Effect of GI endoscopy nurse experience on screening colonoscopy outcomes

Development of a Nurse-Led Competency-Based Program for Therapeutic Endoscopy: The Formation of the Nurse Product Procedure Group

Therapeutic endoscopy is emerging as an innovating alternative to gastroenterology surgery. Due to the increase in new technologies, endoscopy clinical staff require ongoing education to develop safe, competent practice for new equipment and supplies. Maintaining competencies with new equipment and supplies can be challenging. This article illustrates the development and implementation of a continuous educational program for endoscopy clinical staff at a major academic medical center. An initial needs assessment of staff education and competency led to the multidisciplinary plan for continuous education. Development of the Nurse Product Procedure Group enabled endoscopy staff to standardize care and maintain competency in advanced therapeutic procedures. The Nurse Product Procedure Group offers various pathways of learning to meet clinical staff's individual learning needs. Over a 5-year span of implementation, staff satisfaction of education and resources improved. Key implementation elements of the Nurse Product Procedure Group include monthly staff education, resource development, multidisciplinary collaboration, cost savings, outreach education, and external collaboration with national and international gastroenterology professional organizations and societies.

ASGE guideline on minimum staffing requirements for the performance of GI endoscopy

Efforts to increase patient safety and satisfaction, a critical concern for health providers, require periodic evaluation of all factors involved in the provision of GI endoscopy services. We aimed to develop guidelines on minimum staffing requirements and scope of practice of available staff for the safe and efficient performance of GI endoscopy. The recommendations in this guideline were based on a systematic review of published literature, results from a nationwide survey of endoscopy directors, along with the expert guidance of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Standards of Practice Committee members, ASGE Practice Operation Committee members, and the ASGE Governing Board.

Study on the influence of assistant experience on the quality of colonoscopy: A pilot single-center study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Colonoscopy is the most important method for the diagnosis and treatment of intestinal diseases, and there are many factors affecting the quality of examination. Although the assistant is one of the factors influencing the quality of colonoscopy, there are few studies on the effect of different assistants with different experiences on the quality of colonoscopy. Therefore, the study was aimed to research the correlation between different assistants with different experiences and the quality of water-injection colonoscopy.

METHOD

In this study, a single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted to analyze the key quality indicators (the rate to arrive cecum, time to arrive cecum, total operation time, detection rate of polyps, detection rate of adenoma, pain score, operation satisfaction, and the pressure on abdomen) of patients who underwent water-injection colonoscopy under non-sedation from January 2018 to June 2018 in the center. Patients were randomly assigned to different assistant groups based on the actual working period of 6 months (0∼6 months inexperienced assistant group and assistant group with more than 6 months of experience). Through fitting the bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models, the differences between the two groups and the effects on the key quality indicators of colon examination were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 331 patients who were eligible for non-sedation colonoscopy were randomly assigned to the experienced assistant group (n = 179) and the inexperienced assistant group (n = 152). Among them, 103 cases of polyp and 70 cases of adenoma were detected. The rate to arrive cecum, polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate were compared between the two groups during operation (P > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in the time to arrive cecum, patients' satisfaction with operation, pain score and abdominal pressure (P < .05). In the inexperienced assistant group, 20% of the operation time was one standard deviation higher than the mean value, while the experienced assistant group was 12% (339 s vs 405s, OR 0.541, 95% 0.295-0.990). Compared with the inexperienced assistant group, patients in the experienced assistant group had higher operational satisfaction (98.32% vs 92.11%, OR 0.199, 95% 0.055-0.718) and lower pain score (0.3 vs 0.49, OR 1.993, 95% 1.52-3.775). All relations remained unchanged after adjusting for potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

The assistant is a key factor in the quality of colonoscopy, especially in the case of non-sedating colonoscopy. The experience of the assistant is related to the time to arrive cecum, the degree of pain and the overall satisfaction of patient with the operation. The assistant should be subject to the quality supervision of the endoscopic inspector. Proof of human Clinical Trial Registration: The institutional review board of Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Zhejiang Province, China approved the study. The study is registered on. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800015650).

[Colonoscopy quality control as a requirement of colorectal cancer screening]

The strategies used in population-based colorectal screening strategies culminate in colonoscopy and consequently the success of these programs largely depends on the quality of this diagnostic test. The main factors to consider when evaluating quality are scientific-technical quality, safety, patient satisfaction, and accessibility. Quality indicators allow variability among hospitals, endoscopy units and endoscopists to be determined and can identify those not achieving recommended standards. In Spain, the working group for colonoscopy quality of the Spanish Society of Gastroenterology and the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy have recently drawn up a Clinical Practice Guideline that contains the available evidence on the quality of screening colonoscopy, as well as the basic requirements that must be met by endoscopy units and endoscopists carrying out this procedure. The implementation of training programs and screening colonoscopy quality controls are strongly recommended to guarantee the success of population-based colorectal cancer screening.

Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND

No reported prospective, randomized study has evaluated the impact of an endoscopy nurse participating as a second observer during colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the participation of an endoscopy nurse enhanced the polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) during screening colonoscopy.

DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Academic hospitals.

PATIENTS

A total of 844 consecutive patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.

INTERVENTIONS

Single observation by colonoscopist or dual observation by colonoscopist and endoscopy nurse during colonoscope withdrawal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

PDR and ADR.

RESULTS

No significant difference in patient demographic data, adequacy of bowel preparation, or mean withdrawal time was observed between the 2 groups. In total, 1153 polyps, including 762 adenomas, were detected in 791 patients. Seven nonpolypoid, depressed neoplastic lesions (0-IIc or combined types) were only detected in the dual observation group. A multivariate analysis revealed that experienced (≥ 2 years) endoscopy nurse participation significantly increased the PDR and ADR compared with those in the single observation group by a colonoscopist alone (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.58 [95% CI, 1.07-2.32]; adjusted OR 1.47 [95% CI, 1.01-2.12], respectively). Additionally, the PDR was significantly higher in the dual-observation group with fellows (<500 colonoscopies) and an experienced endoscopy nurse versus that in the single observation group (adjusted OR 2.07 [95% CI, 1.15-3.74]). There was no significant benefit of experienced nurse participation in the subgroup with experienced colonoscopists.

LIMITATIONS

Absence of colonoscopist blinding.

CONCLUSIONS

Experienced endoscopy nurse participation increased the PDR and ADR during screening colonoscopy. However, the benefit of participation by experienced nurses appears to be exclusively with inexperienced colonoscopists.