1
|
García MJ, Riestra S, Amiot A, Julsgaard M, García de la Filia I, Calafat M, Aguas M, de la Peña L, Roig C, Caballol B, Casanova MJ, Farkas K, Boysen T, Bujanda L, Cuarán C, Dobru D, Fousekis F, Gargallo-Puyuelo CJ, Savarino E, Calvet X, Huguet JM, Kupcinskas L, López-Cardona J, Raine T, van Oostrom J, Gisbert JP, Chaparro M. Effectiveness and safety of a third-line rescue treatment for acute severe ulcerative colitis refractory to infliximab or ciclosporin (REASUC study). Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:1248-1259. [PMID: 38445785 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advent of new therapeutic agents and the improvement of supporting care might change the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) and avoid colectomy. AIMS To evaluate the colectomy-free survival and safety of a third-line treatment in patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids and who failed either infliximab or ciclosporin. METHODS Multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients with ASUC refractory to intravenous steroids who had failed infliximab or ciclosporin and received a third-line treatment during the same hospitalisation. Patients who stopped second-line treatment due to disease activity or adverse events (AEs) were eligible. We assessed short-term colectomy-free survival by logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for long-term assessment. RESULTS Among 78 patients, 32 received infliximab and 46 ciclosporin as second-line rescue treatment. Third-line treatment was infliximab in 45 (58%), ciclosporin in 17 (22%), tofacitinib in 13 (17%) and ustekinumab in 3 (3.8%). Colectomy was performed in 29 patients (37%) during follow-up (median 21 weeks). Of the 78 patients, 32 and 18 were in clinical remission at, respectively, 12 and 52 weeks. At the last visit, 25 patients were still on third-line rescue treatment, while 12 had stopped it due to clinical remission. AEs were reported in 26 (33%) patients. Two patients died (2.6%), including one following colectomy. CONCLUSION Third-line rescue treatment avoided colectomy in over half of the patients with ASUC and may be considered a therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María José García
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Grupo de Investigación Clínica y Traslacional en Enfermedades Digestivas, Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain
| | - Sabino Riestra
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias (ISPA), Oviedo, Spain
| | - Aurelien Amiot
- Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Bicêtre, Universite Paris Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Mette Julsgaard
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Molecular Prediction of Inflammatory Bowel Disease [PREDICT], Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Margalida Calafat
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariam Aguas
- Gastroenterology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luisa de la Peña
- Gastroenterology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Roig
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Berta Caballol
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| | - María José Casanova
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Klaudia Farkas
- Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Trine Boysen
- Gastro Unit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Luis Bujanda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Camila Cuarán
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Daniela Dobru
- Gastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Science and Tehnology "G E Palade" Tg.Mures, Târgu-Mureș, Romania
| | - Fotios Fousekis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Carla Jerusalén Gargallo-Puyuelo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, Institute for Health Research Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology (DiSCOG), Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Università di Padova (AOUP), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Xavier Calvet
- Gastroenterology Department, Servei d'Aparell Digestiu, Parc Taulí, Hospital Universitari, Institut d'Investigació i Innovació Parc Taulí, Departamento de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Sabadell, Spain
| | - José María Huguet
- Digestive Diseases Department, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Limas Kupcinskas
- Institute for Digestive Research, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | | | - Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joep van Oostrom
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - María Chaparro
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Parra V, Cifuentes S, Avendaño S, Ponce de León E, Florez C, Reyes G, Puentes F, Ballesteros M, Nuñez E, Gómez F, Márquez JR. Real-world experience of vedolizumab use in Colombian patients with inflammatory bowel disease-EXVEDOCOL. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S0210-5705(24)00025-6. [PMID: 38311006 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world studies about the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Latin America are scarce. Our study describes the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in Colombian patients with IBD. METHODS EXVEDOCOL (EXperience of VEDOlizumab in COLombia) was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Adults with IBD receiving a first dose of VDZ between July 2016 and October 2018 were included. The co-primary outcomes clinical response, and remission, were determined at week 14 and last visit during the maintenance phase (LVMP). The secondary outcomes, deep remission and loss of response were recorded at LVMP. