Clinical practice in Crohn's disease in bordering regions of two countries: different medical options, distinct surgical events

Guideline recommendations for treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases are not implemented in clinical practice-results of a non-representative survey

PURPOSE

There is a growing evidence for over-, under-, or misuse of health care in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Most studies looked at treatment variability or used quality measures, which mostly capture supportive interventions rather than treatment of IBD in itself. We aimed to evaluate if current recommendations in clinical practice guidelines regarding the medical treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases are being followed in Germany.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to 1901 patients insured with two large German statutory sickness funds and an ICD 10 diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). The questionnaire asked about drug treatment, indications for drug treatment, provision of surveillance endoscopies in ulcerative colitis patients, and smoking status in Crohn's disease patients.

RESULTS

Out of 460 evaluable patients, 62.4% of UC patients and 53.9% of CD patients were treated with mesalamine according to guidelines, 91.3% of all patients were treated with glucocorticoids according to guideline recommendations, while only 75.6% received recommended immunosuppressive treatment. Of UC patients, 94.5% had surveillance colonoscopies at the recommended interval and 58.8% of CD patients were non-smokers. No predictor for overall treatment according to guidelines could be found while being of age older than 60 or being treated outside of a dedicated IBD clinic was associated with less immunosuppressive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of patients with IBD do not receive drug treatment in accordance with clinical practice guidelines. Quality improvement measures are much needed.

Systematic review: treatment pattern and clinical effectiveness and safety of pharmaceutical therapies for Crohn's disease in Europe

Background

Although many clinical trials have been conducted in treatments of Crohn’s disease (CD), whether the trial results were representative of daily practice needs to be supported by studies conducted in real-world settings.

Aim

This study aims to identify how CD is treated and what are the clinical effectiveness and safety of the pharmaceutical therapies of CD in real-world settings.

Methods

A systematic literature review was conducted based on Medline^®, Embase^®, and Cochrane. All publications were assessed for title/abstract and full-text according to a predefined study protocol. Data were extracted and reported.

Results

A total of 1,998 publications were identified. Fifty studies including six publications reporting treatment pattern and 44 studies reporting clinical effectiveness and safety of pharmaceutical therapies in CD management in Europe were included. 5-Aminosalicylic acid and corticosteroids were reported to be used among 14%–74% of CD patients. Immunomodulators were used by 14%–25% and 29%–31% of CD patients as an initial and follow-up treatment, respectively. Biological therapies were used by 25%–33% of CD patients. A trend toward an increasing use of immunomodulators and biological therapies in Europe has been reported in recent years. Approximately 50% of patients achieved remission on immunomodulator or biologic treatment, although a relapse rate of up to 23% has been reported.

Conclusion

There is a trend of treatment shift to immunomodulators and biologics in CD management. Clinical effectiveness of immunomodulators and biologics has been demonstrated, though with a lack of sustainability of the effectiveness.

How is inflammatory bowel disease managed in Spanish gastroenterology departments? The results of the GESTIONA-EII survey

INTRODUCTION

Not all national health centers include specialized units or clinicians devoted to inflammatory bowel disease. The goal of the survey was to gain an insight into the management of this disease within Spanish gastroenterology departments via a survey among their members.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An online survey was conducted in February and March 2015, among SEPD members (2017 clinician members), who were split into three categories: heads of department, general gastroenterologists, and experts in this disease. The results of the last two surveys are reported, including demography-related questions and specific questions on the strategies and resources available for the care of these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 166 responses were received (response rate 8.19%), excluding those from heads of department (previously published). Sixty gastroenterologists considered themselves experts in inflammatory bowel disease, and 106 non-experts in it, the latter being either general gastroenterologists or specialists in other areas, mainly endoscopy. Twenty-eight percent of non-expert gastroenterologists said their hospitals had specific units, with a monographic clinic in 46%. However, 26% reported that they were treating affected patients themselves. Experts in inflammatory bowel disease reported that their institute had resources to support their work, but there was a lack of surgeons with expertise in this condition, particularly in county hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

At least, within SEPD members, 2 out of 3 experts in inflammatory bowel disease seem to have the resources available for their work (nurses, day unit, telephone line, database, referrals, joint sessions). Although there is room for improvement (email to contact patients, devoted surgeon, absence of referral protocols), and 2 out of 3 are concerned about pharmacy costs. Since a substantial number of patients remain treated by general practitioners, rapid referral programs might be helpful in this setting.

