Prognostic Value of Lung Ultrasound B-Lines in Systemic Sclerosis

Clinical research on point-of-care lung ultrasound: misconceptions and limitations

Over the last 20 years, advances in point-of-care lung ultrasound (PoCLUS) have been consistent. The clinical application of PoCLUS has drastically changed the diagnosis of some respiratory conditions mainly in the acute setting. Despite these improvements, misconceptions regarding the current scientific evidence and errors in the direction given to the latest research are delaying the implementation of PoCLUS in the clinical field. The diagnostic power of PoCLUS is still under-evaluated in many settings and there is a generalized yet unjustified feeling that further evidence is needed before introducing PoCLUS as a standard of care. In the effort to build up further evidence by new studies, the role of randomized clinical trials is over-emphasized and gold standards used to investigate diagnostic accuracy of PoCLUS are sometimes not appropriate. Moreover, the sonographic patterns and techniques used to confirm the diagnoses not always are adapted to the patients' clinical condition, which limit the scientific value of those clinical studies. Finally, there is a recurrent confusion in the role of PoCLUS scoring techniques, which should be only applied to quantify and monitor injury severity and not to diagnose lung diseases. Awareness of these misconceptions and errors could help the researchers when approaching new study projects on PoCLUS.

The Value of Ultrasound for Detecting and Following Subclinical Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a complication in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Accurate strategies to identify its presence in early phases are essential. We conducted the study aiming to determine the validity of ultrasound (US) in detecting subclinical ILD in SSc, and to ascertain its potential in determining the disease progression.

METHODS

133 patients without respiratory symptoms and 133 healthy controls were included. Borg scale, Rodnan skin score (RSS), auscultation, chest radiographs, and respiratory function tests (RFT) were performed. A rheumatologist performed the lung US. High-resolution CT (HRCT) was also performed. The patients were followed every 12 weeks for 48 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 79 of 133 patients (59.4%) showed US signs of ILD in contrast to healthy controls (4.8%) (p = 0.0001). Anti-centromere antibodies (p = 0.005) and RSS (p = 0.004) showed an association with ILD. A positive correlation was demonstrated between the US and HRCT findings (p = 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of US in detecting ILD were 91.2% and 88.6%, respectively. In the follow-up, a total of 30 patients out of 79 (37.9%) who demonstrated US signs of ILD at baseline, showed changes in the ILD score by US.

CONCLUSIONS

US showed a high prevalence of subclinical ILD in SSc patients. It proved to be a valid, reliable, and feasible tool to detect ILD in SSc and to monitor disease progression.

Standardization of interstitial lung disease assessment by ultrasound: results from a Delphi process and web-reliability exercise by the OMERACT ultrasound working group

OBJECTIVES

Over the last years ultrasound has shown to be an important tool for evaluating lung involvement, including interstitial lung disease (ILD) a potentially severe systemic involvement in many rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD). Despite the potential sensitivity of the technique the actual use is hampered by the lack of consensual definitions of elementary lesions to be assessed and of the scanning protocol to apply. Within the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Ultrasound Working Group we aimed at developing consensus-based definitions for ultrasound detected ILD findings in RMDs and assessing their reliability in dynamic images.

METHODS

Based on the results from a systematic literature review, several findings were identified for defining the presence of ILD by ultrasound (i.e., Am-lines, B-lines, pleural cysts and pleural line irregularity). Therefore, a Delphi survey was conducted among 23 experts in sonography to agree on which findings should be included and on their definitions. Subsequently, a web-reliability exercise was performed to test the reliability of the agreed definitions on video-clips, by using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

After three rounds of Delphi an agreement >75 % was obtained to include and define B-lines and pleural line irregularity as elementary lesions to assess. The reliability in the web-based exercise, consisting of 80 video-clips (30 for pleural line irregularity, 50 for B-lines), showed moderate inter-reader reliability for both B-lines (kappa = 0.51) and pleural line irregularity (kappa = 0.58), while intra-reader reliability was good for both B-lines (kappa = 0.72) and pleural line irregularity (kappa = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Consensus-based ultrasound definitions for B-lines and pleural line irregularity were obtained, with moderate to good reliability to detect these lesions using video-clips. The next step will be testing the reliability in patients with ILD linked to RMDs and to propose a consensual and standardized protocol to scan such patients.

Lung ultrasound in the evaluation of pulmonary edema in newborns with critical congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Newborns with critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) with increased pulmonary blood flow (PBF) are at high risk for congestive heart failure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the presence and degree of pulmonary edema in newborns with CCHD using lung ultrasound (LUS) during the perioperative period.

METHODS

Prospective clinical trial, 44 newborn patients with CCHD were evaluated in this prospective clinical trial. LUS was repeatedly performed to determine the course of pulmonary edema during the perioperative period. LUS was performed simultaneously with chest radiography (CXR), which was the main part of patient management. The primary outcome of this study was to identify whether a correlation existed between LUS and CXR findings. The secondary outcomes were to determine the relationship between LUS and the need for respiratory support, diuretic use, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), and pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) levels during the perioperative period.

RESULTS

The mean gestational age of the patients was 38.3 ± 1.7 weeks, with a mean birth weight of 3026 ± 432 g. In the preoperative period, both LUS and CXR images were consistent with clinical signs of pulmonary edema. On the first postoperative day, pulmonary edema increased compared to the preoperative period but gradually decreased by the 6th day of surgery (p < 0.05). Positive correlations were observed between the LUS and CXR findings at all study points (p < 0.05). The LUS findings exhibited trends parallel to those of VIS, serum pro-BNP levels, need for respiratory support, and diuretic requirements. As expected, these trends were more pronounced in CCHDs where PBF increased.

CONCLUSION

In CCHD, serial lung ultrasound (LUS) assessments, particularly in cases with increased PBF, can provide valuable guidance for managing patients during the perioperative period.

Usefulness of Lung Ultrasound as a Method for Early Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Purpose

To determine the value of lung ultrasound (LUS) compared to high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in the early diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Patients and Methods

An observational prospective study was performed. Were included patients with respiratory symptoms or/and, patients with crackles in auscultation during medical consultation. All patients underwent to chest X-rays, LUS, HRCT,and respiratory function tests.

