1
|
Zhou J, Wang J, Wang W, Sun L, Zhao S, Sun Q, Wang D. Pathological Complete Response Achieved with XELOX Chemotherapy, HIPEC, and Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Stage IV Gastric Adenocarcinoma with Peritoneal Metastasis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024:10.1007/s12029-024-01056-0. [PMID: 38676903 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01056-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The detection rates of early gastric cancer (GC) in China are approximately 20%; upon diagnosis, the majority of patients with GC are identified as having advanced stage disease, and in some cases, even metastatic advanced GC. Currently, the optimal treatment strategy for peritoneal metastasis (PM) in GC remains uncertain, and pathological complete response (pCR) is rare following conversion therapy. CASE PRESENTATION This case report details the management of a 66-year-old patient diagnosed with advanced stage IVB (T4N2M1c) adenocarcinomas of the gastric cardia with PM who received multimodal therapy comprised of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), XELOX chemotherapy, and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) therapy followed by radical gastrectomy. Through the multimodal management, the patient attained PCR and experienced long-term survival. CONCLUSION The conversion therapy protocol combined with HIPEC, XELOX chemotherapy, and anti-PD-1 therapy and our scientific, accurate, full-course management strategy may be propagable for potentially curing patients with advanced GC with PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiajie Zhou
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital , Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Longhe Sun
- Clinical Medical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
- The Forth People's Hospital of Taizhou, Taizhou, 225300, China
| | - Shuai Zhao
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital , Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Qiannan Sun
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Daorong Wang
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital , Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou, 225001, China.
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, 225001, China.
- Yangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Clinical Transformation of Digestive and Metabolic Disease, Yangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gurusamy K, Leung J, Vale C, Roberts D, Linden A, Tan XW, Taribagil P, Patel S, Pizzo E, Davidson B, Saunders M, Aziz O, O'Dwyer ST. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy for people with peritoneal metastases from colorectal, ovarian or gastric origin: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 2024. [PMID: 38658171 DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is uncertainty in the relative benefits and harms of hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) when added to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) +/- systemic chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone in people with peritoneal metastases from colorectal, gastric, or ovarian cancers. METHODS We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the medical literature until April 14, 2022 and applied methods used for high-quality systematic reviews. FINDINGS We included a total of eight RCTs (seven RCTs included in quantitative analysis as one RCT did not provide data in an analyzable format). All comparisons other than ovarian cancer contained only one trial. For gastric cancer, there is high uncertainty about the effect of CRS + HIPEC + systemic chemotherapy. For stage III or greater epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery, CRS + HIPEC + systemic chemotherapy probably decreases all-cause mortality compared to CRS + systemic chemotherapy. For colorectal cancer, CRS + HIPEC + systemic chemotherapy probably results in little to no difference in all-cause mortality and may increase the serious adverse events proportions compared to CRS +/- systemic chemotherapy, but probably decreases all-cause mortality compared to fluorouracil-based systemic chemotherapy alone. INTERPRETATION The role of CRS + HIPEC in gastric peritoneal metastases is uncertain. CRS + HIPEC should be standard of care in women with stage III or greater epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval CRS. CRS + systemic chemotherapy should be standard of care for people with colorectal peritoneal metastases, with HIPEC given only as part of a RCT focusing on subgroups and regimes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42019130504.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark Saunders
- The Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Omer Aziz
- The Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Cancer Studies, University of Manchester, London, UK
| | - Sarah T O'Dwyer
- The Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Division of Cancer Studies, University of Manchester, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ryu HS, Kim HJ, Ji WB, Kim BC, Kim JH, Moon SK, Kang SI, Kwak HD, Kim ES, Kim CH, Kim TH, Noh GT, Park BS, Park HM, Bae JM, Bae JH, Seo NE, Song CH, Ahn MS, Eo JS, Yoon YC, Yoon JK, Lee KH, Lee KH, Lee KY, Lee MS, Lee SH, Lee JM, Lee JE, Lee HH, Ihn MH, Jang JH, Jeon SK, Chae KJ, Choi JH, Pyo DH, Ha GW, Han KS, Hong YK, Hong CW, Kwak JM. Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Ann Coloproctol 2024; 40:89-113. [PMID: 38712437 PMCID: PMC11082542 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2024.00059.0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients' values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyo Seon Ryu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Cochrane Collaboration, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woong Bae Ji
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
| | - Byung Chang Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ji Hun Kim
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Kyung Moon
- Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Il Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Han Deok Kwak
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eun Sun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Hyun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Tae Hyung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyoung Tae Noh
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Soo Park
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Hyeung-Min Park
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Jeong Mo Bae
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Hoon Bae
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ni Eun Seo
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Hoon Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Mi Sun Ahn
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jae Seon Eo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Chul Yoon
- Department of General Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joon-Kee Yoon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Kyung Ha Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Kyung Hee Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Kil-Yong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
| | - Myung Su Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hak Lee
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Min Lee
- Department of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Ji Eun Lee
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Han Hee Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Myong Hoon Ihn
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Je-Ho Jang
- Department of Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sun Kyung Jeon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kum Ju Chae
- Department of Radiology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Jin-Ho Choi
- Center for Lung Cancer, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Dae Hee Pyo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi Won Ha
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Kyung Su Han
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Young Ki Hong
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chang Won Hong
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jung-Myun Kwak
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Korean Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary Committee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Cochrane Collaboration, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of General Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Daejeon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea
- Center for Lung Cancer, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yao L, Shao H, Zhang X, Huang X. A novel risk model for predicting peritoneal metastasis in colorectal cancer based on the SEER database. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:15989-16000. [PMID: 37679653 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05368-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early detection and intervention could significantly improve the prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM). Our main purpose was to develop a model to predict the risk of PM in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with CRC classified according to the AJCC 8th TNM staging system were selected for the study. After data pre-processing, the dataset was divided into a training set and a validation set. In the training set, univariate logistic analysis and stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis were utilized to screen clinical features and construct a risk prediction model. Then, we validated the model using the confusion matrix, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves to examine its performance. RESULTS The model constructed using stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporated the following eight clinical features: age, tumor location, histological type, T stage, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor deposits (TDs), log odds (LODDS) of metastatic lymph nodes, and extraperitoneal metastasis (EM). The areas under the curve (AUCs) of the model in the training and validation sets were 0.924 and 0.912, respectively. The accuracy and the recall ratio were higher than 0.8 in both cohorts. DCA and the calibration curves also confirmed its excellent predictive power. CONCLUSIONS Our model can effectively predict the risk of PM in CRC patients, which is of great significance for the timely identification of patients at high risk of PM and further clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Number 54, Youdian Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Huan Shao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Number 54, Youdian Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xinyi Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Number 54, Youdian Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xuan Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Number 54, Youdian Road, Shangcheng District, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Allan Z, Witts S, Tie J, Tebbutt N, Clemons NJ, Liu DS. The prognostic impact of peritoneal tumour DNA in gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies: a systematic review. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1717-1726. [PMID: 37700064 PMCID: PMC10667497 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02424-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases from various abdominal cancer types are common and carry poor prognosis. The presence of peritoneal disease upstages cancer diagnosis and alters disease trajectory and treatment pathway in many cancer types. Therefore, accurate and timely detection of peritoneal disease is crucial. The current practice of diagnostic laparoscopy and peritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) in detecting peritoneal disease has variable sensitivity. The significant proportion of peritoneal recurrence seen during follow-up in patients where initial PLC was negative indicates the ongoing need for a better diagnostic tool for detecting clinically occult peritoneal disease, especially peritoneal micro-metastases. Advancement in liquid biopsy has allowed the development and use of peritoneal tumour DNA (ptDNA) as a cancer-specific biomarker within the peritoneum, and the presence of ptDNA may be a surrogate marker for early peritoneal metastases. A growing body of literature on ptDNA in different cancer types portends promising results. Here, we conduct a systematic review to evaluate the prognostic impact of ptDNA in various cancer types and discuss its potential future clinical applications, with a focus on gastrointestinal and gynaecological malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zexi Allan
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia.
