Magnetoencephalography to confirm epileptiform discharges mimicking small sharp spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy

Interhemispheric asymmetrical change in gray matter volume in patients with unilateral hippocampal sclerosis

Objectives

To clarify the interhemispheric asymmetrical change in gray matter volume (GMV) in unilateral hippocampal sclerosis (HS), we compared changes in GMV relative to normal subjects between the HS and contralateral or non-HS sides.

Material and Methods

Forty-five patients with unilateral HS and 30 healthy subjects were enrolled. We quantified changes in GMV in the patients with HS as compared to GMV in the normal subjects by introducing the Z-score (Z-GMV) in each region or region of interest in unilateral HS. Then, we assessed the asymmetrically decreased regions, that is, regions with significantly higher Z-GMV on the HS side than the contralateral or non-HS side. Z-GMV was calculated according to the two templates of 58 regions per hemisphere covering the whole brain by anatomical automatic labeling (AAL) and 78 regions per cerebral hemisphere using the Anatomy Toolbox.

Results

Seven and four regions in AAL and 17 and 11 regions in Anatomy Toolbox were asymmetrically decreased in the Left Hand Side (LHS) and Right Hand Side (RHS), respectively. Hippocampus and Caudate in AAL, five subregions of the hippocampus (CA1-3, Dentate Gyrus and hippocampus-amygdala-transition-area and 4 extrahippocampal regions including two subregions in amygdala (CM: Centromedial, SF: Superficial), basal forebrain (BF) (Ch4), and thalamus (temporal) in anatomy toolbox were common among LHS and RHS concerning asymmetrically decreased regions.

Conclusion

By introducing Z-GMV, we demonstrated the regions with asymmetrically decreased GMV in LHS and RHS, and found that the hippocampus and extrahippocampal regions, including the BF, were the common asymmetrically decreased regions among LHS and RHS.

Normal variants and artifacts: Importance in EEG interpretation

Overinterpretation of EEG is an important contributor to the misdiagnosis of epilepsy. For the EEG to have a high diagnostic value and high specificity, it is critical to recognize waveforms that can be mistaken for abnormal patterns. This article describes artifacts, normal rhythms, and normal patterns that are prone to being misinterpreted as abnormal. Artifacts are potentials generated outside the brain. They are divided into physiologic and extraphysiologic. Physiologic artifacts arise from the body and include EMG, eyes, various movements, EKG, pulse, and sweat. Some physiologic artifacts can be useful for interpretation such as EMG and eye movements. Extraphysiologic artifacts arise from outside the body, and in turn can be divided into the environments (electrodes, equipment, and cellphones) and devices within the body (pacemakers and neurostimulators). Normal rhythms can be divided into awake patterns (alpha rhythm and its variants, mu rhythm, lambda waves, posterior slow waves of youth, HV-induced slowing, photic driving, and photomyogenic response) and sleep patterns (POSTS, vertex waves, spindles, K complexes, sleep-related hypersynchrony, and frontal arousal rhythm). Breach can affect both awake and sleep rhythms. Normal variants or variants of uncertain clinical significance include variants that may have been considered abnormal in the early days of EEG but are now considered normal. These include wicket spikes and wicket rhythms (the most common normal pattern overread as epileptiform), small sharp spikes (aka benign epileptiform transients of sleep), rhythmic midtemporal theta of drowsiness (aka psychomotor variant), Cigánek rhythm (aka midline theta), 6 Hz phantom spike-wave, 14 and 6 Hz positive spikes, subclinical rhythmic epileptiform discharges of adults (SREDA), slow-fused transients, occipital spikes of blindness, and temporal slowing of the elderly. Correctly identifying artifacts and normal patterns can help avoid overinterpretation and misdiagnosis. This is an educational review paper addressing a learning objective of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) curriculum.

Magnetoencephalographic spikes with small spikes on simultaneous electroencephalography have high spatial clustering in temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To classify magnetoencephalographic (MEG) spikes according to the findings of simultaneous scalp electroencephalography (EEG) to study dipole estimation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

METHODS

We analyzed MEG and simultaneous scalp EEG in 27 patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy. We classified MEG spikes into three groups (H-EM-spikes, L-EM-spikes, M-spikes) based on the amplitude of simultaneous EEG (50 μV or higher, lower than 50 μV, no spike morphology on EEG, respectively). We calculated parameters of the dipoles, such as goodness of fit (GOF), current moment, and location.

RESULTS

We detected 707 MEG spikes, consisting of 175 H-EM-spikes, 245 L-EM-spikes, and 287 M-spikes. Dipoles of H-EM-spikes showed the highest current moment among the three spike groups. Dipoles of L-EM-spikes showed the highest GOF, a moderate current moment, the highest density to cluster, and the highest proportion of being located in the temporal lobe among the three groups. Dipoles of M-spikes showed the lowest GOF and current moment among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of the dipoles of the MEG spikes differ depending on the simultaneous scalp EEG findings, though most of the MEG spikes were located in the temporal lobe. MEG spikes with concurrent small spikes on simultaneous scalp EEG may have higher spatial clustering in temporal lobe epilepsy.