Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Double Bundle of Long Head Biceps Tendon Autograft: The "Box" Technique

Patients With Intact Shoulder Superior Capsular Reconstruction Grafts on Ultrasound Show Significant Improvement in Functional Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Purpose

To assess the utility of using dynamic ultrasound for postoperative evaluation after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) by evaluating graft integrity and its correlation with clinical outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent SCR between July 2015 and July 2020 with a minimum 2-year clinical and ultrasound follow-up. Clinical outcome measures included Simple Shoulder (SS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) scores. Integrity of the SCR graft was evaluated by dynamic ultrasound.

Results

We evaluated 22 shoulders in 21 patients with a mean follow-up of 44.8 months (range, 24-71 months). The graft was found to be intact by ultrasound evaluation in 82% (18/22). Patients with intact grafts had higher mean SS (11.6 vs 7.8, P = .00079) and ASES (91.2 vs 64.1, P = .0296) scores at latest follow-up compared to those with failed grafts. Those with intact grafts also had significant improvement in SS (3.7 vs 11.6, P < .00001) and ASES (23.2 vs 91.2, P < .00001) scores at latest follow-up compared to their preoperative scores. In contrast, patients with graft failure had no significant improvement in SS (6.3 vs 9.0, P = .123) and ASES (40.4 vs 58.3, P = .05469) scores at latest follow-up compared to their preoperative scores. There was no difference between clinical outcomes at 6 to 12 months vs latest follow-up for both SS (P = .11, P = .5) and ASES (P = .27, P = .21) scores.

Conclusions

SCR grafts were found by ultrasound to be intact in 82% of cases. Patients with intact grafts on ultrasound had significant improvement in functional outcome scores while those with graft failure did not. Functional outcome scores suggest that maximal recovery from this procedure occurs by 6 to 12 months.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Double Attack Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Long Head of Biceps Tendon Plus Margin Convergence Repair

Arthroscopic repair of massive retracted rotator cuff tears is very challenging with a high incidence of retears. Many techniques have been described to improve the outcomes of arthroscopic repair. In this technique, a superior capsular reconstruction using the long head of the biceps is combined with margin convergence repair aimed at improving the mechanical strength of the repair. The long head of the biceps is used as a superior capsular reconstruction to stabilize the humeral head and prevent proximal migration. Moreover, margin convergence provides an efficient gap filling between remnants of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons to restore an efficient rotator repair in anatomical, biological, and tension-free fashion.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction With the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon to Reinforce the Repair of a Supraspinatus Tear and Increase Healing

Rotator cuff tears continue to be a challenge for the shoulder surgeon since there is still a high rate of retears. To increase the rate of repair and decrease the number of retears, we present a technique, in which we reinforce a tension-free double-row repair of the supraspinatus with reconstruction of the superior capsule with the long head of the biceps (LHB). With this reinforcement of the cuff suture using the LHB, we increase both the biomechanics and biology of the repair and decrease the rate of reruptures.

Dynamic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Histologic Analysis in a Rat Model and Short-term Clinical Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has been demonstrated to be a valuable treatment for patients with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (IMRCTs). However, the torn medial supraspinatus (SSP) tendons, which acted as dynamic stabilizers, were left untreated in conventional SCR, and the dynamic force from the SSP tendon was not restored.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of dynamic SCR (dSCR) on fascia-to-bone healing in a rat model, and to compare the short-term clinical effectiveness of dSCR and SCR using autologous fascia lata (FL) in patients with IMRCTs.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study and cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 50 rats were divided randomly into 2 groups: the dSCR group and the SCR group (25 rats per group). First, chronic IMRCTs were created, and then the torn tendons in both groups were subjected to SCR using autologous thoracolumbar fascial (TLF) grafts. The remnant of the SSP tendon was sutured to the medial part of the TLF graft in the dSCR group but not in the SCR group. Histologic sections were assessed at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 weeks postoperatively. In the clinical study, 22 patients (9 SCR, 13 dSCR) were analyzed. The recovery of shoulder function, including the active range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, and University of California Los Angeles score, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and fatty infiltration, was evaluated before surgery and at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

