Preventing the development and progression of diabetic kidney disease: Where do we stand?

Effects of Keluoxin capsule combined with losartan potassium on diabetic kidney disease: study protocol for a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial

Background

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most important microvascular complications of diabetes, and its prevalence has increased dramatically in the past few decades. DKD is responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality of patients with diabetes. Keluoxin capsule (KLX) is a Chinese patent medicine that has been used in the clinic to control DKD for years. Previous studies have shown that KLX appears to reduce proteinuria, but the study protocols as well as the primary outcome need to be improved. Thus, we aim to evaluate whether losartan potassium combined with KLX is more effective than losartan potassium in DKD treatment and to provide validated evidence for the application of KLX in the treatment of DKD.

Methods

We will conduct a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial. A total of 252 participants diagnosed with DKD recruited from 18 institutions will be randomly allocated to either a losartan potassium plus KLX (n = 126) or a losartan potassium plus placebo group (n = 126). The participants will be administered KLX or placebo in addition to losartan potassium for 24 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (ml/min/1.73 m²/year) from baseline within 24 weeks, and the secondary outcomes will be the incidence of serum creatinine doubling, the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the proportion of subjects with a progressive decline in eGFR > 30%, the percent change in 24 h urinary total protein (UTP), the change in the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR), and the total effective rate of the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome scale scores. Comparison of the differences in the variables between groups will be performed according to the data revealed by independent t tests, chi-squared tests, Fisher’s exact tests, or Wilcoxon’s tests. All statistical tests will be two-sided, and significance will be considered for p values < 0.05.

Discussion

This study will be the first randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KLX versus the placebo for the treatment of patients with DKD. The outcome of this trial will provide a basis for prescribing KLX to patients with DKD.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn) ChiCTR1900021113. Registered on January 29, 2019.

Glycated Hemoglobin and Blood Pressure Levels in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: How Many Patients Are on Target?

OBJECTIVES

Achieving glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and blood pressure targets is an important strategy for preventing chronic vascular complications in diabetes. Our aim in this study was to determine the proportion of type 2 diabetes patients who meet the recommended A1C and arterial blood pressure targets and to identify the determinants of failure to do so.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in an outpatient endocrine clinic at a university hospital. The A1C goal was 7% in general and 8% for patients with advanced chronic complications. Regarding blood pressure, the overall expected target was 140/90 mmHg.

RESULTS

A total of 602 type 2 diabetes patients were analyzed: 62% were female, 14% self-reported as black, mean age was 63±11 years, mean diabetes duration was 17±9 years and median A1C was 8.0% (interquartile range, 7.0% to 9.5%). Macrovascular disease was present in 33% of the patients, diabetic retinopathy in 47%, peripheral neuropathy in 43% and diabetic kidney disease in 56%. Regarding metabolic control, 403 (67%) patients were not at the adjusted target A1C level, and being female, black, young and an insulin user were the main determinants of poor glycemic control. Regarding blood pressure, 348 (58%) patients were not at the recommended targets, and a more advanced age was the main associated factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Because more than half of type 2 diabetes outpatients do not meet the recommended A1C and blood pressure target values, there is a major call to overcome the therapeutic inertia and target treatment of patients on an individual basis.

Diabetic kidney diseases revisited: A new perspective for a new era

BACKGROUND

Globally, diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. As the most common microvascular complication of diabetes, DKD is a thorny, clinical problem in terms of its diagnosis and management. Intensive glucose control in DKD could slow down but not significantly halt disease progression. Revisiting the tremendous advances that have occurred in the field would enhance recognition of DKD pathogenesis as well as improve our understanding of translational science in DKD in this new era.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

In this review, we summarize advances in the understanding of the local microenvironmental changes in diabetic kidneys and discuss the involvement of genetic and epigenetic factors in the pathogenesis of DKD. We also review DKD prevalence changes and analyze the challenges in optimizing the diagnostic approaches and management strategies for DKD in the clinic. As we enter the era of 'big data', we also explore the possibility of linking systems biology with translational medicine in DKD in the current healthcare system.

MAJOR CONCLUSION

Newer understanding of the structural changes of diabetic kidneys and mechanisms of DKD pathogenesis, as well as emergent research technologies will shed light on new methods of dealing with the existing clinical challenges of DKD.