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia.
| | - Sasha Witts
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Niall Tebbutt
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| | - Nicholas J Clemons
- Division of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - David S Liu
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
- General and Gastrointestinal Surgery Research and Trials Group, The University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hernandez Dominguez O, Yilmaz S, Steele SR. Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Management and Treatment. J Clin Med 2023; 12. [PMID: 36902858 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12052072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Up to 50% of patients with CRC develop metastatic CRC (mCRC). Surgical and systemic therapy advances can now offer significant survival advantages. Understanding the evolving treatment options is essential for decreasing mCRC mortality. We aim to summarize current evidence and guidelines regarding the management of mCRC to provide utility when making a treatment plan for the heterogenous spectrum of mCRC. (2) Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and current guidelines written by major cancer and surgical societies were reviewed. The references of the included studies were screened to identify additional studies that were incorporated as appropriate. (3) Results: The standard of care for mCRC primarily consists of surgical resection and systemic therapy. Complete resection of liver, lung, and peritoneal metastases is associated with better disease control and survival. Systemic therapy now includes chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy options that can be tailored by molecular profiling. Differences between colon and rectal metastasis management exist between major guidelines. (4) Conclusions: With the advances in surgical and systemic therapy, as well as a better understanding of tumor biology and the importance of molecular profiling, more patients can anticipate prolonged survival. We provide a summary of available evidence for the management of mCRC, highlighting the similarities and presenting the difference in available literature. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with mCRC is crucial to selecting the appropriate pathway.
Collapse
|
7
|
Di Carlo S, Cavallaro G, La Rovere F, Usai V, Siragusa L, Izzo P, Izzo L, Fassari A, Izzo S, Franceschilli M, Rossi P, Dhimolea S, Fiori E, Sibio S. Synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: Is cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with liver resection a feasible option? Front Surg 2022; 9:1006591. [PMID: 36589624 PMCID: PMC9797824 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1006591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Traditionally, synchronous liver resection (LR), cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases have been contraindicated. Nowadays, clinical practice has promoted this aggressive treatment in selected cases. This study aimed to review surgical and survival results of an extensive surgical approach including CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and LR. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were matched to find the available literature on this topic. The search period was limited to 10 years (January 2010-January 2021). A threshold of case series of 10 patients or more was applied. Results In the search period, out of 114 studies found about liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer, we found 18 papers matching the inclusion criteria. Higher morbidity and mortality were reported for patients who underwent such an extensive surgical approach when compared with patients who underwent only cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Also, survival rates seem worse in the former than in the latter. Conclusion The role of combined surgical strategy in patients with synchronous liver and peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer remains controversial. Survival rates and morbidity and mortality seem not in favor of this option. A more accurate selection of patients and more restrictive surgical indications could perhaps help improve results in this subgroup of patients with limited curative options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Di Carlo
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Cavallaro
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca La Rovere
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Usai
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Leandro Siragusa
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Luciano Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Fassari
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Izzo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marzia Franceschilli
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Piero Rossi
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Sirvjo Dhimolea
- Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Fiori
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Sibio
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Oncologic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy,Correspondence: Simone Sibio
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wintjens AGWE, Simkens GA, Fransen PPKH, Serafras N, Lenaerts K, Franssen GHLM, de Hingh IHJT, Dankers PYW, Bouvy ND, Peeters A. Intraperitoneal drug delivery systems releasing cytostatic agents to target gastro-intestinal peritoneal metastases in laboratory animals: a systematic review. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:541-579. [PMID: 35737252 PMCID: PMC9338897 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10173-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
For peritoneal metastases (PM), there are few curative treatment options, and they are only available for a select patient group. Recently, new therapies have been developed to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy for a prolonged period, suitable for a larger patient group. These drug delivery systems (DDSs) seem promising in the experimental setting. Many types of DDSs have been explored in a variety of animal models, using different cytostatics. This review aimed to provide an overview of animal studies using DDSs containing cytostatics for the treatment of gastro-intestinal PM and identify the most promising therapeutic combinations. The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) guidelines. The 35 studies included revealed similar results: using a cytostatic-loaded DDS to treat PM resulted in a higher median survival time (MST) and a lower intraperitoneal tumor load compared to no treatment or treatment with a ‘free’ cytostatic or an unloaded DDS. In 65% of the studies, the MST was significantly longer and in 24% the tumor load was significantly lower in the animals treated with cytostatic-loaded DDS. The large variety of experimental setups made it impossible to identify the most promising DDS-cytostatic combination. In most studies, the risk of bias was unclear due to poor reporting. Future studies should focus more on improving the clinical relevance of the experiments, standardizing the experimental study setup, and improving their methodological quality and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne G W E Wintjens
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Narcis Serafras
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kaatje Lenaerts
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gregor H L M Franssen
- Department of Education, Content & Support, University Library, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia Y W Dankers
- Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole D Bouvy
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Peeters
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li J, Wang AR, Chen XD, Zhang YX, Pan H, Li SQ. Effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in combination with cytoreductive surgery on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:200. [PMID: 35701802 PMCID: PMC9195265 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02666-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Peritoneal metastasis often occurs in patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, and the prognosis is poor. A large body of evidence highlights the beneficial effects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on survival, but to date, there is little consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of CRS + HIPEC on survival and provide reference for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened from inception of the review to March 11, 2022. Ten studies were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. Results A total of 3200 patients were enrolled in the study, including 788 patients in the CRS and HIPEC groups and 2412 patients in the control group, of which 3 were randomized controlled trials and 7 were cohort studies. The 3 randomized controlled studies were of high quality, and the quality scores of the 7 cohort studies were all 7 or above, indicating high quality. The results showed that the OS of CRS + HIPEC group was higher than that of control group (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.38–0.73; P < 0.00001, I2 = 82.9%); the heterogeneity of the studies was large. The subgroup analysis showed that the OS of CRS and HIPEC group was higher than that of PC group (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.30–0.47; P = 0.215, I2 = 31%) and higher than that in CRS group (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.49–1.07; P = 0.163, I2 = 44.8%); the heterogeneity of the studies was low. In the OPEN group, the OS of THE CRS and HIPEC groups was higher than that in the control group (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.38–0.70; P = 0.353, I2 = 3.9%); OPEN group showed lower heterogeneity. The OS of 60–100-min group was higher than that in the control group (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.88; P = 0.172, I2 = 37.4%); the heterogeneity of the studies was low. Sensitivity analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the results of the combined analysis after each study was deleted. The results of publication bias showed that the P-value of Egger and Begg tests was 0.078 > 0.05, indicating that there is no publication bias. Conclusions CRS + HIPEC can improve the survival rate of patients with colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Li
- General Surgery, Chongqing Western Hospital, Chongqing, 400051, China
| | - An-Ran Wang
- Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Chen
- General Surgery, Chongqing Western Hospital, Chongqing, 400051, China
| | - Yu-Xin Zhang
- General Surgery, Chongqing Western Hospital, Chongqing, 400051, China
| | - Hong Pan
- General Surgery, Chongqing Western Hospital, Chongqing, 400051, China
| | - Shi-Qiang Li
- General Surgery, Chongqing Western Hospital, Chongqing, 400051, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Assaf D, Mor E, Laks S, Zohar N, Benvenisti H, Hazzan D, Segev L, Akopyan OK, Shacham-Shmueli E, Margalit O, Halpern N, Boursi B, Ben-Yaacov A, Nissan A, Adileh M. The pattern of peritoneal colorectal metastasis predicts survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:197-203. [PMID: 34489120 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) has been used reliably to prognosticate patients with peritoneal metastasis, however, it fails to describe the patterns of peritoneal spread and to correlate these patterns to survival outcomes. We aim to define the scattered peritoneal spread (SPS) as a pattern associated with worse survival in colorectal peritoneal metastasis. METHODS A retrospective analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients from a prospectively maintained database of peritoneal surface malignances (n = 280) between 2015 and 2020. SPS was defined by the presence of at least two distant and non-contiguous PCI regions. We compared patients with SPS (n = 73) and clustered peritoneal spread (CPS) (n = 88) for demographics, perioperative and survival outcomes. RESULTS No difference in demographics or post-operative course was noted between the groups. The median follow-up was 15.4 months (0.4-70.8 months). Worse disease-free survival (DFS) in the SPS group with an estimated median of 8.2 months compared to 22.5 months in the CPS spread group, (p = 0.001). The estimated median overall survival (OS) for SPS group was 35.7 months whereas in the CPS group the median was not reached (p = 0.025). The same effect of SPS was preserved even after stratification of PCI. CONCLUSIONS We defined and described the association of the peritoneal spread pattern to survival outcomes. SPS patients exhibit worse DFS and OS independent of the PCI level. Integration of malignant spread pattern into prognostication models along with PCI may aid in predicting oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Assaf
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel; The Sheba Talpiot Medical Leadership Program, Israel.