Results

A total of 192 patients with RA were included. Mean disease duration was 16.8 ± 11.1 years. 72% were positive for rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated antibodies. Of the total number of subjects, 54.7% had respiratory symptoms. The other patients did not have respiratory symptoms, but they did have had crackles on pulmonary auscultation. B lines > 11.5 on the ROC curve predicted ILD (AUC 0.63; CI 95%: 0.55-0.71; p < 0.003). A DLCO value of <7.13 significantly predicted the presence of ILD (AUC 0.61; 95% CI: 0.52-0.70; p < 0.028).

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest that LUS is a valuable tool for the early diagnosis of ILD in patients with RA, and together with DLCO, can adequately predict the presence of ILD in this population. LUS also helps to determine which patients with respiratory symptoms and signs suggestive for ILD are undergo to HRCT.

Systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease: unmet needs and potential solutions

Systemic sclerosis (SSc), or scleroderma, is a rare, complex, systemic autoimmune disease of unknown aetiology, characterized by high morbidity and mortality often resulting from cardiopulmonary complications such as interstitial lung disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension. Despite substantial progress in unravelling the pathways involved in the pathogenesis of SSc and the increasing number of therapeutic targets tested in clinical trials, there is still no cure for this disease, although several proposed treatments might limit the involvement of specific organs, thereby slowing the natural history of the disease. A specific focus of recent research has been to address the plethora of unmet needs regarding the global management of SSc-related interstitial lung disease, including its pathogenesis, early diagnosis, risk stratification of patients, appropriate treatment regimens and monitoring of treatment response, as well as the definition of progression and predictors of progression and mortality. More refined stratification of patients on the basis of clinical features, molecular signatures, identification of subpopulations with distinct clinical trajectories and implementation of outcome measures for future clinical trials could also improve therapeutic management strategies, helping to avoid poor outcomes related to lung involvement.

Clinical Implications of the Lung Ultrasound Score in Patients after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Background

Lung ultrasound score (LUS) is a clinical index used to measure lung injury, but its clinical value in patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) remains relatively unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical value of LUS in patients after CPR.

Methods

This retrospective study included a total of 34 patients older than 18 years with a nontraumatic cause of in-hospital cardiac arrest, who received standard resuscitation and achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). All patients underwent bedside lung ultrasound examination within half an hour once ROSC was achieved, and LUSs were calculated. The study included patient death as the endpoint event.

Results

Compared with the group with lower LUSs, the patients with higher LUSs had a lower oxygenation index, longer duration of CPR, and lower 72 h survival rate. The initial LUS had good clinical value in predicting the secondary outcomes of CPR (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.353, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.018-1.797, and P = 0.037) and 72 h survival rate of patients who underwent CPR (aOR: 1.145, 95% CI: 1.014-1.294, and P = 0.029).

Conclusions

LUS was shown to be helpful and had a prognostic value in patients after CPR.

Diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) secondary to systemic sclerosis (SSc) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and identification of 'progressive pulmonary fibrosis' using chest CT: a narrative review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent manifestation of connective tissue diseases (CTDs), with incidence and prevalence variously assessed in the literature but reported in up to 30% of patients, with higher frequency in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). Recent years have seen a growing interest in the pulmonary manifestations of ILD-CTDs, mainly due to the widening of the use of anti-fibrotic drugs initially introduced exclusively for IPF, and radiologists play a key role because the lung biopsy is very rarely used in these patients where the morphological assessment is essentially left to imaging and especially HRCT. In this narrative review we will discuss, from the radiologist's point of view, the most recent findings in the field of ILD secondary to SSc and RA, with a special focus about the progression of disease and in particular about the 'progressive pulmonary fibrosis' (PPF) phenotype, and we will try to address two main issues: How to predict a possible evolution and therefore a worse prognosis when diagnosing a new case of ILD-CTDs and how to assess the progression of an already diagnosed ILD-CTDs.

Heterogeneity of determining disease severity, clinical course and outcomes in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic literature review

Objective The course of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is highly variable and different from continuously progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Most proposed definitions of progressive pulmonary fibrosis or SSc-ILD severity are based on the research data from patients with IPF and are not validated for patients with SSc-ILD. Our study aimed to gather the current evidence for severity, progression and outcomes of SSc-ILD.Methods A systematic literature review to search for definitions of severity, progression and outcomes recorded for SSc-ILD was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to 1 August 2023.Results A total of 9054 papers were reviewed and 342 were finally included. The most frequent tools used for the definition of SSc-ILD progression and severity were combined changes of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) and forced vital capacity (FVC), isolated FVC or DLCO changes, high-resolution CT (HRCT) extension and composite algorithms including pulmonary function test, clinical signs and HRCT data. Mortality was the most frequently reported long-term event, both from all causes or ILD related.Conclusions The studies presenting definitions of SSc-ILD 'progression', 'severity' and 'outcome' show a large heterogeneity. These results emphasise the need for developing a standardised, consensus definition of severe SSc-ILD, to link a disease specific definition of progression as a surrogate outcome for clinical trials and clinical practice.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022379254.Cite Now.

Pleural clinic: where thoracic ultrasound meets respiratory medicine

Thoracic ultrasound (TUS) has become an essential procedure in respiratory medicine. Due to its intrinsic safety and versatility, it has been applied in patients affected by several respiratory diseases both in intensive care and outpatient settings. TUS can complement and often exceed stethoscope and radiological findings, especially in managing pleural diseases. We hereby aimed to describe the establishment, development, and optimization in a large, tertiary care hospital of a pleural clinic, which is dedicated to the evaluation and monitoring of patients with pleural diseases, including, among others, pleural effusion and/or thickening, pneumothorax and subpleural consolidation. The clinic was initially meant to follow outpatients undergoing medical thoracoscopy. In this scenario, TUS allowed rapid and regular assessment of these patients, promptly diagnosing recurrence of pleural effusion and other complications that could be appropriately managed. Over time, our clinic has rapidly expanded its initial indications thus becoming the place to handle more complex respiratory patients in collaboration with, among others, thoracic surgeons and oncologists. In this article, we critically describe the strengths and pitfalls of our "pleural clinic" and propose an organizational model that results from a synergy between respiratory physicians and other professionals. This model can inspire other healthcare professionals to develop a similar organization based on their local setting.

