Comparison of multiplexed sensitivity encoding and single-shot echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver

Evaluation of multiplexed sensitivity encoding diffusion-weighted imaging in detecting uterine lesions: Image quality optimization

PURPOSE

To compare the image quality of multiplexed sensitivity-encoding diffusion-weighted imaging (MUSE-DWI) and single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI-DWI) techniques in uterine MRI.

METHODS

Eighty-eight eligible patients underwent MUSE-DWI and SS-EPI-DWI examinations simultaneously using a 3.0 T MRI system. Two radiologists independently performed quantitative and qualitative analysis of the two groups of images using a double-blind method. The weighted Kappa test was used to evaluate the interobserver agreement. Wilcoxon's rank sum test was used for qualitative parameters, and paired t-test was used for quantitative parameters. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to obtained correlation between pathological results and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value.

RESULTS

The qualitative and quantitative analysis of the images by the two radiologists were in good or excellent agreement, with weighted kappa value ranging from 0.636 to 0.981. The scores of total subjective image quality (15.4 ± 0.99) and signal-to-noise ratio (158.99 ± 60.71) of MUSE-DWI were significantly higher than those of SS-EPI-DWI (12.93 ± 1.62 P < 0.001; 130.23 ± 48.29 P < 0.05). It effectively reduced image distortion and artifact, and had better lesion conspicuity. There was no significant difference in contrast-to-noise ratio score and average ADC values between the two DWI sequences. The average ADC values of the two DWI sequences were highest in the normal uterus group and lowest in the endometrial cancer group, with statistically significant differences among groups (P < 0.01). In addition, the average ADC values of the two DWI sequences were negatively correlated with the type of lesions, decreasing with the malignancy of the lesions (r = -0.805 P < 0.01, r = -0.815 P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared to SS-EPI-DWI, MUSE-DWI can significantly reduce distortion, artifacts, and fuzziness in MRI of uterine lesions, which is more conducive to lesion detection.

Improved reconstruction for highly accelerated propeller diffusion 1.5 T clinical MRI

PURPOSE

Propeller fast-spin-echo diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (FSE-dMRI) is essential for the diagnosis of Cholesteatoma. However, at clinical 1.5 T MRI, its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) remains relatively low. To gain sufficient SNR, signal averaging (number of excitations, NEX) is usually used with the cost of prolonged scan time. In this work, we leveraged the benefits of Locally Low Rank (LLR) constrained reconstruction to enhance the SNR. Furthermore, we enhanced both the speed and SNR by employing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for the accelerated PROPELLER FSE-dMRI on a 1.5 T clinical scanner.

METHODS

Residual U-Net (RU-Net) was found to be efficient for propeller FSE-dMRI data. It was trained to predict 2-NEX images obtained by Locally Low Rank (LLR) constrained reconstruction and used 1-NEX images obtained via simplified reconstruction as the inputs. The brain scans from healthy volunteers and patients with cholesteatoma were performed for model training and testing. The performance of trained networks was evaluated with normalized root-mean-square-error (NRMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and peak SNR (PSNR).

RESULTS

For 4 × under-sampled with 7 blades data, online reconstruction appears to provide suboptimal images-some small details are missing due to high noise interferences. Offline LLR enables suppression of noises and discovering some small structures. RU-Net demonstrated further improvement compared to LLR by increasing 18.87% of PSNR, 2.11% of SSIM, and reducing 53.84% of NRMSE. Moreover, RU-Net is about 1500 × faster than LLR (0.03 vs. 47.59 s/slice).

CONCLUSION

The LLR remarkably enhances the SNR compared to online reconstruction. Moreover, RU-Net improves propeller FSE-dMRI as reflected in PSNR, SSIM, and NRMSE. It requires only 1-NEX data, which allows a 2 × scan time reduction. In addition, its speed is approximately 1500 times faster than that of LLR-constrained reconstruction.