The Swedish Crohn Trial: A Prematurely Terminated Randomized Controlled Trial of Thiopurines or Open Surgery for Primary Treatment of Ileocaecal Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The importance of efficient and safe treatment of Crohn's disease is highlighted by its chronicity. Both medical and surgical treatments have shown good results in the symptomatic control of limited ileocaecal Crohn's disease. The aim of this study was to compare medical treatment with surgical treatment of ileocaecal Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients from seven hospitals with primary ileocaecal Crohn's disease were randomized to either medical or surgical treatment. The medical treatment was induction of remission with budesonide and thereafter maintenance treatment with azathioprine. The surgical treatment was open ileocaecal resection. Crohn's disease activity index over time, expressed as area under the curve at 1, 3 and 5 years, was the primary endpoint. Subjective health measured with the 36-item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF36) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the treatment groups in Crohn's disease activity index over time. General health, measured as SF36 score, was higher in patients receiving surgical treatment than in those receiving medical treatment at 1 year, but there was no corresponding difference in VAS. Due to the slow inclusion rate and changes in clinical practice, the study was t=erminated prematurely.

CONCLUSION

The study ended up being underpowered and should be interpreted with caution, but there was no clinically significant difference between the two treatment arms. Further studies are needed to address this important clinical question.

Influence of urban/rural and coastal/inland environment on the prevalence, phenotype, and clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease patients from northwest of Spain: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Data on the influence of rural/urban and coastal/inland environment on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are either conflicting or lacking. Our aim was to analyze whether the environment has any influence on the prevalence, phenotype, and course of IBD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a multicenter retrospective study in 1194 IBD patients from Galicia, Spain. Urban areas were defined as those with over 25,000 inhabitants. Sex, age, family history, smoking, Montreal classification, extraintestinal manifestations, steroid dependence/refractoriness, and treatment were assessed. We used the Student's t-test/Mann-Whitney U tests to compare continuous variables and χ to compare categorical variables. Logistic regression was also used.

RESULTS

Living in urban municipalities was a risk factor for Crohn's disease [relative risk (RR) 1.47; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-1.73; P<0.001]; living in coastal municipalities was a protective factor for ulcerative colitis (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.60-0.85; P<0.001). Crohn's disease patients living on the coast had more frequent ileocolonic disease and needed immunosuppressives more frequently than inland patients (RR for inland 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.90; P=0.008). Urban Crohn's disease patients needed immunosuppressives more frequently than rural patients (RR 1.41; 95% CI 1.04-1.92; P=0.027). Urban ulcerative colitis patients had left-sided colitis less frequently. Coastal ulcerative colitis patients more frequently had extensive colitis.

CONCLUSION

Crohn's disease was found more frequently in urban and coastal areas and ulcerative colitis in inland municipalities. Place of residence may also influence phenotype and clinical course as patients living on the coast have more frequent ileocolonic Crohn's disease phenotype, extensive ulcerative colitis, and greater need for immunosuppressive therapy.

A chronic care model significantly decreases costs and healthcare utilisation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition, yet the model of care is often reactive. We sought to examine whether a formal IBD service (IBDS) reduced inpatient healthcare utilisation or lowered costs for inpatient care.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

With protocols, routine nurse phone follow-up a help-line, more proactive care was delivered, with many symptoms and concerns dealt with prior to routine presentation. Over two five month periods before (2007/8) and after (2009/10) introducing a formal IBDS two discrete cohorts of admitted IBD patients were identified at a single centre. Each patient was assigned five contemporaneously admitted, age and gender matched controls. Inpatient healthcare utilisation was compared between patients and controls and disease-specific factors amongst the two IBD cohorts.

RESULTS

The initial audit captured 102 admitted IBD patients (510 controls, median age 44 years, 57% female); the second audit 95 patients (475 controls, median age 46 years, 45.3% female). In 2009/10, the number of admissions was lower in IBD patients than in controls (mean 1.53+/-1.03 vs. 2.54+/-2.35; p<0.0001). This contrasts with the first audit, where IBD patients had more admissions than controls. Following IBDS introduction, the mean total cost of inpatient care was lower for IBD patients than controls (US$12,857.48 (US$15,236.79) vs. US$ 30,467.78 (US$ 53,760.20), p=0.005). In addition, patients known to a specialist gastroenterologist (GE) and the IBD Service tended to have the lowest mean number of admissions (GE and IBDS 1.14 (+/-0.36) vs. no GE/IBDS 1.64 (+/-1.25)).

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare utilisation and disease burden in IBD decreased significantly since introducing an IBDS. These data suggest that proactive management improved outcomes. Contact with a gastroenterologist and IBDS seemed to give best results.