Ultrasound for diagnosis of interstitial lung disease in diffuse connective tissue diseases

Patients with diffuse connective tissue diseases frequently develop interstitial lung disease, which carries a worse prognosis and shortens survival. High-resolution computed tomography is the first-choice test, and is competitive with histopathology, however, the cost and radiation may limit its use, particularly for screening. Lung ultrasound is a rapid, accessible, reproducible, and inexpensive study that is useful for diagnosis of interstitial lung disease. Furthermore, extensive training is not required to identify the alterations associated with these lung diseases. B lines and pleural irregularities compose the ultrasonographic interstitial syndrome, although, it must be kept in mind that it is not specific, and it is necessary to rule out haemodynamic, cardiovascular, and infectious abnormalities. This review highlights the elevated prevalence of this lung condition in the main rheumatological diseases, with emphasis on the usefulness of pulmonary ultrasound.

Ultrasonographic Presentation and Anatomic Distribution of Lung Involvement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic auto-immune disease, typically affecting the joints, which can also present with lung involvement (pleuritis, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary nodules, etc.). Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an upcoming tool in the detection of these pulmonary manifestations.

METHODS

We performed a 72-window LUS in 75 patients presenting to the outpatient rheumatology clinic and describe the abnormalities (presence of B-lines (vertical comet-tail artefacts), pleural abnormalities, pleural effusions, and subpleural nodules) on lung ultrasound. We created a topological mapping of the number of B-lines per intercostal zone.

RESULTS

We observed pleural effusions, pleural abnormalities, and pleural nodules in, respectively, 1.3%, 45.3%, and 14% of patients. There were 35 (46.7%) patients who had less than 5 B-lines, 15 (20%) patients who had between 5 and 10 B-lines, 11 (14.6%) between 10 and 20, 10 (13.3%) between 20 and 50, 1 (1.3%) between 50 and 100, and 3 (4%) of patients who had more than 100 B-lines.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS in patients with RA shows an array of abnormalities ranging from interstitial syndromes to pleural abnormalities, subpleural nodules, and pleural effusions. Hotspots for the presence of B-lines are situated bilaterally in the posterior subscapular regions, as well as the anterior right mid-clavicular region.

Deep Learning for Detection and Localization of B-Lines in Lung Ultrasound

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an important imaging modality used by emergency physicians to assess pulmonary congestion at the patient bedside. B-line artifacts in LUS videos are key findings associated with pulmonary congestion. Not only can the interpretation of LUS be challenging for novice operators, but visual quantification of B-lines remains subject to observer variability. In this work, we investigate the strengths and weaknesses of multiple deep learning approaches for automated B-line detection and localization in LUS videos. We curate and publish, BEDLUS, a new ultrasound dataset comprising 1,419 videos from 113 patients with a total of 15,755 expert-annotated B-lines. Based on this dataset, we present a benchmark of established deep learning methods applied to the task of B-line detection. To pave the way for interpretable quantification of B-lines, we propose a novel "single-point" approach to B-line localization using only the point of origin. Our results show that (a) the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranges from 0.864 to 0.955 for the benchmarked detection methods, (b) within this range, the best performance is achieved by models that leverage multiple successive frames as input, and (c) the proposed single-point approach for B-line localization reaches an F 1-score of 0.65, performing on par with the inter-observer agreement. The dataset and developed methods can facilitate further biomedical research on automated interpretation of lung ultrasound with the potential to expand the clinical utility.

Lung Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Pulmonary involvement due to SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19. Consequently, pulmonary imaging is crucial for management of COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of lung ultrasound (LUS) with a handheld ultrasound device (HHUD) in patients with COVID-19 treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Therefore, patients underwent LUS with a HHUD every two days until they were either discharged from the intensive care unit or died. The study was conducted at the University Hospital of Bonn's anesthesiological intensive care ward from December 2020 to August 2021. A total of 33 patients (median [IQR]: 56.0 [53-60.5] years) were included. A high LUS score was associated with a decreased P/F ratio (repeated measures correlation [rmcorr]: -0.26; 95% CI: -0.34, -0.15; p < 0.001), increased extravascular lung water, defined as fluid accumulation in the pulmonary interstitium and alveoli (rmcorr: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.20; p = 0.030), deteriorated electrolyte status (base excess: rmcorr: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.24; p = 0.004; pH: rmcorr: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.03, 0.21; p = 0.001), and decreased pulmonary compliance (rmcorr: -0.10; 95% CI: -0.20, -0.01; p = 0.034). The maximum LUS score was lower in survivors (median difference [md]: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.55, -0.06; p = 0.006). A cutoff value for non-survival was calculated at a LUS score of 2.63. At the time of maximum LUS score, P/F ratio (md: 1.97; 95% CI: 1.12, 2.76; p < 0.001) and pulmonary compliance (md: 18.67; 95% CI: 3.33, 37.15; p = 0.018) were higher in surviving patients. In conclusion, LUS with a HHUD enables continuous evaluation of cardiopulmonary function in COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO support therapy and provides prognostic value in determining the patients' likelihood of survival.

Lung Ultrasound Abnormalities in Patients Without Pulmonary Pathology Prior to Surgery

Background

The occurrence of lung ultrasound abnormalities in patients without lung disease remains uncertain, while patients with respiratory disease often exhibit such abnormalities.

Objectives

The primary aim was to identify pathological ultrasonographic pulmonary findings and their correlation with baseline diseases and static lung compliance in patients without any pre-existing respiratory conditions.

