The impact of guidelines on the outcomes of community-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia

Evaluating the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program on the length of stay of immune-competent adult patients admitted to a hospital ward with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia: A quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate an antimicrobial stewardship intervention can reduce length of stay for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

Starting April 1, 2013, consecutive adult patients with CAP admitted to an acute care community hospital in Barrie, Ontario, Canada, were eligible for enrollment until March 31, 2015. The antimicrobial stewardship intervention was a prospective audit and feedback recommendation implemented in a stepped-wedge design across 4 wards. The primary outcome was time to hospital discharge, and secondary outcomes included time to antibiotic discontinuation and a composite outcome of 30-day readmission or all-cause mortality. The intervention effect was estimated by survival (time to discharge and antibiotic discontinuation) and logistic (30-day readmission or all-cause mortality) regression analyses.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 763 patients. The primary outcome was observed in 196 (82%) control patients and 402 (77%) intervention patients. Length of stay was reduced by 11% (95% confidence interval [CI], -9% to 35%). Time to antibiotic discontinuation was shortened by 29% (95% CI, 10%-52%). Odds ratio for 30-day readmission or all-cause mortality was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.49-1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

A prospective audit and feedback intervention did not significantly reduce length of hospital stay in CAP patients despite reducing overall antibiotic utilization.

Investigational drugs in phase I and phase II clincial trials for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) is one of the main infections acquired by patients during a stay in hospital. The main issue when dealing with patients with HAP and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is the increasing role of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs).

AREAS COVERED

In this review the authors summarize the actual situation of MDROs as a cause of HAP and VAP. They also review the current treatment options stated in the most important international guidelines. Finally, they focus on the investigational drugs that have reached the phase III stage of development and the novel compounds that are being studied in phase I and II clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Thanks to their excellent activity against MDROs, drugs in development for the treatment of HAP and VAP can significantly improve the therapeutic options available. In selected patients, the possibility to administer directed therapy with monoclonal antibodies to specific pathogens is an exciting strategy in the fight against widespread resistance.

Can an antimicrobial stewardship program reduce length of stay of immune-competent adult patients admitted to hospital with diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia? Study protocol for pragmatic controlled non-randomized clinical study

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia is responsible for a large proportion of hospital admissions and antibiotic utilization. Physician adherence to evidence-based pneumonia management guidelines is poor. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are an effective intervention to mitigate against unwarranted variation from these guidelines. Despite this benefit, ASPs have not been shown to reduce the length of stay of hospitalized patients with pneumonia. In immune-competent adult patients admitted to a hospital ward with a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, does a multi-faceted ASP utilizing prospective chart audit and feedback reduce the length of stay, compared with usual care, without increasing the risk of death or readmission 30 days after discharge from hospital?

METHODS/DESIGN

Starting on 1 April 2013, all consecutive immune-competent adult patients (>18 years old) admitted to a hospital ward with a positive febrile respiratory illness screening questionnaire and a diagnosis of pneumonia by the attending physician will be eligible for inclusion in this non-randomized study. All eligible patients who fulfill the ASP review criteria will undergo a prospective chart audit, followed by an ASP recommendation provided to the attending physician. The attending physician is responsible for implementing or rejecting the ASP recommendation. This is a modified stepped-wedge design with a baseline data collection period of 3 months, followed by non-random sequential introduction of the ASP intervention on each of four hospital wards in a single community-based, academic-affiliated 339-bed acute-care hospital in Barrie, ON, Canada. The primary outcome measure is hospital length of stay; secondary outcome measures include days and duration of antibiotic therapy, and inadvertent adverse outcomes of 30 day post-discharge mortality and hospital readmission rates. Differences in outcome measures will be assessed using extended Cox regression analysis. Time to ASP intervention is included as a time-dependent covariate in the final model, to account for time-dependent bias.

DISCUSSION

By designing a pragmatic clinical trial with unique design and analytic features, we not only expect to demonstrate the effectiveness of a real-world ASP, but also provide a model for program evaluation that can be used more broadly to improve patient safety and quality of care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02264756 .

Causes of non-adherence to therapeutic guidelines in severe community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the adherence to Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines and the causes of lack of adherence during empirical antibiotic prescription in severe pneumonia in Latin America.

METHODS

A clinical questionnaire was submitted to 36 physicians from Latin America; they were asked to indicate the empirical treatment in two fictitious cases of severe respiratory infection: community-acquired pneumonia and nosocomial pneumonia.

RESULTS

In the case of community acquired pneumonia, 11 prescriptions of 36 (30.6%) were compliant with international guidelines. The causes for non-compliant treatment were monotherapy (16.0%), the unnecessary prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics (40.0%) and the use of non-recommended antibiotics (44.0%). In the case of nosocomial pneumonia, the rate of adherence to the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines was 2.8% (1 patient of 36). The reasons for lack of compliance were monotherapy (14.3%) and a lack of dual antibiotic coverage against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (85.7%). If monotherapy with an antipseudomonal antibiotic was considered adequate, the antibiotic treatment would be adequate in 100% of the total prescriptions.

