1
|
Kozyk M, Kumar L, Strubchevska K, Trivedi M, Wasvary M, Giri S. Efficacy and Safety of Argon Plasma Coagulation for the Ablation of Barrett's Esophagus: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gut Liver 2024; 18:434-443. [PMID: 37800316 PMCID: PMC11096916 DOI: 10.5009/gnl230094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is an alternate ablative method to radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE), and it is preferred due to its lower cost and widespread availability. The present meta-analysis aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of APC for the management of BE. Methods A literature search from January 2000 to November 2022 was done for studies analyzing the outcome of APC in BE. The primary outcomes were clearance rate of intestinal metaplasia and adverse events (AE). Pooled event rates were expressed with summative statistics. Results A total of 38 studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled event rate for clearance rate of intestinal metaplasia with APC in BE was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83.5% to 90.2%), with high-power and hybrid APC having a higher rate compared to standard APC. The pooled incidence of AE with APC in BE was 22.5% (95% CI, 15.3% to 29.7%), without any significant difference between the subgroups, with self-limited chest pain being the commonest AE. The incidence of serious AE was only 0.4% (95% CI, 0.0% to 1.0%), while stricture development was seen only in 1.7% (95% CI, 0.9% to 2.6%) of cases. The pooled recurrence rate of BE was 16.1% (95% CI, 10.7% to 21.6%), with a significantly lower recurrence with high-power APC than standard APC. Conclusions High-power and hybrid APC seem to have an advantage over standard APC in terms of clearance rate and recurrence rate. Further studies are required to compare the efficacy and safety of hybrid APC with standard APC and radiofrequency ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Kozyk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Lohith Kumar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
| | - Kateryna Strubchevska
- Department of Internal Medicine, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Manan Trivedi
- Department of General Surgery, KB Bhabha Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Suprabhat Giri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lao SH, Huang JL, Wu LF. Barrett’s esophagus: Current challenges in diagnosis and treatment. WORLD CHINESE JOURNAL OF DIGESTOLOGY 2024; 32:267-275. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v32.i4.267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
|
3
|
Patil DT, Odze RD. Barrett's Esophagus and Associated Dysplasia. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2024; 53:1-23. [PMID: 38280743 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
Early detection of dysplasia and effective management are critical steps in halting neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). This review provides a contemporary overview of the BE-related dysplasia, its role in guiding surveillance and management, and discusses emerging diagnostic and therapeutic approaches that might further enhance patient management. Novel, noninvasive techniques for sampling and surveillance, adjunct biomarkers for risk assessment, and their limitations are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepa T Patil
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Robert D Odze
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sapoznikov B, Fisch G, Shamah S, Shinhar N, Benjaminov F, Levi Z, Peleg N. Multi-focal dysplasia is associated with high recurrence rates after successful ablation of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Dig Liver Dis 2023; 55:1667-1672. [PMID: 37517963 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Barrett's esophagus (BE) might recur after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM). We investigated factors associated with recurrence of BE after successful Radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS A longitudinal study of BE patients with dysplasia treated with RFA from 2014 to 2021 in two large referral centers. Recurrence was identified in histologic specimens. Factors associated with post-RFA recurrence were analyzed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 728 patients with BE were identified, 118 had underwent RFA, and 113 had sufficient follow up time. Mean age was 63.7 (±11.7) years, 73.5% were males, 59.3% had long segment of BE, and 30.1% had multifocal dysplasia. During 340.8 patient-years of follow-up, 15 patients (13.3%) had recurrence of BE, which represent an incidence rate of 4.41% per patient-year. Incidence rate of recurrence with dysplasia was 1.17% per patient-year. Multifocal dysplasia, number of RFA sessions, and endoscopic resection before RFA were associated with risk of recurrence in univariate analysis. However, in cox regression analysis only multifocal dysplasia (HR 10.99; 95% CI 2.83-22.62, p = 0.001) was associated with post-RFA recurrence. CONCLUSION Total recurrence rates after CEIM are low, and multifocal dysplasia before the ablative therapy is significantly associated with BE recurrence after CEIM. Patients with multifocal dysplasia should be monitored rigorously after successful ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Sapoznikov
- The Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - George Fisch
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Steven Shamah
- The Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nadav Shinhar
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; The department of Gastroenterology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Fabiana Benjaminov
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; The department of Gastroenterology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - Zohar Levi
- The Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Noam Peleg
- The Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Davis C, Fuller A, Katzka D, Wani S, Sawas T. High Proportions of Newly Detected Visible Lesions and Pathology Grade Change Among Patients with Barrett's Esophagus Referred to Expert Centers. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3584-3595. [PMID: 37402985 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-07968-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia is increasingly being performed at tertiary and community centers. While it has been suggested that these patients should be evaluated at expert centers, the impact of this practice has not been evaluated. We aimed to assess the impact of referral of BE-related neoplasia patients to expert centers by assessing the proportion of patients with change in pathological diagnosis and visible lesions detected. METHODS Multiple databases were searched until December 2021 for studies of patients with BE referred from the community to expert center. The proportions of pathology grade change and newly detected visible lesions at expert centers were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed based on baseline histology and other relevant factors. RESULTS Twelve studies were included (1630 patients). The pooled proportion of pathology grade change after expert pathologist review was 47% (95% CI 34-59%) overall and 46% (95% CI 31-62%) among patients with baseline low-grade dysplasia. When upper endoscopy was repeated at an expert center, the pooled proportion of pathology grade change was still high 47% (95% 26-69%) overall and 40% (95% CI 34-45%) among patients with baseline LGD. The pooled proportion of newly detected visible lesions was 45% (95% CI 28-63%) and among patients referred with LGD was 27% (95% CI 22-32%). CONCLUSION An alarmingly high proportion of newly detected visible lesions and pathology grade change were found when patients were referred to expert centers supporting the need for centralized care for BE-related neoplasia patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Davis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Andrew Fuller