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (25 ulcerative colitis (UC), 6 Crohn's disease (CD)) were included. At week 14, clinical response was achieved by 87.1% (27/31) of the patients treated with VDZ, while loss of response was reported in 6.7% (2/30). The remission rate at week 14 was 65.5% (19/29) and 75.9% (22/29) at LVMP. Prior anti-TNF exposure was reported in 61.3% (19 patients) of whom 84.2% (16/19) achieved clinical response at week 14 and 89.5% (17/19) at LVMP. For anti-TNF naïve patients, clinical response was recorded in 91.7% (11/12) at week 14 and 100% (12/12) at LVMP. CONCLUSIONS High clinical remission rates and safety profile highlight VDZ as a valuable treatment option for IBD patients. Anti-TNF naïve patients may derive greater benefit from therapy. Studies with larger cohorts could confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Parra
- Gastroadvanced, Bogotá, Hospital Internacional de Colombia, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | | | | | | | - Cristian Florez
- Gastroadvanced, Bogotá, Hospital Internacional de Colombia, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodríguez-Lago I, Cañete F, Guerra-Del-Río E, Herrera-deGuise C, Iglesias E, Leo E, Zabana Y, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Ginard D, Cabriada JL. Combination of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis and tofacitinib: Multicentre and retrospective study. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:S0210-5705(24)00022-0. [PMID: 38266817 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC), also in combination with biologics. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective study including all patients with refractory UC who received GMA plus TOFA. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing GMA by partial Mayo score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis. RESULTS Twelve patients were included (median 46 years [IQR, 37-58]; 67% female; 67% E3). Patients were mostly receiving TOFA 10mg bid (75%), and 33% also concomitant steroids at baseline. Median partial Mayo score at baseline was 7 (IQR, 5-7), and it decreased to a median of 2 (IQR, 0-3) and 0 (IQR, 0-3) after 1 and 6 months (p=0.027 and 0.020, respectively), while no differences were found in CRP and FC. Clinical remission was achieved by 6 patients both at 1 (50%) and 6 months (67%). CF values<250mg/kg were achieved by 2 and 4 patients at 1 and 6 months (data available in 5 and 7 patients, respectively). No patient required dose-escalation of TOFA, and one patient was able to de-escalate the drug. No patient required colectomy and all patients under steroids were able to stop them. CONCLUSION The combination of GMA and TOFA can be effective in selected cases of UC after PNR or LOR to this drug.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iago Rodríguez-Lago
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Galdakao, Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Galdakao, Spain.
| | - Fiorella Cañete
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Spain
| | - Elena Guerra-Del-Río
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - Eva Iglesias
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Eduardo Leo
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Yamile Zabana
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Terrassa, Spain
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Daniel Ginard
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma, Spain
| | - José Luis Cabriada
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Galdakao, Biobizkaia Health Research Institute, Galdakao, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sans Cuffi M, Argüelles Arias F, Echarri Piudo A, Ginard Vicens D, Gutiérrez Casbas A, Marín-Jiménez I. Optimizing treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis: CU-forum Delphi consensus. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 46:784-794. [PMID: 36803681 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Ulcerative colitis (UC) clinical guidelines include the best available evidence, although not all clinical situations are answered, so their management can be controversial. The aim of this study is to identify the situations of mild to moderate UC susceptible to controversy and to evaluate the degree of agreement or disagreement with specific proposals. METHODS Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) expert discussion meetings were used to identify criteria, attitudes and opinions regarding the management of UC. A Delphi questionnaire was then developed with 60 items regarding antibiotics, salicylates and probiotics; local, systemic and topical corticosteroids; and immunosuppressants. RESULTS Consensus was reached in 44 statements (73.3%); 32 in agreement (53.3%) and 12 in disagreement (20.0%). Some of them were: it is not necessary the systematic use of antibiotics despite the severity of the outbreak, being reserved when there is suspicion of infection or systemic toxicity; when faced with a mild-moderate outbreak of UC and in patients who do not respond to aminosalicylates, it is appropriate to use a dose of beclomethasone of 10mg/day for one month and 5mg/day for another month; it is advised that the dose of azathioprine be administered in a single dose. CONCLUSIONS IBD experts agree on most of the proposals identified for managing mild to moderate UC and there is a need for scientific evidence in some specific situations where expert opinion may be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miquel Sans Cuffi
- Servicio Gastroenterología/ISADMU, Centro Médico Teknon. Barcelona, España.
