Canadian Cardiovascular Society-Canadian Heart Failure Society Focused Clinical Practice Update of Patients With Differing Heart Failure Phenotypes

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Elderly: Basic Mechanisms and Clinical Considerations

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) refers to a clinical condition in which the signs of HF, such as pulmonary congestion, peripheral edema and increased natriuretic-peptide levels, are present despite normal ejection-fractions and the absence of other causes (e.g. pericardial disease). The ejection-fraction cutoff for the definition of HFpEF has varied in the past, but recent society guidelines have settled on a consensus of 50%. HFpEF is particularly common in the elderly. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the available literature regarding HFpEF in the elderly in terms of evidence for the age-dependence, specific clinical features and underlying mechanisms. In the clinical arena, we review the epidemiology, discuss distinct clinical phenotypes typically seen in the elderly, the importance of frailty, the role of biomarkers and the role of medical therapies (including sodium-glucose cotransport protein 2 (SGLT2)-inhibitors, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers, angiotensin-receptor/neprilysin inhibitors, diuretics and beta-adrenergic receptor blockers). We then go on to discuss the basic mechanisms implicated in HFpEF, including cellular senescence, fibrosis, inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, enhanced production of reactive-oxygen species, abnormal cellular calcium handling, changes in microRNA signaling, insulin resistance, and sex-hormone changes. Finally, we review knowledge gaps and promising areas of future investigation. Improved understanding of the specific clinical manifestations of HFpEF in the elderly and of the fundamental mechanisms contributing to the age-related risk of HFpEF promises to lead to novel diagnostic and treatment approaches that will improve outcomes for this common cardiac disorder in a vulnerable population.

Association and Prognostic Value of Multidomain Frailty Defined by Cumulative Deficit and Phenotype Models in Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Frailty is associated with a poor prognosis in older patients with heart failure (HF). However, multidomain frailty assessment tools have not been established in patients with HF, and the association between the frailty phenotype and the deficit-accumulation frailty index in these patients is unclear. We aimed to understand this relationship and evaluate the prognostic value of the deficit-accumulation frailty index in older patients with HF.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed FRAGILE-HF cohort, which consisted of prospectively registered hospitalized patients with HF aged ≥ 65 years. The frailty index was calculated using 34 health-related items. The physical, social, and cognitive domains of frailty were evaluated using a phenotypic approach. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Among 1027 patients with HF (median age, 81 years; male, 58.1%; median frailty index, 0.44), a higher frailty index was associated with a higher prevalence in all domains of cognitive, physical, and social frailty defined by the phenotype model. During the 2-year follow-up period, a higher frailty index was independently associated with all-cause death even after adjustment for Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) score plus log B-type natriuretic peptide (per 0.1 increase: hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.37; P = 0.002). The addition of the frailty index to the baseline model yielded statistically significant incremental prognostic value (net reclassification improvement, 0.165; 95% confidence interval, 0.012-0.318; P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher frailty index was associated with a higher prevalence of all domains of frailty defined by the phenotype model and provided incremental prognostic information with pre-existing risk factors in older patients with HF.

Preclinical studies on the impacts of frailty in the aging heart

Age is a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases in men and in women. However, not all people age at the same rate and those who are aging rapidly are considered frail, when compared to their fit counterparts. Frailty is an important clinical challenge because those who are frail are more likely to develop and die from illnesses, including cardiovascular diseases, than fit people of the same age. This increase in susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases in older individuals may occur as the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the aging process facilitate structural and functional damage in the heart. Consistent with this, recent studies in murine frailty models have provided strong evidence that maladaptive cardiac remodeling in older mice is the most pronounced in mice with a high level of frailty. For example, there is evidence that ventricular hypertrophy and contractile dysfunction increase as frailty increases in aging mice. Additionally, fibrosis and slowing of conduction in the sinoatrial node and atria are proportional to the level of frailty. These modifications could predispose frail older adults to diseases like heart failure and atrial fibrillation. This preclinical work also raises the possibility that emerging interventions designed to "treat frailty" may also treat or prevent cardiovascular diseases. These findings may help to explain why frail older people are most likely to develop these disorders as they age.

Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusions for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anaemia by Heart Failure Status: An RCT Subgroup Analysis

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell transfusion can cause fluid overload. We evaluated the interaction between heart failure (HF) at baseline and transfusion strategy on outcomes in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

We used data from the randomized REALITY trial (https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/study/NCT02648113), comparing restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in patients with AMI and anaemia. HF was defined as history of HF or Killip class > 1 at randomization. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, non-recurrent AMI, stroke, or emergency revascularization prompted by ischaemia) at 30 days.

RESULTS

Among 658 randomized patients, 311 (47.3%) had HF. HF patients had higher rates of MACE at 30 days and 1 year, and higher rates of non-fatal new-onset HF. There was no interaction between HF and effect of randomized assignment on the primary outcome or non-fatal new-onset HF. A liberal transfusion strategy was associated with increased all-cause death at 30 days and at 1 year in HF patients (Pinteraction = 0.009 and P = 0.049, respectively). The main numerical difference in cause of death between restrictive and liberal strategies was death by HF at 30 days (4 vs 11).

CONCLUSIONS

HF is frequent in AMI patients with anaemia and is associated with higher risk of MACE (including all-cause death) and non-fatal new-onset HF. While there was no interaction of HF with effect of transfusion strategy on MACE, a liberal transfusion strategy was associated with higher all-cause death that appears driven by a higher risk of early death due to HF.

Predictive value of valvular calcification for the recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

Valvular calcification (VC) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. The relationship between VC and atrial fibrillation is not clear.

HYPOTHESIS

We treated the aortic valve, mitral valve, and tricuspid valve as a whole and considered the possible association between VC and recurrence of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

METHODS

This study involved 2687 PsAF patients who underwent RFCA. Data were collected to explore the relationship between VC and outcome. VC was defined by echocardiography in aortic valve, mitral valve, or tricuspid valve. After 1 year follow-up, subgroup analysis, mixed model regression analysis, and score system analysis were performed. The external validation of 133 patients demonstrated the accuracy of this clinical prediction model.

RESULTS

Overall, 2687 inpatients were assigned to the recurrence group (n = 682) or the no recurrence group (n = 2005) with or without VC. Compared to patients with no recurrence, the incidence of VC was higher in recurrence patients. Recurrence was present in 18.5%, 34.9%, 39.3%, and 52.0% of the four groups, which met VC numbers of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, VC was an independent risk factor for AF recurrence in several models. For multivariable logistic regression, a scoring system was established based on the regression coefficient. The receiver operating characteristic area of the scoring system was 0.787 in the external validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

VC was an independent risk factor for AF recurrence in PsAF after RFCA. The scoring system may be a useful clinical tool to assess AF recurrence.

Access to Heart Failure Services in Canada: Findings of the Heart and Stroke National Heart Failure Resources and Services Inventory

BACKGROUND

The rising incidence of heart failure (HF) in Canada necessitates commensurate resources dedicated to its management. Several health system partners launched an HF Action Plan to understand the current state of HF care in Canada and address inequities in access and resources.

METHODS

A national Heart Failure Resources and Services Inventory (HF-RaSI) was conducted from 2020 to 2021 of all 629 acute care hospitals and 20 urgent care centres in Canada. The HF-RaSI consisted of 44 questions on available resources, service,s and processes across acute care hospitals and related ambulatory settings.

RESULTS

HF-RaSIs were completed by 501 acute care hospitals and urgent care centres, representing 94.7% of all HF hospitalisations across Canada. Only 12.2% of HF care was provided by hospitals with HF expertise and resources, and 50.9% of HF admissions were in centres with minimal outpatient or inpatient HF capabilities. Across all Canadian hospitals, 28.7% did not have access to B-type natriuretic peptide testing, and only 48.1% had access to on-site echocardiography. Designated HF medical directors were present at 21.6% of sites (108), and 16.2% sites (81) had dedicated inpatient interdisciplinary HF teams. Among all of the sites, 28.1% (141) were HF clinics, and of those, 40.4% (57) had average wait times from referral to first appointment of more than 2 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant gaps and geographic variation in delivery and access to HF services exist in Canada. This study highlights the need for provincial and national health systems changes and quality improvement initiatives to ensure equitable access to the appropriate evidence-based HF care.