Which FDG/PET parameters of the primary tumors in colon or sigmoid cancer provide the best correlation with the pathological findings?

Radiologic T staging of colon cancer: renewed interest for clinical practice

Radiologic imaging, especially MRI, has long been the mainstay for rectal cancer staging and patient selection for neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection. In contrast, colonoscopy and CT have been the standard for colon cancer diagnosis and metastasis staging with T and N staging often performed at the time of surgical resection. With recent clinical trials exploring the expansion of the use of neoadjuvant therapy beyond the anorectum to the remainder of the colon, the current and future state of colon cancer treatment is evolving with a renewed interest in evaluating the role radiology may play in the primary T staging of colon cancer. The performance of CT, CT colonography, MRI, and FDG PET-CT for colon cancer staging will be reviewed. N staging will also be briefly discussed. It is expected that accurate radiologic T staging will significantly impact future clinical decisions regarding the neoadjuvant versus surgical management of colon cancer.

The metabolic parameters based on volume in PET/CT are associated with clinicopathological N stage of colorectal cancer and can predict prognosis

Background

A combination of positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) is an important modality for the diagnosis of carcinoma. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) have been reported as metabolic parameters in PET/CT since the late 1990s, and they are expected to be useful in diagnosing diverse cancers and as prognostic biomarkers. We evaluated the potential of these parameters in the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) by comparing them with conventional parameters, including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). We enrolled 84 patients who underwent surgery for CRC without distal metastasis between April 2015 and April 2019. SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were measured by ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT. To find an optimal threshold value related to prognosis, the volume of interest in the primary carcinoma was measured at fixed relative and absolute thresholds based on SUVmax (30%, 40%, and 50%; 2.5, 3.0, and 3.5, respectively), tumor-to-liver standardized uptake ratios, TLR (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0), and SUV normalized to lean body mass, SUL (2.0, 2.5, and 3.0). After classifying the patients into two groups according to pathological N stage, the optimal threshold values of all metabolic parameters were compared between groups using a non-parametric comparison test.

Result

The most suitable thresholds for MTV were a SUVmax of 3.5 and a TLR 2.0. TLG with a SUVmax value of 40% showed the most significant difference. The MTV standard uptake ratio of 2.0 was significantly associated with pathological N stage.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that an MTV TLR 2.0 on PET/CT reflects pathological N stage in local patients with CRC.

Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis in PET/CT Correlate With the Pathological Findings of Colorectal Cancer and Allow Its Accurate Staging

INTRODUCTION

PET/CT plays an important role in cancer diagnosis. Recently, novel metabolic parameters in PET/CT such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) have been reported to be diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of various cancers. We evaluated the diagnostic value of these metabolic parameters in colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

The study included 138 patients who underwent surgical resection of CRCs between August 2012 and March 2014. The MTVs and TLGs of tumors were measured using various SUV thresholds. The diagnostic abilities of the metabolic parameters were analyzed using ROC curves and classification and regression trees.

RESULTS

The AUCs of the MTVs and TLGs for predicting T stage (0.881-0.892) were significantly higher than the AUC of the SUVmax (0.824). In the M stage, the AUCs of MTVs and TLGs (0.688-0.723) were significantly higher than that of the SUVmax (0.606). Recursive partitioning applying classification and regression trees demonstrated that the optimal cutoff values of the most important variables for discriminating T, N, and M stages are MTV2.5 = 9.35 and 63.33 mL, TLG50% = 328.1, and TLG50% = 94.81, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Metabolic tumor volumes and TLGs in PET/CT are reliable diagnostic biomarkers. Using these parameters, more accurate preoperative diagnoses for CRC can be made.

Reproducibility and uptake time dependency of volume-based parameters on FDG-PET for lung cancer

Background

Volume-based parameters, such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), on F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) are useful for predicting treatment response in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to examine intra- and inter-operator reproducibility to measure the MTV and TLG, and to estimate their dependency on the uptake time.

Methods

Fifty NSCLC patients underwent preoperative FDG-PET. After an injection of FDG, the whole body was scanned twice: at the early phase (61.4 ± 2.8 min) and delayed phase (117.7 ± 1.6 min). Two operators independently defined the tumor boundary using three different delineation methods: (1) the absolute SUV threshold method (MTV_p and TLG_p; p = 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5), (2) the fixed% SUVmax threshold method (MTV_q% and TLG_q%; q = 35, 40, 45), and (3) the adaptive region-growing method (MTV_ARG and TLG_ARG). Parameters were compared between operators and between phases.

Results

Both the intra- and inter-operator reproducibility were high for all parameters using any method (intra-class correlation > 0.99 each). MTV_3.0 and MTV_3.5 resulted in a significant increase from the early to delayed phase (P < 0.05 for both), whereas MTV_2.0 and MTV_2.5 neither increased nor decreased (P = n.s.). All of the MTV_q% values significantly decreased over time (P < 0.01), whereas MTV_ARG and TLG with any delineation method increased significantly (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

High reproducibility of MTV and TLG was obtained by all of the methods used. MTV_2.0 and MTV_2.5 were the least sensitive to uptake time, and may be good alternatives when we compare images acquired with different uptake times, although applying constant uptake time is important for volume measurement.