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Tarek Sawas
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern, 1801 Inwood Rd Ste 6-102, Dallas, TX, 75235, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
S2k-Leitlinie Gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit und eosinophile Ösophagitis der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) – März 2023 – AWMF-Registernummer: 021–013. Z Gastroenterol 2023; 61:862-933. [PMID: 37494073 DOI: 10.1055/a-2060-1069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
|
7
|
Reiter AJ, Farina DA, Fronza JS, Komanduri S. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: considerations for use in Barrett's esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doac096. [PMID: 36575922 PMCID: PMC10267686 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) occurs in 5-15% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While acid suppressive therapy is a critical component of BE management to minimize the risk of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma, surgical control of mechanical reflux is sometimes necessary. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is an increasingly utilized anti-reflux surgical therapy for GERD. While the use of MSA is listed as a precaution by the United States Food and Drug Administration, there are limited data showing effective BE regression with MSA. MSA offers several advantages in BE including effective reflux control, anti-reflux barrier restoration and reduced hiatal hernia recurrence. However, careful patient selection for MSA is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audra J Reiter
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Domenico A Farina
- Department of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Fronza
- Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davis C, Kolb JM. Management of Post Ablative Barrett's Esophagus: a Review of Current Practices and Look at Emerging Technologies. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2023; 21:125-137. [PMID: 37284351 PMCID: PMC9999319 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-023-00414-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of review Endoscopic eradication therapy is an effective and durable treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE) related neoplasia, but even after achieving successful eradication, these patients remain at risk for recurrence and require ongoing routine examinations. The optimal surveillance protocol including endoscopic technique, sampling strategy, and timing are still being refined. The aim of this review is to discuss current management principles for the post ablation patient and emerging technologies to guide clinical practice. Recent findings There is increasing evidence to support less frequent surveillance exams in the first year after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia and a move towards targeted biopsies of visible lesions and sampling high-risk locations such as the gastroesophageal junction. Promising technologies on the horizon that could impact management include novel biomarkers, personalized surveillance intervals, and non-endoscopic approaches. Summary Ongoing high-quality examinations after endoscopic eradication therapy are key to limiting recurrent BE. Surveillance intervals should be based on the pretreatment grade of dysplasia. Future research should focus on technologies and surveillance practices that are most efficient for patients and the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Davis
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA
| | - Jennifer M Kolb
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Parenteral Nutrition, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073 USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kahn A, Crook J, Heckman MG, Wieczorek MA, Sami S, Snyder D, Agarwal S, Santiago J, Fernandez-Sordo JO, Tan WK, Lansing R, Wang KK, Ragunath K, DiPietro M, Wolfsen H, Ramirez F, Fleischer D, Leggett CL, Iyer PG. Optimized Surveillance Intervals Following Endoscopic Eradication of Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: An International Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2763-2771.e3. [PMID: 35245702 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Recommended surveillance intervals after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) after endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) are largely not evidence-based. Using recurrence rates in a multicenter international Barrett's esophagus (BE) CE-IM cohort, we aimed to generate optimal intervals for surveillance. METHODS Patients with dysplastic BE undergoing EET and achieving CE-IM from prospectively maintained databases at 5 tertiary-care centers in the United States and the United Kingdom were included. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was estimated, accounting for the unknown date of actual recurrence that lies between the dates of current and previous endoscopy. This cumulative incidence of recurrence subsequently was used to estimate the proportion of patients with undetected recurrence for various surveillance intervals over 5 years. Intervals were selected that minimized recurrences remaining undetected for more than 6 months. Actual patterns of post-CE-IM follow-up evaluation are described. RESULTS A total of 498 patients (with baseline low-grade dysplasia, 115 patients; high-grade dysplasia [HGD], 288 patients; and intramucosal adenocarcinoma [IMCa], 95 patients) were included. Any recurrence occurred in 27.1% and dysplastic recurrence occurred in 8.4% over a median of 2.6 years of follow-up evaluation. For pre-ablation HGD/IMCa, intervals of 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and then annually, resulted in no patients with dysplastic recurrence undetected for more than 6 months, comparable with current guideline recommendations despite a 33% reduction in the number of surveillance endoscopies. For pre-ablation low-grade dysplasia, intervals of 1, 2, and 4 years balanced endoscopic burden and undetected recurrence risk. CONCLUSIONS Lengthening post-CE-IM surveillance intervals would reduce the endoscopic burden after CE-IM with comparable rates of recurrent HGD/IMCa. Future guidelines should consider reduced surveillance frequency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allon Kahn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Julia Crook
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Michael G Heckman
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Mikolaj A Wieczorek
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Sarmed Sami
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Diana Snyder
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Siddharth Agarwal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jose Santiago
