Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia

Resectability of Small Duodenal Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Cold Snare Polypectomy

INTRODUCTION

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) and cold snare polypectomy (CSP) are novel endoscopic procedures for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADET). However, consensus on how to use both procedures appropriately has not been established. In this study, we evaluated treatment outcomes of both procedures, including resectability.

METHODS

In this single-center randomized controlled study conducted between January 2020 and June 2022, patients with SNADET ≤12 mm were randomly allocated to UEMR and CSP groups. The primary end point was sufficient vertical R0 resection (SVR0), which was defined as R0 resection including a sufficient submucosal layer. We compared treatment outcomes including SVR0 rate between groups.

RESULTS

The SVR0 rate was significantly higher in the UEMR group than in the CSP group (65.6% vs 41.5%, P = 0.01). By contrast, the R0 resection rate was not significantly different between study groups (70.3% vs 61.5%, P = 0.29). The submucosal layer thickness was significantly greater in the UEMR group than in the CSP group (median 546 [range, 309-833] μm vs 69 [0-295] μm, P < 0.01). CSP had a shorter total procedure time (median 12 [range, 8-16] min vs 1 [1-3] min, P < 0.01) and fewer total bleeding events (9.4% vs 1.5%, P = 0.06).

DISCUSSION

UEMR has superior vertical resectability compared with CSP, but CSP has a shorter procedure time and fewer bleeding events. Although CSP is preferable for most small SNADET, UEMR should be selected for lesions that cannot be definitively diagnosed as mucosal low-grade neoplasias.

A first-in-human clinical study of laparoscopic autologous myoblast sheet transplantation to prevent delayed perforation after duodenal endoscopic mucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

The detection rate of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) has recently been increasing. Large tumors may contain malignant lesions and early therapeutic intervention is recommended. Endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD) is considered a feasible treatment modality, however, the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the duodenum create a risk of postoperative perforation after ESD.

METHODS

To explore whether myoblast sheet transplantation could prevent delayed perforation after ESD, a first-in-human (FIH) clinical trial of laparoscopic autologous myoblast sheet transplantation after duodenal ESD was launched. Autologous myoblast sheets fabricated from muscle tissue obtained seven weeks before ESD were transplanted laparoscopically onto the serous side of the ESD. The primary endpoints were the onset of peritonitis due to delayed perforation within three days after surgery and all adverse events during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Three patients with SNADETs ≥ 20 mm in size underwent transplantation of a myoblast sheet onto the serous side of the duodenum after ESD. In case 1, The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Endoscopy and abdominal computed tomography revealed no signs of delayed perforation. Despite incomplete mucosal closure in case 2, and multiple micro perforations during ESD in case 3, cell sheet transplantation could prevent the postoperative massive perforation after ESD, and endoscopy on day 49 after transplantation revealed no stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical trial showed the safety, efficacy, and procedural operability of this novel regenerative medicine approach involving transplanting an autologous myoblast sheet laparoscopically onto the serosa after ESD in cases with a high risk of delayed perforation. This result indicates the potential application of cell sheet medicine in treating various abdominal organs and conditions with minimal invasiveness in the future.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

jRCT, jRCT2073210094. Registered November 8 2021, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2073210094 .

Can underwater endoscopic mucosal resection be an alternative to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors?

Objectives

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a simpler procedure for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADET) than conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (cEMR). This study aimed to evaluate whether cEMR can be substituted by UEMR for SNADET in terms of effectiveness, safety, and learning curve.

Methods

A total of 157 consecutive patients with 203 SNADETs ≤20 mm in diameter, including 107 lesions resected by cEMR and 96 lesions resected by UEMR, between January 2019 and May 2023, were retrospectively recruited. The treatment outcomes were compared between the cEMR and UEMR groups. The risk factors for incomplete resection by UEMR were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Lesions in the UEMR group were divided chronologically into five periods; thereafter, the en bloc resection rate and procedure time were compared.

