Comparing the clinical utility of single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver at 3 tesla

Deep learning-based compressed SENSE improved diffusion-weighted image quality and liver cancer detection: A prospective study

PURPOSE

To assess whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with Compressed SENSE (CS) and deep learning (DL-CS-DWI) can improve image quality and lesion detection in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

This single-center prospective study enrolled consecutive at-risk participants who underwent 3.0 T gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. Conventional DWI was acquired using parallel imaging (PI) with SENSE (PI-DWI). In CS-DWI and DL-CS-DWI, CS but not PI with SENSE was used to accelerate the scan with 2.5 as the acceleration factor. Qualitative and quantitative image quality were independently assessed by two masked reviewers, and were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The detection rates of clinically-relevant (LR-4/5/M based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018) liver lesions for each DWI sequence were independently evaluated by another two masked reviewers against their consensus assessments based on all available non-DWI sequences, and were compared by the McNemar test.

RESULTS

67 participants (median age, 58.0 years; 56 males) with 197 clinically-relevant liver lesions were enrolled. Among the three DWI sequences, DL-CS-DWI showed the best qualitative and quantitative image qualities (p range, <0.001-0.039). For clinically-relevant liver lesions, the detection rates (91.4%-93.4%) of DL-CS-DWI showed no difference with CS-DWI (87.3%-89.8%, p = 0.230-0.231) but were superior to PI-DWI (82.7%-85.8%, p = 0.015-0.025). For lesions located in the hepatic dome, DL-CS-DWI demonstrated the highest detection rates (94.8%-97.4% vs 76.9%-79.5% vs 64.1%-69.2%, p = 0.002-0.045) among the three DWI sequences.

CONCLUSION

In patients at high-risk for HCC, DL-CS-DWI improved image quality and detection for clinically-relevant liver lesions, especially for the hepatic dome.

Diffusion weighted imaging combining respiratory triggering and navigator echo tracking in the upper abdomen

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a new motion correction method, named RT + NV Track, for upper abdominal DWI that combines the respiratory triggering (RT) method using a respiration sensor and the Navigator Track (NV Track) method using navigator echoes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To evaluate image quality acquired upper abdominal DWI and ADC images with RT, NV, and RT + NV Track in 10 healthy volunteers and 35 patients, signal-to-noise efficiency (SNRefficiency) and the coefficient of variation (CV) of ADC values were measured. Five radiologists independently performed qualitative image-analysis assessments.

RESULTS

RT + NV Track showed significantly higher SNRefficiency than RT and NV (14.01 ± 4.86 vs 12.05 ± 4.65, 10.05 ± 3.18; p < 0.001, p < 0.001). RT + NV Track was superior to RT and equal or better quality than NV in CV and visual evaluation of ADC values (0.033 ± 0.018 vs 0.080 ± 0.042, 0.057 ± 0.034; p < 0.001, p < 0.001). RT + NV Track tends to acquire only expiratory data rather than NV, even in patients with relatively rapid breathing, and can correct for respiratory depth variations, a weakness of RT, thus minimizing image quality degradation.

CONCLUSION

The RT + NV Track method is an efficient imaging method that combines the advantages of both RT and NV methods in upper abdominal DWI, providing stably good images in a short scan time.

Liver metastases: The role of magnetic resonance imaging

The liver is one of the organs most commonly involved in metastatic disease, especially due to its unique vascularization. It's well known that liver metastases represent the most common hepatic malignant tumors. From a practical point of view, it's of utmost importance to evaluate the presence of liver metastases when staging oncologic patients, to select the best treatment possible, and finally to predict the overall prognosis. In the past few years, imaging techniques have gained a central role in identifying liver metastases, thanks to ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All these techniques, especially CT and MRI, can be considered the non-invasive reference standard techniques for the assessment of liver involvement by metastases. On the other hand, the liver can be affected by different focal lesions, sometimes benign, and sometimes malignant. On these bases, radiologists should face the differential diagnosis between benign and secondary lesions to correctly allocate patients to the best management. Considering the above-mentioned principles, it's extremely important to underline and refresh the broad spectrum of liver metastases features that can occur in everyday clinical practice. This review aims to summarize the most common imaging features of liver metastases, with a special focus on typical and atypical appearance, by using MRI.

