Rapid effective dose calculation for raster-scanning 4He ion therapy with the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM)

Evaluation of Helium Ion Radiotherapy in Combination with Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer In Vitro

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive and lethal cancers. New treatment strategies are highly warranted. Particle radiotherapy could offer a way to overcome the radioresistant nature of pancreatic cancer because of its biological and physical characteristics. Within particles, helium ions represent an attractive therapy option to achieve the highest possible conformity while at the same time protecting the surrounding normal tissue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic efficacy of helium ion irradiation in pancreatic cancer in vitro.

METHODS

Human pancreatic cancer cell lines AsPC-1, BxPC-3 and Panc-1 were irradiated with photons and helium ions at various doses and treated with gemcitabine. Photon irradiation was performed with a biological cabin X-ray irradiator, and helium ion irradiation was performed with a spread-out Bragg peak using the raster scanning technique at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT). The cytotoxic effect on pancreatic cancer cells was measured with clonogenic survival. The survival curves were compared to the predicted curves that were calculated via the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM).

RESULTS

The experimental relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of helium ion irradiation ranged from 1.0 to 1.7. The predicted survival curves obtained via mMKM calculations matched the experimental survival curves. Mainly additive cytotoxic effects were observed for the cell lines AsPC-1, BxPC-3 and Panc-1.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate the cytotoxic efficacy of helium ion radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer in vitro as well as the capability of mMKM calculation and its value for biological plan optimization in helium ion therapy for pancreatic cancer. A combined treatment of helium irradiation and chemotherapy with gemcitabine leads to mainly additive cytotoxic effects in pancreatic cancer cell lines. The data generated in this study may serve as the radiobiological basis for future experimental and clinical works using helium ion radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer treatment.

Exploring Helium Ions' Potential for Post-Mastectomy Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Proton therapy presents a promising modality for treating left-sided breast cancer due to its unique dose distribution. Helium ions provide increased conformality thanks to a reduced lateral scattering. Consequently, the potential clinical benefit of both techniques was explored. An explorative treatment planning study involving ten patients, previously treated with VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) for 50 Gy in 25 fractions for locally advanced, node-positive breast cancer, was carried out using proton pencil beam therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and helium therapy with a variable RBE described by the mMKM (modified microdosimetric kinetic model). Results indicated that target coverage was improved with particle therapy for both the clinical target volume and especially the internal mammary lymph nodes compared to VMAT. Median dose value analysis revealed that proton and helium plans provided lower dose on the left anterior descending artery (LAD), heart, lungs and right breast than VMAT. Notably, helium therapy exhibited improved ipsilateral lung sparing over protons. Employing NTCP models as available in the literature, helium therapy showed a lower probability of grade ≤ 2 radiation pneumonitis (22% for photons, 5% for protons and 2% for helium ions), while both proton and helium ions reduce the probability of major coronary events with respect to VMAT.

Roadmap: helium ion therapy

Helium ion beam therapy for the treatment of cancer was one of several developed and studied particle treatments in the 1950s, leading to clinical trials beginning in 1975 at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The trial shutdown was followed by decades of research and clinical silence on the topic while proton and carbon ion therapy made debuts at research facilities and academic hospitals worldwide. The lack of progression in understanding the principle facets of helium ion beam therapy in terms of physics, biological and clinical findings persists today, mainly attributable to its highly limited availability. Despite this major setback, there is an increasing focus on evaluating and establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams, with both therapy and imaging initiatives to supplement the clinical palette of radiotherapy in the treatment of aggressive disease and sensitive clinical cases. Moreover, due its intermediate physical and radio-biological properties between proton and carbon ion beams, helium ions may provide a streamlined economic steppingstone towards an era of widespread use of different particle species in light and heavy ion therapy. With respect to the clinical proton beams, helium ions exhibit superior physical properties such as reduced lateral scattering and range straggling with higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LET_d) ranging from ∼4 keVμm^-1to ∼40 keVμm^-1. In the frame of heavy ion therapy using carbon, oxygen or neon ions, where LET_dincreases beyond 100 keVμm^-1, helium ions exhibit similar physical attributes such as a sharp lateral penumbra, however, with reduced radio-biological uncertainties and without potentially spoiling dose distributions due to excess fragmentation of heavier ion beams, particularly for higher penetration depths. This roadmap presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art and future directions of helium ion therapy: understanding physics and improving modeling, understanding biology and improving modeling, imaging techniques using helium ions and refining and establishing clinical approaches and aims from learned experience with protons. These topics are organized and presented into three main sections, outlining current and future tasks in establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams-A. Physics B. Biological and C. Clinical Perspectives.