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - W Keith Tan
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ramona Lansing
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kenneth K Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Herbert Wolfsen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Francisco Ramirez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - David Fleischer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Cadman L Leggett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Souza RF, Wani S. Guideline to Practice: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated ACG Guideline. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:1177-80. [PMID: 35467555 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
11
|
Emura F, Chandrasekar VT, Hassan C, Armstrong D, Messmann H, Arantes V, Araya R, Barrera-Leon O, Bergman JJGHM, Bandhari P, Bourke MJ, Cerisoli C, Chiu PWY, Desai M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Falk GW, Fujishiro M, Gaddam S, Goda K, Gross S, Haidry R, Ho L, Iyer PG, Kashin S, Kothari S, Lee YY, Matsuda K, Neuhaus H, Oyama T, Ragunath K, Repici A, Shaheen N, Singh R, Sobrino-Cossio S, Wang KK, Waxman I, Sharma P. Rio de Janeiro Global Consensus on Landmarks, Definitions, and Classifications in Barrett's Esophagus: World Endoscopy Organization Delphi Study. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:84-96.e2. [PMID: 35339464 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Despite the significant advances made in the diagnosis and treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE), there is still a need for standardized definitions, appropriate recognition of endoscopic landmarks, and consistent use of classification systems. Current controversies in basic definitions of BE and the relative lack of anatomic knowledge are significant barriers to uniform documentation. We aimed to provide consensus-driven recommendations for uniform reporting and global application. METHODS The World Endoscopy Organization Barrett's Esophagus Committee appointed leaders to develop an evidence-based Delphi study. A working group of 6 members identified and formulated 23 statements, and 30 internationally recognized experts from 18 countries participated in 3 rounds of voting. We defined consensus as agreement by ≥80% of experts for each statement and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) tool to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. RESULTS After 3 rounds of voting, experts achieved consensus on 6 endoscopic landmarks (palisade vessels, gastroesophageal junction, squamocolumnar junction, lesion location, extraluminal compressions, and quadrant orientation), 13 definitions (BE, hiatus hernia, squamous islands, columnar islands, Barrett's endoscopic therapy, endoscopic resection, endoscopic ablation, systematic inspection, complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia, complete eradication of dysplasia, residual disease, recurrent disease, and failure of endoscopic therapy), and 4 classification systems (Prague, Los Angeles, Paris, and Barrett's International NBI Group). In round 1, 18 statements (78%) reached consensus, with 12 (67%) receiving strong agreement from more than half of the experts. In round 2, 4 of the remaining statements (80%) reached consensus, with 1 statement receiving strong agreement from 50% of the experts. In the third round, a consensus was reached on the remaining statement. CONCLUSIONS We developed evidence-based, consensus-driven statements on endoscopic landmarks, definitions, and classifications of BE. These recommendations may facilitate global uniform reporting in BE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Emura
- Gastroenterology Division, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia; Advanced GI Endoscopy, EmuraCenter LatinoAmerica, Bogotá DC, Colombia.
| | | | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - David Armstrong
- Division of Gastroenterology & Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Vitor Arantes
- Endoscopy Division, Hospital das Clınicas e Mater Dei Contorno, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; Alfa Institute of Gastroenterology, Medical School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Raul Araya
- Clinic Los Andes University, Division of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Army Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Chile
| | - Oscar Barrera-Leon
- Gastroenterology Division, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia; Advanced GI Endoscopy, EmuraCenter LatinoAmerica, Bogotá DC, Colombia
| | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pradeep Bandhari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Cecilio Cerisoli
- Gastroenterology and Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy (GEDYT), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Madhav Desai
- Division of Gastroenterology, VA Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- MEDCIDS-Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Porto, University of Medicine, Porto, Portugal
| | - Gary W Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Srinivas Gaddam
- Division of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kenichi Goda
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Koto Toyosu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seth Gross
- Division of Gastroenterology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Endoscopy, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Lawrence Ho
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Barrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sergey Kashin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yaroslavl Oncology Hospital, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
| | - Shivangi Kothari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Rochester Medical Center and Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, New York; Developmental Endoscopy, Lab at University of Rochester (DELUR), University of Rochester Medical, Rochester, New York
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- Department of Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia
| | - Koji Matsuda
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, St. Marianna University, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Horst Neuhaus
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tsuneo Oyama
- Department of Endoscopy, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Nagano, Japan
| | - Krish Ragunath
- Department of Gastroenterology, Curtin University Medical School, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicholas Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sergio Sobrino-Cossio
- Unidad de Endoscopia y Fisiología Digestiva, Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal, México DF, México
| | - Kenneth K Wang
- Barrett's Esophagus Unit, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Irving Waxman