Results

No significant differences existed between the cEMR and UEMR groups in the mean procedure time (3.9 min vs. 3.6 min, p = 0.1380) or en bloc resection rate (91% vs. 94%, p = 0.4138). No perforation was observed in either group. Tumor size was an independent risk factor for incomplete resection using UEMR (p < 0.01). The history of biopsy was not associated with incomplete resection using UEMR. The en bloc resection rate of UEMR was 100% (20/20) in the first period and ranged from 90% to 100% over all periods.

Conclusion

UEMR is safe and effective for SNADET ≤20 mm, regardless of a history of biopsy, and is easy to learn. Thus, UEMR can serve as an alternative to cEMR.

Therapeutic Endoscopy to the Rescue: EUS Gallbladder Drainage and ESD of a Giant Duodenal Polyp

The role of endoscopy in the management of traditionally surgical conditions continues to evolve. Endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection and more recently endoscopic submucosal dissection, which remove cancerous and precancerous lesions in the gastrointestinal tract, continue to grow in use. In addition, therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound has evolved to include the management of patients with acute cholecystitis. Here, we present an 83-year-old man with acute calculus cholecystitis, who was considered ineligible for cholecystectomy and had a giant duodenal polyp that obstructed the visualization of the duodenal lumen, preventing the successful placement of lumen-apposing metal stents. Volume reduction of a duodenal polyp was performed through epinephrine injection to assist in the successful endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage. Subsequently, the patient underwent elective endoscopic mucosal resection to remove the giant duodenal polyp.

Clinical course and management of adverse events after endoscopic resection of superficial duodenal epithelial tumors: Multicenter retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to elucidate the clinical course and management of adverse events (AEs) after endoscopic resection (ER) for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs).

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent ER of SDETs between January 2008 and July 2018 at 18 Japanese institutions were retrospectively enrolled. The study outcomes included the clinical course, management, and risk of surgical conversion with perioperative AEs after ER for SDETs.

RESULTS

Of the 226 patients with AEs, the surgical conversion rate was 8.0% (18/226), including 3.7% (4/108), 1.0% (1/99), and 50.0% (12/24) of patients with intraoperative perforation, delayed bleeding, or delayed perforation, respectively. In the multivariate logistic analysis, involvement of the major papilla (odds ratio [OR] 12.788; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.098-77.961, P = 0.006) and delayed perforation (OR 37.054; 95% CI 10.219-134.366, P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for surgical conversion after AEs. Delayed bleeding occurred from postoperative days 1-14 or more, whereas delayed perforation occurred within 3 days in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical conversion rate was higher for delayed perforation than those for other AEs after ER of SDETs. Involvement of the major papilla and delayed perforation were significant risk factors for surgical conversion following AEs. In addition, reliable prevention of delayed perforation is required for 3 days after duodenal ER to prevent the need for surgical interventions.

Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy as an alternative to emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation: a case report

A 71-year-old woman underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for early duodenal cancer at the second portion of the duodenum and developed acute peritonitis due to delayed duodenal perforation. Emergency laparotomy was performed. A huge perforation formed at the descending duodenum without ampulla involvement. Pancreas-sparing partial duodenectomy (PPD) with gastrojejunostomy was performed (250 min operative time) with 50 mL of intraoperative blood loss. She required intensive care for 3 days and was discharged on postoperative day 21 with no severe complications. Emergency treatment for a major duodenal injury or perforation remains challenging because of high morbidity and mortality. An appropriate treatment should be considered according to the nature of the defect. Although PPD is an acceptable procedure for patients with a duodenal neoplasm, its use in emergency surgery is rarely reported. PPD is more reliable than primary repair or anastomosis using a jejunal wall, and less invasive than pancreaticoduodenectomy, for emergency treatment. We performed PPD in this patient because the duodenal perforation was too large to reconstruct and did not involve the ampulla. PPD can be a safe and feasible alternative surgical procedure to pancreaticoduodenectomy for a major duodenal perforation, especially in patients with a duodenal perforation that does not involve the ampulla.