Spot-scanning hadron arc (SHArc) therapy: A proof of concept using single and multi-ion strategies with helium, carbon, oxygen and neon ions

PURPOSE

To present particle arc therapy treatments using single and multi-ion therapy optimization strategies with helium (⁴ He), carbon (¹² C), oxygen (¹⁶ O) and neon (²⁰ Ne) ion beams.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An optimization procedure and workflow were devised for spot-scanning hadron arc therapy (SHArc) treatment planning in the PRECISE (PaRticle thErapy using single and Combined Ion optimization StratEgies) treatment planning system (TPS). Physical and biological beam models were developed for helium, carbon, oxygen and neon ions via FLUKA MC simulation. SHArc treatments were optimized using both single ion (¹² C, ¹⁶ O, or ²⁰ Ne) and multi-ion therapy (¹⁶ O+⁴ He or ²⁰ Ne+⁴ He) applying variable relative biological effectiveness (RBE) modeling using a modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) with (α/β)_x values of 2Gy, 5Gy and 3.1Gy respectively, for glioblastoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and prostate adenocarcinoma patient cases. Dose, effective dose, linear energy transfer (LET) and RBE were computed with the GPU-accelerated dose engine FRoG and dosimetric/biophysical attributes were evaluated in the context of conventional particle and photon-based therapies (e.g., volumetric modulated arc therapy [VMAT]).

RESULTS

All SHArc plans met the target optimization goals (3GyRBE) and demonstrated increased target conformity and substantially lower low-dose bath to surrounding normal tissues than VMAT. SHArc plans using a single ion species (¹² C, ¹⁶ O, or ²⁰ Ne) exhibited favorable LET distributions with the highest-LET components centralized in the target volume, with values ranging from ∼80-170keV/μm, ∼130-220keV/μm and ∼180-350keV/μm, for ¹² C, ¹⁶ O, or ²⁰ Ne, respectively, exceeding mean target LET of conventional particle therapy (¹² C:∼60, ¹⁶ O:∼78 ²⁰ Ne:∼100 keV/μm). Multi-ion therapy with SHArc delivery (SHArc_MIT ) provided a similar level of target LET enhancement as SHArc compared to conventional planning, however, with additional benefits of homogenous physical dose and RBE distributions.

CONCLUSION

Here, we demonstrate that arc delivery of light and heavy ion beams, using either a single ion species (¹² C, ¹⁶ O, or ²⁰ Ne) or combining two ions in a single fraction (¹⁶ O+⁴ He or ²⁰ Ne+⁴ He), affords enhanced physical and biological distributions (e.g., LET) compared with conventional delivery with photons or particle beams. SHArc marks the first single and multi-ion arc therapy treatment optimization approach using light and heavy ions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Biological Dose Optimization for Particle Arc Therapy using Helium and Carbon Ions

PURPOSE

To present biological dose optimization for particle arc therapy using helium and carbon ions.

METHODS

Treatment plan planning and optimization procedures were developed for spot-scanning hadron arc (SHArc) delivery using the RayStation TPS and a GPU-accelerated dose engine (^†TPS-XXX). The SHArc optimization algorithm is applicable for charged particle beams and determines angle-dependencies for spot/energy selection with three main initiatives: i) achieve standard clinical optimization goals and constraints for target and OARs, ii) target dose robustness and iii) increasing LET in the target volume. Three patient cases previously treated at the ^†INSTITUTION-XXX were selected for evaluation of conventional versus arc delivery for the two clinical particle beams (helium [⁴He] and carbon [¹²C] ions): glioblastoma, prostate-adenocarcinoma and skull-base chordoma. Biological dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LET_d) distributions for SHArc were evaluated against conventional planning techniques (VMAT and IMPT_2F) applying the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM) for considering bio-effect with (α/β)_x=2Gy. Clinical viability and deliverability were assessed via evaluation of plan quality, robustness and irradiation time.

