Response to Pembrolizumab After Dose-Reduced Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine Chemotherapy Is Inferior to That After Carboplatin Plus Gemcitabine Chemotherapy in Cisplatin-Unfit Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Enfortumab vedotin following platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced urothelial carcinoma: response, survival and safety analysis from a multicentre real-world Japanese cohort

OBJECTIVE

Real-world evidence regarding enfortumab vedotin for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is scarce, particularly in Japan. We investigated real-world data focusing on patient background, previous treatments, response, survival and adverse events in patients receiving enfortumab vedotin.

METHODS

A multicentre database was used to register 556 patients diagnosed with metastatic urothelial carcinoma from 2008 to 2023; 34 patients (6.1%) treated with enfortumab vedotin were included. Best radiographic objective responses were evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (v1.1) during treatments. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated (Kaplan-Meier method). Toxicities were reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. The relative dose intensity, which could impact oncological outcomes, was calculated.

RESULTS

The median number of enfortumab vedotin therapy cycles was 5. The best objective response to enfortumab vedotin was partial response, stable disease and progressive disease in 19 (56%), 5 (15%) and 10 (29%) patients, respectively. The median overall survival and progression-free survival after the first enfortumab vedotin dose were 16 and 9 months, respectively. No significant relationship was observed between survival outcomes after enfortumab vedotin initiation and the enfortumab vedotin relative dose intensity. The median overall survival from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy initiation was 42 months. Twenty-six (76%) patients experienced any grade of enfortumab vedotin-related toxicities; eight (24%) experienced Grades 3-4 toxicities, the most common being skin toxicity (any grade, 47%; Grades 3-4, 12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we report real-world evidence for enfortumab vedotin therapy in Japan. Tumour responses and safety profiles were comparable with those of clinical trials on this novel treatment.

Switch-maintenance avelumab immunotherapy following first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced, unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: the first Japanese real-world evidence from a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

To develop the first Japanese real-world evidence of switch-maintenance avelumab in advanced, unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (aUC).

METHODS

A multicenter-derived database registered 505 patients diagnosed with aUC between 2008 and 2021. Of these, 204 patients (40%) were selected and stratified according to the type of therapy used: maintenance avelumab group (27 [5.3%]), second-line (2 L) pembrolizumab group (103 [20%]) and 2 L cytotoxic chemotherapy group (74 [15%]). The progression-free survival and overall survival from the initiation of following therapy were compared. Tumor response was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guideline v1.1 during the treatment period. A detailed analysis was performed in the maintenance avelumab group to investigate possible factors associated with response to avelumab therapy.

RESULTS

The maintenance avelumab group had a longer overall survival, not progression-free survival, compared with the other two treatment groups. The median treatment-free interval between the last dose of first-line (1 L) chemotherapy and the initiation of avelumab therapy was 6 weeks (range, 3-22). Disease control rate of maintenance avelumab therapy in patients with a treatment-free interval of ≤6 weeks was higher than that in patients with a treatment-free interval of >6 weeks (77 vs 40%, P = 0.029). The patients showing objective response to 1 L chemotherapy were less likely to experience tumor relapse (4 of 19) after the initiation of avelumab therapy compared with those showing stable disease (7 of 8).

CONCLUSIONS

Objective response to 1 L chemotherapy and early induction of maintenance avelumab therapy may be associated with increased benefit from maintenance avelumab therapy.

Probiotics enhances anti-tumor immune response induced by gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy for urothelial cancer

Chemotherapy drugs, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC), are frequently administered to patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma, however the influence of the gut microbiota on their action is unclear. Thus, we investigated the effects of GC on the gut microbiome and determined whether oral supplementation with a probiotics mixture of Lactobacillus casei Shirota and Bifidobacterium breve enhanced the anti-tumor immune response. After subcutaneous inoculation with MBT2 murine bladder cancer cells, syngenic C3H mice were randomly allocated into eight groups. The gut microbiome cluster pattern was altered in both the GC and oral probiotics groups (p = 0.025). Both tumor-bearing conditions (no treatment) and GC chemotherapy influenced Pseudoclostridium, Robinsoniella, Merdimonas, and Phocea in the gut. Furthermore, comparison of the GC-treated and GC + probiotics groups revealed an association of four methyltransferase family enzymes and two short-change fatty acid-related enzymes with oral probiotics use. A significant difference in tumor volume was observed between the GC and GC + probiotics groups at week 2 of treatment. Additionally, decreased recruitment of cancer-associated fibroblasts and regulatory T cells, and activation of CD8⁺ T cells and dendritic cells were observed in the tumor microenvironment. Our findings reveal the positive effects of a probiotics mixture of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in enhancing anti-tumor effects through the gut-tumor immune response axis. Future clinical trials are needed to evaluate the full benefits of this novel supplement with oral probiotics in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

