The surgical outcome of patients with bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy

Surgical Treatment of Epilepsy with Bilateral MRI Abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the surgical outcomes of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and bilateral brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities who had undergone various epilepsy surgeries.

METHODS

Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy and bilateral brain abnormalities on MRI who underwent epilepsy surgery at the Severance Children's Hospital between October 2003 and December 2021 were included. The age of seizure onset was 18 years or younger. Engel's classification was used to assess seizure outcomes at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age at surgery was 10.9 years (interquartile range [IQR] 6.9-15.1); the median interval to surgery was 7.1 years (IQR 2.7-11.5). One year after surgery, a favorable outcome of Engel class I-II was observed in 53% (21/40) of patients. At the 2- and 5-year follow-ups, 56% (20/36) and 63% (17/27) of patients showed good postoperative outcomes, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately, half of the patients with bilateral brain MRI abnormalities achieved seizure freedom after epilepsy surgery. The existence of bilateral brain MRI abnormalities should not hinder resective epilepsy surgery.

Hippocampal volumetry to determine the resection side in patients with intractable non-lesional bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy

Bilateral Temporal lobe epilepsy (BTLE) cases may result in poor surgical outcomes due to the difficulty in determining/localizing the epileptogenic zone. In this study, we investigated whether hippocampal volume (HV) would be useful for the determination of the best resection side in BTLE. Eighteen cases of BTLE determined by a scalp video electroencephalogram (SVEEG) underwent resection via intracranial electroencephalography (IVEEG). Patients with lesions or semiologically determined focus lateralization were excluded. In addition to SVEEG, an epilepsy protocol magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including hippocampus fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and HV, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), single-photon emission computed tomography with 123I-iomazenil (IMZ-SPECT), and magnetoencephalography (MEG) were performed for the preoperative evaluation of the lateralization. The resection side was determined based on the IVEEG results, and the seizure outcome at two years postoperatively was classified as either a well-controlled seizure outcome (Engel class I), or residual (classes II-V). We used a Fisher's exact test to compare the concordance between the determination of the epileptic focus by each modality and the resected side where patients achieved a well-controlled seizure outcome. Seizures were well controlled in 9/18 patients after surgery. Eight out of 11 patients (72.7%), in whom the HV results (strongly atrophic side) and the resection side were matched, had well-controlled seizure outcomes (P = 0.0498). The concordance of other presurgical evaluations with the resection side was not significantly related to a well-controlled seizure outcome. HV may be a useful method to determine the optimal resection side of the epileptic focus/foci in cases of suspected BTLE.

Surgery procedures in temporal lobe epilepsies

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common cause of refractory epilepsy amenable for surgical treatment and seizure control. Surgery for TLE is a safe and effective strategy. The seizure-free rate after surgical resection in patients with mesial or neocortical TLE is about 70%. Resective surgery has an advantage over stereotactic radiosurgery in terms of seizure outcomes for mesial TLE patients. Both techniques have similar results for safety, cognitive outcomes, and associated costs. Stereotactic radiosurgery should therefore be seen as an alternative to open surgery for patients with contraindications for or with reluctance to undergo open surgery. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has also shown promising results as a curative technique in mesial TLE but needs to be more deeply evaluated. Brain-responsive stimulation represents a palliative treatment option for patients with unilateral or bilateral MTLE who are not candidates for temporal lobectomy or who have failed a prior mesial temporal lobe resection. Overall, despite the expansion of innovative techniques in recent years, resective surgery remains the reference treatment for TLE and should be proposed as the first-line surgical modality. In the future, ultrasound therapies could become a credible therapeutic option for refractory TLE patients.