Proprioceptive representations of the hand in somatosensory cortex

The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands

Advances in our understanding of brain function, along with the development of neural interfaces that allow for the monitoring and activation of neurons, have paved the way for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which harness neural signals to reanimate the limbs via electrical activation of the muscles or to control extracorporeal devices, thereby bypassing the muscles and senses altogether. BMIs consist of reading out motor intent from the neuronal responses monitored in motor regions of the brain and executing intended movements with bionic limbs, reanimated limbs, or exoskeletons. BMIs also allow for the restoration of the sense of touch by electrically activating neurons in somatosensory regions of the brain, thereby evoking vivid tactile sensations and conveying feedback about object interactions. In this review, we discuss the neural mechanisms of motor control and somatosensation in able-bodied individuals and describe approaches to use neuronal responses as control signals for movement restoration and to activate residual sensory pathways to restore touch. Although the focus of the review is on intracortical approaches, we also describe alternative signal sources for control and noninvasive strategies for sensory restoration.

Proprioceptive sensitivity to imposed finger deflections

Hand proprioception, the sense of the posture and movements of the wrist and digits, is critical to dexterous manual behavior and to stereognosis, the ability to sense the three-dimensional structure of objects held in the hand. To better understand this sensory modality and its role in hand function, we sought to characterize the acuity with which the postures and movements of finger joints are sensed. To this end, we measured the ability of human subjects to discriminate changes in posture and speed around the three joints of the index finger. In these experiments, we isolated the sensory component by imposing the postures on an otherwise still hand, to complement other studies in which subjects made judgments on actively achieved postures. We found that subjects could reliably sense 12-16% changes in joint angle and 18-32% changes in joint speed. Furthermore, the acuity for posture and speed was comparable across the three joints of the finger. Finally, task performance was unaffected by the presence of a vibratory stimulus, calling into question the role of cutaneous cues in hand proprioception.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Manual dexterity and stereognosis are supported by two exquisite sensory systems, namely touch and proprioception. Here, we measure the sensitivity of hand proprioception and show that humans can sense the posture and movements of the fingers with great accuracy. We also show that application of a skin vibration does not impair sensitivity, suggesting that proprioceptive acuity relies primarily on receptors in the muscles (and possibly tendons) rather than the skin.

Limits of Cross-modal Plasticity? Short-term Visual Deprivation Does Not Enhance Cardiac Interoception, Thermosensation, or Tactile Spatial Acuity

In the present study, we investigated the effect of short-term visual deprivation on discriminative touch, cardiac interoception, and thermosensation by asking 64 healthy volunteers to perform four behavioral tasks. The experimental group contained 32 subjects who were blindfolded and kept in complete darkness for 110minutes, while the control group consisted of 32 volunteers who were not blindfolded but were otherwise kept under identical experimental conditions. Both groups performed the required tasks three times: before and directly after deprivation (or control) and after an additional washout period of 40minutes, in which all participants were exposed to normal light conditions. Our results showed that short-term visual deprivation had no effect on any of the senses tested. This finding suggests that short-term visual deprivation does not modulate basic bodily senses and extends this principle beyond tactile processing to the interoceptive modalities of cardiac and thermal sensations.

Visually and Tactually Guided Grasps Lead to Different Neuronal Activity in Non-human Primates

Movements are defining characteristics of all behaviors. Animals walk around, move their eyes to explore the world or touch structures to learn more about them. So far we only have some basic understanding of how the brain generates movements, especially when we want to understand how different areas of the brain interact with each other. In this study we investigated the influence of sensory object information on grasp planning in four different brain areas involved in vision, touch, movement planning, and movement generation in the parietal, somatosensory, premotor and motor cortex. We trained one monkey to grasp objects that he either saw or touched beforehand while continuously recording neural spiking activity with chronically implanted floating multi-electrode arrays. The animal was instructed to sit in the dark and either look at a shortly illuminated object or reach out and explore the object with his hand in the dark before lifting it up. In a first analysis we confirmed that the animal not only memorizes the object in both tasks, but also applies an object-specific grip type, independent of the sensory modality. In the neuronal population, we found a significant difference in the number of tuned units for sensory modalities during grasp planning that persisted into grasp execution. These differences were sufficient to enable a classifier to decode the object and sensory modality in a single trial exclusively from neural population activity. These results give valuable insights in how different brain areas contribute to the preparation of grasp movement and how different sensory streams can lead to distinct neural activity while still resulting in the same action execution.