| | | | | | - Daniel Ginard Vicens
- Servicio Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Son Espases. Palma de Mallorca, España
| | - Ana Gutiérrez Casbas
- Servicio Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis, Alicante, España
| | - Ignacio Marín-Jiménez
- Servicio Aparato Digestivo, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón. Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mouhtar El Hálabi S, Valdés Delgado T, Maldonado Pérez B, Belvis Jiménez M, Argüelles Arias F. Severe outbreak of ulcerative colitis and cerebral neoplasia. Difficult management in COVID time. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2023; 115:657. [PMID: 36926936 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2023.9527/2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
A 61-year-old male diabetic patient, diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) 30 years ago, currently under treatment with mesalazine is presented. He was admitted to the emergency department due to a severe outbreak of UC, with 15 depositions daily, rectal bleeding and poor general condition. A brain CT-scan was carried out in the emergency department due to a sudden self-limited aphasia. A left frontal lesion of 45x38 mms with a prominent perilesional edema and with a displacement of the midline was reported. This was believed to be a meningioma (figure 1A). Urgent neurosurgery was not performed, prioritizing the severe flare-up UC. Based on this, full-dose metilprednisolone was administered.
Collapse
|
6
|
Quera R, Núñez P, Sicilia B, Flores L, Gomollón F. Corticosteroids in inflammatory bowel disease: Are they still a therapeutic option? Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 46:716-726. [PMID: 36375697 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Despite the development and incorporation of new therapeutic strategies, such as biologic therapy and small molecules, corticosteroids still play an important role in inducting inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remission. Variables like indicating the right doses at the right time, in adequate intervals, the security of these drugs and the pharmacological alternatives available must be considered by the providers when they are indicated to patients with IBD. Although the use of corticosteroids is considered as a marker of quality of care in patients with IBD, the use of these drugs in the clinical practice of IBD is far from being the correct one. This review article is not intended to be just a classic review of the indications for corticosteroids. Here we explain the scenarios in which, in our opinion, steroids would not be an appropriate option for our patients, as well as the most frequent mistakes we make in our daily practice when using them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Quera
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Paulina Núñez
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile; Sección de Gastroenterología, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Facultad Medicina Occidente, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Beatriz Sicilia
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, España
| | - Lilian Flores
- Programa Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Centro de Enfermedades Digestivas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Fernando Gomollón
- Facultad de Medicina, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón, CIBEREHD, Zaragoza, España.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Piñero G, Mañosa M, Calafat M, Vayreda E, Cañete F, Puig M, Domènech E. Mesalazine dose modification based on faecal calprotectin levels in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023:S0210-5705(23)00439-9. [PMID: 37806344 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Faecal calprotectin (FC) shows an excellent correlation with endoscopic and histological activity of ulcerative colitis (UC) and it is the best predictor of clinical relapse. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of modifying the dose of mesalazine based on FC levels, in clinical practice. METHODS Retrospective, single-centre study in UC patients in clinical remission while treated with mesalazine which dosage was decreased (DOWN) or increased (UP) according to FC levels. The main endpoint was the long-term maintenance of clinical remission. RESULTS A total of 56 patients were included (39 DOWN, 17 UP). In the DOWN group, the median baseline dose of mesalazine was 3.6g/day and the median baseline FC was 36μg/g. After a median follow-up of 22 months, 28% required rescue therapy. The cumulative relapse-free survival after tapering was 91% and 82% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. In the UP group, the median baseline dose of mesalazine was 2.4g/day, with a median baseline FC of 524μg/g. After a median follow-up of 12 months, 29% required rescue therapy. The cumulative relapse-free survival after dose increase was 86% and 72% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Mesalazine dose modification based on FC monitoring seems to be a safe strategy in patients with UC in clinical remission, with a probability of clinical relapse around 20% at two years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gisela Piñero
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Univrsitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España; Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Provincial del Centenario, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Míriam Mañosa
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Univrsitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España
| | - Margalida Calafat
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Univrsitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España
| | - Eva Vayreda
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Univrsitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España