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology, VA Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Munster SN, Nieuwenhuis E, Bisschops R, Willekens H, Weusten BLAM, Herrero LA, Bogte A, Alkhalaf A, Schenk EBE, Schoon EJ, Curvers W, Koch AD, de Jonge PJF, Tang TJ, Nagengast WB, Westerhof J, Houben MHMG, Seewald S, Eijkemans MJC, Bergman JJGHM, Pouw RE. Dysplastic Recurrence After Successful Treatment for Early Barrett's Neoplasia: Development and Validation of a Prediction Model. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:285-294. [PMID: 35306024 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The combination of endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation is the treatment of choice for eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and/or early cancer. Currently, there are no evidence-based recommendations on how to survey patients after successful treatment, and most patients undergo frequent follow-up endoscopies. We aimed to develop and externally validate a prediction model for visible dysplastic recurrence, which can be used to personalize surveillance after treatment. METHODS We collected data from the Dutch Barrett Expert Center Registry, a nationwide registry that captures outcomes from all patients with BE undergoing endoscopic treatment in the Netherlands in a centralized care setting. We used predictors related to demographics, severity of reflux, histologic status at baseline, and treatment characteristics. We built a Fine and Gray survival model with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalization to predict the incidence of visible dysplastic recurrence after initial successful treatment. The model was validated externally in patients with BE treated in Switzerland and Belgium. RESULTS A total of 1154 patients with complete BE eradication were included for model building. During a mean endoscopic follow-up of 4 years, 38 patients developed recurrent disease (1.0%/person-year). The following characteristics were independently associated with recurrence (strongest to weakest predictor): a new visible lesion during treatment phase, higher number of endoscopic resection treatments, male sex, increasing BE length, high-grade dysplasia or cancer at baseline, and younger age. External validation showed a C-statistic of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.94) with good calibration. CONCLUSIONS This is the first externally validated model to predict visible dysplastic recurrence after successful endoscopic eradication treatment of BE with dysplasia or early cancer. On external validation, our model has good discrimination and calibration. This model can help clinicians and patients to determine a personalized follow-up strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne N van Munster
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Nieuwenhuis
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Willekens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenza Alvarez Herrero
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Auke Bogte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alaa Alkhalaf
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Ed B E Schenk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J Schoon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Health, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Arjun D Koch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jan F de Jonge
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tjon J Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IJsselland Hospital, Cappelle aan den Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Nagengast
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jessie Westerhof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin H M G Houben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Haga Teaching Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Seewald
- Centre of Gastroenterology, Klinik Hirslanden, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Martinus J C Eijkemans
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wani S. Personalized Approach to the Post-Endoscopic Eradication Therapy Barrett's Esophagus Patient. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:39-42. [PMID: 35526573 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Um PS, Chan MQ, Hinton A, Haisley K, Perry KA, Balasubramanian G. Adherence to Surveillance Endoscopies Posteradication of Barrett's Esophagus With High-grade Dysplasia or Carcinoma In Situ. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022. [PMID: 35389913 DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
GOALS We aimed to evaluate factors associated with patient adherence to recommended surveillance guidelines during the first 3 years after endoscopic eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or T1a carcinoma in situ (CIS) and the relationship between adherence and detection of recurrence. BACKGROUND While surveillance endoscopies after treatment of BE with HGD or T1a CIS are an important component of therapy, it is unclear whether these high-risk patients are adhering to recommended surveillance guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 123 BE patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation±endoscopic mucosal resection for biopsy-proven HGD, or CIS between January 2010 and November 2018 underwent retrospective review for adherence to surveillance guidelines, patient factors related to adherence, and recurrence of dysplasia or CIS at 12, 24, and 36 months. RESULTS Of 123 BE patients (89 HGD and 34 CIS), adherence during the first year following treatment was 26.97% for HGD patients and 41.18% for CIS patients, with increasing adherence rates in subsequent years. Patients who received 3 to 4 surveillance endoscopies in the first year posttreatment had significantly higher rates of recurrence detection than patients who received 0 to 2 surveillance endoscopies over this interval (P=0.01). No patient factors were found to impact adherence significantly. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to recommended surveillance intervals after endoscopic treatment of BE with HGD or CIS is low, with poor adherence during the first year associated with decreased detection of recurrence. Future studies are needed to evaluate risk factors and develop a potential intervention for poor adherence in this high-risk population.
Collapse
|
15
|
Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Souza RF, Yadlapati RH, Sauer BG, Wani S. Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated ACG Guideline. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:559-87. [PMID: 35354777 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common condition associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. BE is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, a highly lethal cancer with an increasing incidence over the last 5 decades. These revised guidelines implement Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to propose recommendations for the definition and diagnosis of BE, screening for BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma, surveillance of patients with known BE, and the medical and endoscopic treatment of BE and its associated early neoplasia. Important changes since the previous iteration of this guideline include a broadening of acceptable screening modalities for BE to include nonendoscopic methods, liberalized intervals for surveillance of short-segment BE, and volume criteria for endoscopic therapy centers for BE. We recommend endoscopic eradication therapy for patients with BE and high-grade dysplasia and those with BE and low-grade dysplasia. We propose structured surveillance intervals for patients with dysplastic BE after successful ablation based on the baseline degree of dysplasia. We could not make recommendations regarding chemoprevention or use of biomarkers in routine practice due to insufficient data.
