|
1
|
Kim KS, Makhdoum A, Koziarz A, Gupta S, Alsagheir A, Pandey A, Reza S, Um K, Teoh K, Alhazzani W, Lamy A, Yanagawa B, Belley-Côté EP, Whitlock RP. Outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement versus conventional aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement, updated systematic review, and meta-analysis. J Card Surg 2021; 36:4734-4742. [PMID: 34617322 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sutureless aortic valve replacement (SuAVR) is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study compares the effectiveness of SuAVR to SAVR and TAVR. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception to July 2021 for studies evaluating SuAVR, SAVR, and TAVR in adults with aortic stenosis. We performed screening, full-text assessment, data collection, and risk of bias evaluation independently and in duplicate. We evaluated risk of bias using by Cochrane and CLARITY's tools, and certainty in evidence using the GRADE framework. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS We identified one randomized and 78 observational studies (n = 60,689; SuAVR vs. SAVR = 39,171, vs. TAVR = 21,518). All studies were at high or unclear risk of bias, with very-low certainty in effect estimates. Compared to TAVR, SuAVR demonstrates no significant difference in mortality at 30-days (odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI: 0.85, 1.16], I2 = 0%), but decreased odds at 2-years (OR: 0.39, 95% CI [0.17, 0.88], I2 = 0%). SuAVR also reduced odds of mild paravalvular regurgitation (OR: 0.11, 95% CI [0.06, 0.21], I2 = 50%). Compared to SAVR, SuAVR was associated with a similar mortality at 30-days (OR: 0.99, 95% CI [0.85, 1.16], I2 = 0%) and 2-years (OR: 0.99, 95% CI [0.43-2.30], I2 = 7%). SuAVR significantly increased odds of permanent pacemaker implantation (OR: 2.5, 95% CI [2.25, 2.77], I2 = 0%). Pooled effect estimates were consistent with results from the randomized trial comparing SuAVR and SAVR. CONCLUSION Based on very-low quality evidence, SuAVR is associated with similar short- and midterm outcomes compared to TAVR and SAVR. Comparative randomized data with long-term follow-up are required to clarify the role of SuAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin S Kim
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Ahmad Makhdoum
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alex Koziarz
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Saurabh Gupta
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ali Alsagheir
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Pandey
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Seleman Reza
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Kevin Um
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin Teoh
- Southlake Regional Health Sciences Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
| | - Waleed Alhazzani
- Department of Health Research Methodology, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - André Lamy
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bobby Yanagawa
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Emilie P Belley-Côté
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard P Whitlock
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|