| | - Fiorella Cañete
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Univrsitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España
| | - Maria Puig
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Univrsitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España
| | - Eugeni Domènech
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Univrsitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, España; Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ginard D, Ricote M, Nos P, Pejenaute ME, Sans M, Fontanillas N, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Polo Garcia J. Spanish Society of Primary Care Physicians (SEMERGEN) and Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) survey on the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 46:647-656. [PMID: 36402262 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Collaboration between Primary Care (PC) and Gastroenterology in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is crucial to provide high-quality healthcare. The aim of this study is to analyse the relationship between PC and gastroenterologists at a national level in order to identify areas for improvement in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and how to address them, with the aim of subsequently developing concrete proposals and projects between SEMERGEN and GETECCU. METHODS Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study, was carried out using an anonymous online questionnaire between October 2021 and March 2022. RESULTS A total of 157 surveys from Gastroenterology and 222 from PC were collected. 43.8% and 34.3% of gastroenterologists and family practitioners, respectively, considered that there was a good relationship between the units. The level of knowledge from family practitioners regarding different aspects of IBD out of 10 was: clinical 6.67±1.48, diagnosis 6.47±1.46, treatment 5.63±1.51, follow-up 5.53±1.68 and complications 6.05±1.54. The perception of support between both units did not exceed 4.5 on a scale from 0 to 10 in either of the surveys. The most highly voted improvement proposals were better coordination between the units, implementation of IBD units, and nursing collaboration. CONCLUSION There are deficiencies in the relationship between PC and Gastroenterology with special dedication to IBD that require the efforts of the scientific societies that represent them for greater coordination with the development of joint protocols and agile, fast, and effective communication channels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Ginard
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo/IDISBA, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, España; Miembro de GETECCU.
| | - Mercedes Ricote
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Mar Báltico, Madrid, España; Miembro del grupo de trabajo de Aparato Digestivo de SEMERGEN
| | - Pilar Nos
- Miembro de GETECCU; Servicio de Medicina Digestiva, Hospital Universitari y Politècnic de València, Valencia, España
| | - M Elena Pejenaute
- Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Mar Báltico, Madrid, España; Miembro del grupo de trabajo de Aparato Digestivo de SEMERGEN
| | - Miquel Sans
- Miembro de GETECCU; Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Centro Médico Teknon/ISADMU, Barcelona, España
| | - Noelia Fontanillas
- Miembro del grupo de trabajo de Aparato Digestivo de SEMERGEN; Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, Centro de Salud Bezana, Santa Cruz de Bezana, Cantabria, España; Coordinadora Grupo de Digestivo de SEMERGEN
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Miembro de GETECCU; Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España; Presidente de GETECCU
| | - José Polo Garcia
- Miembro del grupo de trabajo de Aparato Digestivo de SEMERGEN; Medicina Familiar, Centro de Salud Casar de Cáceres, Casar de Cáceres, Cáceres, España; Presidente de SEMERGEN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Herrador-López M, Martín-Masot R, Navas-López VM. Dietary Interventions in Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence with Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2023; 15:4194. [PMID: 37836478 PMCID: PMC10574654 DOI: 10.3390/nu15194194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic colon inflammation caused by genetic and environmental factors, including diet. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of diet on UC management in children and adults (2) Methods: A comprehensive search across databases yielded relevant studies, and risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This study was conducted in conformity to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. The certainty of evidence for outcomes was evaluated using GRADE methodology. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software version 5.4. (3) Results: Fourteen RCTs were included, results indicated higher clinical response, remission, and endoscopic remission rates in diet-treated groups. Carrageenan-free, anti-inflammatory, and cow milk protein elimination diets showed no significant advantages in maintaining clinical remission. However, a study involving fermented cow milk with bifidobacterial demonstrated favorable outcomes. Overall, pooled analysis leaned in favor of dietary intervention for sustaining clinical remission; (4) Conclusions: The relationship between diet and UC is an evolving terrain that demands deeper exploration. This systematic review and meta-analysis highlight the evolving relationship between diet and UC, necessitating further exploration. While understanding grows, adopting personalized dietary approaches could alleviate symptoms, and support a more positive disease trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Herrador-López
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29011 Málaga, Spain; (M.H.-L.); (V.M.N.-L.)