Histologic analysis of the fascia-to-bone junction in the rat model showed that the TLF gradually migrated into tendon-like tissue over the rotator cuff defects in both groups, and the modified tendon maturation score of the fascia-to-bone interface in the dSCR group was higher than that in the SCR group at 4 weeks (12.20 ± 1.30 vs 14.60 ± 1.52; P = .004), 8 weeks (19.60 ± 1.14 vs 22.20 ± 1.10; P = .019), and 16 weeks (23.80 ± 0.84 vs 26.20 ± 0.84 P = .024). The dSCR group showed earlier fibrocartilage cell formation and angiogenesis. In the clinical study, all 22 patients completed a minimum of 12 months of follow-up after surgery, and the mean follow-up duration was 22.89 ± 7.59 months in the SCR group and 25.62 ± 7.32 months in the dSCR group. The patients in both groups showed significant improvements in terms of ROM, shoulder function scores, and AHD. At the last follow-up, abduction (56.67°± 27.39° vs 86.54°± 30.37°; P = .029), external rotation (25.00°± 9.35° vs 33.08°± 8.55°; P = .049), internal rotation cone rank (-2.78 ± 2.44 vs -4.38 ± 1.12; P = .049), VAS (-3.00 ± 0.87 vs -3.92 ± 0.95; P = .031) and Constant (47.89 ± 15.39 vs 59.15 ± 9.74; P = .048) scores, and the AHD improvement degree (3.06 ± 1.41 mm vs 4.38 ± 1.35 mm; P = .039) in the dSCR group were significantly improved compared with those in the SCR group. The results of fatty infiltration at the last follow-up showed that there was significant improvement compared with the preoperative results in both the conventional SCR (P = .036) and the dSCR (P = .001) groups. However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups (P = .511).

CONCLUSION

dSCR can promote faster fascia-to-bone healing in a rat model, and the dSCR technique could provide a preferable treatment option for patients with IMRCTs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

dSCR might restore the dynamic of SSP in some sense and then improve the fatty infiltration in the SSP.

Anterior Cable Reconstruction: Prioritize Rotator Cable and Tendon Cord When Considering Superior Capsular Reconstruction

Although distinct in name, the anterior cable of the superior capsule and tendon cord of the supraspinatus are structurally one in the same at the attachment on the greater tuberosity footprint. Force transmission through both structures where they converge and interdigitate at this location is disproportionately high, which has implications on functional impact. Superior capsule reconstruction, and, specifically, the anterior cable of the superior capsule, has been shown to assist in maintaining superior stability and a functional fulcrum of the glenohumeral joint, without overconstraining range of motion. Anterior cable reconstructions have been described for specific indications, including full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus and anterior one-half of the infraspinatus. Cord-like grafts, including long head biceps tendon autografts and semitendinosus allografts, can provide relative technical ease during surgery compared to sheet-like grafts for this indication. Side-to-side sutures between anterior cable reconstruction graft and posterosuperior capsule retension the native capsule to optimize its natural functional role. Accounting for abduction and rotation at the time of fixation and employing "loop-around" fixation sutures (no sutures through the graft), are critical concepts to consider in terms of kinematics and limiting graft failure. With both the biomechanically and clinically based literature demonstrating functionality with maintenance of the superior capsule (and specifically the anterior cable of the capsule), despite rotator cuff tendon insufficiency or irreparability, the anterior cable of the superior capsule should be prioritized when considering full-thickness rotator cuff tears that naturally involve both the capsular cable and the supraspinatus tendon cord. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V (expert opinion).

