Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor Theranostics: Early Clinical Translation

Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI) PET Imaging in Sarcomas: A New Frontier in Nuclear Medicine

The field of nuclear medicine has witnessed significant advancements in recent years, particularly in the area of PET imaging. One such development is the use of Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) as a novel radiotracer. FAPI PET imaging has shown promising results in various malignancies, including sarcomas, which are a diverse group of cancers originating from mesenchymal cells. This paper aims to explore the potential of FAPI PET imaging in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring of sarcomas. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of FAPI PET in sarcomas. Furthermore, FAPI PET imaging has shown potential in assessing treatment response, with changes in FAPI uptake correlating with treatment outcomes. However, there are challenges to be addressed. The heterogeneity of sarcomas, both inter- and intra-tumoral, may affect the uniformity of Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) expression and thus the effectiveness of FAPI PET imaging. Additionally, the optimal timing and dosage of FAPI for PET imaging in sarcomas need further investigation. In conclusion, the introduction of FAPI PET imaging represents a significant advancement in the field of nuclear medicine and oncology. The ability to target FAP, a protein overexpressed in the majority of sarcomas, offers new possibilities for the diagnosis and treatment of these complex and diverse tumors. Its potential applications in diagnosis, staging, and theranostics are vast, and on-going research continues to explore and address its limitations. As we continue to deepen our understanding of this novel imaging technique, it is hoped that FAPI PET imaging will play an increasingly important role in the fight against cancer. However, as with any new technology, further research is needed to fully understand the potential and limitations of FAPI PET imaging in the clinical setting.

How to Perform FAPI PET? An Expedited Systematic Review Providing a Recommendation for FAPI PET Imaging With Different FAPI Tracers

This expedited systematic review aims to provide the first overview of the different Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET scan procedures in the literature and discuss how to efficiently obtain optimal FAPI PET images based on the best available evidence. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched in April 2023. Peer-reviewed cohort studies published in English and used FAPI tracers were included. Articles were excluded if critical scan procedure information was missing, or the article was not retrievable from a university library within 30 days. Data were grouped according to the FAPI tracer applied. Meta-analysis with proper statistics was deemed not feasible based on a pilot study. A total of 946 records were identified. After screening, 159 studies were included. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 was applied in 98 studies (61%), followed by [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 in 19 studies (12%). Most studies did not report specific patient preparation. A mean/median administered activity of 80-200 MBq was most common; however, wide ranges were seen in [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET studies (56-370 MBq). An injection-to-scan-time of 60 minutes was dominant for all FAPI PET studies. A possible trend toward shorter injection-to-scan times was observed for [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46. Three studies evaluated [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET acquisition at multiple time points in more than 593 cancer lesions, all yielding equivalent tumor detection at 10 minutes vs later time points despite slightly lower tumor-to-background Ratios. Despite the wide ranges, most institutions administer an average of 80-200 MBq [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/46 and scan patients at 60 minutes postinjection. For [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46, the present evidence consistently supports the feasibility of image acquisition earlier than 30 minutes. Currently, data on the optimal FAPI PET scan procedure are limited, and more studies are encouraged. The current review can serve as a temporary guideline for institutions planning FAPI PET studies.

Potential applications of PET/MRI in non-oncologic conditions within the abdomen and pelvis

PET/MRI is a relatively new imaging modality with several advantages over PET/CT that promise to improve imaging of the abdomen and pelvis for specific diagnostic tasks by combining the superior soft tissue characterization of MRI with the functional information acquired from PET. PET/MRI has an established role in staging and response assessment of multiple abdominopelvic malignancies, but the modality is not yet established for non-oncologic conditions of the abdomen and pelvis. In this review, potential applications of PET/MRI for non-oncologic conditions of abdomen and pelvis are outlined, and the available literature is reviewed to highlight promising areas for further research and translation into clinical practice.

Head-to-Head Intra-Individual Comparison of Biodistribution and Tumor Uptake of [18F]FAPI-74 with [18F]FDG in Patients with PDAC: A Prospective Exploratory Study

BACKGROUND

Radiolabeled fibroblast activation protein (FAP) ligands, a novel class of tracers for PET/CT imaging, have demonstrated very promising results in various oncological, as well as in some benign, diseases with long-term potential to supplant the current pan-cancer agent [¹⁸F]FDG in some cancer types. Pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) belongs to the group of epithelial malignancies with a strong so-called "desmoplastic reaction", leading to a prominent tumor stroma with cancer-associated fibroblasts that exhibit a marked overexpression of fibroblast activation protein (FAP). The first clinical experiences in PDAC with ⁶⁸Ga-labeled FAP ligands suggested superior sensitivity to [¹⁸F]FDG. However, there is limited data with ¹⁸F-labeled FAP derivatives, i.e. [¹⁸F]FAPI-74, yet prospective single- and multicenter trials are already ongoing. In this proof-of-concept study, we sought to evaluate the biodistribution, tumor uptake, and lesion detectability in patients with PDAC using [¹⁸F]FAPI-74 PET/CT as compared to [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT scans for staging.

METHODS

This study includes 7 patients (median age 69) who underwent both [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhancement and [¹⁸F]FAPI-74 PET with low-dose CT for primary staging (n = 3) and therapy response control after neoadjuvant (n = 1) or re-staging after palliative therapy (n = 3). The mean interval between PET scans was 11 ± 4 days (range 1-15 days). The [¹⁸F]FDG and [¹⁸F]FAPI-74 PET/CT scans were acquired at 64 ± 4.1 min (range 61-91 min) and 66.4 ± 6.3 min (range 60-76 min), respectively, after administration of 200 ± 94 MBq (range 79-318 MBq) and 235 ± 88 MBq (range 90-321 MBq), respectively. Quantification of tracer uptake was determined with SUV_max and SUV_mean. Furthermore, the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) was derived by dividing the SUV_max of tumor lesions by the SUV_max of adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and blood pool.

RESULTS

Overall, 32 lesions were detected in 7 patients including primary (n = 7), lung (n = 7), bone (n = 3), lymph node (n = 13), and peritoneal metastases (n = 2). [¹⁸F]FAPI-74 detected 22% more lesions compared with [¹⁸F]FDG with a better TBR and visual lesion delineation. In one patient the primary lesion could be detected unequivocally with [¹⁸F]FAPI-74 but was missed by [¹⁸F]FDG imaging. Altogether, most of the lesions demonstrated markedly elevated uptake of [¹⁸F]FAPI-74 with a simultaneous lower uptake in the background, providing a very high visual contrast.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first, prospective, intra-individual investigation comparing [¹⁸F]FAPI-74 with [¹⁸F]FDG imaging in PDAC with encouraging results. These pivotalresults supporta larger, multicentric, prospective study to determine the value of [¹⁸F]FAPI-74 in detecting and staging PDAC in comparison with current standard of care imaging.