Methods

This prospective observational study enrolled a series of surgical patients with no history of pulmonary pathology (n = 104). Baseline diseases and patients' physical status classification, based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), were documented by reviewing medical records. Prior to surgery, a lung ultrasound was performed to assess pulmonary changes. During surgery with general anesthesia, static lung compliance was measured. The Spearman correlation coefficient was employed to determine the correlation between the two variables.

Results

Twenty-four patients (23.07%) exhibited 1 - 2 B-lines in certain lung fields. Seven patients (6.7%) had an ultrasound B-line score > 0 (indicating ≥ 3 B-lines). Among these patients, the average number of lung fields with ≥ 3 B-lines was 3.71 ± 2.43. Patients with systemic diseases (ASA ≥ 2) displayed a higher number of B-lines compared to ASA I patients (P-value = 0.039). Pleural irregularities were found in 10 patients (9.6%), while atelectasis and pleural effusion were observed in five (4.8%) and four (3.8%) patients, respectively. The mean lung compliance value was 56.78 ± 15.33. No correlation was observed between the total score of the B-lines and lung compliance (Spearman's correlation: rho = -0.028, P-value = 0.812).

Conclusions

Patients without pulmonary pathology may exhibit ultrasound pulmonary abnormalities, which tend to increase with higher ASA scores and do not appear to have a correlation with static lung compliance.

The Role of Lung Ultrasound in Systemic Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

In systemic sclerosis (SSc), high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest is the standard criterion for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, recent evidence suggests that lung ultrasound (LUS) can also detect ILD, without radiation exposure. Thus, our goal was to perform a systematic review, aiming to clarify the role of LUS in the detection of ILD in SSc.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out in PubMed and EMBASE (PROSPERO register number CRD42022293132), to identify studies that compared LUS with HRCT in the detection of ILD in patients with SSc. Risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 () tool.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-five publications were identified. After screening, 13 were included in the final analysis. No study presented high risk of bias. Lung ultrasound protocol was highly heterogeneous between authors, specifically concerning transducer, intercostal spaces evaluated, exclusion criteria, and definition of positive LUS. Most authors evaluated the presence of B-lines as a surrogate of ILD, with only 4 focusing on pleural changes. A positive correlation between LUS findings and ILD detected by HRCT was reported. Results also revealed high sensitivity (74.3%-100%) but variable specificity (16%-99%). Positive predictive value varied between 16% and 95.1%, and negative predictive value between 51.7% and 100%.

CONCLUSION

Lung ultrasound is sensitive in the detection of ILD, but specificity must be optimized. The value of pleural evaluation also requires further investigation. Moreover, a consensus is needed to define a uniform LUS protocol to implement in future investigations.

Pulmonary Ultrasonography in Systemic Sclerosis-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current systematic review was to summarize and evaluate the overall advantages of lung ultrasonography (LUS) examination using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) as a reference standard in assessing the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients.

METHODS

Databases PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies evaluating LUSs in ILD assessments including SSc patients on 1 February 2023. In assessing risk of bias and applicability, the Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used. A meta-analysis was performed and the mean specificity, sensitivity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained. In addition, in a bivariate meta-analysis, the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve area was additionally calculated.

RESULTS

Nine studies with a total of 888 participants entered the meta-analysis. A meta-analysis was also performed without one study that used pleural irregularity to assess the diagnostic accuracy of LUSs using B-lines (with a total of 868 participants). Overall sensitivity and specificity did not differ significantly, with only the analysis of the B-lines having a specificity of 0.61 (95% CI 0.44-0.85) and a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.89-0.98). The diagnostic odds ratio of univariate analysis of the eight studies using the B-lines as a criterion for ILD diagnosis was 45.32 (95% CI 17.88-114.89). The AUC value of the SROC curve was 0.912 (and 0.917 in consideration of all nine studies), which indicates high sensitivity and a low false-positive rate for the majority of the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS examination proved to be a valuable tool in discerning which SSc patients should receive additional HRCT scans to detect ILD and therefore reduces the doses of ionizing radiation exposure in SSc patients. However, further studies are needed to achieve consensus in scoring and the evaluation methodology of LUS examination.

Use of Cardio-Pulmonary Ultrasound in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Cardiopulmonary ultrasound (CPUS), the combination of lung ultrasound (LUS) and targeted neonatal echocardiography (TnECHO)AA, may offer a more appropriate approach to the challenging neonatal cardiovascular and respiratory disorders. This paper reviews the possible use of CPUS in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

Interstitial disease associated with connective tissue disease and vasculitis

Systemic autoimmune diseases comprise a complex, heterogeneous group of entities. Noteworthy among the pulmonary complications of these entities is interstitial involvement, which manifests with the same radiopathologic patterns as in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. High-resolution computed tomography is the gold-standard imaging technique; it enables us to identify and classify the disease and to determine its extent, providing useful information about the prognosis. In this group of processes, the most common pattern of presentation is nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. It is essential for radiologists to work together in collaboration with other specialists to reach the correct diagnosis and enable appropriate, integrated treatment.

Lung Ultrasound B-Lines in the Evaluation of the Extent of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis

Background: Chest computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for the evaluation of systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a radiation-free tool that identifies the B-lines as a main feature of ILD. We aimed to investigate the role of LUS in the evaluation of the extent of SSc-ILD. Methods: Adult SSc patients underwent pulmonary function tests (PFTs), LUS and CT. The CT images were qualitatively, semi-quantitatively (the Wells score on five levels and the categorical Goh et al. staging) and quantitatively (histogram-based densitometry) analysed for ILD. LUS quantified B-lines in 21 intercostal spaces on both the anterior and posterior chest wall. Results: Out of the 77 SSc patients eligible for the study, 35 presented with ILD on CT (21 limited, 14 extensive). Total B-lines significantly differentiated ILD vs. no ILD (median 24 vs. 8, p < 0.001). Posterior and total B-lines significantly differentiated limited from absent ILD, while anterior B-lines distinguished extensive from limited ILD. Total B-lines correlated with the Wells score (r = 0.446, p < 0.001) and MLA (r = −0.571, p < 0.001); similar results were confirmed when anterior and posterior B-lines were analysed separately. Conclusions: LUS is a useful tool to identify SSc-ILD and to correlate with different evaluations of ILD extent and severity.