| | - Eyal Mor
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Shachar Laks
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Nitzan Zohar
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Haggai Benvenisti
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - David Hazzan
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Lior Segev
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Olga Klebanov Akopyan
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Einat Shacham-Shmueli
- The Department of Oncology Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Ofer Margalit
- The Department of Oncology Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Naama Halpern
- The Department of Oncology Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Ben Boursi
- The Department of Oncology Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Almog Ben-Yaacov
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Aviram Nissan
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| | - Mohammad Adileh
- The Department of General and Oncological Surgery - Surgery C Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, (Affyliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University), Israel
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Simkens GA, Wintjens AGWE, Rovers KP, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Effective Strategies to Predict Survival of Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Patients Eligible for Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:5239-5249. [PMID: 34234566 PMCID: PMC8257566 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s277912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), often combined with systemic therapy, can be offered to selected colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) patients. However, clinical heterogeneity and the lack of high-level evidence challenges determination of the correct treatment strategy. This review aims to provide an overview of current strategies to predict survival of colorectal PM patients treated with CRS and HIPEC, guiding clinicians to select a suitable treatment-strategy and to inform patients about their prognosis. First, the prognostic relevance of several clinicopathological prognostic factors, such as extent of PM, location of primary tumor, histology type, and the presence of lymph node or liver metastases will be discussed. Subsequently, special attention will be given to recent developments in several aspects of tumor biology such as RAF/RAS mutations, circulating tumor DNA, immunoprofiling, and consensus molecular subtypes. Finally, currently available prognostic models to predict survival will be evaluated, concluding these models perform moderate to good, but most of them partly rely on intra-operative data. New insights in tumor biology, as well as the reliable assessment of extent of peritoneal disease by diffusion weighted MRI pose promising opportunities to establish an adequate and clinically meaningful preoperative prognostic model in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne G W E Wintjens
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Accurate and rapid diagnosis is essential for correct treatment in rectal cancer. Determining the optimal treatment plan for a patient with rectal cancer is a complex process, and the oncological results and toxicity are not the same in every patient with the same treatment at the same stage. In recent years, the increasing interest in artificial intelligence in all fields of science has also led to the development of innovative tools in oncology. Artificial intelligence studies have increased in many steps from diagnosis to follow-up in rectal cancer. It is thought that artificial intelligence will provide convenience in many ways from personalized treatment to reducing the workload of the physician. Prediction algorithms can be standardized by sharing data between centers, diversifying data, and creating big data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Yakar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University Center of Research and Application for Computer Aided Diagnosis and Treatment in Health, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey
| | - Durmus Etiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey
- Eskisehir Osmangazi University Center of Research and Application for Computer Aided Diagnosis and Treatment in Health, Eskisehir 26040, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bhatt A, Rousset P, Benzerdjeb N, Kammar P, Mehta S, Parikh L, Goswami G, Shaikh S, Kepenekian V, Passot G, Glehen O. Prospective correlation of the radiological, surgical and pathological findings in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases: implications for the preoperative estimation of the peritoneal cancer index. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:2123-2132. [PMID: 32940414 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) is one of the strongest prognostic factors in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Using pathological evaluation, however, the disease extent differs in a large proportion of patients. Our aim was to study the correlation between the radiological (rPCI), surgical (sPCI) and pathological (pPCI) PCI in order to determine factors affecting the discordance between these indices and their potential therapeutic implications. METHOD From July 2018 to December 2019, 128 patients were included in this study. The radiological, pathological and surgical findings were compared. A protocol for pathological evaluation was followed at all centres. RESULTS All patients underwent a CT scan and 102 (79.6%) had a peritoneal MRI. The rPCI was the same as the sPCI in 81 (63.2%) patients and the pPCI in 93 (72.6%). Concordance was significantly lower for moderate-volume (sPCI 13-20) and high-volume (sPCI > 20) disease than for low-volume disease (sPCI 0-12) (P < 0.001 for sPCI; P = 0.001 for pPCI). The accuracy of imaging in predicting presence/absence of disease upon pathological evaluation ranged from 63% to 97% in the different regions of the PCI. The pPCI concurred with the sPCI in 86 (68.8%) patients. Of the nine patients with sPCI > 20, the pPCI was less than 20 in six. CONCLUSION The rPCI and sPCI both concurred with pPCI in approximately two thirds of patients. Preoperative evaluation should focus on the range in which the sPCI lies and not its absolute value. Radiological evaluation did not overestimate sPCI in any patient with high/moderate-volume disease. The benefit of CRS in patients with a high r/sPCI (> 20) who respond to systemic therapies should be prospectively evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - P Rousset
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - N Benzerdjeb
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - P Kammar
- Department Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - S Mehta
- Department Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - L Parikh
- Department of Pathology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - G Goswami
- Department of Radiology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - S Shaikh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - V Kepenekian
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - G Passot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - O Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bhatt A, Rousset P, Benzerdjeb N, Kammar P, Mehta S, Parikh L, Goswami G, Shaikh S, Kepenekian V, Passot G, Glehen O. Clinical and Radiologic Predictors of a Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: Results of a Prospective Multi-center Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3840-3849. [PMID: 33210270 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09330-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for colorectal peritoneal metastases who have a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy experience a significantly longer survival than those with residual disease. This response is known only after surgery. This study aimed to examine clinical and radiologic predictors of a pCR. METHODS From July 2018 to December 2019, the study prospectively enrolled 120 patients. The clinical and radiologic findings were compared between patients with and without a pCR. A protocol for pathologic evaluation was followed. RESULTS A pCR was observed in 34 patients (28.3%). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that patients with a surgical Peritoneal Cancer Index (sPCI) of 3 or lower had an 80% probability of experiencing a pCR, and that patients with a radiologic PCI (rPCI) of 2 or lower had a 70% probability of experiencing a pCR. A pCR was correctly predicted for 47% of the patients by imaging and for 44.4% of the patients by surgical evaluation. The site of primary tumor, the timing of peritoneal metastasis (PM), histology, tumor marker positivity, and mutations in known poor prognostic genes (KRAS) did not differ between the patients with and those without pCR. The primary tumor showed residual disease in 23.5% and regional nodes in 26.4% of the patients with pCR. CONCLUSIONS The rPCI and sPCI concurred with a pCR in less than 50% of the patients. The patients with a lower PCI had greater concordance. An sPCI of 3 or lower was predictive of a pCR in 80% of the patients. The impact of KRAS mutations on pCR should be evaluated in a larger series. The predictors of pCR and response to systemic chemotherapy should be incorporated in prognostic scores used to select patients for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Pascal Rousset
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Nazim Benzerdjeb
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Praveen Kammar
- Department Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sanket Mehta
- Department Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Loma Parikh
- Department of Pathology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Gaurav Goswami
- Department of Radiology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Sakina Shaikh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Vahan Kepenekian
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Guillaume Passot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France. .,Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zou Y, Chen X, Zhang X, Shen Z, Cai J, Tan Y, Weng J, Rong Y, Lin X. Clinical outcomes of curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases combined with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Int J Hyperthermia 2020; 37:944-954. [PMID: 32787474 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1803424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) with synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and liver metastases (LM) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM who had undergone curative surgery, including resections at both metastatic sites and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy. METHODS We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for eligible studies. Studies focusing on the clinical effects of curative surgery and synchronous intraabdominal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and concomitant PC and LM were included. Meta-analysis results were recorded as hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences. RESULTS We included 9 of 998 identified studies in the meta-analysis, involving 746 patients (221 patients with PC + LM, 525 patients with PC). Overall survival (pooled HR 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-2.13, p < 0.01) and disease-free survival (pooled HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.51-2.20, p < 0.01) were both lower in patients with PC + LM. A higher recurrence rate (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44, p = 0.02) and major postoperative morbidity (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.19-1.82, p < 0.01) were also observed in patients with PC + LM. CONCLUSION Liver resection in combination with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with CRC and synchronous hepatic and peritoneal metastases may be associated with worse survival and higher morbidity compared with patients with isolated PC. More restricted patient inclusion criteria should be established to facilitate an optimal prognosis for this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifeng Zou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xi Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xinzhi Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhihong Shen
- Department of General surgery, Jieyang City Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jieyang, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiawei Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yingxin Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - JingRong Weng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuming Rong
- Department of VIP Region, Cancer Center of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xutao Lin