Collapse
|
16
|
Shimizu T, Samarasena JB, Fortinsky KJ, Hashimoto R, El Hage Chehade N, Chin MA, Moosvi Z, Chang KJ. Benefit, tolerance, and safety of hybrid argon plasma coagulation for treatment of Barrett's esophagus: US pilot study. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E1870-E1876. [PMID: 34917455 PMCID: PMC8671001 DOI: 10.1055/a-1492-2450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims A novel technique for Barrett's esophagus (BE) ablation, termed hybrid APC, has recently been developed. The aims of this US pilot study were to evaluate the efficacy, tolerance and safety of hybrid APC for the treatment of BE. Patients and methods Patients with biopsy-proven BE referred to our tertiary care center over a 12-month period for mucosal ablation were eligible for this study. Efficacy of ablation was measured on follow-up endoscopy by demonstrating either a reduction of visible BE or biopsies proving complete resolution of intestinal metaplasia (CRIM). To evaluate tolerance and safety, patients were called on post-procedure days 1 and 7. Results Twenty-two patients with BE (4.5 % intramucosal carcinoma, 31.8 % high-grade dysplasia, 18.1 % low-grade dysplasia, 36.3 % non-dysplastic, 9.1 % indefinite for dysplasia) underwent 40 treatments with hybrid APC. All patients had endoscopic improvement of BE disease and 19 of 22 patients (86.4 %) achieved CRIM. With regard to tolerance, average pain scores (0 to 10 scale) on follow-up were 2.65 and 0.62 on days 1 and 7, respectively. With regards to safety, there were two treatment-related strictures (9.1 %) that required a single balloon dilation. Conclusions Hybrid APC appears to be promising in the treatment of BE. The ablation protocol used in this study demonstrated efficacy, tolerability, and a safety profile similar to radiofrequency ablation. Given the significant price difference between hybrid APC and other modalities for Barrett's ablation, this modality may be more cost-effective. These results warrant further study in a large prospective multicenter trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshitaka Shimizu
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Jason B. Samarasena
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Kyle J. Fortinsky
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Rintaro Hashimoto
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Nabil El Hage Chehade
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Matthew A. Chin
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Zain Moosvi
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| | - Kenneth J. Chang
- H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ali S, Bailey A, Ash S, Haghighat M, Leedham SJ, Lu X, East JE, Rittscher J, Braden B. A Pilot Study on Automatic Three-Dimensional Quantification of Barrett's Esophagus for Risk Stratification and Therapy Monitoring. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:865-878.e8. [PMID: 34116029 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.05.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Barrett's epithelium measurement using widely accepted Prague C&M classification is highly operator dependent. We propose a novel methodology for measuring this risk score automatically. The method also enables quantification of the area of Barrett's epithelium (BEA) and islands, which was not possible before. Furthermore, it allows 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the esophageal surface, enabling interactive 3D visualization. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the proposed artificial intelligence system on both phantom and endoscopic patient data. METHODS Using advanced deep learning, a depth estimator network is used to predict endoscope camera distance from the gastric folds. By segmenting BEA and gastroesophageal junction and projecting them to the estimated mm distances, we measure C&M scores including the BEA. The derived endoscopy artificial intelligence system was tested on a purpose-built 3D printed esophagus phantom with varying BEAs and on 194 high-definition videos from 131 patients with C&M values scored by expert endoscopists. RESULTS Endoscopic phantom video data demonstrated a 97.2% accuracy with a marginal ± 0.9 mm average deviation for C&M and island measurements, while for BEA we achieved 98.4% accuracy with only ±0.4 cm2 average deviation compared with ground-truth. On patient data, the C&M measurements provided by our system concurred with expert scores with marginal overall relative error (mean difference) of 8% (3.6 mm) and 7% (2.8 mm) for C and M scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The proposed methodology automatically extracts Prague C&M scores with high accuracy. Quantification and 3D reconstruction of the entire Barrett's area provides new opportunities for risk stratification and assessment of therapy response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharib Ali
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom; Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Adam Bailey
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Experimental Medicine Division, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Ash
- Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maryam Haghighat
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J Leedham
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom; Intestinal Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Xin Lu
- Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - James E East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Experimental Medicine Division, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Rittscher
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom; Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Barbara Braden
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Experimental Medicine Division, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Prasanta Debnath
- Department of Gastroenterology, TNMC and BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Pravin Rathi
- Department of Gastroenterology, TNMC and BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Solfisburg QS, Sami SS, Gabre J, Soroush A, Dhaliwal L, Beveridge C, Jin Z, Poneros JM, Falk GW, Ginsberg GG, Wang KK, Lightdale CJ, Iyer PG, Abrams JA. Clinical significance of recurrent gastroesophageal junction intestinal metaplasia after endoscopic eradication of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:1250-1257.e3. [PMID: 33144238 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS After endoscopic eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE), recurrence of intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJIM) is common. The clinical significance of this finding is unclear. We assessed whether recurrent GEJIM is associated with increased risk of subsequent dysplasia and whether endoscopic treatment lowers this risk. METHODS A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study was performed of treated BE patients who achieved complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (IM). Postablation follow-up was performed at standard intervals. Recurrent GEJIM was defined as nondysplastic IM on gastroesophageal junction biopsy specimens without endoscopic evidence of BE. Patients were categorized as "never-GEJIM," "GEJIM-observed," or "GEJIM-treated." Endoscopic treatment for recurrent GEJIM was at the endoscopists' discretion. The primary outcome was dysplasia recurrence. Analyses were performed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS Six hundred thirty-three patients were analyzed; median follow-up was 47 months (interquartile range, 24-69). Most patients (81%) had high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma before treatment. Dysplasia recurrence was 2.2% per year. GEJIM-observed patients had the lowest rate of recurrence (.6%/y) followed by GEJIM-treated (2.2%/y) and never-GEJIM (2.6%/y) (log-rank P = .07). In multivariate analyses, compared with never-GEJIM, the risk of dysplasia recurrence was significantly lower in GEJIM-observed patients (adjusted hazard ratio, .19; 95% confidence interval, .05-.81) and not different in GEJIM-treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio, .81; 95% confidence interval, .39-1.67). Older age and longer initial BE length were independently associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Recurrent GEJIM after endoscopic eradication of BE was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent dysplasia. Future studies are warranted to determine if observation is appropriate for this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quinn S Solfisburg
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sarmed S Sami
- Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joel Gabre
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ali Soroush
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lovekirat Dhaliwal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Claire Beveridge
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zhezhen Jin
- Departments of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - John M Poneros
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gary W Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gregory G Ginsberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kenneth K Wang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Charles J Lightdale
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Julian A Abrams
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is recommended for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated neoplasia and is effective in achieving complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM). However, BE that is refractory to EET, defined as partial or no improvement in dysplasia after less than or equal to 3 ablative sessions, and the development of recurrence post-EET is not uncommon. Identification of refractory BE or recurrent intestinal metaplasia should prompt esophageal physiologic testing and modification of antireflux strategy, as appropriate. In patients who ultimately fail standard EET despite optimization of reflux control, salvage EET with alternate modalities may need to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico A Farina
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, 676 North St. Clair Street, Arkes Pavilion Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Ashwinee Condon
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Room 330-37, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, 676 North St. Clair Street, Arkes Pavilion Suite 1400, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 200 UCLA Medical Plaza, Room 330-37, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Otaki F, Iyer PG. Response. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:283-284. [PMID: 33353635 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fouad Otaki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Prasad G Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Leclercq P, Bisschops R. Optimizing Outcomes with Radiofrequency Ablation of Barrett's Esophagus: Candidates, Efficacy and Durability. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2021; 31:131-54. [PMID: 33213792 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of early Barrett's esophagus (BE) has undergone a paradigm shift from surgical subtotal esophagectomy to organ-saving endoluminal treatment. Over the past 15 years, several high-quality studies were conducted to assess safe oncological outcome of endoscopic resection of mucosal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia. It became clear that add-on ablative therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) significantly reduces recurrence risk of neoplasia after resection. In this review, we highlight the most essential elements to optimize outcomes of RFA of BE, addressing the correct indication and patient selection in combination with the most efficient and safest treatment protocols to obtain long-term durability.