- The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Rafael Martín-Masot
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29011 Málaga, Spain; (M.H.-L.); (V.M.N.-L.)
- The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| | - Víctor Manuel Navas-López
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29011 Málaga, Spain; (M.H.-L.); (V.M.N.-L.)
- The Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA), 29010 Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fuxman C, Sicilia B, Linares ME, García-López S, González Sueyro R, González-Lamac Y, Zabana Y, Hinojosa J, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Balderramo D, Balfour D, Bellicoso M, Daffra P, Morelli D, Orsi M, Rausch A, Ruffinengo O, Toro M, Sambuelli A, Novillo A, Gomollón F, De Paula JA. GADECCU 2022 Guideline for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Adaptation and updating of the GETECCU 2020 Guideline. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 46 Suppl 1:S1-S56. [PMID: 36731724 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease that compromises the colon, affecting the quality of life of individuals of any age. In practice, there is a wide spectrum of clinical situations. The advances made in the physio pathogenesis of UC have allowed the development of new, more effective and safer therapeutic agents. OBJECTIVES To update and expand the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of relevant treatments for remission induction and maintenance after a mild, moderate or severe flare of UC. RECIPIENTS Gastroenterologists, coloproctologists, general practitioners, family physicians and others health professionals, interested in the treatment of UC. METHODOLOGY GADECCU authorities obtained authorization from GETECCU to adapt and update the GETECCU 2020 Guide for the treatment of UC. Prepared with GRADE methodology. A team was formed that included authors, a panel of experts, a nurse and a patient, methodological experts, and external reviewers. GRADE methodology was used with the new information. RESULTS A 118-page document was prepared with the 44 GADECCU 2022 recommendations, for different clinical situations and therapeutic options, according to levels of evidence. A section was added with the new molecules that are about to be available. CONCLUSIONS This guideline has been made in order to facilitate decision-making regarding the treatment of UC, adapting and updating the guide prepared by GETECCU in the year 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Fuxman
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Beatriz Sicilia
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, España
| | - María Eugenia Linares
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Santiago García-López
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Aragón, Zaragoza, España
| | - Ramiro González Sueyro
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Yago González-Lamac
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España
| | - Yamile Zabana
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Mútua Terrassa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, España
| | - Joaquín Hinojosa
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital de Manise, Valencia, España
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España
| | - Domingo Balderramo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Deborah Balfour
- Unidad de Enfermedades Inflamatorias, HIGEA Clínica de Gastroenterología, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Maricel Bellicoso
- Área de Gastroenterología, Inmunología Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pamela Daffra
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Central de Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Daniela Morelli
- Departamento de Educación, Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Marina Orsi
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Astrid Rausch
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Orlando Ruffinengo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Provincial del Centenario, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Martín Toro
- Unidad de Enfermedades Inflamatorias, HIGEA Clínica de Gastroenterología, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Alicia Sambuelli
- Sección de Enfermedades Inflamatorias Intestinales, Hospital Bonorino Udaondo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Abel Novillo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Sanatorio 9 de Julio, Tucumán, Argentina.
