Inpatient outcomes of posterior fossa decompression with or without duraplasty for Chiari malformation type I

PEG hydrogel sealant versus fibrin glue in posterior fossa surgery: an economic comparison across five European countries

Aim: Posterior cranial fossa (PCF) surgery is associated with complications, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Dural sealants such as polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogels and fibrin glue can prevent CSF leaks, with evidence suggesting PEG hydrogels may outperform fibrin glue. However, the budget impact of using PEG hydrogels in PCF surgeries in Europe is unclear. Materials & methods: A decision tree was developed based on a previous US model, to assess the budget impact of switching from fibrin glue to PEG hydrogel in PCF surgery across five European countries. Input costs were derived from published sources for the financial year 2022/2023. Health outcomes, including CSF leaks, were considered. Results: The model predicted that using PEG hydrogel instead of fibrin glue in PCF surgery can lead to cost savings in five European countries. Cost savings per patient ranged from EUR 419 to EUR 1279, depending on the country. Sensitivity analysis showed that the incidence of CSF leaks and pseudomeningoceles had a substantial impact on the model's results. Conclusion: PEG hydrogels may be a cost-effective alternative to fibrin glue in PCF surgery. The model predicted that cost savings would be mainly driven by a reduction in the incidence of postoperative CSF leaks, resulting in reduced reliance on lumbar drains, reparative surgery and shortened hospital stays.

Reoperation in Chiari-1 Malformations

(1) Background: The issue of unsuccessful surgery for Chiari-1 malformation (CM-1), as well as its potential causes and possible solutions, remains poorly documented and studied. (2) Methods: From a retrospective review of a personal series of 98 patients undergoing treatment for CM-1 during the past 10 years, we created two study groups. Group 1: 8 patients (8.1%) requiring additional surgeries owing to postoperative complications (7 cerebrospinal fluid leakage, 1 extradural hematoma); 7 patients (7.1%) undergoing reoperations for failed decompression during the follow-up. Group 2: During the same period, we also managed 19 patients who had previously been operated on elsewhere: 8 patients who required adequate CM-1 treatment following extradural section of the filum terminale; 11 patients requiring reoperations for failed decompression. Failed decompression was managed by adequate osteodural decompression, which was associated with tonsillectomy (6 cases), subarachnoid exploration (8 cases), graft substitution (6 cases), and occipito-cervical fixation/revision (1 case). (3) Results: There was no mortality or surgical morbidity in Group 1. However, one patient's condition worsened due to untreatable syrinx. In Group 2, there were two cases of mortality, and surgical morbidity was represented by functional limitation and pain in the patient who needed revision of the occipitocervical fixation. Twenty patients improved (58.8%), 6 remained unchanged (32.3%), 1 worsened (2.9%) and 2 died (5.9%). (4) Conclusions: The rate of complications remains high in CM-1 treatment. Unfortunately, a certain rate of treatment failure is unavoidable, but it appears that a significant number of re-operations could have been avoided using proper indications and careful technique.

Above-The-Hairline Suboccipital Transverse Approach for the Treatment of Chiari I Malformation

BACKGROUND

Chiari I malformation is a common pediatric neurosurgical disorder with an established treatment paradigm. Posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty (PFDD) is associated with symptom improvement but it carries postoperative risk, particularly cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and wound complications. In addition, the cosmetic outcomes of PFDD have been overlooked in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel approach for PFDD in which the transverse surgical incision is completely hidden above the hairline and to report early outcomes in a prospective patient cohort.

METHODS

Clinical and cosmetic outcomes were recorded for 15 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent PFDD for Chiari I malformation via the above-the-hairline transverse suboccipital approach.

RESULTS

The median clinical follow-up time was 6 months (range 1-12 months), and the majority of patients experienced significant improvement of their preoperative symptoms. Three patients (20%) experienced complications associated with surgery, which included injury to the greater occipital nerve, CSF hypotension and subfascial pseudomeningocele, and superficial wound dehiscence that resolved spontaneously with oral antibiotics. Zero patients (0%) returned to the operating room for persistent CSF leak, deep wound infection, or revision decompression. An excellent cosmetic outcome was achieved in 12 patients (80%). No patient had a poor cosmetic outcome.

CONCLUSION

The above-the-hairline transverse suboccipital approach for PFDD in patients with Chiari I malformation offers favorable cosmetic outcomes and fascial closure while permitting adequate decompression.

Chiari Type 1 Malformation and Syringomyelia in Children: Classification and Treatment Options

Chiari type 1 malformation (CIM) is defined as tonsillar ectopia of >5 mm, while syringomyelia (SM) is defined as a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled cavity larger than 3 mm dissecting the spinal cord. Over the last decades, our understanding of these pathologies has grown; however, many controversies still exist almost in every aspect of CIM and SM, including etiology, indication for treatment, timing of treatment, surgical technique, follow-up regime, and outcome. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview on different aspects of CIM and SM and on the still existing controversies, based on the evidence presently available. Future directions for clinical research concerning CIM and SM treatment and outcome are elaborated and discussed as well.

Foramen magnum decompression for Chiari malformation type I - UK surgical practice

Background: Symptomatic Chiari 1 malformation (CM1) is a common condition in Neurosurgery. Surgery involves hindbrain decompression and restoration of CSF flow through different surgical approaches. No Class 1 evidence exists to suggest the superiority of any of the surgical techniques.Aims: To investigate current surgical practice for symptomatic CM1 patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and determine the willingness to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing different surgical techniques.Methods: An electronic survey was sent to consultant members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons and the British Chiari-Syringomyelia Group. The questions covered pre-operative and intra-operative management, presence of equipoise/uncertainty in optimal technique and willingness to participate in an RCT.Results: 98 responses were received. 67% operate on adults. 30% on adult and paediatric patients. There is variation in routine pre-operative use of: ICP monitoring (18%), flexion/extension x-rays (16%), venography (20%) and ophthalmology assessment (26%). 18% of neurosurgeons would not offer foramen magnum decompression when the presenting symptom is only refractory cough/sneeze headache. 15% routinely perform bony decompression alone in adults vs 8% in children. In 68% of adult cases, durotomy is performed routinely (46% of them leave the dura open, 54% perform a type of duroplasty) and 16% routinely resect the cerebellar tonsils. Only 17% leave the dura open in children. The most common indicators for durotomy are syringomyelia and intra-operative ultrasound findings. 61% believe there is equipoise/uncertainty in the optimal strategy for decompression and would be willing to participate in an RCT. Comments also mention the heterogeneity of CM1 and that treatment should be tailored to each patient.Conclusion: There is wide variation in pre- and intra-operative management of CM1 patients in the UK and the majority of neurosurgeons would be willing to participate in an RCT comparing bony decompression alone vs dural opening with/without duroplasty.