Transfer Learning for Automated COVID-19 B-Line Classification in Lung Ultrasound

Lung ultrasound (LUS) as a diagnostic tool is gaining support for its role in the diagnosis and management of COVID-19 and a number of other lung pathologies. B-lines are a predominant feature in COVID-19, however LUS requires a skilled clinician to interpret findings. To facilitate the interpretation, our main objective was to develop automated methods to classify B-lines as pathologic vs. normal. We developed transfer learning models based on ResNet networks to classify B-lines as pathologic (at least 3 B-lines per lung field) vs. normal using COVID-19 LUS data. Assessment of B-line severity on a 0-4 multi-class scale was also explored. For binary B-line classification, at the frame-level, all ResNet models pretrained with ImageNet yielded higher performance than the baseline nonpretrained ResNet-18. Pretrained ResNet-18 has the best Equal Error Rate (EER) of 9.1% vs the baseline of 11.9%. At the clip-level, all pretrained network models resulted in better Cohen's kappa agreement (linear-weighted) and clip score accuracy, with the pretrained ResNet-18 having the best Cohen's kappa of 0.815 [95% CI: 0.804-0.826], and ResNet-101 the best clip scoring accuracy of 93.6%. Similar results were shown for multi-class scoring, where pretrained network models outperformed the baseline model. A class activation map is also presented to guide clinicians in interpreting LUS findings. Future work aims to further improve the multi-class assessment for severity of B-lines with a more diverse LUS dataset.

Management of Connective Tissue Disease-related Interstitial Lung Disease

Purpose of Review

This review aims to collate current evidence on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of various connective tissue disease (CTD)–associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) and present a contemporary framework for the management of such patients. It also seeks to summarize treatment outcomes including efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants, anti-fibrotics, and stem cell transplantation in CTD-ILD.

Recent Findings

Screening for ILD has been augmented by the use of artificial intelligence, ultra-low dose computerized tomography (CT) of the chest, and the use of chest ultrasound. Serum biomarkers have not found their way into clinical practice as yet. Identifying patients who need treatment and choosing the appropriate therapy is important to minimize the risk of therapy-related toxicity. The first-line drugs for systemic sclerosis (SSc) ILD include mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide. Nintedanib, an anti-fibrotic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for use in SSc-ILD. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved tocilizumab subcutaneous injection for slowing the rate of decline in pulmonary function in adult patients with SSc-ILD. Autologous stem cell transplantation may have a role in select cases of SSc-ILD.

Summary

CTD-ILD is a challenging area with diverse entities and variable outcomes. High-resolution CT is the investigative modality of choice. Treatment decisions need to be individualized and are based on patient symptoms, lung function, radiologic abnormalities, and the risk of disease progression. Precision medicine may play an important role in determining the optimal therapy for an individual patient in the future.

Performance of Lung Ultrasound for Monitoring Interstitial Lung Disease

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we sought to assess the validity of lung ultrasound (LUS) during the follow-up of patients with a wide spectrum of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs).

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (13 males, 11 females; mean age ± SD, 65.4 ± 14.3 years; age range, 40-84 years) with a diagnosis of ILDs who were admitted to the Interstitial Lung Disease Unit were prospectively enrolled. Patients were examined with a 56-lung intercostal space LUS protocol in lateral decubitus position, at baseline, 6-months, and 1-year. The LUS score was defined as the sum of B-lines counted in each intercostal space. All patients underwent complete pulmonary function tests at baseline and follow-up time-points. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was performed at baseline and during follow-up, according to personalized patients' needs. All HRCT studies were graded according to the Warrick scoring system (WS).

RESULTS

Pooled data analysis showed a significant correlation between WS and LUS scores (P < .001). For separate time-point analysis, a significant correlation between LUS scores and WS was found at baseline (P < .001) and 1 year (P = .005). LUS scores negatively correlated with alveolar volume (VA) (P < .046) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P < .001) at 6 months and with transfer coefficient of the lung for carbon monoxide (KCO) (P < .031) and DLCO (P = .002) at 12-months. A multivariate regression model showed DLCO to be an independent predictor of LUS score at 1 year (P = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the validity and potential applicability of LUS for disease monitoring in a wide spectrum of ILDs.

Vertical Artifacts in Lung Ultrasonography: Some Common Clinician Questions and the Related Engineer Answers

Introduction: Vertical artifacts, including B lines, are frequently seen in a variety of lung diseases. Their sonomorphology varies in length, width, shape, and internal reverberations. The reason for this diversity is still unknown and is the cause of discussion between clinicians and ultrasound physics engineers. Aim: The aim of this work is to sum up the most common clinician observations and provide an explanation to each of them derived from ultrasound physics. Materials and Methods: Based on clinical and engineering experiences as well as data collected from relevant literature, the sonomorphology of vertical artifacts was analyzed. Thirteen questions and answers were prepared on the common sonomorphology of vertical artifacts, current nomenclature, and clinical observations. Conclusions: From a clinical standpoint, the analysis of vertical artifacts is very important and requires that further clinical studies be conducted in cooperation with engineers who specialize in physics.

Targeted management of evolving and established chronic lung disease of prematurity assisted by cardiopulmonary ultrasound: A case report of four patients

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is one of the most common complications of premature birth. The current definition of BPD is based on the duration of oxygen therapy and/or respiratory support. Among the pitfalls of all the diagnostic definitions, the lack of a proper pathophysiologic classification makes it difficult to choose an appropriate drug strategy for BPD. In this case report, we describe the clinical course of four premature infants, admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, for whom the use of lung and cardiac ultrasound was an integral part of the diagnostic and therapeutic process. We describe, for the first time to our knowledge, four different cardiopulmonary ultrasound patterns of evolving and established chronic lung disease of prematurity and the consequent therapeutic choices. This approach, if confirmed in prospective studies, may guide the personalized management of infants suffering from evolving and established BPD, optimizing the chances of success of the therapies and at the same time reducing the risk of exposure to inadequate and potentially harmful drugs.