| | - Fernando Gomollón
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Aragón, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestiva (CIBEREHD), Zaragoza, España
| | - Juan Andrés De Paula
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
González-Lama Y, Ricart E, Cábez A, Fortes P, Gómez S, Casellas F. Medical consultation in ulcerative colitis: Key elements for improvement. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:917-925. [PMID: 36844134 PMCID: PMC9950864 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i6.917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a high impact. In order to improve patient outcomes, the clinician-patient relationship in daily practice is critical. Clinical guidelines provide a framework for UC diagnosis and treatment. However, standard procedures and the medical content focused upon medical consultations in UC patients has not yet been defined. Moreover, UC is a complex disease, given that patient characteristics and patient needs have been proven to vary during clinical consultation since establishing the diagnosis and upon the course of the disease. In this article, we have discussed the key elements and specific objectives to consider in medical consultation, such as diagnosis, first visits, follow-up visits, active disease patients, patients on topical therapies, new treatment initiation, refractory patients, extra-intestinal manifestations, as well as challenging situations. The key elements have been mentioned to comprise effective communication techniques, motivational interviewing (MI), as well as information and educational aspects, or organizational issues. The key elements to be implemented in daily practice were reported to comprise several general principles like duly prepared consultations, in addition to honesty and empathy with patients, as well as effective communication techniques, MI, information and educational points, or organizational issues. The role of other healthcare professionals such as specialized nurses, psychologists, or the use of checklists was also discussed and commented on.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yago González-Lama
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid 28222, Spain
| | - Elena Ricart
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona 08036, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Barcelona 08036, Spain
| | - Ana Cábez
- Department of Medical, Pfizer Spain, Madrid 28108, Spain
| | - Pilar Fortes
- Department of Medical, Pfizer Spain, Madrid 28108, Spain
| | - Susana Gómez
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca 37007, Spain
| | - Francesc Casellas
- Biomedical Research Networking Center in Hepatic and Digestive Diseases (CIBERehd), Barcelona 08036, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona 08035, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Taxonera C, Carpio López D, Cabez Manas A, Hinojosa Del Val JE. Clinical settings with tofacitinib in ulcerative colitis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2022. [PMID: 35373565 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8660/2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
There are aspects of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, specifically tofacitinib, that distinguish them from other drugs used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), such as their oral administration, their short half-life and their lack of immunogenicity. With the available evidence, we can highlight tofacitinib's quick action and flexibility of use, and its efficacy in patients, irrespective of whether or not they have previously been exposed to TNF inhibitors (anti-TNF drugs) and other biologic agents. Moreover, their safety profile is known and manageable, with certain considerations and precautions being factored in before and during treatment. In this review, we have defined various scenarios pertaining to this drug, e.g. its use in the event of failure or intolerance to previous treatment with biologics, when a quick response is required or in patients with other concurrent immune-mediated diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Taxonera
- Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, España
| | - Daniel Carpio López
- Gastroenterología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, España
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Huang J, Zhang J, Wang Y, Ma J, Yang X, Guo X, Lv M, Ma J, Zheng Y, Wang F, Tang X, Pandurangan A. Science Evidence of Chinese Herbal Medicine (Gegen Qinlian Decoction) in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2022; 2022:1-8. [PMID: 35356743 PMCID: PMC8958105 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7942845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives. Gegen Qinlian decoction (GQD), a Chinese herbal compound, has been widely used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) in China. However, evidence from systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) of GQD in UC remains highly controversial. To collate, evaluate, and synthesize the current evidence, we carried out this study. Methods. SRs/MAs of GQD for UC were obtained from eight databases. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) was utilized to appraise the methodological quality, Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) for reporting quality, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) for evidence quality. Results. Four eligible SRs/MAs were obtained. According to AMSTAR 2, all SRs/MAs were graded as critically low quality. According to PRISMA checklist, all SRs/MAs failed to report the information of protocol and registration. With GRADE, no outcome measure with high-quality evidence was found, and the evidence quality for outcome measures was in the moderate to critically low levels. Conclusions. GQD with conventional medicine (CM) seems to be more effective in UC than CM alone. This finding provides a new alternative strategy for the treatment of UC. However, owing to the limitations of the evidence provided by the included SRs/MAs, this conclusion must be treated with caution.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mesonero F, Fernández C, Sánchez-Rodríguez E, García-García Paredes A, Senosiain C, Albillos A, López-Sanromán A. Polypharmacy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Prevalence and Outcomes in a Single-center Series. J Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 56:e189-e195. [PMID: 34864790 PMCID: PMC8843391 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypharmacy can complicate the course and management of chronic diseases, and has been little explored in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to date. AIM The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy in a series of IBD patients, describing associated factors and its correlation with poor disease outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study of a single-center series. Polypharmacy was defined as the simultaneous use of 5 or more drugs. Disease outcomes, IBD treatment nonadherence and undertreatment were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS A total of 407 patients were included [56% males, median age: 48 y (interquartile range, 18 to 92 y)], of whom 60.2% had Crohn's disease; Chronic comorbidity and multiple comorbidities were present in 54% and 27% of patients, respectively. Median number of prescriptions per patient was 3 (range: 0 to 15). Polypharmacy was identified in 18.4% of cases, inappropriate medication in 10.5% and use of high-risk drugs in 6.1% (mainly opioids). In multivariate analysis, polypharmacy was associated with chronic comorbidity [odds ratio (OR)=10.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.14-47.56; P˂0.003], multiple comorbidities (OR=3.53, 95% CI: 1.46-8.51; P=0.005) and age above 62 years (OR=3.54, 95% CI: 1.67-7.51; P=0.001). No association with poor disease outcomes was found at 12 months. However, polypharmacy was the only factor associated with IBD treatment nonadherence (OR=2.24, 95% CI: 1.13-4.54, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Polypharmacy occurs in around 1 in 5 patients with IBD, mainly in older adults and those with comorbidity. This situation could interfere with adherence to IBD treatment and therapeutic success.