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.,Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rovers KP, Bakkers C, van Erning FN, Burger JWA, Nienhuijs SW, Simkens GAAM, Creemers GJM, Hemmer PHJ, Punt CJA, Lemmens VEPP, Tanis PJ, de Hingh IHJT. Adjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy vs Active Surveillance Following Up-front Resection of Isolated Synchronous Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:e202701. [PMID: 32672798 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Importance To date, there are no data on the value of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy following up-front resection of isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases. Objective To assess the association between adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and overall survival following up-front resection of isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants In this population-based, observational cohort study using nationwide data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (diagnoses between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2017; follow-up until January 31, 2019), 393 patients with isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases who were alive 3 months after up-front complete cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy were included. Patients allocated to the adjuvant systemic chemotherapy group were matched (1:1) with those allocated to the active surveillance group by propensity scores based on patient-, tumor-, and treatment-level covariates. Exposures Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, defined as systemic chemotherapy without targeted therapy, starting within 3 months postoperatively. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival was compared between matched groups using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis adjusted for residual imbalance. A landmark analysis was performed by excluding patients who died within 6 months postoperatively. A sensitivity analysis was performed to adjust for unmeasured confounding by major postoperative morbidity. Results Of 393 patients (mean [SD] age, 61 [10] years; 181 [46%] men), 172 patients (44%) were allocated to the adjuvant systemic chemotherapy group. After propensity score matching of 142 patients in the adjuvant systemic chemotherapy group with 142 patients in the active surveillance group, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared with active surveillance (median, 39.2 [interquartile range, 21.1-111.1] months vs 24.8 [interquartile range, 15.0-58.4] months; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.88; P = .006), which remained consistent after excluding patients who died within 6 months postoperatively (aHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93; P = .02) and after adjustment for major postoperative morbidity (aHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53-0.95). Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this study suggest that in patients undergoing up-front resection of isolated synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases, adjuvant systemic chemotherapy appeared to be associated with improved overall survival. Although randomized trials are needed to address the influence of potential residual confounding and allocation bias on this association, results of this study may be used for clinical decision-making in this patient group for whom no data are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Checca Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Geert A A M Simkens
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan M Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Patrick H J Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Valery E P P Lemmens
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.,Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Development Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Yuan Z, Xu T, Cai J, Zhao Y, Cao W, Fichera A, Liu X, Yao J, Wang H. Development and Validation of an Image-based Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Synchronous Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg. 2020;. [PMID: 32694449 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to build a SVM classifier using ResNet-3D algorithm by artificial intelligence for prediction of synchronous PC. BACKGROUND Adequate detection and staging of PC from CRC remain difficult. METHODS The primary tumors in synchronous PC were delineated on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images. The features of adjacent peritoneum were extracted to build a ResNet3D + SVM classifier. The performance of ResNet3D + SVM classifier was evaluated in the test set and was compared to routine CT which was evaluated by radiologists. RESULTS The training set consisted of 19,814 images from 54 patients with PC and 76 patients without PC. The test set consisted of 7837 images from 40 test patients. The ResNet-3D spent only 34 seconds to analyze the test images. To increase the accuracy of PC detection, we have built a SVM classifier by integrating ResNet-3D features with twelve PC-specific features (P < 0.05). The ResNet3D + SVM classifier showed accuracy of 94.11% with AUC of 0.922 (0.912-0.944), sensitivity of 93.75%, specificity of 94.44%, PPV of 93.75%, and NPV of 94.44% in the test set. The performance was superior to routine contrast-enhanced CT (AUC: 0.791). CONCLUSIONS The ResNet3D + SVM classifier based on deep learning algorithm using ResNet-3D framework has shown great potential in prediction of synchronous PC in CRC.
Collapse
|
18
|
Vining CC, Izquierdo F, Eng OS, Turaga KK. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Technical considerations and the learning curve. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:85-95. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Oliver S. Eng
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of Chicago Chicago Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gurusamy K, Vale CL, Pizzo E, Bhanot R, Davidson BR, Mould T, Mughal M, Saunders M, Aziz O, O'Dwyer S. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) versus standard of care (SoC) in people with peritoneal metastases from colorectal, ovarian or gastric origin: protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039314. [PMID: 32404398 PMCID: PMC7228534 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is uncertainty about whether cytoreductive surgery (CRS)+hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) improves survival and/or quality of life compared with standard of care (SoC) in people with peritoneal metastases who can withstand major surgery. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES To compare the relative benefits and harms of CRS+HIPEC versus SoC in people with peritoneal metastases from colorectal, ovarian or gastric cancers eligible to undergo CRS+HIPEC by a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES To compare the cost-effectiveness of CRS+HIPEC versus SoC from a National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services perspective using a model-based cost-utility analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will perform a systematic review of literature by updating the searches from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane library, Science Citation Index as well as trial registers. Two members of our team will independently screen the search results and identify randomised controlled trials comparing CRS+HIPEC versus SoC for inclusion based on full texts for articles shortlisted during screening. We will assess the risk of bias in the trials and obtain data related to baseline prognostic characteristics, details of intervention and control, and outcome data related to overall survival, disease progression, health-related quality of life, treatment related complications and resource utilisation data. Using IPD, we will perform a two-step IPD, that is, calculate the adjusted effect estimate from each included study and then perform a random-effects model meta-analysis. We will perform various subgroup analyses, meta-regression and sensitivity analyses. We will also perform a model-based cost-utility analysis to assess whether CRS+HIPEC is cost-effective in the NHS setting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This project was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee (Ethics number: 16023/001). We aim to present the findings at appropriate international meetings and publish the review, irrespective of the findings, in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019130504.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurinchi Gurusamy
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claire L Vale
- Meta-analysis Group, MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK
| | - Elena Pizzo
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - R Bhanot
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of HPB Surgery, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tim Mould
- Gynaecological Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Muntzer Mughal
- Surgery, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark Saunders
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Omer Aziz
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah O'Dwyer
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hulshof EC, Lurvink RJ, Caserta N, de Hingh IHJT, van Wezel T, Böhringer S, Swen JJ, Gelderblom H, Guchelaar HJ, Deenen MJ. Identification of pharmacogenetic biomarkers for efficacy of cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal mitomycin C in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1925-1931. [PMID: 32354538 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Mitomycin C (MMC) is commonly used in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) treated with cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). MMC requires metabolic activation prior to exert its cytotoxic effect of which the main activating enzymes are NQO1 and POR. However, not all patients are able to activate MMC for example due to polymorphisms in the genes encoding these enzymes. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of NQO1∗2, NQO1∗3, and POR∗28 with the efficacy of CRS + HIPEC with MMC in patients with CPM. METHOD A retrospective follow-up design was used to study genetic association in patients with histologically proven CPM treated with CRS + HIPEC with MMC with respect to peritoneal recurrence rate after 3 months (primary endpoint), after 6 months, disease-free survival and overall survival. Genetic polymorphisms NQO1∗2, NQO1∗3, and POR∗28 were tested for association. RESULTS A total of 253 patients were included. In NQO1∗3 carriers the peritoneal recurrence rate 3 and 6 months after HIPEC was significantly higher than in wild type patients, respectively 30.0% vs 3.8% (p = 0.009) and 40.0% vs 12.1% (p = 0.031). In line with these results, NQO1∗3 was associated with a shorter disease-free survival (HR 2.04, 95% CI [1.03-4.03]). There was no significant association with overall survival (HR 1.42, 95% CI [0.66-3.07]). CONCLUSION Carriership of the NQO1∗3 allele is associated with worse peritoneal recurrence rate and disease-free survival. These results suggest that individualization of patients treated with CRS + HIPEC based upon pharmacogenetics may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E C Hulshof
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R J Lurvink
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - N Caserta
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - I H J T de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - T van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - S Böhringer
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - J J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Network for Personalized Therapeutics, the Netherlands
| | - H Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - H J Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Network for Personalized Therapeutics, the Netherlands
| | - M J Deenen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lennartz S, Zopfs D, Abdullayev N, Bratke G, Le Blanc M, Slebocki K, Wagner A, Wybranski C, Wahba R, Maintz D, Große Hokamp N, Persigehl T. Iodine overlays to improve differentiation between peritoneal carcinomatosis and benign peritoneal lesions. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:3968-76. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06729-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
22
|