Improved Value of Multiplexed Sensitivity Encoding DWI with Reversed Polarity Gradients in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer: A Comparison Study with Single-Shot DWI and MUSE DWI

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the value of multiplexed sensitivity encoding with reversed polarity gradients in improving the quality of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) images of the prostate and the diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-three patients with prostate disease underwent multiplexed sensitivity encoding with reversed polarity gradients (RPG-MUSE), multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE), and single-shot echo-planar imaging (ssEPI) DWI. Three radiologists performed a qualitative image analysis of the three DWI sequences. Qualitative image analysis included artifact minimization, anatomical detail, and sharpness of prostate edges. Two radiologists measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), geometric distortion rate, and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the prostate disease tissue. Two radiologists jointly performed Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scoring of prostate lesions and compared the diagnostic efficacy of the three DWI sequences for prostate cancer.

RESULTS

There was good agreement among radiologists in the evaluation and measurement of the three DWI sequence images (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.75, P < 0.05). The RPG-MUSE DWI images were rated higher than those of MUSE and ssEPI in terms of artifact minimization, anatomical details, and sharpness of prostate edges (P < 0.05). The SNR and CNR of the RPG-MUSE DWI images were higher than those of MUSE and ssEPI (P < 0.05), and the geometric distortion rate was lower than that of the other two sequences (P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in ADC values between the three DWI sequences (P > 0.05). The diagnostic efficacy of RPG-MUSE and MUSE DWI was higher than that of ssEPI (P < 0.017).

CONCLUSION

RPG-MUSE can reduce the artifacts and geometric distortion in DWI images of the prostate, improve the SNR and CNR of the images, improve the clarity of anatomical details and boundaries without affecting the measurement of ADC values, has the potential to improve the diagnostic efficacy of prostate lesions, and facilitates the clear display and accurate assessment of prostate lesions.

Multiplexed sensitivity-encoding versus single-shot echo-planar imaging: a comparative study for diffusion-weighted imaging of the thyroid lesions

PURPOSE

To compare multiplexed sensitivity-encoding diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MUSE-DWI) and conventional DWI (cDWI) techniques in thyroid MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nineteen patients who underwent thyroid MRI using both MUSE-DWI and cDWI at a 3.0 T MRI system were enrolled. Qualitative parameters (image quality, thyroid contour, and lesion conspicuity) and quantitative parameters (signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lesion-to-thyroid contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)) were compared between the two sequences. In addition, ADC values derived from MUSE-DWI and cDWI were separately compared between benign and malignant lesions.

RESULTS

MUSE-DWI outperformed cDWI in terms of image quality, thyroid contour, and lesion conspicuity. Significantly, higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in both the thyroid and its lesion were found in MUSE-DWI than those in cDWI (both P < 0.05). The lesion-to-thyroid contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values were also significantly higher in MUSE-DWI than those in cDWI (P < 0.05). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the thyroid in MUSE-DWI was significantly lower than that in cDWI (P < 0.05). The ADC of the lesion in MUSE-DWI was also significantly lower than that in cDWI (P < 0.05). In addition, ADC values derived from MUSE-DWI and cDWI were significantly higher in benign lesions than malignant lesions (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with cDWI, MUSE-DWI can improve the image quality, thyroid contour sharpness, lesion conspicuity, SNR in both the thyroid and its lesions, and enhancing the CNR between lesions and thyroid.

Multiparametric MRI for Staging of Bowel Inflammatory Activity in Crohn's Disease with MUSE-IVIM and DCE-MRI: A Preliminary Study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate if the combination of multishot diffusion imaging-based multiplexed sensitivity encoding intravoxel incoherent motion (MUSE-IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is feasible for staging Crohn's disease (CD) activity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 65 CD patients were enrolled and analyzed in this retrospective study. The simplified endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) and magnetic resonance index of activity (MaRIA) were used as the reference. The MUSE-IVIM and DCE-MRI data were acquired at 3.0-T MRI scanner and processed by two radiologists. Three MUSE-IVIM parameters: fast apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCfast), slow apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCslow), and the fractional perfusion (Fraction of ADCfast), as well as four DCE-MRI parameters: volume transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (Kep), extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve), and plasma volume fraction (Vp) were generated. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), non-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis H and Mann-Whitney U), logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis, Delong test, and Spearman's correlation test were performed.