Collapse
|
23
|
Garg S, Xie J, Inamdar S, Thomas SL, Trindade AJ. Spatial distribution of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus segments before and after endoscopic ablation therapy: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53:6-14. [PMID: 32503057 DOI: 10.1055/a-1195-1000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is focal and difficult to locate. The aim of this meta-analysis was to understand the spatial distribution of dysplasia in BE before and after endoscopic ablation therapy. METHODS A systematic search was performed of multiple databases to July 2019. The location of dysplasia prior to ablation was determined using a clock-face orientation (right or left half of the esophagus). The location of the dysplasia post-ablation was classified as within the tubular esophagus or at the top of the gastric folds (TGF). RESULTS 13 studies with 2234 patients were analyzed. Pooled analysis from six studies (819 lesions in 802 patients) showed that before ablation, dysplasia was more commonly located in the right half versus the left half (odds ratio [OR] 4.3; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.33 - 7.93; P < 0.001). Pooled analysis from seven studies showed that dysplasia after ablation recurred in 101 /1432 patients (7.05 %; 95 %CI 5.7 % - 8.4 %). Recurrence of dysplasia was located more commonly at the TGF (n = 68) than in the tubular esophagus (n = 34; OR 5.33; 95 %CI 1.75 - 16.21; P = 0.003). Of the esophageal lesions, 90 % (27 /30) were visible, whereas only 46 % (23 /50) of the recurrent dysplastic lesions at the TGF were visible (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Before ablation, dysplasia in BE is found more frequently in the right half of the esophagus versus the left. Post-ablation recurrence is more commonly found in the TGF and is non-visible, compared with the tubular esophagus, which is mainly visible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shashank Garg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Jesse Xie
- Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Sheila L Thomas
- Education and Research Services, UAMS Library, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jones B, Wani S. Endoscopic Eradication Therapy for Barrett's Neoplasia: Where Do We Stand a Decade Later? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 22:61. [PMID: 33277663 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00799-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), a cancer associated with increasing incidence and poor survival. Early identification and effective treatment of BE-related neoplasia prior to the development of invasive adenocarcinoma are essential to limiting the morbidity and mortality associated with this cancer. In this review, we summarized the recent evidence guiding endoscopic eradication therapies (EET) for neoplastic BE. RECENT FINDINGS New sampling technologies and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) systems have potential to revolutionize early neoplasia detection in BE. EET for BE are safe and effective in achieving complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) and reducing the progression to EAC, a practice endorsed by all GI society guidelines. EET should be considered in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), intramucosal carcinoma (IMC), and select cases with low-grade dysplasia (LGD). The increasing use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the West may allow EET of select cases with submucosal EAC. Post-EET surveillance strategies will continue to evolve as knowledge of specific risk factors and long-term neoplasia recurrence rates improve. In the last decade, major advancements in EET for neoplastic BE have been achieved. These now represent the standard of care in the management of BE-related dysplasia and intramucosal cancer.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wani S, Han S, Kushnir V, Early D, Mullady D, Hammad H, Brauer B, Thaker A, Simon V, Ezekwe E, Hollander T, Wood M, Rastogi A, Edmundowicz S, Muthusamy VR, Komanduri S. Recurrence Is Rare Following Complete Eradication of Intestinal Metaplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus and Peaks at 18 Months. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:2609-2617.e2. [PMID: 31982610 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There have been few studies describing the long-term durability of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia who received endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Data are needed to guide surveillance interval protocols and identify patients at risk for recurrence. We assessed the rate of recurrence of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia, histologic features, and outcomes after recurrence of CE-IM, and identified factors associated with recurrence. METHODS We performed a prospective study of 807 patients with BE who underwent EET, which produced CE-IM, at 4 tertiary-care referral centers, from January 2013 to October 2018. Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative incidence rates (IR) of recurrence were calculated for up to 5 years following CE-IM and were stratified by baseline level of histology. Density estimates of recurrence were used to determine the change in the rate of recurrence over time. We conducted logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with recurrence. RESULTS Intestinal metaplasia recurred in 121 patients (15%; IR, 5.2/100 person-years), and dysplasia recurred in 41 patients (5.1%; IR, 1.8/100 person-years), after a median follow-up time of 2317 person-years. The rate of recurrence was not constant and the time to any recurrence converged to a normal distribution; recurrences peaked at 1.6 y after patients had CE-IM. Baseline high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.19), presence of reflux symptoms (aOR, 12.1) or hiatal hernia (aOR, 13.8), and number of sessions required to achieve CE-IM (aOR, 1.8) were associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In a prospective study of a large cohort of patients with BE undergoing EET, we found a low rate of recurrence after CE-IM. The rate of recurrence peaked at 1-2 y after CE-IM. These findings indicate that aggressive surveillance might not be necessary more than 1 y after CE-IM and should be considered in surveillance guidelines. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02634645.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - Samuel Han
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Vladimir Kushnir
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Dayna Early
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Daniel Mullady
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Hazem Hammad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Brian Brauer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Adarsh Thaker
- Vatche and Tamar Maoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Violette Simon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Eze Ezekwe
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Thomas Hollander
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Mariah Wood
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Steven Edmundowicz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Maoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
