1
|
Holzhauser T, Johnson P, Hindley JP, O'Connor G, Chan CH, Costa J, Fæste CK, Hirst BJ, Lambertini F, Miani M, Robert MC, Röder M, Ronsmans S, Bugyi Z, Tömösközi S, Flanagan SD. Are current analytical methods suitable to verify VITAL® 2.0/3.0 allergen reference doses for EU allergens in foods? Food Chem Toxicol 2020; 145:111709. [PMID: 32866515 DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy affects up to 6% of Europeans. Allergen identification is important for the risk assessment and management of the inadvertent presence of allergens in foods. The VITAL® initiative for voluntary incidental trace allergen labeling suggests protein reference doses, based on clinical reactivity in food challenge studies, at or below which voluntary labelling is unnecessary. Here, we investigated if current analytical methodology could verify the published VITAL® 2.0 doses, that were available during this analysis, in serving sizes between 5 and 500 g. Available data on published and commercial ELISA, PCR and mass spectrometry methods, especially for the detection of peanuts, soy, hazelnut, wheat, cow's milk and hen's egg were reviewed in detail. Limit of detection, quantitative capability, matrix compatibility, and specificity were assessed. Implications by the recently published VITAL® 3.0 doses were also considered. We conclude that available analytical methods are capable of reasonably robust detection of peanut, soy, hazelnut and wheat allergens for levels at or below the VITAL® 2.0 and also 3.0 doses, with some methods even capable of achieving this in a large 500 g serving size. Cow's milk and hen's egg are more problematic, largely due to matrix/processing incompatibility. An unmet need remains for harmonized reporting units, available reference materials, and method ring-trials to enable validation and the provision of comparable measurement results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Holzhauser
- Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Division of Allergology, D-63225, Langen, Germany.
| | - Philip Johnson
- University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Food Science and Technology, FARRP, Rm 266 Food Innovation Center, 1901 N 21 Street, PO Box 886207, Lincoln, NE, 68588-6207, USA.
| | | | - Gavin O'Connor
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Bundesallee 100, 38116, Braunschweig, Germany.
| | | | - Joana Costa
- REQUIMTE-LAQV, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade do Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Christiane K Fæste
- Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Toxicology Research Group, P.O. Box 750 Sentrum, 0106, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | - Michela Miani
- International Life Sciences Institute, European Branch, ILSI Europe a.i.s.b.l., Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Marie-Claude Robert
- Nestlé Research, Institute of Food Safety and Analytical Sciences, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Martin Röder
- Ifp Institut für Produktqualität GmbH, Wagner-Régeny-Str. 8, 12489, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Zsuzsanna Bugyi
- Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Research Group of Cereal Science and Food Quality, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Sándor Tömösközi
- Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Applied Biotechnology and Food Science, Research Group of Cereal Science and Food Quality, Budapest, Hungary.
| | | |
Collapse
|