de Boer NL, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Madsen EVE, Diepeveen M, van Meerten E, van Eerden RAG, de Man FM, Bouamar R, Koolen SLW, de Hingh IHJT, Bakkers C, Rovers KP, Creemers GJM, Deenen MJ, Kranenburg OW, Constantinides A, Mathijssen RHJ, Verhoef C, Burger JWA. Concomitant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy for extensive peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin: protocol of the multicentre, open-label, phase I, dose-escalation INTERACT trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e034508. [PMID: 31818845 PMCID: PMC6924694 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) has become standard of care for patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin with a low/moderate abdominal disease load. In case of a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score >20, CRS-HIPEC is not considered to be beneficial. Patients with a PCI >20 are currently offered palliative systemic chemotherapy. Previous studies have shown that systemic chemotherapy is less effective against peritoneal metastases than it is against haematogenous spread of colorectal cancer. It is suggested that patients with peritoneal metastases may benefit from the addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy. Aim of this study is to establish the maximum tolerated dose of intraperitoneal irinotecan, added to standard of care systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. Secondary endpoints are to determine the safety and feasibility of this treatment and to establish the pharmacokinetic profile of intraperitoneally administered irinotecan. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This phase I, '3+3' dose-escalation, study is performed in two Dutch tertiary referral centres. The study population consists of adult patients with extensive peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin who have a good performance status and no extra-abdominal metastases. According to standard work-up for CRS-HIPEC, patients will undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy to score the PCI. In case of a PCI >20, a peritoneal access port will be placed in the abdomen of the patient. Through this port we will administer intraperitoneal irinotecan, in combination with standard systemic treatment consisting of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin and the targeted agent bevacizumab. Therapy consists of a maximum of 12 cycles 2-weekly. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study protocol is approved by a research medical ethics committee (Rotterdam, Netherlands) and the Dutch Competent Authority (CCMO, The Hague, Netherlands). The results of this trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL6988 and NL2018-000479-33; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Leonie de Boer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eva V E Madsen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Diepeveen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther van Meerten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruben A G van Eerden
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke M de Man
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rachida Bouamar
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Stijn L W Koolen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Checca Bakkers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan M Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten J Deenen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Onno W Kranenburg
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander Constantinides
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobus W A Burger
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Larentzakis A, O'Dwyer ST, Becker J, Shuweihdi F, Aziz O, Selvasekar CR, Fulford P, Renehan AG, Wilson M. Referral pathways and outcome of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastasis (CRPM). Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:2310-2315. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2019] [Revised: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
24
|
Le DM, Ahmed S, Ahmed S, Brunet B, Davies J, Doll C, Ferguson M, Ginther N, Gordon V, Hamilton T, Hebbard P, Helewa R, Kim CA, Lee-Ying R, Lim H, Loree JM, McGhie JP, Mulder K, Park J, Renouf D, Wong RPW, Zaidi A, Asif T. Report from the 20th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; 28-29 September 2018. Curr Oncol 2019; 26:e773-e784. [PMID: 31896948 PMCID: PMC6927778 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.5517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The 20th annual Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference was held in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 28-29 September 2018. This interactive multidisciplinary conference is attended by health care professionals from across Western Canada (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba) who are involved in the care of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. In addition, invited speakers from other provinces participate. Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists, and allied health care professionals participated in presentations and discussion sessions for the purpose of developing the recommendations presented here. This consensus statement addresses current issues in the management of colorectal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Le
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| | - S Ahmed
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| | - S Ahmed
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - B Brunet
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| | | | - C Doll
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, AB
| | - M Ferguson
- Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Regina, SK
| | - N Ginther
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK
| | - V Gordon
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - T Hamilton
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | | | - R Helewa
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - C A Kim
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | - R Lee-Ying
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Alberta Health Services, AB
| | | | | | | | - K Mulder
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB
| | - J Park
- CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB
| | | | | | - A Zaidi
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| | - T Asif
- Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatchewan Cancer Agency, Saskatoon, SK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vandamme LKJ, Wouters PAAF, Slooter GD, de Hingh IHJT. Cancer Survival Data Representation for Improved Parametric and Dynamic Lifetime Analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 2019; 7:healthcare7040123. [PMID: 31661787 PMCID: PMC6955760 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7040123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Survival functions are often characterized by a median survival time or a 5-year survival. Whether or not such representation is sufficient depends on tumour development. Different tumour stages have different mean survival times after therapy. The validity of an exponential decay and the origins of deviations are substantiated. The paper shows, that representation of survival data as logarithmic functions visualizes differences better, which allows for differentiating short- and long-term dynamic lifetime. It is more instructive to represent the changing lifetime expectancy for an individual who has survived a certain time, which can be significantly different from the initial expectation just after treatment. Survival data from 15 publications on cancer are compared and re-analysed based on the well-established: (i) exponential decay (ii) piecewise constant hazard (iii) Weibull model and our proposed parametric survival models, (iv) the two-τ and (v) the sliding-τ model. The new models describe either accelerated aging or filtering out of defects with numerical parameters with a physical meaning and add information to the usually provided log-rank P-value or median survival. The statistical inhomogeneity in a group by mixing up different tumour stages, metastases and treatments is the main origin for deviations from the exponential decay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lode K J Vandamme
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Peter A A F Wouters
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5612AE Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Máxima Medical Center, 5504DB Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Paredes AZ, Guzman-Pruneda FA, Abdel-Misih S, Hays J, Dillhoff ME, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM. Perioperative Morbidity of Gastrectomy During CRS-HIPEC: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis. J Surg Res 2019; 241:31-39. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 02/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
27
|
Berger Y, Jacoby H, Kaufmann MI, Ben-Yaacov A, Westreich G, Sharon I, Barda L, Sharif N, Nadler R, Horesh N, Nissan A, Gutman M, Hoffman A. Correlation Between Intraoperative and Pathological Findings for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:1103-1109. [PMID: 30746598 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07219-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to examine the correlation between intraoperative and pathological findings for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) and to determine their prognostic significance. METHODS Pathological reports of all colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC between 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Pathological specimens lacking tumor cells were defined as negative pathological specimens (NPS). The intraoperative peritoneal cancer index (PCI) and pathological PCI (excluding NPS) were calculated separately. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to compare the prognostic value of intraoperative and pathological scoring systems. RESULTS For 108 CRC patients, 113 CRS/HIPEC procedures were performed. Of 959 pathological specimens examined, 178 (18.6%) were NPS. Overall, 78 procedures (69%) showed NPS. In 52 procedures (46%), the pathological PCI differed from the intraoperative PCI (∆PCI > 0). The ROC areas for intraoperative PCI and pathological PCI were similar in predicting 1-year overall survival (OS), 2-year OS, and 1-year disease-free survival (all p values not significant). However, for the patients with NPS, the number of positive specimens (containing tumor tissue) was superior to intraoperative PCI in predicting 2-year OS (ROC under the curve areas, 0.69 vs. 0.58, respectively; p = 0.012). In addition, a subgroup of 15 patients with a high ∆PCI (≥ 3) had a more favorable median OS than a matched group of 30 patients with similar intraoperative PCI and a ∆PCI of 0 (median survival not reached vs. 21.6 months, respectively; p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In the majority of CRC CRS/HIPEC procedures, NPS may be found. Among patients with NPS, pathological correlation may have a prognostic significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Berger
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation-Surgery B, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - H Jacoby
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation-Surgery B, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - M I Kaufmann
- Department of Pathology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - A Ben-Yaacov
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery-Surgery C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - G Westreich
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery-Surgery C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - I Sharon
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery-Surgery C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - L Barda
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation-Surgery B, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - N Sharif
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation-Surgery B, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - R Nadler
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation-Surgery B, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - N Horesh
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation-Surgery B, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - A Nissan
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery-Surgery C, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - M Gutman
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation-Surgery B, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - A Hoffman
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation-Surgery B, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated to Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Piso P, Stierstorfer K, Gerken M, Klinkhammer-Schalke M. Benefit of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with isolated peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:1559-67. [PMID: 30132068 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3146-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ever since Sugarbaker has established the cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in combination with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), there is a chance of cure for selected patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Objective of this study was to investigate the benefit of CRS and HIPEC compared to other therapy options in patients with isolated synchronous and metachronous peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin in terms of long-term overall survival. METHODS A retrospective population-based cohort study, including 370 patients diagnosed with isolated synchronous and metachronous peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin, was carried out. Therefore, data were acquired from the cancer registry at the Regensburg Tumor Center in Bavaria, Germany. Patients' overall survival (OAS) according to their therapy received was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS Overall median survival was 41.6 months for patients treated with CRS and HIPEC, compared with surgery and chemotherapy (24.0 months, log-rank p = 0.015), chemotherapy only (14.1 months, p < 0.001), surgery only (11.4 months, p < 0.001), and best supportive care (7.9 months, p < 0.001). This benefit persisted after adjustment for further risk factors in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION The effect of CRS and HIPEC stands out significantly in comparison to all other therapies. The multimodality approach should be a regular option for patients with isolated peritoneal metastases.