MRI: Evaluating the Application of FOCUS-MUSE Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Pancreas in Comparison With FOCUS, MUSE, and Single-Shot DWIs

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a useful technique to detect pancreatic lesion. In DWIs, field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot (FOCUS) can improve the spatial resolution and multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE) can gain a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Based on the advantage of FOCUS and MUSE, a new DWI sequence-named FOCUS-MUSE DWI (FOCUS combined with MUSE)-was developed to delineate the pancreas.

PURPOSE

To investigate the reliability of FOCUS-MUSE DWI compared to FOCUS, MUSE and single-shot (SS) DWI via the systematical evaluation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, SNR and image quality.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

A total of 33 healthy volunteers and 9 patients with pancreatic lesion.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T scanner. FOCUS-MUSE DWI, FOCUS DWI, MUSE DWI, SS DWI.

ASSESSMENT

For volunteers, ADC and SNR were measured by two readers in the pancreatic head, body, and tail. For all subjects, the diagnostic image quality score was assessed by three other readers on above four DWIs.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Paired-sample T-test, intraclass correlation (ICC), Bland-Altman method, Friedman test, Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc test and kappa coefficient. A significance level of 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

FOCUS-MUSE DWI had the best intersession repeatability of ADC measurements (head: 59.53, body: 101.64, tail: 42.30) among the four DWIs, and also maintained the significantly highest SNR (reader 1 [head: 19.68 ± 3.23, body: 23.42 ± 5.00, tail: 28.85 ± 4.96], reader 2 [head: 19.93 ± 3.52, body: 23.02 ± 5.69, tail: 29.77 ± 6.33]) except for MUSE DWI. Furthermore, it significantly achieved better image quality in volunteers (median value: 4 score) and 9 patients (most in 4 score).

DATA CONCLUSION

FOCUS-MUSE DWI improved the reliability of pancreatic images with the most stable ADC measurement, best image quality score and sufficient SNR among four DWIs.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Performance of Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging in Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Rat Sciatic Nerve Compared With Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging

Objectives

To compare the performances of single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS–EPI) and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RS–EPI) for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the rat sciatic nerve.

Methods

Eight healthy adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized and scanned with a 3T MRI scanner using SS–EPI and RS–EPI DTI sequences. The image quality in terms of the morphology of the nerve, distortions of the nearby femur, muscles, and homogeneity of neuromuscular were evaluated and scored. The correlations between the DTI parameters including fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and histopathological parameters were calculated by using the Pearson correlation coefficient and compared by the modified Fisher Z-transform, respectively.

Results

The quality scores were higher for the images from the SS–EPI sequence compared with the RS–EPI sequence for characteristics such as sharpness of the sciatic nerve margin (P = 0.008), artifacts of the sciatic nerve (P = 0.008), and homogeneity of the neuromuscular region (P = 0.007), as well as the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of DW images (P < 0.001). The correlation coefficients were higher for the FA and RD values from the SS–EPI sequence compared with those from the RS–EPI sequence. Furthermore, the correlation coefficients between FA and myelin thickness (P = 0.027), FA and diameter of the myelinated fiber (P = 0.036), as well as RD and myelin thickness (P = 0.05) were statistically higher for the SS–EPI sequence compared with those for the RS–EPI sequence.

Conclusion

Diffusion tensor imaging analysis of the rat sciatic nerve showed that the image quality from the SS–EPI sequence was significantly higher compared with that from the RS–EPI sequence. Furthermore, the FA and RD derived from the SS–EPI sequence are promising and sensitive biomarkers to detect the histopathological changes in the rat sciatic nerve.