Percutaneous ultrasonography-guided radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinomas: usefulness of image fusion with three-dimensional ultrasonography

The usefulness of three-dimensional ultrasound fusion imaging for precise needle placement in liver thermal ablation: a phantom and an in vivo simulation study

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of three-dimensional ultrasound fusion imaging (3DUS-FI) in real-time guiding needle placement by phantom models and in vivo simulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two radiologists (beginner and expert) performed needle placement using two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS) and 3DUS-FI, respectively. In the phantom study, single-needle placement was performed by puncturing the center point of each ball and assessed based on the specimen length. Multiple-needles placement was performed by placing three needles in each ball, and their locations were confirmed by computed tomography, and assessed based on the distance deviation between needles. In the in vivo simulation study, simulated-needle placement was performed by placing a virtual ablation needle in each liver tumor and assessed by the simulated ablative cover rate and margin.

RESULTS

Specimen length was significantly longer with 3DUS-FI in the beginner, whereas no significant difference was observed in the expert (2DUS vs. 3DUS-FI: beginner, 14.60 ± 2.60 mm vs. 16.25 ± 1.38 mm, p = .017; expert, 16.78 ± 1.40 mm vs. 16.95 ± 1.15 mm, p = .668). Distance deviation between needles was significantly smaller with 3DUS-FI (2DUS vs. 3DUS-FI: beginner, 25.06 ± 16.07 mm vs. 3.72 ± 1.99 mm, p < .001; expert, 11.70 ± 7.79 mm vs. 2.89 ± 1.52 mm, p < .001). The simulated ablative cover rate and margin were significantly larger with 3DUS-FI for the beginner, whereas only the latter was significantly larger for the expert (2DUS vs. 3DUS-FI: beginner, 73.55 ± 8.73% vs. 81.38 ± 11.84%, p = .001, 0.82 ± 0.97 mm vs. 2.65 ± 1.23 mm, p < .001; expert, 78.60 ± 9.91% vs. 83.24 ± 11.69%, p = .059; 1.65 ± 1.15 mm vs. 2.95 ± 1.13 mm, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

3DUS-FI is useful for real-time guiding precise needle placement and may be further use to improve the efficacy of liver thermal ablation.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in HCC diagnosis and assessment of tumor response to locoregional therapies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global problem constituting the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, thereby necessitating an accurate and cost-effective solution for managing care. Ultrasound is well poised to address this need due to its low cost, portability, safety, and excellent temporal resolution. The role of ultrasound for HCC screening has been well established and supported by multiple international guidelines. Similarly, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be used for the characterization of focal liver lesions in high-risk populations, and standardized criteria for CEUS have been established by the American College of Radiology Liver Imaging Reporting & Data System (LI-RADS). Following HCC identification, CEUS can also be highly beneficial in treatment planning, delivery, and monitoring HCC response to locoregional therapies. Specific advantages of CEUS include providing real-time treatment guidance and improved diagnostic performance for the detection of residual tumor viability or recurrence, thereby identifying patients in need of retreatment substantially earlier than contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. This review provides a primer on ultrasound and CEUS for the screening and characterization of HCC, with an emphasis on assessing tumor response to locoregional therapies.

Investigating the Accuracy of Ultrasound-Ultrasound Fusion Imaging for Evaluating the Ablation Effect via Special Phantom-Simulated Liver Tumors

The goal of this study was to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound-ultrasound (US-US) fusion imaging for evaluating the ablation effect via phantom-simulated liver tumors. Twenty special phantom models were established, ablated and divided into a complete ablation group (n = 10) and an incomplete ablation group (n = 10). US-US fusion imaging was performed to evaluate the ablation effect. Gross specimens were observed as a standard reference. In this US-US fusion imaging study, the registration success rate was 100% (20/20), and the assessment time was 3.8 ± 0.9 min. The accuracy rate of the evaluation was 100% (20/20). There was no significant difference in the residual pseudo-tumoral area between the evaluation with US-US fusion imaging and gross specimen observation (p = 0.811), and the measurement error was 1.1 ± 0.6 mm. In conclusion, the feasibility and accuracy of US-US fusion imaging when evaluating the ablation effect can be investigated with this phantom-simulated liver tumor ablation model in an ideal state.