Efficacy and safety of cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia ≤ 10 mm

Background and study aims Endoscopic treatment strategies for small superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia (SDET) have not been established, and the R0 resection rates of all previously reported endoscopic techniques are somewhat low. Furthermore, no reports of cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMRC), which is reportedly associated with a relatively high R0 resection rate, have been evaluated in sufficient numbers of patients. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy and safety of EMRC for SDETs ≤ 10 mm in a retrospective cohort study. Patients and methods We examined a prospectively maintained database and identified 248 consecutive patients (248 lesions) who had undergone endoscopic resection for SDETs ≤ 10 mm between January 2017 and June 2022. Our treatment strategy was consistent, with EMRC indicated for all SDETs ≤ 10 mm without non-lifting signs. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. Results Overall, 20 lesions had non-lifting signs and were selected for endoscopic submucosal dissection, while the remaining 228 lesions were treated with EMRC. As a result of EMRC, the median tumor size was 5 mm, and the mean procedure time was 5 minutes. Most of the lesions (89.2%) were located in the descending part. The R0 resection rate was 97.4% (222/228 cases), and the en bloc resection rate was 99.6%. Only seven patients(3.1%) experienced adverse events (6 patients, delayed bleeding; 1 patient, acute pancreatitis), which were successfully managed without surgical intervention. Furthermore, no recurrences were observed. Conclusions We have demonstrated that EMRC is an effective and safe treatment for SDETs ≤ 10 mm that do not have non-lifting signs.

Partial duodenectomy with seromyotomy by the "lift-and-cut" method for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A novel technique

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic strategy for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors remains controversial. We developed a novel surgical technique for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. We report the initial two cases managed with this method.

MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

We endoscopically confirmed the tumor location and circumferentially incised the seromuscular layer of the duodenum along it. After circumferential seromyotomy, the submucosal layer was expanded by endoscopic insufflation, and the target lesion was sufficiently lifted. The submucosal layer, including the target lesion, was stapled and resected after confirming the absence of problems with endoscopic passage. The seromuscular layer was continuously sutured to bury and reinforce the stapler line. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery was performed in one case. The resected specimens measured 52 × 32 mm and 50 × 26 mm with negative surgical margins. Both patients were discharged without complications and demonstrated no evidence of stenosis.

DISCUSSION

Compared with previously reported procedures, this method of partial duodenectomy with seromyotomy for superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors is promising, simple, and safe.

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A review

The surface of the small bowel mucosa is covered more than any other section of the digestive canal; however, the overall prevalence of small bowel tumors of the whole gastrointestinal tract is evidently low. Owing to the improvement in endoscopic techniques, the prevalence of small bowel tumors has increased across multiple countries, which is mainly due to an increase in duodenal tumors. Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) are defined as tumors originating from the non-ampullary region in the duodenum that share similarities and discrepancies with their gastric and colorectal counterparts in the pathogenesis and clinicopathologic characteristics. To date, white light endoscopy (WLE) remains the cornerstone of endoscopic diagnosis for SNADETs. Besides, narrow-band imaging (NBI) techniques and magnifying endoscopy (ME) have been widely used in the clinic and endorsed by multiple guidelines and consensuses for SNADETs' evaluation. Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), endocytoscopy (ECS), and artificial intelligence (AI) are also up-and-coming methods, showing an exceptional value in the diagnosis of SNADETs. Similar to the endoscopic treatment for colorectal polyps, the choices for SNADETs mainly include cold snare polypectomy (CSP), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS). However, owing to the narrow lumen, rich vascularity, weak muscle layer, abundant Brunner's gland, and the hardship of endoscope control, the duodenum ranks as one of the most dangerous operating areas in the digestive tract. Therefore, endoscopists must anticipate the difficulties in endoscopic maneuverability, remain aware of the increased risk of complications, and then select the appropriate treatment according to the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

