Migraine: Does aura require investigation?

Migraine and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with migraines, particularly those with auras, may present with stroke. Atrial fibrillation is a known risk factor for stroke. With common pathophysiological factors between migraines and atrial fibrillation, we aimed to clarify the association between migraine and atrial fibrillation in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane electronic bibliographic databases from inception to 5 September 2022 with the following inclusion criteria: (a) cohort or cross-sectional studies; (b) studies that included only patients aged ≥18 years; and (c) studies that examined the association between atrial fibrillation and migraines. Exclusion criteria were case-control studies and the studies that included patients with previous diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or nonmigrainous headache. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of studies.

RESULTS

Six studies were included, demonstrating a pooled prevalence of atrial fibrillation of 1.61% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51, 3.29) in migraine with aura and 1.32% (95% CI 0.17, 3.41) in migraine without aura. The overall prevalence of atrial fibrillation in migraine was 1.39% (95% CI 0.24, 3.46).

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the overall prevalence of atrial fibrillation in patients with migraine was low. Further studies are needed to clarify this relationship.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache: 2022 Update

Headache is an ancient problem plaguing a large proportion of the population. At present, headache disorders rank third among the global causes of disability, accounting for over $78 billion per year in direct and indirect costs in the United States. Given the prevalence of headache and the wide range of possible etiologies, the goal of this document is to help clarify the most appropriate initial imaging guidelines for headache for eight clinical scenarios/variants, which range from acute onset, life-threatening etiologies to chronic benign scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Prevalence and impact of visual aura in migraine and probable migraine: a population study

Visual aura (VA) presents in 98% of cases of migraine with aura. However, data on its prevalence and impact in individuals with migraine and probable migraine (PM) are limited. Data from the nation-wide, population-based Circannual Change in Headache and Sleep Study were collected. Participants with VA rating scale scores ≥ 3 were classified as having VA. Of 3,030 participants, 170 (5.6%) and 337 (11.1%) had migraine and PM, respectively; VA prevalence did not differ between these cohorts (29.4% [50/170] vs. 24.3% [82/337], p = 0.219). Participants with migraine with VA had a higher headache frequency per month (4.0 [2.0–10.0] vs. 2.0 [1.0–4.8], p = 0.014) and more severe cutaneous allodynia (12-item Allodynia Symptom Checklist score; 3.0 [1.0–8.0] vs. 2.0 [0.0–4.8], p = 0.046) than those without VA. Participants with PM with VA had a higher headache frequency per month (2.0 [2.0–8.0] vs. 2.0 [0.6–4.0], p = 0.001), greater disability (Migraine Disability Assessment score; 10.0 [5.0–26.3] vs. 5.0 [2.0–12.0], p < 0.001), and more severe cutaneous allodynia (12-item Allodynia Symptom Checklist score, 2.5 [0.0–6.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0–3.0], p < 0.001) than those without VA. VA prevalence was similar between migraine and PM. Some symptoms were more severe in the presence of VA.

Validity and reliability of the self-administered Visual Aura Rating Scale questionnaire for migraine with aura diagnosis: A prospective clinic-based study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the validity and reliability of the self-administered Visual Aura Rating Scale (VARS) questionnaire using a hospital-based sample in a cross-sectional setting.

BACKGROUND

Visual aura is the most common type of aura manifesting in 98%-99% of migraine with aura (MA). The VARS is a diagnostic rating scale used to quantify the cardinal characteristics of MA and has shown high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of visual aura.

METHODS

We translated the VARS into Korean and constructed a five-item self-administered questionnaire based on the VARS. We consecutively recruited first-visit patients with migraine at the neurology clinics of two university hospitals. The scoring of the self-administered VARS questionnaire was the same as that for the original VARS. We assessed criterion validity and internal consistency reliability. The diagnosis of migraine and aura was assigned by two headache neurologists based on a comprehensive clinical assessment using the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition.

RESULTS

A total of 240 participants with migraine were enrolled. Of these, 55 (22.9%) had MA. All participants with MA had visual aura. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a cutoff score of 3 provided the highest rate of correct identification of patients ([200/240], 83.3%), with a sensitivity of 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.5%-99.6%) and specificity of 79.5% (95% CI, 72.9%-85.0%). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.852.

CONCLUSION

The self-administered VARS questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for the screening of visual aura in patients with migraine in neurology outpatient clinics.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Headache

Headache is one of the most common human afflictions. In most cases, headaches are benign and idiopathic, and resolve spontaneously or with minor therapeutic measures. Imaging is not required for many types of headaches. However, patients presenting with headaches in the setting of "red flags" such as head trauma, cancer, immunocompromised state, pregnancy, patients 50 years or older, related to activity or position, or with a corresponding neurological deficit, may benefit from CT, MRI, or noninvasive vascular imaging to identify a treatable cause. This publication addresses the initial imaging strategies for headaches associated with the following features: severe and sudden onset, optic disc edema, "red flags," migraine or tension-type, trigeminal autonomic origin, and chronic headaches with and without new or progressive features. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Evaluation of simple inflammatory blood parameters in patients with migraine

AIM

This study aimed to identify the serum neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin (CAR) ratios among patients with diagnosis of migraine according to migraine subtypes (attack/attack-free period, migraine with or without aura, episodic/chronic migraine, family history/no family history) and to collect data to investigate the role of inflammation and oxidative stress in etiology.

METHOD

The study was completed with 235 patients with migraine diagnosis classified according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders-2013(ICHD) classification and 166 healthy controls. Patients with migraine were assessed during the attack by emergency medicine specialists in the emergency room and in attack-free periods in neurology clinics by neurology specialists.

RESULTS

Of patients with migraine, 77.02% were female and 22.98% were male. The neutrophil, NLR, PLR, and MLR levels were higher than the control group (p < 0.05). The serum CRP, neutrophil, NLR, MLR, and CAR levels were higher, and albumin and lymphocyte levels were lower during migraine attack periods (p < 0.05). Migraines with aura were observed to have higher serum NLR levels compared to the aura-free patients (p < 0.05). Migraine patients with positive family history were found to have higher NLR levels compared to patients without a family history (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although non-specific, serum NLR, MLR, PLR, and CAR levels may be potential biomarkers associated with migraine subtypes with different clinical features such as migraine attack period, migraine with aura, and patients with family history of migraine. Elevated inflammatory markers may indicate the severity of disease.