CONCLUSION

The compliance rate with the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines in the community-acquired pneumonia scenario was 30.6%; the most frequent cause of lack of compliance was the indication of monotherapy. In the case of nosocomial pneumonia, the compliance rate with the guidelines was 2.8%, and the most important cause of non-adherence was lack of combined antipseudomonal therapy. If the use of monotherapy with an antipseudomonal antibiotic was considered the correct option, the treatment would be adequate in 100% of the prescriptions.

Decrease in mortality in severe community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia: impact of improving antibiotic strategies (2000-2013)

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to compare antibiotic prescribing practices and survival in the ICU for patients with pneumococcal severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) between 2000 and 2013.

METHODS

This was a matched case-control study of two prospectively recorded cohorts in Europe. Eighty patients from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (CAPUCI) II study (case group) were matched with 80 patients from CAPUCI I (control group) based on the following: shock at admission, need of mechanical ventilation, COPD, immunosuppression, and age.

RESULTS

Demographic data were comparable in the two groups. Combined antibiotic therapy increased from 66.2% to 87.5% (P < .01), and the percentage of patients receiving the first dose of antibiotic within 3 h increased from 27.5% to 70.0% (P < .01). ICU mortality was significantly lower (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.98) in cases, both in the whole population and in the subgroups of patients with shock (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.89) or receiving mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.96). In the multivariate analysis, ICU mortality increased in patients requiring mechanical ventilation (OR, 5.23; 95% CI, 1.60-17.17) and decreased in patients receiving early antibiotic treatment (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.87) and combined therapy (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

In pneumococcal SCAP, early antibiotic prescription and use of combination therapy increased. Both were associated with improved survival.

High-dose levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, open-label study

BACKGROUND

The conventional treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) involves combination therapy consisting of a β-lactam penicillin or a cephalosporin with a macrolide. Alternatively, high-dose levofloxacin treatment has been used as single-agent therapy for treating CAP, covering atypical pathogens.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of high-dose levofloxacin with combined ceftriaxone and azithromycin for the treatment of CAP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase IV, prospective, randomized, open-label trial enrolled patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital for CAP treatment from 2010 to 2011. Hospital admission was decided based on clinical judgement and the pneumonia severity index. Forty subjects were enrolled and assigned to two treatment arms using a random numbers table. The 20 subjects in the experimental group were given levofloxacin 750 mg intravenously once daily, followed by the same dose of oral levofloxacin at discharge when clinically improved and the 20 subjects in the control group were given ceftriaxone 2.0 g intravenously once daily plus oral azithromycin 500 mg for 3 consecutive days, followed by oral cefpodoxime 200 mg per day at discharge after clinical improvement. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate. Secondary outcomes were the microbiological success rate and adverse events during the study.

RESULTS

Of the 40 subjects enrolled, 36 completed the study: 17 in the experimental group and 19 in the control group. The groups did not differ in terms of demographic factors or clinical findings at baseline. The clinical success rate (cured + improved) was 94% in the experimental (levofloxacin) group and 84% in the control group (p > 0.05). The microbiological success rate and overall adverse events were also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent, high-dose levofloxacin treatment exhibited excellent clinical and microbiological efficacy with a safety profile comparable to that of ceftriaxone plus azithromycin therapy. Large-scale clinical trials are required to verify these results.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

WHO International Clinical Trials Registry: KCT0000374; Daiichi-Sankyo Korea study code: T11-13-V1.

High-dose levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, open-label study

BACKGROUND

The conventional treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) involves combination therapy consisting of a β-lactam penicillin or a cephalosporin with a macrolide. Alternatively, high-dose levofloxacin treatment has been used as single-agent therapy for treating CAP, covering atypical pathogens.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of high-dose levofloxacin with combined ceftriaxone and azithromycin for the treatment of CAP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase IV, prospective, randomized, open-label trial enrolled patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital for CAP treatment from 2010 to 2011. Hospital admission was decided based on clinical judgement and the pneumonia severity index. Forty subjects were enrolled and assigned to two treatment arms using a random numbers table. The 20 subjects in the experimental group were given levofloxacin 750 mg intravenously once daily, followed by the same dose of oral levofloxacin at discharge when clinically improved and the 20 subjects in the control group were given ceftriaxone 2.0 g intravenously once daily plus oral azithromycin 500 mg for 3 consecutive days, followed by oral cefpodoxime 200 mg per day at discharge after clinical improvement. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate. Secondary outcomes were the microbiological success rate and adverse events during the study.

RESULTS

Of the 40 subjects enrolled, 36 completed the study: 17 in the experimental group and 19 in the control group. The groups did not differ in terms of demographic factors or clinical findings at baseline. The clinical success rate (cured + improved) was 94% in the experimental (levofloxacin) group and 84% in the control group (p > 0.05). The microbiological success rate and overall adverse events were also similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Single-agent, high-dose levofloxacin treatment exhibited excellent clinical and microbiological efficacy with a safety profile comparable to that of ceftriaxone plus azithromycin therapy. Large-scale clinical trials are required to verify these results.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

WHO International Clinical Trials Registry: KCT0000374; Daiichi-Sankyo Korea study code: T11-13-V1.