The Use of an Extra-corporeal Graft to Maintain Cerebral Perfusion During Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Carotid Access for Aortic Interventions: Genius or Madness?

The endovascular-first approach remains is omnipresent ubiquitous amongst in the vascular community today. However, several key issues have ensued remain, one of which involves the choice of vessel site. Although the transfemoral route is the first-line approach has been established as first-line approach in endovascular interventions of the aorta (endovascular aortic repair [EVAR], thoracic endovascular aortic repair [TEVAR], and transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]), there remains a select some group of patients who are contraindicated for the aforementioned this as well as for alternatives vessel routes such as the transapical approach. The carotid artery, first used in aortic aneurysm repair, is potential alternative for these patients. Emerging evidence appears to support this relatively unpopular approach in EVAR, TEVAR and TAVI. Sporadic case reports and series have reported the transcarotid approach for EVAR and TEVAR, and collectively show relatively low rates of mortality and neurological complications. For TAVI, the carotid artery appears to be a safe and effective route of access compared to the transapical and even the transfemoral approach. However, technical aspects have not been ironed out; there are procedural variations, for example, in type of anaesthesia used, intraoperative neurological monitoring and choice of common carotid artery. The overall quality of evidence is poor, since the majority of it consists of case reports, and retrospective and prospective cohort studies. Although a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to compare the transcarotid against the transfemoral approach, this is unlikely to take place because of ethical considerations. Therefore, the authors recommend future research to consider cohort studies with adequately powered sample sizes to establish any firm conclusions. However, as transcarotid procedures are performed infrequently, most institutions will have relatively small sample sizes. Therefore, it is recommended that collaborative efforts are undertaken to increase the overall sample size in the cohort analysis.

Carotid Access for Endovascular Repair of Aortic Pathology: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Endovascular repair is now preferred to open access for the management of aortic diseases. This is typically performed via the femoral artery; however, not all patients are eligible for this. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence for utilizing the carotid artery as an alternative access route.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines using 4 electronic databases.

RESULTS

The search found 11 case reports representing 12 patients eligible for analysis (mean age 64.5 years). This included 3 thoracic aneurysms, 3 abdominal aneurysms, 4 penetrating ulcers, 1 endoleak, and 1 pseudoaneurysm. An open procedure was contraindicated in 83% (10/12) due to the poor physiological fitness of the patient. In 75% (9/12) of cases, traditional endovascular access was contraindicated by severe iliac disease. The remainder were contraindicated because of an existing ligated aortic stump (1/12, 8.3%) or technical difficulty with graft deployment via the femoral artery (2/12, 16.7%). There was 1 death, with the 30-day mortality 8.3%. The same patient suffered the only spinal ischemia before death (8.3%). There were no cases of stroke (0%), with one case of transient ischemic attack (8.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is a relative paucity of literature, this study demonstrates when traditional endovascular access is impossible and an open procedure contraindicated, carotid artery access for endovascular repair of aortic pathology is a viable alternative with good 30-day survival and low rates of neurological sequelae.

Use of an extracorporeal femoral-carotid shunt in the management of complex supra-aortic disease

Management of symptomatic multifocal supra-aortic atherosclerotic disease presents a complex surgical challenge. We describe a novel approach where a temporary extra-corporeal femoro-carotid shunt was used to maintain cerebral perfusion during hybrid surgical and endovascular treatment for tandem supra-aortic lesions.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The carotid approach

We present the case of a 61-year-old man with a 5.8 cm infrarenal aortic aneurysm with extensive iliac disease that did not permit conventional EVAR, who was also judged to be too high risk for open surgery. Despite these factors, the aneurysm was still successfully repaired using endovascular means and an alternative access technique. This involved a specially commissioned Zenith aorto-uniliac endograft reverse mounted onto a TX2 delivery device, delivered via the carotid artery.