Collapse
|
29
|
Bhatt A, Mehta SS, Zaveri S, Rajan F, Ray M, Sethna K, Katdare N, Patel MD, Kammar P, Prabhu R, Sinukumar S, Mishra S, Rangarajan B, Rangole A, Damodaran D, Penumadu P, Ganesh M, Peedicayil A, Raj H, Seshadri R. Treading the beaten path with old and new obstacles: a report from the Indian HIPEC registry. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 35:361-369. [PMID: 30300029 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1503345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Indian HIPEC registry is a self-funded registry instituted by a group of Indian surgeons for patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) undergoing surgical treatment. This work was performed to • Evaluate outcomes of cytoreductive surgery ± HIPEC in patients enrolled in the registry. • Identify operational problems. METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the registry from March 2016 to September 2017 was performed. An online survey was performed to study the surgeons' attitudes and existing practices pertaining to the registry and identify operational problems. RESULTS During the study period, 332 patients were enrolled in 8 participating centres. The common indication was ovarian cancer for three centres and pseudomyxoma peritonei for three others. The median PCI ranged from 3 to 23. A CC-0/1 resection was obtained in 94.7%. There was no significant difference in the morbidity (p = .25) and mortality (p = .19) rates between different centres. There was a high rate of failure-to-rescue (19.3%) patients with complications and the survival in patients with colorectal PM was inferior. A lack of dedicated personnel for data collection and entry was the main reason for only 10/43 surgeons contributing data. The other problem was the lack of complete electronic medical record systems at all centres. CONCLUSIONS These results validate existing practices and identify country-specific problems that need to be addressed. Despite operational problems, the registry is an invaluable tool for audit and research. It shows the feasibility of fruitful collaboration between surgeons in the absence of any regulatory body or funding for the project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- a Department of Surgical Oncology , Fortis Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Sanket S Mehta
- b Department of Peritoneal surface oncology , Saifee Hospital , Mumbai , India
| | - Shabber Zaveri
- c Department of Surgical Oncology , Manipal Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Firoz Rajan
- d Department of Surgical Oncology , Kovai Medical Center , Coimbatore , India
| | - Mukurdipi Ray
- e Department of Surgical Oncology , All India Institute of Medical Sciences , New Delhi , India
| | - Kayomarz Sethna
- f Department of Surgery , Lokmanya Tilak Municipal medical college and general hospital , Mumbai , India
| | - Ninad Katdare
- g Department of Surgical Oncology , SL Raheja hospital , Mumbai , India
| | - Mahesh D Patel
- h Department of Surgical Oncology , Zydus Hospital , Ahmedabad , India
| | - Praveen Kammar
- i Department of Surgical Oncology , Global hospitals , Hyderabad , India
| | - Robin Prabhu
- a Department of Surgical Oncology , Fortis Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Snita Sinukumar
- j Department of Surgical oncology , Jehangir Hospital , Pune , India
| | - Suniti Mishra
- k Department of Pathology , Fortis Hospital , Bangalore , India
| | - Bharath Rangarajan
- l Department of Medical oncology , Kovai Medical center , Coimbatore , India
| | - Ashvin Rangole
- m Department of Surgical oncology , CHL, CBCC cancer center , Indore , India
| | - Dileep Damodaran
- n Department of Surgical oncology , MVR cancer center and research Institute , Calicut , India
| | - Prasanth Penumadu
- o Department of Surgical oncology , Jawarharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER) , Puducherry , India
| | - Mandakulutur Ganesh
- p Department of Surgical Oncology , Vaidehi Institute of Medical sciences , Bangalore , India
| | - Abraham Peedicayil
- q Department of Gynecologic Oncology , Christian Medical College , Vellore , India
| | - Hemant Raj
- r Department of Surgical Oncology , Cancer Institute (WIA) , Chennai , India
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vuijk FA, Hilling DE, Mieog JSD, Vahrmeijer AL. Fluorescent-guided surgery for sentinel lymph node detection in gastric cancer and carcinoembryonic antigen targeted fluorescent-guided surgery in colorectal and pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:315-323. [PMID: 30216455 PMCID: PMC6175076 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node procedures for gastric cancer resections using indocyanine green (ICG) linked to Nanocoll outperformed normal ICG but did not provide information on possible lymph node metastasis. Carcinoembryonic antigen targeted fluorescent imaging using SGM‐101 was successful in both pancreatic and colorectal cancer. A large phase III multicentre trial will soon be initiated in colorectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris A Vuijk
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Denise E Hilling
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Boogerd LSF, Hoogstins CES, Schaap DP, Kusters M, Handgraaf HJM, van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Holman FA, Peeters KCMJ, Mieog JSD, van de Velde CJH, Farina-Sarasqueta A, van Lijnschoten I, Framery B, Pèlegrin A, Gutowski M, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IHJT, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Rutten HJT, Cailler F, Burggraaf J, Vahrmeijer AL. Safety and effectiveness of SGM-101, a fluorescent antibody targeting carcinoembryonic antigen, for intraoperative detection of colorectal cancer: a dose-escalation pilot study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3:181-191. [PMID: 29361435 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(17)30395-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Revised: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumour-targeted fluorescence imaging has the potential to advance current practice of oncological surgery by selectively highlighting malignant tissue during surgery. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is overexpressed in 90% of colorectal cancers and is a promising target for colorectal cancer imaging. We aimed to assess the tolerability of SGM-101, a fluorescent anti-CEA monoclonal antibody, and to investigate the feasibility to detect colorectal cancer with intraoperative fluorescence imaging. METHODS We did an open-label, pilot study in two medical centres in the Netherlands. In the dose-escalation cohort, we included patients (aged ≥18 years) with primary colorectal cancer with increased serum CEA concentrations (upper limit of normal of ≥3 ng/mL) since diagnosis, who were scheduled for open or laparoscopic tumour resection. In the expansion cohort, we included patients (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent or peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer, with increasing serum concentrations of CEA since diagnosis, who were scheduled for open surgical resection. We did not mask patients, investigators, or anyone from the health-care team. We assigned patients using a 3 + 3 dose design to 5 mg, 7·5 mg, or 10 mg of SGM-101 in the dose-escalation cohort. In the expansion cohort, patients received a dose that was considered optimal at that moment of the study but not higher than the dose used in the dose-escalation cohort. SGM-101 was administered intravenously for 30 min to patients 2 or 4 days before surgery. Intraoperative imaging was done to identify near-infrared fluorescent lesions, which were resected and assessed for fluorescence. The primary outcome was tolerability and safety of SGM-101, assessed before administration and continued up to 12 h after dosing, on the day of surgery, the first postoperative day, and follow-up visits at the day of discharge and the first outpatient clinic visit. Secondary outcomes were effectiveness of SGM-101 for detection of colorectal cancer, assessed by tumour-to-background ratios (TBR); concordance between fluorescent signal and tumour status of resected tissue; and diagnostic accuracy in both cohorts. This trial is registered with the Nederlands Trial Register, number NTR5673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02973672. FINDINGS Between January, 2016, and February, 2017, 26 patients (nine in the dose-escalation cohort and 17 in the expansion cohort) were included in this study. SGM-101 did not cause any treatment-related adverse events, although three possibly related mild adverse events were reported in three (33%) of nine patients in the dose-escalation cohort and five were reported in three (18%) of 17 patients in the expansion cohort. Five moderate adverse events were reported in three (18%) patients in the expansion cohort, but they were deemed unrelated to SGM-101. No changes in vital signs, electrocardiogram, or laboratory results were found after administration of the maximum dose of 10 mg of SGM-101 in both cohorts. A dose of 10 mg, administered 4 days before surgery, showed the highest TBR (mean TBR 6·10 [SD 0·42] in the dose-escalation cohort). In the expansion cohort, 19 (43%) of 43 lesions were detected using fluorescence imaging and were not clinically suspected before fluorescent detection, which changed the treatment strategy in six (35%) of 17 patients. Sensitivity was 98%, specificity was 62%, and accuracy of fluorescence intensity was 84% in the expansion cohort. INTERPRETATION This study presents the first clinical use of CEA-targeted detection of colorectal cancer and shows that SGM-101 is safe and can influence clinical decision making during the surgical procedure for patients with colorectal cancer. FUNDING Surgimab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonora S F Boogerd
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Dennis P Schaap
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Miranda Kusters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Denise E Hilling
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Fabian A Holman
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Koen C M J Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - André Pèlegrin
- IRCM, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; INSERM, U1194, Montpellier, France; Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France
| | - Marian Gutowski
- Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, ICM, Montpellier, France
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Harm J T Rutten
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands; GROW, School Of Oncology and Developmental Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Jacobus Burggraaf
- Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands; Leiden Academic Center for Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wang W, Tan GHC, Skanthakumar T, Chia CS, Soo KC, Teo MCC. Exploring the trend in referrals for consideration of CRS and HIPEC to understand the attitudes of clinicians in the development of a national cancer centre programme in peritoneal disease. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 34:551-558. [DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1387939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Weining Wang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Khee Chee Soo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Grimmig T, Moll EM, Kloos K, Thumm R, Moench R, Callies S, Kreckel J, Vetterlein M, Pelz J, Polat B, Tripathi S, Rehder R, Ribas CM, Chandraker A, Germer CT, Waaga-Gasser AM, Gasser M. Upregulated Heat Shock Proteins After Hyperthermic Chemotherapy Point to Induced Cell Survival Mechanisms in Affected Tumor Cells From Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Cancer Growth Metastasis 2017; 10:1179064417730559. [PMID: 29403306 PMCID: PMC5791678 DOI: 10.1177/1179064417730559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
In patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) represents a promising treatment strategy. Here, we studied the role of hyperthermic chemotherapy on heat shock protein (HSP) expression and induction of tumor cell death and survival. HSP27, HSP70, and HSP90 combined with effects on tumor cell proliferation and chemosensitivity were analyzed in human colon cancer. Hyperthermic chemotherapy resulted in significant HSP27/HSP70 and HSP90 gene/protein overexpression in analyzed HT-29/SW480/SW620 colon cancer cells and peritoneal metastases from patients displaying amplified expression of proliferation markers, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL. Moreover, functionally increased chemoresistance against 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C and oxaliplatin after hyperthermic chemotherapy points to induced survival mechanisms in cancer cells. In conclusion, the results indicate that intracellular HSP-associated antiapoptotic and proliferative effects after hyperthermic chemotherapy negatively influence beneficial effects of hyperthermic chemotherapy-induced cell death. Therefore, blocking HSPs could be a promising strategy to further improve the rate of tumor cell death and outcome of patients undergoing HIPEC therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Grimmig
- Department of Surgery I, Molecular Oncology and Immunology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Moll
- Department of Surgery I, Molecular Oncology and Immunology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Kloos
- Department of Surgery I, Molecular Oncology and Immunology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Rebecca Thumm
- Department of Surgery I, Molecular Oncology and Immunology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Romana Moench
- Department of Surgery I, Molecular Oncology and Immunology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Simone Callies
- Department of Surgery I, Molecular Oncology and Immunology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Jennifer Kreckel
- Division of Molecular Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Malte Vetterlein
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Joerg Pelz
- Department of Surgery I, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Buelent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Sudipta Tripathi
- Transplant Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Roberta Rehder
- Evangelical Medical School, Faculty University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Carmen M Ribas
- Evangelical Medical School, Faculty University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
| | - Anil Chandraker
- Transplant Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ana Maria Waaga-Gasser
- Department of Surgery I, Molecular Oncology and Immunology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.,Transplant Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin Gasser
- Department of Surgery I, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Simkens GA, Rovers KP, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Patient selection for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2017; 9:259-266. [PMID: 28721098 PMCID: PMC5501638 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s119569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a viable option for selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) from colorectal origin, resulting in long-term survival and even cure in some cases. However, adequate patient selection for this treatment is currently one of the major challenges. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of clinically relevant factors associated with overall survival. This may help to guide clinicians through the complex interplay of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics to adequately select patients who benefit the most from this extensive surgical treatment. First, basic principles of colorectal PM and the CRS and HIPEC treatment will be discussed. According to available literature, especially extent of peritoneal disease, completeness of cytoreduction, and signet ring cell histology have great influence on the outcome after CRS and HIPEC. Other factors that seem to have a negative prognostic value are the presence of liver metastases and the absence of treatment with neo-adjuvant systemic therapy. Prognostic models combining the above-mentioned factors, such as the Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Prognostic Surgical Score nomogram, may provide clinically relevant tools to use in everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Koen P Rovers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Verwaal VJ, Rau B, Jamali F, Gilly FN, de Hingh I, Takala H, Syk I, Pelz J, Mulsow J, van der Speeten K, Shigeki K, Iversen LH, Mohamed F, Glehen O, Younan R, Yarema R, Gonzalez-Moreno S, O’Dwyer S, Yonemura Y, Sugarbaker P. Registries on peritoneal surface malignancies throughout the world, their use and their options. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 33:528-533. [PMID: 28540833 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1315178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Beate Rau
- Charite Campus Mitte, Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - Faek Jamali
- American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Ignace de Hingh
- Catharina Ziekenhuis, Surgical Oncology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ingvar Syk
- Lunds Universitet Institutionen for kliniska vetenskaper Malmo, Sweden
| | - Jorg Pelz
- Zentrum fur Operative Medizin, Wurtzburg, Germany
| | - Jurgen Mulsow
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Lene H. Iversen
- Aarhus Universitet Hospital, Department of Surgery, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Faheez Mohamed
- Department of Surgery, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yukata Yonemura
- NPO Organization to Support Peritoneal Dissemination Treatment, Osaka, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
El-Nakeep S, Rashad N, Oweira H, Schmidt J, Helbling D, Giryes A, Petrausch U, Mehrabi A, Decker M, Abdel-Rahman O. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases coupled with curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases: an updated systematic review. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 11:249-258. [PMID: 28099818 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1284586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of delivering intraperitoneal chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal metastases coupled with curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search using PubMed was conducted to screen for eligible records. Studies evaluating colorectal surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with curative treatment of liver metastases were included. We excluded duplicate publications. Sixty-seven full-text papers were assessed and six papers were finally included. The overall survival in the included studies ranged from 6-49 months. Five-year survival ranged from 18%-28%, three-year survival ranged from 22%-42% and two-year survival ranged from 34%-78%. Survival was lower in patients with liver metastases and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) than those with PC alone in the majority of studies. Expert commentary: This review poses questions rather than presenting answers. The heterogeneity of survival data suggests the possible benefit of this aggressive treatment approach in selected patients. Standardization of the technique used for intraperitoneal chemotherapy instillation, agent used as well as the systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapy type and duration through prospective controlled trials is required to provide an evidence of a higher strength to support or prohibit this treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah El-Nakeep
- a Internal Medicine Department, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Faculty of Medicine , Ain Shams University , Cairo , Egypt
| | - Noha Rashad
- b Medical Oncology department , Maadi Military hospital , Cairo , Egypt
| | - Hani Oweira
- c Department of Surgery, Swiss Cancer institute , Zurich , Switzerland.,d Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Jan Schmidt
- d Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Daniel Helbling
- e Department of Surgery , OncoCentrum Zurich, Gastrointestinal Tumor Center Zurich (GITZ) , Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Anwar Giryes
- c Department of Surgery, Swiss Cancer institute , Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Ulf Petrausch
- e Department of Surgery , OncoCentrum Zurich, Gastrointestinal Tumor Center Zurich (GITZ) , Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Arianeb Mehrabi
- d Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery , University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg , Germany
| | - Michael Decker
- c Department of Surgery, Swiss Cancer institute , Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Omar Abdel-Rahman
- c Department of Surgery, Swiss Cancer institute , Zurich , Switzerland.,f Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine , Ain Shams University , Cairo , Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kitai T, Yamanaka K, Miyauchi Y, Kawashima M. Indications for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in elderly patients with peritoneal malignancy. Int J Clin Oncol 2017; 22:519-25. [PMID: 28054141 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-016-1078-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A combination of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) is effective for some peritoneal malignancies. However, the indications for elderly patients remain unclear, with substantial postoperative morbidity and mortality being problematic. MATERIALS Clinical data were analyzed in 42 patients undergoing CRS + HIPEC for peritoneal malignancy. The primary tumor was located in the appendix in 32 cases and elsewhere in 10 cases. Operative results and survival data were compared between patients aged ≥70 and <70 years. RESULTS Fourteen patients were older than 70 years. Elderly patients had a higher peritoneal cancer index (32.0 vs. 21.5), higher CA19-9 level (189.0 vs. 28.1), and higher frequency of grade 4-5 complications (5/9 vs. 2/26) than the younger patients. Grade 4-5 respiratory failure occurred in three elderly patients. There was a significant difference of postoperative survival between the elderly patients and younger patients, with 5-year survival rates being 41.3 and 74.2%, respectively (p = 0.0166). The poor prognosis of elderly patients was related to the higher frequency of grade 4-5 complications. CONCLUSIONS Elderly patients were referred for treatment with more advanced disease than younger patients. An age ≥70 years was associated with more frequent grade 4-5 complications and worse survival. Performing CRS + HIPEC in elderly patients should be considered carefully due to the risk of severe complications, especially respiratory failure.