High-Resolution Computed Tomography and Lung Ultrasound in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: Which One to Choose?

Imaging plays a pivotal role in systemic sclerosis for both diagnosis management of pulmonary complications, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the most sensitive technique for the evaluation of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that HRCT helps radiologists and clinicians to make a correct diagnosis on the basis of recognised typical patterns for SSc-ILD. Most SSc patients affected by ILD have a non-specific interstitial pneumonia pattern (NISP) on HRCT scan, whilst a minority of cases fulfil the criteria for usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP). Moreover, several recent studies have demonstrated that lung ultrasound (LUS) is an emergent tool in SSc diagnosis and follow-up, although its role is still to be confirmed. Therefore, this article aims at evaluating the role of LUS in SSc screening, aimed at limiting the use of CT to selected cases.

Interobserver Agreement of Lung Ultrasound Findings of COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Lung ultrasound (LUS) has received considerable interest in the clinical evaluation of patients with COVID-19. Previously described LUS manifestations for COVID-19 include B-lines, consolidations, and pleural thickening. The interrater reliability (IRR) of these findings for COVID-19 is unknown.

METHODS

This study was conducted between March and June 2020. Nine physicians (hospitalists: n = 4; emergency medicine: n = 5) from 3 medical centers independently evaluated n = 20 LUS scans (n = 180 independent observations) collected from patients with COVID-19, diagnosed via RT-PCR. These studies were randomly selected from an image database consisting of COVID-19 patients evaluated in the emergency department with portable ultrasound devices. Physicians were blinded to any patient information or previous LUS interpretation. Kappa values (κ) were used to calculate IRR.

RESULTS

There was substantial IRR on the following items: normal LUS scan (κ = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.72-0.87]), presence of B-lines (κ = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.72-0.87]), ≥3 B-lines observed (κ = 0.72 [95% CI: 0.64-0.79]). Moderate IRR was observed for the presence of any consolidation (κ = 0.57 [95% CI: 0.50-0.64]), subpleural consolidation (κ = 0.49 [95% CI: 0.42-0.56]), and presence of effusion (κ = 0.49 [95% CI: 0.41-0.56]). Fair IRR was observed for pleural thickening (κ = 0.23 [95% CI: 0.15-0.30]).

DISCUSSION

Many LUS manifestations for COVID-19 appear to have moderate to substantial IRR across providers from multiple specialties utilizing differing portable devices. The most reliable LUS findings with COVID-19 may include the presence/count of B-lines or determining if a scan is normal. Clinical protocols for LUS with COVID-19 may require additional observers for the confirmation of less reliable findings such as consolidations.

Lung ultrasound B-lines in systemic sclerosis: cut-off values and methodological indications for interstitial lung disease screening

OBJECTIVES

Lung ultrasound (LUS), through assessment of B-lines and pleural line alterations, is able to evaluate interstitial lung disease (ILD), a frequent complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Different scanning schemes and counting methods have been proposed, but no clear cut-off values have been indicated for screening. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different LUS methodological approaches to detect ILD, compared with high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) as gold standard.

METHODS

Sixty-nine SSc patients underwent LUS and chest HRCT on the same day. Both exams were scored by expert readers. The accuracy of different scanning schemes and counting methods was assessed, and clinical and functional data were compared with imaging findings.

RESULTS

B-lines were more numerous in patients with the diffuse skin subset and Scl70 autoantibody positivity. The number of B-lines correlated with the Scleroderma Lung Study (SLS) I HRCT score (R = 0.754, p< 0.0001). A total number >10 B-lines on the whole chest or > 1 B-line on the postero-basal chest showed 97% sensitivity for detecting even very early ILD signs (corresponding to SLS I score =1). Sensitivity increased to 100% when pleural line alterations were included in the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS has a very high sensitivity in detecting SSc-related ILD. A cut-off value of > 10 B-lines on the whole chest or > 1 B-line on the postero-basal chest can be used for the screening of SSc-ILD. Assessing only the postero-basal chest seems mostly effective to combine high sensitivity with a less time-consuming approach.

Lung Ultrasound in the Screening of Pulmonary Interstitial Involvement Secondary to Systemic Connective Tissue Disease: A Prospective Pilot Study Involving 180 Patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was the assessment of lung ultrasound (LUS) as a screening of pulmonary interstitial involvement secondary to systemic connective tissue diseases.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on the study group comprising 180 patients diagnosed with different systemic connective tissue diseases. Each patient underwent lung ultrasound (LUS), high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT), and echocardiography (ECHO). Each imaging examination was blinded and performed by an independent operator. LUS was conducted with convex and linear transducers.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of LUS as compared to HRCT in detecting pulmonary interstitial involvement in the study group were 99.3% and 96.4%, respectively; positive predictive value (PPV) 0.7, negative predictive value (NPV) 3.6. Abnormalities indicating interstitial lung disease (ILD) with fibrosis were most frequently localized bilaterally in the lower fields of the lungs, assessed in the dorsal view.

CONCLUSIONS

LUS is an efficient imaging modality that can detect pulmonary interstitial involvement in patients with systemic connective tissue disease with a high sensitivity and specificity. Further prospective studies conducted on a larger population are deemed necessary.

The role of lung ultrasound B-lines and serum KL-6 in the screening and follow-up of rheumatoid arthritis patients for an identification of interstitial lung disease: review of the literature, proposal for a preliminary algorithm, and clinical application to cases

Screening and follow-up of interstitial lung disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA-ILD) is a challenge in clinical practice. In fact, the majority of RA-ILD patients are asymptomatic and optimal tools for early screening and regular follow-up are lacking. Furthermore, some patients may remain oligosymptomatic despite significant radiological abnormalities. In RA-ILD, usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is the most frequent radiological and pathological pattern, associated with a poor prognosis and a high risk to develop acute exacerbations and infections. If RA-ILD can be identified early, there may be an opportunity for an early treatment and close follow-up that might delay ILD progression and improve the long-term outcome.In connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), lung ultrasound (LUS) with the assessment of B-lines and serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 antigen (KL-6) has been recognized as sensitive biomarkers for the early detection of ILD. B-line number and serum KL-6 level were found to correlate with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and other clinical parameters in systemic sclerosis-associated ILD (SSc-ILD). Recently, the significant correlation between B-lines and KL-6, two non-ionizing and non-invasive biomarkers, was demonstrated. Hence, the combined use of LUS and KL-6 to screen and follow up ILD in RA patients might be useful in clinical practice in addition to existing tools. Herein, we review relevant literature to support this concept, propose a preliminary screening algorithm, and present 2 cases where the algorithm was used.