First-line pembrolizumab for patients with early relapsing urothelial carcinoma after perioperative chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of bladder cancer and upper urinary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

First-line pembrolizumab is available for recurrent disease within 12 months after the receipt of platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy. However, the benefit of first-line pembrolizumab is unclear. This study evaluated the oncological outcome of patients treated with pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapy for early relapsing disease after the receipt of platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy.

METHODS

Data from a multicenter study included 454 patients diagnosed with unresectable or metastatic UC from November 2006 to July 2021. We identified patients with early and non-early relapsing disease. Oncological outcomes were evaluated using progression-free survival, overall survival, and survival with disease control.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients with early relapsing disease and 15 patients with non-early relapsing disease were identified. Of 53 patients with early relapsing disease, 26 (49.1%) were treated with pembrolizumab and 27 (50.9%) were treated with chemotherapy as first-line therapy. Fifteen patients with non-early relapsing disease were treated with chemotherapy. Early relapsing disease was associated with shorter progression-free survival and overall survival than non-early relapsing disease. Pembrolizumab was associated with longer progression-free survival and survival with disease control than chemotherapy in patients with early relapsing disease. There was no significant difference in overall survival between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, but overall survival plateau with a long tail was observed in pembrolizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line pembrolizumab in earlier clinical settings for highly malignant tumors might improve the prognosis of patients with early relapsing disease after the receipt of platinum-based perioperative chemotherapy.

Efficacy of pembrolizumab rechallenge for metastatic urothelial carcinoma

Introduction

Before the approval of enfortumab vedotin, no standard treatment was available as the salvage treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had failed second‐line or later pembrolizumab. Pembrolizumab rechallenge is one of the options for these patients, but there is limited evidence on the effectiveness of pembrolizumab rechallenge. We report three patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab rechallenge and discuss rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors in other malignancies.

Case presentation

This study included three cases treated with pembrolizumab rechallenge with the age of 54 (Case 1), 78 (Case 2), and 67 (Case 3) years old. A complete response to the prior pembrolizumab was observed only in Case 1. However, no patients responded to the pembrolizumab rechallenge.

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab rechallenge is not recommended in the current clinical setting of metastatic urothelial carcinoma, even for patients who showed complete response to the prior pembrolizumab.

Organ-Specific and Mixed Responses to Pembrolizumab in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

To investigate the organ-specific response and clinical outcomes of mixed responses (MRs) to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (ur/mUC), we retrospectively analyzed 136 patients who received pembrolizumab. The total objective response rate (ORR) and organ-specific ORR were determined for each lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 as follows: (i) complete response (CR), (ii) partial response (PR), (iii) stable disease (SD), and (iv) progressive disease (PD). Most of the organ-specific ORR was 30−40%, but bone metastasis was only 5%. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) between responders and non-responders with locally advanced lesions and lymph node, lung, or liver metastases (HR 9.02 (3.63−22.4) p < 0.0001; HR 3.63 (1.97−6.69), p < 0.0001; HR 2.75 (1.35−5.59), p = 0.0053; and HR 3.17 (1.00−10.0), p = 0.049, respectively). MR was defined as occurring when PD happened in one lesion plus either CR or PR occurred in another lesion simultaneously, and 12 cases were applicable. MR was significantly associated with a poorer prognosis than that of the responder group (CR or PR; HR 0.09 (0.02−0.35), p = 0.004). Patients with bone metastases benefitted less. Care may be needed to treat patients with MR as well as patients with pure PD. Further studies should be conducted in the future.