Prognostic value of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters differs according to primary tumour location in small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic value of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) parameters for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), according to the primary tumour location, adjusted by conventional prognostic factors.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2013, we enrolled consecutive patients with histologically proven SCLC, who had undergone FDG-PET/CT prior to initial therapy. The primary tumour location was categorized into central or peripheral types. PET parameters and clinical variables were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients were enrolled in this study; 28 of these patients were categorized as having the central type and 41 patients as having the peripheral type. In univariate analysis, stage, serum neuron-specific enolase, whole-body metabolic tumour volume (WB-MTV) and whole-body total lesion glycolysis (WB-TLG) were found to be significant in both types of patients. In multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factor was found to be stage in the central type, but WB-MTV and WB-TLG in the peripheral type. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with peripheral type with limited disease and low WB-MTV or WB-TLG showed significantly better overall survival than all of the other groups (p < 0.0083).

CONCLUSION

The FDG-PET volumetric parameters were demonstrated to be significant and independent prognostic factors in patients with peripheral type of SCLC, while stage was the only independent prognostic factor in patients with central type of SCLC.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

FDG-PET is a non-invasive method that could potentially be used to estimate the prognosis of patients, especially those with peripheral-type SCLC.

Prospective, Multicenter Validation Study of Magnetic Resonance Volumetry for Response Assessment After Preoperative Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer: Can the Results in the Literature be Reproduced?

PURPOSE

To review the available literature on tumor size/volume measurements on magnetic resonance imaging for response assessment after chemoradiotherapy, and validate these cut-offs in an independent multicenter patient cohort.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study included 2 parts. (1) Review of the literature: articles were included that assessed the accuracy of tumor size/volume measurements on magnetic resonance imaging for tumor response assessment. Size/volume cut-offs were extracted; (2) Multicenter validation: extracted cut-offs from the literature were tested in a multicenter cohort (n=146). Accuracies were calculated and compared with reported results from the literature.

RESULTS

The review included 14 articles, in which 3 different measurement methods were assessed: (1) tumor length; (2) 3-dimensonial tumor size; and (3) whole volume. Study outcomes consisted of (1) complete response (ypT0) versus residual tumor; (2) tumor regression grade 1 to 2 versus 3 to 5; and (3) T-downstaging (ypT<cT). In the multicenter cohort, best results were obtained for the validation of the whole-volume measurements, in particular for the outcome ypT0 (accuracy 44%-80%), with the optimal cut-offs being 1.6 cm(3) (after chemoradiation therapy) and a volume reduction of Δ80% to 86.6%. Accuracies for whole-volume measurements to assess tumor regression grade 1 to 2 were 52% to 61%, and for T-downstaging 51% to 57%. Overall accuracies for tumor length ranged between 48% and 53% and for 3D size measurement between 52% and 56%.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance volumetry using whole-tumor volume measurements can be helpful in rectal cancer response assessment with selected cut-off values. Measurements of tumor length or 3-dimensional tumor size are not helpful. Magnetic resonance volumetry is mainly accurate to assess a complete tumor response (ypT0) after chemoradiation therapy (accuracies up to 80%).

Preoperative risk stratification using metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the usefulness of metabolic parameters obtained by (18)F-FDG PET/CT for preoperative stratification of high-risk and low-risk endometrial carcinomas.

METHODS

Preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 56 women with endometrial cancer. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of primary tumours were compared with clinicopathological features of surgical specimens. Diagnostic performance in terms of differentiation of low-risk disease (endometrioid histology, histological grade 1 or 2, invasion of less than half of the myometrium, and FIGO stage I) from high-risk disease was assessed.

RESULTS

MTV and TLG were significantly higher in patients with higher histological grade (p = 0.0026 and p = 0.034), larger tumour size (p = 0.002 and p = 0.0017), lymphovascular space involvement (LVSI; p = 0.012 and p = 0.0051), myometrial invasion (p = 0.027 and p = 0.031), cervical stromal invasion (p = 0.023 and p = 0.014), ovarian metastasis (p = 0.00022 and p = 0.00034), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001), and higher FIGO stage (p = 0.0011 and p = 0.00048). SUVmax was significantly higher in patients with larger tumour size (p = 0.0025), LVSI (p = 0.00023) and myometrial invasion (p < 0.0001). The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) for distinguishing high-risk from low-risk carcinoma were 0.625, 0.829 and 0.797 for SUVmax, MTV and TLG, respectively. AUCs for both MTV and TLG were significantly larger than that for SUVmax (p = 0.0049 and p = 0.021). The optimal TLG cut-off value of 70.2, determined by ROC analysis, was found to have 72.0% sensitivity and 74.2% specificity for risk stratification.

CONCLUSION

MTV and TLG of primary endometrial cancer show better correlations with clinicopathological features and are more useful for differentiating high-risk from low-risk carcinoma than SUVmax.