Risk assessment in interstitial lung disease: the incremental prognostic value of cardiopulmonary ultrasound

Background

The mortality risk of chronic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is currently assessed using the ILD-GAP score. The present study evaluates whether the addition of cardiopulmonary ultrasound parameters to the ILD-GAP score can further improve the predictive value of ILD-GAP.

Methods

Medical records from 91 patients with ILD hospitalized from June 2015 to March 2016 were retrospectively examined. The Lung ultrasound (LUS) score, right ventricular (RV) function, and mechanics were obtained from the cardiopulmonary ultrasound. The ILD-GAP score was calculated from demographic characteristics and pulmonary function parameters. Patients were followed up with until May 2020. The primary endpoint was all-cause death.

Results

After exclusions, 74 patients with ILD were included in the analysis. During the follow-up period, 36 patients with ILD survived (ILD_s), and 38 patients died (ILD_d). Compared to ILD_s, the ILD_d cases exhibited a higher number of B-lines, LUS score, and RV end-diastolic base dimension (RVD), but lower RV function. In multivariate analysis, the ILD-GAP score (hazard ratio, 2.88; 95% CI 1.38–5.99, P = 0.005), LUS score (hazard ratio 1.13; 95% CI 1.04–1.24, P = 0.006), and RVD (hazard ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.16, P = 0.004) were significantly related to the risk of death. Adding the LUS score and RVD to the ILD-GAP score significantly improved the predictive value compared to the ILD-GAP score alone (C statistics 0.90 vs 0.76, P = 0.018).

Conclusion

We investigated the utility of a new prognostic model for ILD that includes both cardiopulmonary ultrasound parameters (LUS score and RVD) and the ILD-GAP score. This model better reflects the severity of pulmonary fibrosis and cardiac involvement, and has incremental predictive value over the ILD-GAP score alone.

Association between lung ultrasound B-lines and exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with connective tissue disease

BACKGROUND

Identification of elevation in pulmonary pressures during exercise may provide prognostic and therapeutic implications in patients with connective tissue disease (CTD). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in CTD patients and subtle interstitial abnormalities detected by lung ultrasound could predict exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension (PH).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Echocardiography and lung ultrasound were performed at rest and bicycle exercise in CTD patients (n = 41) and control subjects without CTD (n = 24). Ultrasound B-lines were quantified by scanning four intercostal spaces in the right hemithorax. We examined the association between total B-lines at rest and the development of exercise-induced PH during ergometry exercise. Compared to controls, the number of total B-lines at rest was higher in CTD patients (0 [0, 0] vs 2 [0, 9], P < .0001) and was correlated with radiological severity of ILD assessed by computed tomography (fibrosis score, r = .70, P < .0001). Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was increased with ergometry exercise in CTD compared to controls (48 ± 14 vs 35 ± 13 mm Hg, P = .0006). The number of total B-lines at rest was highly correlated with higher PASP (r = .52, P < .0001) and poor right ventricular pulmonary artery coupling (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/PASP ratio, r = -.31, P = .01) during peak exercise. The number of resting B-lines predicted the development of exercise-induced PH with an area under the curve .79 (P = .0003).

CONCLUSIONS

These data may suggest the value of a simple resting assessment of lung ultrasound as a potential tool for assessing the risk of exercise-induced PH in CTD patients.

Use of ultrasound to diagnose and monitor interstitial lung disease in rheumatic diseases

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most relevant extra-articular manifestations of rheumatic diseases resulting in a substantial increase in morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis and close monitoring to identify patients at high risk of progression are crucial to establish the need for targeted treatment with immunomodulatory and antifibrotic drugs, with potential ability to change the course of the disease. However, there are unmet needs in this field as pulmonary auscultation, chest radiography, or pulmonary function studies do not allow identification of the most incipient stages of the disease. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), which is the current gold standard for diagnosis and evolutionary control, is problematic owing to ionizing radiation, cost, and accessibility. In this context, lung ultrasound (LUS) is an attractive tool in a growing research and validation process. The identification of vertical artifacts, such as B lines, and alterations of the pleural line present a good correlation with the presence of ILD by HRCT and have a good concordance with the extent and severity of the disease, with sensitivity and negative predictive values of up to 100%. Regarding the monitoring of the evolution, the validation process of LUS is in a more preliminary phase but data is encouraging. All this, together with its safety, accessibility, low cost, and good patient acceptance, postulate LUS as a useful tool for the screening of ILD and for the optimization of the indications of HRCT. Key Points • The good sensitivity and negative predictive values of LUS postulate this technique as a useful tool for the screening of ILD and for the optimization of the indications of HRCT in rheumatic diseases.

The role of ultrasound in systemic sclerosis: On the cutting edge to foster clinical and research advancement

Ultrasound has been widely explored in systemic sclerosis in the clinical and research settings. Ultrasound allows a non-invasive and ionising radiation-free 'window' into this complex disease and is well-suited to repeated examinations. Ultrasound provides novel insights into the pathogenesis and measurement of disease in systemic sclerosis, including early (preclinical) internal organ involvement. The purpose of this review is to describe the role of ultrasound to foster clinical and research advancements in systemic sclerosis relating to (1) musculoskeletal, (2) digital ulcer, (3) lung disease and (4) skin disease. We also highlight unmet needs which much be addressed for ultrasound to assume a central role in systemic sclerosis clinical care and research.

