Are calprotectin and lactoferrin equivalent screening tests for inflammatory bowel disease?

The Role of Lactoferrin in Intestinal Health

The intestine represents one of the first barriers where microorganisms and environmental antigens come into tight contact with the host immune system. A healthy intestine is essential for the well-being of humans and animals. The period after birth is a very important phase of development, as the infant moves from a protected environment in the uterus to one with many of unknown antigens and pathogens. In that period, mother's milk plays an important role, as it contains an abundance of biologically active components. Among these components, the iron-binding glycoprotein, lactoferrin (LF), has demonstrated a variety of important benefits in infants and adults, including the promotion of intestinal health. This review article aims to provide a compilation of all the information related to LF and intestinal health, in infants and adults.

Screening for gastrointestinal and pancreatic diseases

Diagnosis of chronic gastrointestinal and pancreatic diseases is challenging because patients generally present with nonspecific symptoms, such as abdominal pain and chronic diarrhea, some of which can last for many years. Although stool assays are more sensitive than serum assays, the former has unique limitations that healthcare providers should be aware of. One algorithm to screen for chronic gastrointestinal and pancreatic issues is to perform stool testing to assess inflammatory, watery (osmotic) and malabsorptive conditions. This chapter will discuss several stool-based screening tests, the major disorders they screen for and clinical performance. Sections on assay and sample limitations are also included. Stool testing can provide valuable diagnostic, prognostic and treatment response information if both the laboratory and clinician understand the benefits and limitations of these assays.

Clinical and Analytical Verification of an Automated Fecal Calprotectin Immunoassay with Extraction Device

BACKGROUND

Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a screening test for intestinal inflammation, and often used by clinicians to help identify and monitor patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Improvements in FC assays include moving to more automated immunoassays compared to ELISAs and simple-to-use extraction devices compared to manual weighing for the extraction process.

METHODS

A method comparison was performed between the PhiCal ELISA and LIAISON immunoassay for 53 stool samples, and the screening results were compared to the gold standard endoscopy with biopsy results. Clinical accuracy was assessed by comparing the FC results from each assay to the presence or absence of inflammation determined from the biopsy report. The performance of the extraction device was compared to manually weighing. Additional studies were completed to verify the manufacturer's claims.

RESULTS

The FC results were compared to the biopsy results for detecting inflammation. PhiCal ELISA had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 100%, while the LIAISON immunoassay had a sensitivity of 97% with specificity of 94%. Therefore, the LIAISON immunoassay performed better than the PhiCal ELISA. The extraction device performed well compared to manual weighing if stool samples were <800 μg/g, within Bristol stool types 2-6, and did not contain a significant amount of undigested material, fibrous material, or mucus.

CONCLUSION

The LIAISON immunoassay with extraction device has acceptable performance for clinical use in measuring fecal calprotectin.