van Munster SN, Bergman JJGHM, Pouw RE. Successful endoscopic treatment of Barrett's dysplasia is not just about the destination; it is about the journey. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:551-553. [PMID: 32838905 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne N van Munster
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Barrett's oesophagus is the only identifiable precursor lesion to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The stepwise progression of Barrett's oesophagus to dysplasia and invasive carcinoma provides the opportunity to intervene and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with this lethal cancer. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for the management of Barrett's oesophagus related neoplasia. The primary goal of EET is to achieve complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) followed by enrolment of patients in surveillance protocols to detect recurrence of Barrett's oesophagus and Barrett's oesophagus related neoplasia. RECENT FINDINGS EET depends on early and accurate detection and diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus related neoplasia. All visible lesions should be resected followed by ablation of the remaining Barrett's epithelium. After treatment, patients should be enrolled in endoscopic surveillance programmes. For nondysplastic Barrett's oesophagus, surveillance alone is recommended. For low-grade dysplasia, both surveillance and ablation are reasonable options and should be decided on an individual basis according to patient risk factors and preferences. EET is preferred for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma. For T1b oesophageal adenocarcinoma, esophagectomy remains the standard of care, but endoscopic therapy can be considered in select cases. SUMMARY EET is now standard of care and endorsed by societal guidelines for the treatment of Barrett's oesophagus related neoplasia. Future studies should focus on risk stratification models using a combination of clinical data and biomarkers to identify ideal candidates for EET, and to predict recurrence. Optimal therapy for T1b cancer and surveillance strategy after CE-IM are topics that require further study.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Because of the rising incidence and lethality of esophageal adenocarcinoma, Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an increasingly important premalignant target for cancer prevention. BE-associated neoplasia can be safely and effectively treated with endoscopic eradication therapy (EET), incorporating tissue resection and ablation. Because EET has proliferated, managing patients after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia has taken on increasing importance. Recurrence after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia occurs in 8%-10% of the patients yearly, and the incidence may remain constant over time. Most recurrences occur at the gastroesophageal junction, whereas those in the tubular esophagus are endoscopically visible and distally located. A simplified biopsy protocol limited to the distal aspect of the BE segment, in addition to gastroesophageal junction sampling, may enhance efficiency and cost without significantly reducing recurrence detection. Similarly, research suggests that current surveillance intervals may be excessively frequent, failing to reflect the cancer risk reduction of EET. If validated, longer surveillance intervals could reduce the burden of resource-intensive endoscopic surveillance. Several important questions in post-EET management remain unanswered, including surveillance duration, the significance of gastric cardia intestinal metaplasia, and the role of advanced imaging and nonendoscopic sampling techniques in detecting recurrence. These merit further research to enhance quality of care and promote a more evidence-based approach.
Collapse
|
29
|
Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Katzka D, Bergman JJGHM. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia and/or Early Cancer: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:760-769. [PMID: 31730766 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Revised: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
DESCRIPTION The purpose of this best practice advice article is to describe the role of Barrett's endoscopic therapy (BET) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia and/or early cancer and appropriate follow-up of these patients. METHODS The best practice advice provided in this document is based on evidence and relevant publications reviewed by the committee. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: In BE patients with confirmed low-grade dysplasia, a repeat examination with high-definition white-light endoscopy should be performed within 3-6 months to rule out the presence of a visible lesion, which should prompt endoscopic resection. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Both BET and continued surveillance are reasonable options for the management of BE patients with confirmed and persistent low-grade dysplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: BET is the preferred treatment for BE patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: BET should be preferred over esophagectomy for BE patients with intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1a). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: BET is a reasonable alternative to esophagectomy in patients with submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1b) with low-risk features (<500-μm invasion in the submucosa [sm1], good to moderate differentiation, and no lymphatic invasion) especially in those who are poor surgical candidates. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: In all patients undergoing BET, mucosal ablation should be applied to 1) all visible esophageal columnar mucosa; 2) 5-10 mm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction and 3) 5-10 mm distal to the gastroesophageal junction, as demarcated by the top of the gastric folds (ie, gastric cardia) using focal ablation in a circumferential fashion. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Mucosal ablation therapy should only be performed in the presence of flat BE without signs of inflammation and in the absence of visible abnormalities. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: BET should be performed by experts in high-volume centers that perform a minimum of 10 new cases annually. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: BET should be continued until there is an absence of columnar epithelium in the tubular esophagus on high-definition white-light endoscopy and preferably optical chromoendoscopy. In case of complete endoscopic eradication, the neosquamous mucosa and the gastric cardia are sampled by 4-quadrant biopsies. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: If random biopsies obtained from the neosquamous epithelium demonstrate intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia or subsquamous intestinal metaplasia, a repeat endoscopy should be performed and visible islands or tongues should undergo targeted focal ablation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Intestinal metaplasia of the gastric cardia (without residual columnar epithelium in the tubular esophagus) should not warrant additional ablation therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: When consenting patients for BET, the most common complication of therapy to be quoted is post-procedural stricture formation, occurring in about 6% of cases. Bleeding and perforation occur at rates <1%. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: After complete eradication (endoscopic and histologic) of intestinal metaplasia has been achieved with BET, surveillance endoscopy with biopsies should be performed at the following intervals: for baseline diagnosis of HGD/esophageal adenocarcinoma: at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter; and baseline diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia: at 1 and 3 years. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Endoscopic surveillance post therapy should be performed with high-definition white-light endoscopy, including careful inspection of the neosquamous mucosal and retroflexed inspection of the gastric cardia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 15: The approach to recurrent disease is similar to that of the initial therapy; visible recurrent nodular lesions require endoscopic resection, whereas flat areas of columnar mucosa in the tubular esophagus can be treated with mucosal ablation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 16: Patients should be counseled on cancer risk in the absence of BET, as well as after BET, to allow for informed decision-making between the patient and the physician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prateek Sharma
- University of Kansas School of Medicine Center, Kansas City, Kansas; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma is inflammation-associated cancer with a recognizable preneoplastic stage, Barrett's. Barrett's describes the metaplastic transformation of esophageal squamous mucosa into columnar epithelium that typically results secondary to mucosal damage caused by acidic gastroduodenal reflux. Continued acid reflux may then result in mucosal inflammation which results in progressive inflammation-induced genetic instability that may eventuate in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Barrett's is the only recognized precursor lesion to esophageal carcinoma. Barrett's mucosa is unique among preneoplastic lesions; ablation therapy results in restitution of a squamous epithelium reducing or eliminating accumulated genetic instabilities and resetting the biological clock progressing toward invasive cancer. However, recurrence of Barrett's after ablation is common. We propose that both Barrett's and recurrence of Barrett's after ablation can be prevented and discuss how current approaches to therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease, for Barrett's screening, chemoprevention, and ablation therapy all might be reconsidered. We propose (1) improved approaches to Barrett's prevention, (2) universal Barrett's screening by linking Barrett's screening to colon cancer screening, (3) ablation of all Barrett's mucosa along with (4) acid-suppressive-antireflux therapy tailored to prevent development of Barrett's or the recurrence of Barrett's after ablation therapy. We propose that ultimately, treatment decisions for gastroesophageal reflux disease and prevention of Barrett's and esophageal carcinoma should be based on assessing and maintaining esophageal mucosal integrity. This will require development and verification of specific measurements that reliably correlate with prevention of Barrett's. We outline the new research and technical advances needed to cost-effectively achieve these goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Y Graham
- Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dugalic P, Djuranovic S, Pavlovic-Markovic A, Dugalic V, Tomasevic R, Gluvic Z, Obradovic M, Bajic V, Isenovic ER. Proton Pump Inhibitors and Radiofrequency Ablation for Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus. Mini Rev Med Chem 2020; 20:975-987. [PMID: 31644405 DOI: 10.2174/1389557519666191015203636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is characterized by acid and bile reflux in the distal oesophagus, and this may cause the development of reflux esophagitis and Barrett's oesophagus (BE). The natural histological course of untreated BE is non-dysplastic or benign BE (ND), then lowgrade (LGD) and High-Grade Dysplastic (HGD) BE, with the expected increase in malignancy transfer to oesophagal adenocarcinoma (EAC). The gold standard for BE diagnostics involves high-resolution white-light endoscopy, followed by uniform endoscopy findings description (Prague classification) with biopsy performance according to Seattle protocol. The medical treatment of GERD and BE includes the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) regarding symptoms control. It is noteworthy that long-term use of PPIs increases gastrin level, which can contribute to transfer from BE to EAC, as a result of its effects on the proliferation of BE epithelium. Endoscopy treatment includes a wide range of resection and ablative techniques, such as radio-frequency ablation (RFA), often concomitantly used in everyday endoscopy practice (multimodal therapy). RFA promotes mucosal necrosis of treated oesophagal region via high-frequency energy. Laparoscopic surgery, partial or total fundoplication, is reserved for PPIs and endoscopy indolent patients or in those with progressive disease. This review aims to explain distinct effects of PPIs and RFA modalities, illuminate certain aspects of molecular mechanisms involved, as well as the effects of their concomitant use regarding the treatment of BE and prevention of its transfer to EAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Predrag Dugalic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Clinical-Hospital Centre Zemun-Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Srdjan Djuranovic
- Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Aleksandra Pavlovic-Markovic
- Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Vladimir Dugalic
- Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Ratko Tomasevic
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, University Clinical-Hospital Centre Zemun-Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Zoran Gluvic
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, University Clinical-Hospital Centre Zemun-Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Milan Obradovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute of Nuclear Sciences Vinca, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Vladan Bajic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute of Nuclear Sciences Vinca, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Esma R Isenovic
- Department of Radiobiology and Molecular Genetics, Institute of Nuclear Sciences Vinca, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shaheen NJ. Where is the finish line for endoscopic eradication therapy in Barrett's esophagus? Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:926-928. [PMID: 31005132 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Shaheen
- Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|