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an extensive procedure with considerable morbidity. Since only few hospitals perform CRS + HIPEC, this might lead to confounded outcomes between hospitals when audited. This study aims to compare outcomes between peritoneally metastasized (PM) colon cancer patients treated with CRS + HIPEC and patients undergoing conventional colon surgery. Furthermore, the impact of CRS + HIPEC on the risk of postoperative complications will be assessed, probably leading to better insight into how to report on postoperative outcomes in this distinct group of patients undergoing extensive colon surgery.All patients with primary colon cancer who underwent segmental colon resection in a tertiary referral hospital between 2011 and 2014 were included in this prospective cohort study. Outcome after surgery was compared between patients who underwent additional CRS + HIPEC treatment or conventional surgery.Consequently, 371 patients underwent surgery, of which 43 (12%) underwent CRS + HIPEC. These patients were younger and healthier than patients undergoing conventional surgery. Tumor characteristics were less favorable and surgery was more extensive in CRS + HIPEC patients. The morbidity rate was also higher in CRS + HIPEC patients (70% vs 41%; P < 0.001). CRS + HIPEC was an independent predictor of postoperative complications (odds ratio 6.4), but was not associated with more severe postoperative complications or higher treatment-related mortality.Although patients with colonic PM undergoing CRS + HIPEC treatment were younger and healthier, the postoperative outcome was worse. This is most probably due to less favorable tumor characteristics and more extensive surgery. Nevertheless, CRS + HIPEC treatment was not associated with severe complications or increased treatment-related mortality. These results stress the need for adequate case-mix correction in colorectal surgery audits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert A. Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Vic J. Verwaal
- Department of Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Valery E. Lemmens
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harm J. Rutten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H. de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: Ignace H. de Hingh, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Department of Surgical Oncology, P.O. Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Razenberg LG, Lemmens VE, Verwaal VJ, Punt CJ, Tanis PJ, Creemers GJ, de Hingh IH. Challenging the dogma of colorectal peritoneal metastases as an untreatable condition: Results of a population-based study. Eur J Cancer 2016; 65:113-20. [PMID: 27497343 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2016] [Revised: 06/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/02/2016] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the impact of the implementation of novel systemic regimens and locoregional treatment modalities on survival at population level in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients presenting with peritoneal metastases (PMs). METHODS All consecutive CRC patients with synchronous PM (<3 months) between 1995 and 2014 were extracted from the Eindhoven area of the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Trends in treatment and overall survival were assessed in four time periods. Multivariable regression analysis was used to analyse the impact of systemic and locoregional treatment modalities on survival. RESULTS A total of 37,036 patients were diagnosed with primary CRC between 1995 and 2014. Synchronous PM was diagnosed in 1,661 patients, of whom 55% had also metastases at other sites (n = 917) and 77% received anticancer therapy (n = 1,273). Treatment with systemic therapy increased from 23% in 1995-1999 to 56% in 2010-2014 (p < 0.0001). Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) was applied since 2005 and increased from 10% in 2005-2009 to 23% in 2010-2014. Surgery for lymphatic or haematogenous metastases increased from 2% to 10% in these periods. Median overall survival of the complete cohort improved from 6.0 months in 1995-2000 to 12.5 months in 2010-2014 (p < 0.0001), with a doubling of survival for both PM alone and PM with other involved sites. The influence of year of diagnosis on survival (hazard ratio, 2010-2014 versus 1995-1999; 0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.62; p < 0.0001) disappeared after including systemic therapy and locoregional treatment modalities in subsequent multivariable models. CONCLUSION CRC patients presenting with PM are increasingly offered a multidisciplinary treatment approach, resulting in an increased overall survival for the entire cohort.
Collapse
|
40
|
Tuvin D, Berger Y, Aycart SN, Shtilbans T, Hiotis S, Labow DM, Sarpel U. Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with epithelial appendiceal neoplasms. Int J Hyperthermia 2016; 32:311-5. [PMID: 27050712 DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2016.1152514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising approach for preventing peritoneal carcinomatosis in high-risk patients. We report our initial experience with prophylactic HIPEC in a series of patients with appendiceal neoplasms. Methods We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent HIPEC in the absence of peritoneal disease. Patients with previously documented peritoneal surface disease were excluded. Data regarding clinical, operative and pathological features were analysed. Results Out of 322 HIPEC procedures performed between March 2007and August 2015, we identified 16 patients who underwent surgery with prophylactic intent. Primary diagnoses included high-grade and low-grade appendiceal neoplasms. Most patients presented originally with appendiceal perforation; all patients underwent initial surgery during which the appendix or right colon were resected. Following a median time interval of 2.2 months, a second surgery performed at our institution consisted of completion of omentectomy, partial colectomy and oophorectomy, with administration of prophylactic HIPEC (using mitomycin C). A totally laparoscopic approach was attempted and achieved in 11 patients in whom the median duration of surgery, estimated intraoperative blood loss and length of hospitalisation were 251 min, 100 cm(3) and 4 days, respectively. There were no cases of major perioperative morbidity or mortality. Conclusions Prophylactic HIPEC for appendiceal neoplasms is feasible, safe and may be performed laparoscopically. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to determine whether a survival benefit is associated with this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Tuvin
- a Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York
| | - Yaniv Berger
- a Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York
| | - Samantha N Aycart
- a Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York
| | - Tatiana Shtilbans
- b Department of Pathology , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York , USA
| | - Spiros Hiotis
- a Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York
| | - Daniel M Labow
- a Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York
| | - Umut Sarpel
- a Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Simkens GA, van Oudheusden TR, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Rutten HJ, Luyer MD, Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH. Development of a Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Peritoneally Metastasized Colorectal Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:4214-4221. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5211-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
42
|
Simkens GA, Razenberg LG, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, Creemers GJ, de Hingh IH. Histological subtype and systemic metastases strongly influence treatment and survival in patients with synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42:794-800. [PMID: 27055946 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 03/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment possibilities for colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) are increasing. It is however unclear how treatment choice and outcome are influenced by histological subtype and the presence of systemic metastases. Therefore, this study assessed the impact of histological subtype and systemic metastases on treatment choice and survival in patients with colorectal PM. METHODS This population-based study included patients with synchronous PM originating from colorectal adenocarcinoma (AC), mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC), or signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). Data of patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 were extracted from the National Cancer Registry (IKNL) of the Netherlands. Treatment strategy and survival were analyzed with logistic regression and cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS In total, 5516 patients were included, of whom 71.8% had an AC, 21.2% an MC, and 7.0% had an SRCC. The use of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was dependent on histological subtype and the presence of systemic metastases, and increased over time, especially in AC and MC patients. The relative survival gain of CRS + HIPEC, corrected for systemic metastases, was comparable in AC, MC, and SRCC patients (hazard ratio: 0.17, 0.21, and 0.13, respectively). Compared to supportive care only, the absolute survival gain was 30, 35, and 18 months, respectively. Systemic therapy improved survival in all histological subtypes. CONCLUSIONS Histological subtype and the presence of systemic metastases strongly influenced treatment choice and survival in patients with synchronous colorectal PM. These results can be used to optimize treatment strategy for patients with synchronous colorectal PM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Simkens
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - L G Razenberg
- Department of Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V E Lemmens
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), PO Box 19079, 3501 DB Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J Rutten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - G-J Creemers
- Department of Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - I H de Hingh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|