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cable Reconstruction for the Shoulder Superior Capsule: Time for "Indication Rounds"

Anterior cable reconstruction (ACR) techniques for the superior capsule are multiple and varied. To optimize patient outcomes, technical considerations must be supported by basic science, both anatomically and biomechanically. ACR was designed to treat only partially repairable rotator cuff tendon tears, to provide a static support to a dynamic partial (and therefore "nonanatomic") repair, and to treat tears that could not be treated by transosseous-equivalent footprint-restoring "anatomic" repairs (both capsule and tendon repaired), but were also not so large as to necessitate superior capsule reconstruction. ACR allows restoration of posterosuperior capsular function with side-to-side repair sutures, and much of the biomechanical functionality comes from using whatever inherent native superior capsule is available. Cable reconstructions should be secured to normal attachment sites on the glenoid and greater tuberosity sulcus. Also, graft tension must be accounted for when considering humeral motion such as rotation and adduction. The indications for ACR need to be carefully considered and account for both anatomic and biomechanical rationales. In the face of new ACR techniques, the need to discern what is possible versus what procedure is indicated cannot be overlooked.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Preoperative Planning: Technique Description

We describe a technique using a fascia lata autograft with 3-dimensional (3D) printing to reconstruct the rotator cuff. Prototyping constitutes the construction of physical prototypes with high complexity after virtual studies. Such models increase the knowledge of the characteristics and size of rotator cuff injuries, thus improving the accuracy of determining the correct size of the graft to be used in superior capsule reconstruction. We present a case of superior capsule reconstruction using 3D printing for enhancing the accuracy of fascia lata allograft size and tension determination; 3D reconstruction has never been described in the literature for rotator cuff injuries.

The best options in superior capsular reconstruction

Irreparable massive rotator cuff tears cause pain, loss of function, and a decrease in range of motion, which cause serious disturbances in daily life. Young patients, in particular, are active and have relatively high functional requirements, and their surgical options are limited. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) was first proposed for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears, good clinical results have been reported in short-term follow up. Since then, SCR has been used increasingly worldwide for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears, and various studies have been published on clinical outcomes, biomechanical outcomes, surgical techniques, and graft types. This article reviews the optimal graft and surgical options for improving clinical outcomes in SCR.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: The Biceps Loop Technique

Irreparable rotator cuff tears can be treated in several ways. Superior capsular reconstruction has been reported as an excellent option, particularly for the young and active patients. We propose capsule reconstruction using the long head of the biceps tendon in a modified way. After its tenotomy at the musculotendinous junction, the long head is rerouted through a humeral bone tunnel and attached to a suture anchor in the posterior aspect of the superior glenoid rim. Further investigation is required, but this modified technique appears promising.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Shoulder Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes

Background and Objectives: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with the use of a fascia lata autograft or a dermal allograft is an established treatment in treating irreparable rotator cuff (RC) tears. The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) has been recently proposed as an alternative graft for SCR. The purpose of this study was to present the surgical techniques and clinical studies utilizing the LHBT for SCR. Material and Methods: Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane library were searched for relevant studies up to December 2020. The primary outcomes were pain intensity improvement and the incidence of RC and LHBT graft retears. Secondary outcomes were functional scores and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) improvements. Results: Nine studies described surgical techniques of SCR using the LHBT, and four clinical studies reported the outcomes of the technique. The mean pain intensity improved from 4.9 ± 2.3 to 1.6 ± 1.5 in terms of the visual analog scale, exceeding the minimum clinically important difference for adequate pain relief. Significant improvements were also noted in functional scores and AHD. When compared with other repair techniques for massive RC tears, i.e., the double-row repair, the transosseous-equivalent technique with absorbable patch reinforcement, and the traditional SCR with a fascia lata autograft, there were no significant differences in pain and function improvements. Conclusion: SCR using the LHBT is a useful treatment option for massive RC tears; it is equally effective with the traditional SCR and other established techniques. It presents numerous advantages being a safe, easy, time-saving, and cost-effective method. The only precondition for the technique is the presence of an intact LHBT. Additional clinical trials are necessary to determine which treatment is superior for treating massive RC tears, as well as to evaluate the long-term results of the technique.