3-D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Fusion Imaging: A New Technique to Evaluate the Ablative Margin of Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

To investigate the feasibility of assessing the ablative margin (AM) of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with 3-D contrast-enhanced ultrasound fusion imaging (3-DCEUS-FI), pre- and post-RFA 3-DCEUS images of 84 patients with HCC were fused for two radiologists to independently assess the AMs. The success rate, duration and influencing factors for registration; inter-observer agreement for AM classification; and local tumor progression (LTP) rate were evaluated. The success rate of the automatic registration (AR), which was completed within 4-12 s, was 57.1% (48/84). The duration and success rate of the interactive registration (IR) were 4.2 ± 1.8 min and 91.7% (77/84) for radiologist A and 4.8 ± 2.1 min and 91.7% (77/84) for radiologist B, respectively. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the pre-RFA image quality, number of vessels (≥3 mm) and presence of acoustic shadow were independent factors for AR (p < 0.05), while the number of vessels was an independent factor for IR (p = 0.001). The agreement between observers was excellent (kappa = 0.914). LTP rate was significantly higher for AMs <5 mm than for AMs ≥5 mm (p = 0.024). Quantitatively evaluating the AM immediately after RFA for HCC with 3-DCEUS-FI was feasible.

Real-time US-CT/MR fusion imaging for percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Although ultrasonography (US) guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a commonly used treatment option for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), inconspicuous tumors on US limits its feasibility. Thus, we prospectively determined whether real-time US-CT/MR fusion imaging can improve the technical feasibility of RFA compared with B-mode US, and help predict local tumor progression after RFA in patients with HCC.

METHODS

A total of 216 patients with 243 HCCs ⩽5cm referred for RFA were prospectively enrolled. Prior to RFA, the operators scored the visibility of tumors, and technical feasibility on a 4-point scale at both B-mode US and fusion imaging. RFA was performed with a switching monopolar system using a separable cluster electrode under fusion imaging guidance. Technique effectiveness, local tumor progression and intrahepatic remote recurrences were evaluated.

RESULTS

Tumor visibility and technical feasibility were significantly improved with fusion imaging compared with B-mode US (p<0.001). Under fusion imaging guidance, the technique effectiveness of RFA for invisible tumors on B-mode US was similar to those for visible tumors (96.1% vs. 97.6%, p=0.295). Estimated cumulative incidence of local tumor progression at 24months was 4.7%, and previous treatment for other hepatic tumors (p=0.01), higher expected number of electrode insertions needed and lower technical feasibility scores (p<0.01) on fusion imaging were significant negative predictive factors for local tumor progression.

CONCLUSION

Real-time fusion imaging guidance significantly improved the tumor visibility and technical feasibility of RFA in patients with HCCs compared with B-mode US, and low feasibility scores on fusion imaging was a significant negative predictive factor for local tumor progression.

LAY SUMMARY

US/CT-MR fusion imaging guidance improved the tumor visibility and technical feasibility of RFA in patients with HCCs. In addition, fusion imaging guided RFA using multiple electrodes demonstrated a high technique effectiveness rate and a low local tumor progression rate during mid-term follow-up. Clinical trial number: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02687113.

Application of Multimodality Imaging Fusion Technology in Diagnosis and Treatment of Malignant Tumors under the Precision Medicine Plan

Objective:

The arrival of precision medicine plan brings new opportunities and challenges for patients undergoing precision diagnosis and treatment of malignant tumors. With the development of medical imaging, information on different modality imaging can be integrated and comprehensively analyzed by imaging fusion system. This review aimed to update the application of multimodality imaging fusion technology in the precise diagnosis and treatment of malignant tumors under the precision medicine plan. We introduced several multimodality imaging fusion technologies and their application to the diagnosis and treatment of malignant tumors in clinical practice.

Date Sources:

The data cited in this review were obtained mainly from the PubMed database from 1996 to 2016, using the keywords of “precision medicine”, “fusion imaging”, “multimodality”, and “tumor diagnosis and treatment”.

Study Selection:

Original articles, clinical practice, reviews, and other relevant literatures published in English were reviewed. Papers focusing on precision medicine, fusion imaging, multimodality, and tumor diagnosis and treatment were selected. Duplicated papers were excluded.

Results:

Multimodality imaging fusion technology plays an important role in tumor diagnosis and treatment under the precision medicine plan, such as accurate location, qualitative diagnosis, tumor staging, treatment plan design, and real-time intraoperative monitoring. Multimodality imaging fusion systems could provide more imaging information of tumors from different dimensions and angles, thereby offing strong technical support for the implementation of precision oncology.

Conclusion:

Under the precision medicine plan, personalized treatment of tumors is a distinct possibility. We believe that multimodality imaging fusion technology will find an increasingly wide application in clinical practice.

Innovative surgical approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide, with an increasing diffusion in Europe and the United States. The management of such a cancer is continuously progressing and the objective of this paper is to evaluate innovation in the surgical treatment of HCC. In this review, we will analyze the modern concept of preoperative management, the role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery, the intrao-perative use of three dimensional models and augme-nted reality, as well as the potential application of fluore-scence.