An Endodontic forecasting model based on the analysis of preoperative dental radiographs: A pilot study on an endodontic predictive deep neural network.
J Endod 2023:S0099-2399(23)00178-4. [PMID:
37019378 DOI:
10.1016/j.joen.2023.03.015]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
This study aimed to evaluate the use of deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) algorithms to detect clinical features and predict the three years outcome of endodontic treatment on preoperative periapical radiographs.
METHODS
A database of single-root premolars that received endodontic treatment or retreatment by endodontists with presence of three years outcome was prepared (n = 598). We constructed a 17-layered DCNN with a self-attention layer (PRESSAN-17), and the model was trained, validated, and tested to 1) detect seven clinical features, i.e., full coverage restoration (FCR), presence of proximal teeth (PRX), coronal defect (COD), root rest (RRS), canal visibility (CAV), previous root filling (PRF), and periapical radiolucency (PAR), and 2) predict the three years endodontic prognosis by analyzing preoperative periapical radiographs as an input. During the prognostication test, a conventional DCNN without a self-attention layer (RESNET-18) was tested for comparison. Accuracy and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were mainly evaluated for performance comparison. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) was used to visualize weighted heatmaps.
RESULTS
PRESSAN-17 detected FCR (AUC = 0.975), PRX (0.866), COD (0.672), RRS (0.989), PRF (0.879) and PAR (0.690) significantly, compared to the no-information rate (p<0.05). Comparing the mean accuracy of 5-fold validation of two models, PRESSAN-17 (67.0%) showed a significant difference to RESNET-18 (63.4%, p<0.05). Also, the area under average ROC of PRESSAN-17 was 0.638, which was significantly different compared to the no-information rate. Grad-CAM demonstrated that PRESSAN-17 correctly identified clinical features.
CONCLUSIONS
Deep convolutional neural networks may aid in the prognostication of endodontic treatment outcome.
Collapse