RESULTS

According to SES-CD, 116 ileocolonic segments with CD lesions were identified as: inactive, mild, and moderate to severe. With multivariable logistic regression analysis, ADCfast (p < 0.001), Fraction of ADCfast (p = 0.005), Ktrans (p < 0.001) and Kep (p = 0.003) were identified as significant factors for differentiating among the three groups. Binary logistic analyses identified ADCfast (p = 0.001), Ktrans (p = 0.014), and Kep (p = 0.029) as independent predictors for the active status. The combination of ADCfast, Ktrans, and Kep performed better than MaRIA score (p = 0.028), for differentiating inactive and active status. MaRIA score was positively correlated with ADCfast (p < 0.001), Ktrans (p < 0.001), Kep (p < 0.001), and Ve (p = 0.001), however, negatively correlated with Fraction of ADCfast (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combination of MUSE-IVIM and DCE-MRI has been demonstrated to accurately stage inflammatory activity in CD.

High-resolution Diffusion-weighted Imaging of the Prostate Using Multiplexed Sensitivity-encoding: Comparison with the Conventional and Reduced Field-of-view Techniques

PURPOSE

To compare objective and subjective image quality, lesion conspicuity, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of high-resolution multiplexed sensitivity-encoding diffusion-weighted imaging (MUSE-DWI) with conventional DWI (c-DWI) and reduced FOV DWI (rFOV-DWI) in prostate MRI.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients who underwent prostate MRI, including c-DWI, rFOV-DWI, and MUSE-DWI, were retrospectively evaluated. SNR and ADC of normal prostate tissue and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and ADC of prostate cancer (PCa) were measured and compared between the three sequences. Image quality and lesion conspicuity were independently graded by two radiologists using a 5-point scale and compared between the three sequences.

RESULTS

The SNR of normal prostate tissue was significantly higher with rFOV-DWI than with the other two DWI techniques (P ≤ 0.01). The CNR of the PCa was significantly higher with rFOV-DWI than with MUSE-DWI (P < 0.05). The ADC of normal prostate tissue measured by rFOV-DWI was lower than that measured by MUSE-DWI and c-DWI (P < 0.01), while there was no difference in the ADC of cancers. In the qualitative analysis, MUSE-DWI showed significantly higher scores than rFOV-DWI and c-DWI for visibility of anatomy and overall image quality in both readers, and significantly higher scores for distortion in one of the two readers (P < 0.001). There was no difference in lesion conspicuity between the three sequences.

CONCLUSION

High-resolution MUSE-DWI showed higher image quality and reduced distortion compared to c-DWI, while maintaining a wide FOV and similar ADC quantification, although no difference in lesion conspicuity was observed.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for evaluating myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: a comparison of MUSE-DWI, rFOV-DWI, and DCE-MRI

OBJECTIVES

To compare the image quality of high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) versus reduced field-of-view (rFOV) techniques in endometrial cancer (EC) and to compare the diagnostic performance of these techniques with that of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI for assessing myometrial invasion of EC.

METHODS

MUSE-DWI and rFOV-DWI were obtained preoperatively in 58 women with EC. Three radiologists assessed the image quality of MUSE-DWI and rFOV-DWI. For 55 women who underwent DCE-MRI, the same radiologists assessed the superficial and deep myometrial invasion using MUSE-DWI, rFOV-DWI, and DCE-MRI. Qualitative scores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Artifacts, sharpness, lesion conspicuity, and overall quality were significantly better with MUSE-DWI than with rFOV-DWI (p < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of MUSE-DWI, rFOV-DWI, and DCE-MRI for the assessment of myometrial invasion were not significantly different except for significantly higher AUC of MUSE-DWI than that of DCE-MRI for superficial myometrial invasion (0.76 for MUSE-DWI and 0.64 for DCE-MRI, p = 0.049) and for deep myometrial invasion (0.92 for MUSE-DWI and 0.80 for DCE-MRI, p = 0.022) in one observer, and that of rFOV-DWI for deep myometrial invasion in another observer (0.96 for MUSE-DWI and 0.89 for rFOV-MRI, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