Collapse
|
15
|
Laredo V, Gargallo-Puyuelo CJ, Gomollón F. How to Choose the Biologic Therapy in a Bio-Naïve Patient with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11030829. [PMID: 35160280 PMCID: PMC8837085 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The availability of biologic therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing significantly. This represents more options to treat patients, but also more difficulties in choosing the therapies, especially in the context of bio-naïve patients. Most evidence of safety and efficacy came from clinical trials comparing biologics with placebo, with a lack of head-to-head studies. Network meta-analysis of biologics and real-world studies have been developed to solve this problem. Despite the results of these studies, there are also other important factors to consider before choosing the biologic, such as patient preferences, comorbidities, genetics, and inflammatory markers. Given that resources are limited, another important aspect is the cost of biologic therapy, since biosimilars are widely available and have been demonstrated to be effective with a significant decrease in costs. In this review, we summarize the evidence comparing biologic therapy in both Crohn´s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in different clinical situations. We also briefly synthesize the evidence related to predictors of biologic response, as well as the biologic use in extraintestinal manifestations and the importance of the drug-related costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viviana Laredo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
- Correspondence: (V.L.); (C.J.G.-P.)
| | - Carla J. Gargallo-Puyuelo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
- Institute for Health Research Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Correspondence: (V.L.); (C.J.G.-P.)
| | - Fernando Gomollón
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
- Institute for Health Research Aragón (IIS Aragón), 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Psychiatry and Dermatology, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain
- Liver and Digestive Diseases Networking Biomedical Research Centre (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, CIBEREHD), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hernández Martínez A, Navajas Hernández P, Martín Rodríguez MDM, Lázaro Sáez M, Olmedo Martín R, Núñez Ortiz A, Argüelles Arias F, Fernández Cano MDC, Gallardo Sánchez F, Marín Pedrosa S, González García J, Vázquez Morón JM. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: real-life experience in Andalusia. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2022; 114:516-521. [PMID: 35000397 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8380/2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tofacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). In the present study we aimed to evaluate its efficacy in a real-life setting. METHODS Retrospective and multicenter observational study including UC patients treated with tofacitinib. Short and long-term treatment effectiveness, treatment survival, need for dose escalation and safety are analyzed. Clinical response and remission were defined in accordance with the partial Mayo score. RESULTS Seventy-four patients were included, 98.3% of whom had received prior biological treatment: 55.4% with 3 or more biologicals and up to 64.9% with 2 or 3 different mechanisms of action. Clinical remission and response rates were 37.8% and 77% at 8 weeks, and 41.8% and 70.1% at 16 weeks. Of non-responders at 8 weeks, 37,5% achieved a delayed clinical response at 16 weeks. Mean treatment duration was 19 months (95% CI: 16-22), with a treatment survival of 56% at 28 months, and remission and response rates at 24 months of 53.8% and 61.5%. Twenty-three treatments were withdrawn, most of them (18) during the induction period. There were adverse events in a quarter of the patients; only 4 were severe and led to treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION Tofacitinib demonstrates in clinical practice its efficacy to induce and maintain clinical response in treatment-refractory UC patients, with an acceptable safety profile.
