Autoimmune pancreatitis presenting with gastric outlet obstruction

An adult female case of autoimmune pancreatitis with gastric outlet obstruction complicated by annular pancreas

A 65-year-old woman presented with epigastric pain persisting for more than 3 months. She was diagnosed with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), based on high serum IgG4 levels (981 mg/dL) and diffuse pancreatic enlargement with a capsule-like rim on computed tomography (CT). Additionally, the main pancreatic duct was indistinct on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. CT, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and upper gastrointestinal radiography revealed stenosis with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) in the second part of the duodenum. Prednisolone administration was initiated as treatment; on day 3 of treatment, the patient's symptoms improved. After 2 weeks, CT and endoscopic ultrasonography of the duodenal bulbs revealed improvement of the enlarged pancreas. The second part of the duodenum ran into the pancreatic head, and no malignant lesions were observed. Based on the above findings, we suspect that she developed AIP in the annular pancreas (AnnP), where duodenal stenosis worsened with diffuse pancreatic enlargement, resulting in GOO. She is currently under careful observation with tapering of prednisolone-without surgical treatment for AnnP. The pathogenesis of GOO caused by AIP without malignancy is rare. One case of GOO caused by AIP, wherein AIP developed in the AnnP (similar to the present case), has been reported, highlighting the novelty of our report.

Etiological spectrum and response to endoscopic balloon dilation in patients with benign gastric outlet obstruction

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD)-related gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) is known to respond favorably to endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD). However, data on efficacy of EBD for other etiologies of benign GOO are sparse. We aimed to compare the response of EBD among different etiologies of GOO.

METHODS

Records of all patients with benign GOO who underwent EBD at our tertiary-care center between January 1998 and December 2017 were analyzed. Dilation was done by using through-the-scope balloons. Procedural and clinical success of EBD was compared among different etiologies.

RESULTS

A total of 306 patients were evaluated, of whom 264 (mean [± standard deviation] [SD] age 37.89 ± 17.49 years; men 183, women 81) underwent dilation. Etiologically, caustic ingestion was the commonest cause of GOO (53.8%) followed by PUD (26.1%) and medication-induced (8.3%). Overall procedural and clinical success was achieved in 200 (75.7%) and 243 (92.04%) patients, respectively, requiring a mean (± SD) of 2.55 (2.8) and 5.37 (3.9) sessions, respectively. Caustic-induced GOO responded less favorably, requiring a higher number of dilation sessions and having more refractory strictures than other etiologies. Medication-induced GOO performed worse than PUD-related GOO. Of the 264 patients, 9 (3.4%) had perforations during EBD, 3 had contained leaks and were managed conservatively, and 6 underwent successful surgery.

CONCLUSION

EBD is successful in a majority of patients with benign GOO, with caustic-induced GOO and medication-induced GOO being more difficult than PUD-related GOO.

Clinical profile and treatment outcomes in autoimmune pancreatitis: a report from North India

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a rare disease, and data from countries like India concerning its clinical presentation and long-term outcomes are scarce. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical presentation, imaging features and treatment outcomes of patients with AIP.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective analysis of our database to identify patients diagnosed with and treated for AIP at our unit in a tertiary care hospital in North India.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients with AIP (mean age: 54.9±11.1 years; 13 male) were evaluated. Of these, 9 (50%) patients had probable type 1 AIP, 2 (11%) patients probable type 2 AIP, and 4 (22%) definite type 1 AIP. Patients with type 2 AIP were significantly younger than patients with type 1 (40.0±2.8 vs. 58.4±9.6 years). In type 1 AIP, other organ involvement was observed in 3/18 (17%) patients, whereas both patients with type 2 AIP had coexisting ulcerative colitis. The diagnosis of AIP was made after resective surgery in 6/18 (33.0%) patients. An accurate diagnosis of AIP could be made in all patients who underwent resection or core biopsy, but cytological examination after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration could not provide a definitive diagnosis in any patient. Initial treatment with steroids was given to 12 (67%) patients, with a 100% response, but the disease relapsed in 5/13 (38%) patients over a mean follow-up period of 34.2±21.6 weeks.

CONCLUSION

AIP is not rare in India and the majority of clinical manifestations, imaging features, treatment response and long-term outcomes are similar to those reported in the literature.