MUSE-DWI exhibits better image quality than rFOV-DWI. MUSE-DWI and rFOV-DWI shows almost equivalent diagnostic performance compared to DCE-MRI for assessing superficial and deep myometrial invasion in EC although MUSE-DWI may be helpful for some radiologists.

MRI: Evaluating the Application of FOCUS-MUSE Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Pancreas in Comparison With FOCUS, MUSE, and Single-Shot DWIs

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a useful technique to detect pancreatic lesion. In DWIs, field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot (FOCUS) can improve the spatial resolution and multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE) can gain a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Based on the advantage of FOCUS and MUSE, a new DWI sequence-named FOCUS-MUSE DWI (FOCUS combined with MUSE)-was developed to delineate the pancreas.

PURPOSE

To investigate the reliability of FOCUS-MUSE DWI compared to FOCUS, MUSE and single-shot (SS) DWI via the systematical evaluation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, SNR and image quality.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

A total of 33 healthy volunteers and 9 patients with pancreatic lesion.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T scanner. FOCUS-MUSE DWI, FOCUS DWI, MUSE DWI, SS DWI.

ASSESSMENT

For volunteers, ADC and SNR were measured by two readers in the pancreatic head, body, and tail. For all subjects, the diagnostic image quality score was assessed by three other readers on above four DWIs.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired-sample T-test, intraclass correlation (ICC), Bland-Altman method, Friedman test, Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc test and kappa coefficient. A significance level of 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

FOCUS-MUSE DWI had the best intersession repeatability of ADC measurements (head: 59.53, body: 101.64, tail: 42.30) among the four DWIs, and also maintained the significantly highest SNR (reader 1 [head: 19.68 ± 3.23, body: 23.42 ± 5.00, tail: 28.85 ± 4.96], reader 2 [head: 19.93 ± 3.52, body: 23.02 ± 5.69, tail: 29.77 ± 6.33]) except for MUSE DWI. Furthermore, it significantly achieved better image quality in volunteers (median value: 4 score) and 9 patients (most in 4 score).

DATA CONCLUSION

FOCUS-MUSE DWI improved the reliability of pancreatic images with the most stable ADC measurement, best image quality score and sufficient SNR among four DWIs.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

The Value of CT Perfusion Parameters and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the malignant tumors with the highest incidence in the world. According to the latest statistics of the National Cancer Center, the incidence of liver cancer ranks fifth in malignant tumors and its mortality rate ranks second in China, which seriously threatens people' s life and health.

Aim

To investigate the value of CT perfusion parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

43 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and 40 patients with hepatic hemangioma treated in our hospital from August 2018 to August 2021 were selected for CT perfusion imaging and MRI examination.

Results

The liver blood flow (BF), liver blood volume (BV), and hepatic artery perfusion (HAP) in the hepatocellular carcinoma group were (267.38 ± 35.59) ml/(min·100 g), (30.20 ± 8.82) ml/100 g, and (0.64 ± 0.10) ml/(min·ml), respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the hepatic hemangioma group (p < 0.05). The ADC value of hepatocellular carcinoma DWI sequence was (1.20 ± 0.17) ×10⁻³ mm², which was significantly lower than that of hepatic hemangioma (p < 0.05). The area under ROC curve of BF, BV, HAP, and ADC values for hepatocellular carcinoma was 0.860, 0.754, 0.804, and 0.890, respectively. The area under ROC curve of the four groups was compared (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

CT perfusion parameters BF, BV, HAP, and DWI sequence ADC values have certain application value in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma, and there is no significant difference between the diagnostic value of each parameter.