B-Line Artifact as a Diagnostic Tool in Various Conditions at the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND: B-line artifacts (BLAs) play an important role in identifying lung pathology. They may indicate different diseases. However, the diagnostic study of BLA as applied to emergency patients has not been well studied. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of BLA in various conditions. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of emergency patients who had received lung ultrasound at Srinagarind Hospital’s Emergency Department throughout January 2020–December 2020. Ultrasound artifacts were recorded. Ultrasonography findings were correlated with final diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity were also calculated. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients were evaluated. The most prevalent condition which BLA found in this study was pulmonary edema (44.12%) with 88.24% sensitivity and 46.48% specificity. BLA also indicated pneumonia with 66.67% sensitivity and 35.71% specificity. Diffuse BLA indicated pulmonary edema with 70% sensitivity and 70.42% specificity. Focal BLA indicated pneumonia with 28.57% sensitivity and 76.19% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of BLA for pulmonary edema and pneumonia diagnosis in this study was of moderate to good sensitivity, but low specificity. BLA may become crucial in the diagnosis of lung pathology in the emergency department.

The Relationship between Pulmonary Damage and Peripheral Vascular Manifestations in Systemic Sclerosis Patients

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease, characterized by the presence of generalized vasculopathy and tissue fibrosis. Collagen vascular disorder in SSc is due to fibroblast and endothelial cell dysfunctions. This leads to collagen overproduction, vascular impairment and immune system abnormalities and, in the last stage, multi-organ damage. Thus, to avoid organ damage, which has a poor prognosis, all patients should be carefully evaluated and followed. This is particularly important in the initial disease phase, so as to facilitate early identification of any organ involvement and to allow for appropriate therapy. Pulmonary disease in SSc mainly involves interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFT) have been proposed to monitor parenchymal damage. Although transthoracic echocardiography is the most commonly used screening tool for PAH in SSc patients, definitive diagnosis necessitates confirmation by right heart catheterization (RHC). Moreover, some studies have demonstrated that nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) provides an accurate evaluation of the microvascular damage in SSc and is able to predict internal organ involvement, such as lung impairment. This review provides an overview of the correlation between lung damage and microvascular involvement in SSc patients.

Prognostic value of bedside lung ultrasound score in patients with COVID-19

Background

Bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a useful and non-invasive tool to detect lung involvement and monitor changes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the clinical significance of the LUS score in patients with COVID-19 remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the LUS score in patients with COVID-19.

Method

The LUS protocol consisted of 12 scanning zones and was performed in 280 consecutive patients with COVID-19. The LUS score based on B-lines, lung consolidation and pleural line abnormalities was evaluated.

Results

The median time from admission to LUS examinations was 7 days (interquartile range [IQR] 3–10). Patients in the highest LUS score group were more likely to have a lower lymphocyte percentage (LYM%); higher levels of D-dimer, C-reactive protein, hypersensitive troponin I and creatine kinase muscle-brain; more invasive mechanical ventilation therapy; higher incidence of ARDS; and higher mortality than patients in the lowest LUS score group. After a median follow-up of 14 days [IQR, 10–20 days], 37 patients developed ARDS, and 13 died. Patients with adverse outcomes presented a higher rate of bilateral involvement; more involved zones and B-lines, pleural line abnormalities and consolidation; and a higher LUS score than event-free survivors. The Cox models adding the LUS score as a continuous variable (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.02 ~ 1.08; P < 0.001; Akaike information criterion [AIC] = 272; C-index = 0.903) or as a categorical variable (HR 10.76, 95% CI 2.75 ~ 42.05; P = 0.001; AIC = 272; C-index = 0.902) were found to predict poor outcomes more accurately than the basic model (AIC = 286; C-index = 0.866). An LUS score cut-off > 12 predicted adverse outcomes with a specificity and sensitivity of 90.5% and 91.9%, respectively.

Conclusions

The LUS score devised by our group performs well at predicting adverse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and is important for risk stratification in COVID-19 patients.

Lung magnetic resonance imaging in systemic sclerosis: a new promising approach to evaluate pulmonary involvement and progression

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is frequent and highly disabling in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not routinely used to evaluate the lung, due to poorer spatial resolution compared to high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). We aimed to compare lung MRI signal with HRCT and evaluate the role of MRI in predicting ILD progression.

METHODS

Thirty SSc patients underwent lung MRI and HRCT. STIR and T1 mapping sequences were acquired before and after gadolinium injection. Patients were classified as normal (group 1 with normal HRCT and MRI), discordant (group 2 without ILD signs on HRCT but areas of hyperintensity on MRI), and abnormal (group 3 with ILD signs on HRCT and areas of hyperintensity on MRI). Patients were followed up for ILD progression.

RESULTS

Mean STIR and T1 values were different between the three groups (p < 0.0001). STIR values correlated with HRCT score (R = 0.79, p < 0.0001), lung ultrasound B-lines (R = 0.73, p < 0.0001), and %DLco (R = - 0.63, p = 0.0001). Nine events were recorded during a follow-up of 25 ± 20 months. Continuous STIR values were independently associated with events (HR 1.018; CI 1.005-1.031, p = 0.005). A STIR value >90 ms discriminated patients at a higher risk of worsening pulmonary involvement (HR 8.80; CI 1.81-42.74; p < 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung MRI can detect SSc-related ILD, with good correlations with other ILD markers. STIR values, independently of HRCT appearance, may predict worsening lung involvement. Lung MRI, although very preliminary, is a promising tool that in a near future could help selecting patients for an early treatment of SSc-related ILD and a more appropriate use of HRCT. Key points • Lung MRI has the potential to differentiate inflammation-predominant versus fibrosis-predominant lesions, but it is not currently used in routine clinical practice to assess SSc-related ILD. • Lung MRI STIR and T1 values are significantly different between patients with and without SSc-related ILD. STIR values, independently of HRCT appearance, are also able to predict worsening lung involvement over time. • These preliminary data suggest that, in a near future, MRI could support the choice for an early treatment of SSc-related ILD, as well as a more appropriate use of HRCT.