A Unifying Concept for Life

Although the knowledge about biological systems has advanced exponentially in recent decades, it is surprising to realize that the very definition of Life keeps presenting theoretical challenges. Even if several lines of reasoning seek to identify the essence of life phenomenon, most of these thoughts contain fundamental problem in their basic conceptual structure. Most concepts fail to identify either necessary or sufficient features to define life. Here, we analyzed the main conceptual frameworks regarding theoretical aspects that have been supporting the most accepted concepts of life, such as (i) the physical, (ii) the cellular and (iii) the molecular approaches. Based on an ontological analysis, we propose that Life should not be positioned under the ontological category of Matter. Yet, life should be better understood under the top-level ontology of "Process". Exercising an epistemological approach, we propose that the essential characteristic that pervades each and every living being is the presence of organic codes. Therefore, we explore theories in biosemiotics and code biology in order to propose a clear concept of life as a macrocode composed by multiple inter-related coding layers. This way, as life is a sort of metaphysical process of encoding, the living beings became the molecular materialization of that process. From the proposed concept, we show that the evolutionary process is a fundamental characteristic for life's maintenance but it is not necessary to define life, as many organisms are clearly alive but they do not participate in the evolutionary process (such as infertile hybrids). The current proposition opens a fertile field of debate in astrobiology, epistemology, biosemiotics, code biology and robotics.

Karyotype coding: The creation and maintenance of system information for complexity and biodiversity

The mechanism of biological information flow is of vital importance. However, traditional research surrounding the genetic code that follows the central dogma to a phenotype faces challengers, including missing heritability and two-phased evolution. Here, we propose the karyotype code, which by organizing genes along chromosomes at once preserves species genome information and provides a platform for other genetic and nongenetic information to develop and accumulate. This specific genome-level code, which exists in all living systems, is compared to the genetic code and other organic codes in the context of information management, leading to the concept of hierarchical biological codes and an 'extended' definition of adaptor where the adaptors of a code can be not only molecular structures but also, more commonly, biological processes. Notably, different levels of a biosystem have their own mechanisms of information management, and gene-coded parts inheritance preserves "parts information" while karyotype-coded system inheritance preserves the "system information" which organizes parts information. The karyotype code prompts many questions regarding the flow of biological information, including the distinction between information creation, maintenance, modification, and usage, along with differences between living and non-living systems. How do biological systems exist, reproduce, and self-evolve for increased complexity and diversity? Inheritance is mediated by organic codes which function as informational tools to organize chemical reactions, create new information, and preserve frozen accidents, transforming historical miracles into biological routines.

Removing quote marks from the RNA polymerase II CTD 'code'

In eukaryotes, RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is responsible for the synthesis of all mRNAs and myriads of short and long untranslated RNAs, whose fabrication involves close spatiotemporal coordination between transcription, RNA processing and chromatin modification. Crucial for such a coordination is an unusual C-terminal domain (CTD) of the Pol II largest subunit, made of tandem repetitions (26 in yeast, 52 in chordates) of the heptapeptide with the consensus sequence YSPTSPS. Although largely unstructured and with poor sequence content, the Pol II CTD derives its extraordinary functional versatility from the fact that each amino acid in the heptapeptide can be posttranslationally modified, and that different combinations of CTD covalent marks are specifically recognized by different protein binding partners. These features have led to propose the existence of a Pol II CTD code, but this expression is generally used by authors with some caution, revealed by the frequent use of quote marks for the word 'code'. Based on the theoretical framework of code biology, it is argued here that the Pol II CTD modification system meets the requirements of a true organic code, where different CTD modification states represent organic signs whose organic meanings are biological reactions contributing to the many facets of RNA biogenesis in coordination with RNA synthesis by Pol II. Importantly, the Pol II CTD code is instantiated by adaptor proteins possessing at least two distinct domains, one of which devoted to specific recognition of CTD modification profiles. Furthermore, code rules can be altered by experimental interchange of CTD recognition domains of different adaptor proteins, a fact arguing in favor of the arbitrariness, and thus bona fide character, of the Pol II CTD code. Since the growing family of CTD adaptors includes RNA binding proteins and histone modification complexes, the Pol II CTD code is by its nature integrated with other organic codes, in particular the splicing code and the histone code. These issues will be discussed taking into account fascinating developments in Pol II CTD research, like the discovery of novel modifications at non-consensus sites, the recently recognized CTD physicochemical properties favoring liquid-liquid phase separation, and the discovery that the Pol II CTD, originated before the divergence of most extant eukaryotic taxa, has expanded and diversified with developmental complexity in animals and plants.

Life and living beings under the perspective of organic macrocodes

A powerful and concise concept of life is crucial for studies aiming to understand the characteristics that emerged from an inorganic world. Among biologists, the most accepted argument define life under a top-down strategy by looking into the shared characteristics observed in all cellular organisms. This is often made highlighting (i) autonomy and (ii) evolutionary capacity as fundamental characteristics observed in all cellular organisms. Along the present work, we assume the framework of code biology considering that biology started with the emergence of the first organic code by self-organization. We reinforces that the conceptual structure of life should be reallocated from the ontology class of Matter to its sister class of Process. Along the emergence and early evolution of biological systems, biological codes changed from open systems of "naked" molecules (at the progenote era), to close, encapsulated systems (at the organismic era). Living beings appeared at the very moment when nucleic acids with coding properties became encapsulated. This led to the origin of viruses and, then, to the origin of cells. In this context, we propose that the single character that makes a clear distinction between the abiotic and the biotic world is the capacity to process organic codes. Thus, life appears with the self-assembly of a genetic code and evolves by the emergence of other overlapping codes. Once life has been clearly conceptualized, we go further to conceptualize organisms, parents, lineages, and species in terms of code biology.