RESULTS

For all investigated patient cases, SHArc treatment optimizations met planning goals and constraints for target coverage and OARs, exhibiting acceptable target coverage and reduced normal tissue volumes with effective dose >10GyRBE compared to conventional 2F planning. For carbon ions, LET_d was increased in the target volume from ∼40-60keV/µm to ∼80-140keV/µm for SHArc compared to conventional treatments. Favorable LET_d distributions were possible with the SHArc approach, with maximum LET_d in CTV/GTV and potential reductions of high-LET regions in normal tissues and OARs. Compared to VMAT, SHArc affords substantial reductions in normal tissue dose (40-70%).

CONCLUSION

SHArc therapy offers potential treatment benefits such as increased normal tissue sparing from higher doses >10GyRBE, enhanced target LET_d, and potential reduction in high-LET components in OARs. Findings justify further development of robust SHArc treatment planning towards potential clinical translation.

Relative biological effectiveness of single and split helium ion doses in the rat spinal cord increases strongly with linear energy transfer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Determination of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of helium ions as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) for single and split doses using the rat cervical spinal cord as model system for late-responding normal tissue.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The rat cervical spinal cord was irradiated at four different positions within a 6 cm spread-out Bragg-peak (SOBP) (LET 2.9, 9.4, 14.4 and 20.7 keV/µm) using increasing levels of single or split doses of helium ions. Dose-response curves were determined and based on TD₅₀-values (dose at 50% effect probability using paresis II as endpoint), RBE-values were derived for the endpoint of radiation-induced myelopathy.

RESULTS

With increasing LET, RBE-values increased from 1.13 ± 0.04 to 1.42 ± 0.05 (single dose) and 1.12 ± 0.03 to 1.50 ± 0.04 (split doses) as TD₅₀-values decreased from 21.7 ± 0.3 Gy to 17.3 ± 0.3 Gy (single dose) and 30.6 ± 0.3 Gy to 22.9 ± 0.3 Gy (split doses), respectively. RBE-models (LEM I and IV, mMKM) deviated differently for single and split doses but described the RBE variation in the high-LET region sufficiently accurate.

CONCLUSION

This study established the LET-dependence of the RBE for late effects in the central nervous system after single and split doses of helium ions. The results extend the existing database for protons and carbon ions and allow systematic testing of RBE-models. While the RBE-values of helium were generally lower than for carbon ions, the increase at the distal edge of the Bragg-peak was larger than for protons, making detailed RBE-modeling necessary.

Dual-layer spectral CT for proton, helium, and carbon ion beam therapy planning of brain tumors

Pretreatment computed tomography (CT) imaging is an essential component of the particle therapy treatment planning chain. Treatment planning and optimization with charged particles require accurate and precise estimations of ion beam range in tissues, characterized by the stopping power ratio (SPR). Reduction of range uncertainties arising from conventional CT-number-to-SPR conversion based on single-energy CT (SECT) imaging is of importance for improving clinical practice. Here, the application of a novel imaging and computational methodology using dual-layer spectral CT (DLCT) was performed toward refining patient-specific SPR estimates. A workflow for DLCT-based treatment planning was devised to evaluate SPR prediction for proton, helium, and carbon ion beam therapy planning in the brain. DLCT- and SECT-based SPR predictions were compared in homogeneous and heterogeneous anatomical regions. This study included eight patients scanned for diagnostic purposes with a DLCT scanner. For each patient, four different treatment plans were created, simulating tumors in different parts of the brain. For homogeneous anatomical regions, mean SPR differences of about 1% between the DLCT- and SECT-based approaches were found. In plans of heterogeneous anatomies, relative (absolute) proton range shifts of 0.6% (0.4 mm) in the mean and up to 4.4% (2.1 mm) at the distal fall-off were observed. In the investigated cohort, 12% of the evaluated organs-at-risk (OARs) presented differences in mean or maximum dose of more than 0.5 Gy (RBE) and up to 6.8 Gy (RBE) over the entire treatment. Range shifts and dose differences in OARs between DLCT and SECT in helium and carbon ion treatment plans were similar to protons. In the majority of investigated cases (75th percentile), SECT- and DLCT-based range estimations were within 0.6 mm. Nonetheless, the magnitude of patient-specific range deviations between SECT and DLCT was clinically relevant in heterogeneous anatomical sites, suggesting further study in larger, more diverse cohorts. Results indicate that patients with brain tumors may benefit from DLCT-based treatment planning.