Collapse
|
17
|
Aparicio Serrano A, Gallego Jiménez E, Castro Rodríguez J, Soto Escribano P, Iglesias Flores E, Marín Pedrosa S, Benítez JM. Mesalazine induced interstitial pneumonitis in the COVID era. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2022; 114:429-430. [DOI: 10.17235/reed.2022.8635/2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
18
|
Tang X, Yang M, Gu Y, Jiang L, Du Y, Liu J. Orally Deliverable Dual-Targeted Pellets for the Synergistic Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Drug Des Devel Ther 2021; 15:4105-4123. [PMID: 34616144 PMCID: PMC8489837 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s322702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The effective treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) poses substantial challenges, and the aetiopathogenesis of UC is closely related to infectious, immunological and environmental factors. Currently, there is a considerable need for the development of orally bioavailable dosage forms that enable the effective delivery of therapeutic drugs to local diseased lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Methods Berberine (BBR) and Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz (AM) volatile oil, derived from the Chinese herbs Coptis chinensis Franch and Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz, have anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities. In this study, we prepared colon-targeted pellets loaded with BBR and stomach-targeted pellets loaded with AM volatile oil for the synergistic treatment of UC. The Box-Behnken design and β-cyclodextrin inclusion technique were used to optimize the enteric coating formula and prepare volatile oil inclusion compounds. Results The two types of pellets were spherical and had satisfactory physical properties. The pharmacokinetic results showed that the AUC and MRT values of the dual-targeted (DPs) pellets were higher than those of the control pellets. In addition, in vivo animal imaging confirmed that the DPs could effectively deliver BBR to the colon. Moreover, compared with sulfasalazine and monotherapy, DPs exerted a more significant anti-inflammatory effect by inhibiting the expression of inflammatory factors including IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, TNF-α and MPO both in serum and tissues and enhancing immunity by decreasing the production of IgA and IgG. Conclusion The DPs play a synergistic anti-UC effect by exerting systemic and local anti-inflammatory and provide an effective oral targeted preparation for the treatment of UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomeng Tang
- Department of Pharmacy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,Department of Pharmacy, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| | - Meng Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, Shanghai Ninth People Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongwei Gu
- Department of Pharmacy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China
| | - Liangdi Jiang
- Department of Pharmacy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,College of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250355, People's Republic of China
| | - Yue Du
- Department of Pharmacy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,College of Pharmacy, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, 250355, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiyong Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China.,Department of Pharmacy, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gargallo-Puyuelo CJ, Laredo V, Gomollón F. Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. How to Optimize Thiopurines in the Biologic Era? Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:681907. [PMID: 34336887 PMCID: PMC8322650 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.681907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Thiopurines have been a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although they have been used for more than 50 years, there are still some unsolved issues about their efficacy and, also, some safety concerns, mainly the risk of myelosuppression and life-threatening lymphoproliferative disorders. Furthermore, the development of biological therapy raises the question whether there is still a role for thiopurines in the IBD treatment algorithm. On the other hand, limited cost and wide availability make thiopurines a reasonable option in settings of limited resources and increasing prevalence of IBD. In fact, there is a growing interest in optimizing thiopurine therapy, since pharmacogenomic findings suggest that a personalized approach based on the genotyping of some molecules involved in its metabolism could be useful to prevent side effects. Polymorphisms of thiopurine methyltransferase enzyme (TPMT) that result in low enzymatic activity have been associated with an increased risk of myelotoxicity, especially in Caucasians; however, in Asians it is assumed that the variants of nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15) are more relevant in the development of toxicity. Age is also important, since in elderly patients the risk of complications seems to be increased. Moreover, the primo-infection of Epstein Barr virus and cytomegalovirus under thiopurine treatment has been associated with severe lymphoproliferative disorders. In addition to assessing individual characteristics that may influence thiopurines treatment outcomes, this review also discusses other strategies to optimize the therapy. Low-dose thiopurines combined with allopurinol can be used in hypermethylators and in thiopurine-related hepatotoxicity. The measurement of metabolites could be useful to assess compliance, identify patients at risk of adverse events and also facilitating the management of refractory patients. Thioguanine is also a rescue therapy in patients with toxicity related to conventional thiopurine therapy. Finally, the current indications for thiopurines in monotherapy or in combination with biologics, as well as the optimal duration of treatment, are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Viviana Laredo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Fernando Gomollón
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Clinic Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Psychiatry and Dermatology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.,Institute for Health Research Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red, Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|