FLASH dose-rate helium ion beams: first in vitro investigations

PURPOSE

To establish and investigate the impact of dose, linear energy transfer (LET) and O₂ concentration on biological response to ultra-high dose-rate (uHDR, FLASH) helium ion beams compared to standard dose-rate (SDR) irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Beam delivery settings for raster-scanned helium ions at both uHDR and SDR were tuned to achieve >100 Gy/s and ∼0.1 Gy/s, respectively. For both SDR and uHDR, plan optimization and calibration for 10 × 10mm² fields was performed to assess in vitro response at LET range of 4.5-16 keV/µm. Clonogenic survival assay was conducted at doses ranging from 2 Gy to 12 Gy in two human lung epithelial cell lines (A549 and H1437). Radiation induced nuclear γH2AX foci (RIF) were assessed in both epithelial cell lines and primary human pulmonary fibroblasts.

RESULTS

Average dose-rates achieved were 185 Gy/s and 0.12 Gy/s for uHDR and SDR, respectively. No differences in cellular response to SDR vs. uHDR were observed for all tested doses at 21% O2, as well as at 2 and 4 Gy at 1% O2. In contrast, at 1% O2 and dose threshold of ≳8Gy cell survival was higher and correlated with reduced nuclear γH2AX RIF signal indicating FLASH sparing effect in the investigated cell lines irradiated with uHDR as compared to SDR .

CONCLUSION

The first uHDR delivery of raster-scanned particle beams was achieved using helium ions, reaching FLASH-level dose-rates of >100 Gy/s.  Baseline oxygen levels and delivered dose (≳ 8 Gy) play a pivotal role, irrespective of the studied cell lines, for observation of a sparing effect for helium ions.

Spot-Scanning Hadron Arc (SHArc) Therapy: A Study With Light and Heavy Ions

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical potential of spot-scanning hadron arc (SHArc) therapy with a heavy-ion gantry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A series of in silico studies was conducted via treatment plan optimization in FRoG and the RayStation TPS to compare SHArc therapy against reference plans using conventional techniques with single, parallel-opposed, and 3-field configurations for 3 clinical particle beams (protons [p], helium [4He], and carbon [12C] ions). Tests were performed on water-equivalent cylindrical phantoms for simple targets and clinical-like scenarios with an organ-at-risk in proximity of the target. Effective dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETD) distributions for SHArc were evaluated against conventional planning techniques applying the modified microdosimetric kinetic model for considering bio-effect with (α/β)x = 2 Gy. A model for hypoxia-induced tumor radio-resistance was developed for particle therapy with dependence on oxygen concentration and particle species/energy (Zeff/β)2 to investigate the impact on effective dose.

RESULTS

SHArc plans exhibited similar target coverage with unique treatment attributes and distributions compared with conventional planning, with carbon ions demonstrating the greatest potential for tumor control and normal tissue sparing among the arc techniques. All SHArc plans exhibited a low-dose bath outside the target volume with a reduced maximum dose in normal tissues compared with single, parallel-opposed, and 3-field configuration plans. Moreover, favorable LETD distributions were made possible using the SHArc approach, with maximum LETD in the r = 5 mm tumor core (~8 keVμm-1, ~30 keVμm-1, and ~150 keVμm-1 for p, 4He, and 12C ions, respectively) and reductions of high-LET regions in normal tissues and organs-at-risk compared with static treatment beam delivery.

CONCLUSION

SHArc therapy offers potential treatment benefits such as increased normal tissue sparing. Without explicit consideration of oxygen concentration during treatment planning and optimization, SHArc-C may mitigate tumor hypoxia-induced loss of efficacy. Findings justify further development of robust SHArc treatment planning toward potential clinical translation.