Intensive endoscopic resection strategy for multiple duodenal polyposis associated with familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Multiple duodenal polyposis associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a high risk of duodenal cancer development. We evaluated the feasibility of intensive endoscopic resection that is a comprehensive treatment strategy combining multiple kinds of endoscopic treatments.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study. From January 2012 to July 2022, a total of 28 consecutive patients in FAP who underwent endoscopic resection for multiple duodenal polyposis more than twice were included. Various endoscopic treatments, such as cold polypectomy (CP), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), underwater EMR (UEMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and endoscopic papillectomy (EP), were applied depending on lesions size and location. We evaluated individual information from patients' medical records, including patient characteristics, lesion characteristics, details of endoscopic treatment, pathologic findings, and Spigelman index (SI). We compared the differences in the number of treatments and observation periods with and without SI decrease.

RESULTS

A total of 1040 lesions were removed by 138 sessions of endoscopic resections. The median follow-up period was 3.2 years. At the beginning of the endoscopic intervention, median SI was 9 (6-11) and the proportion of Spigelman stage (SS) IV was 61%. Repeated endoscopic treatments finally reduced SI in 26 patients (93%), and the proportion of SS IV significantly decreased to 13% with every endoscopic treatment. The mean SI change was -4.2 points per year (95% confidence interval: -0.6 to -5.9). There were no patients required surgical duodenectomy during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Intensive resection has a potential of downstaging duodenal lesions associated with FAP.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review

ESGE suggests conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; marking and mucosal incision followed by circumferential incision and stepwise submucosal dissection) for most esophageal and gastric lesions. ESGE suggests tunneling ESD for esophageal lesions involving more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. ESGE recommends the pocket-creation method for colorectal ESD, at least if traction devices are not used. The use of dedicated ESD knives with size adequate to the location/thickness of the gastrointestinal wall is recommended. It is suggested that isotonic saline or viscous solutions can be used for submucosal injection. ESGE recommends traction methods in esophageal and colorectal ESD and in selected gastric lesions. After gastric ESD, coagulation of visible vessels is recommended, and post-procedural high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (or vonoprazan). ESGE recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD. ESGE recommends corticosteroids after resection of  > 50 % of the esophageal circumference. The use of carbon dioxide when performing ESD is recommended. ESGE recommends against the performance of second-look endoscopy after ESD. ESGE recommends endoscopy/colonoscopy in the case of significant bleeding (hemodynamic instability, drop in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL, severe ongoing bleeding) to perform endoscopic hemostasis with thermal methods or clipping; hemostatic powders represent rescue therapies. ESGE recommends closure of immediate perforations with clips (through-the-scope or cap-mounted, depending on the size and shape of the perforation), as soon as possible but ideally after securing a good plane for further dissection.

Novel closure method for a large mucosal defect after endoscopic resection: String clip suturing method with an anchor

Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a high-risk technique; however, prophylactic closure of mucosal defects reduces the risk. Unfortunately, we have encountered cases where closure is difficult, especially in large lesions. Therefore, we developed a novel closure technique, a string clip suturing method with an anchor (SCSM-A). This study aimed to elucidate the feasibility of this method. Five patients underwent this method for the closure of mucosal defects after duodenal ESD. The initial string clip was deployed at the anal end of the mucosal defects and the second clip was deployed at the other end of the mucosal defect. A third clip was deployed on the muscular layer in the middle of the mucosal defect. The free end of the string was pulled, and additional clips were deployed around the first to the third clips for complete closure. Because of grasping the muscle layer, SCSM-A can be employed for secure closure without creating a pocket. We reviewed the background and clinical course of hospitalization of patients who underwent this method. The resected specimens ranged from 52 to 103 mm in diameter. Complete closure of the mucosal defects was possible in all the cases. There were no adverse events, and no cases required additional treatment. All the patients were discharged within 7 days. The new method achieved secure closure even for large mucosal defects after duodenal ESD. This is a technique that can be applied to other organs, e.g., the colon.

Suturing techniques with endoscopic clips and special devices after endoscopic resection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is an established method for complete resection of large and early gastrointestinal tumors. However, methods to reduce bleeding, perforation, and other adverse events after endoscopic resection (ER) have not yet been defined. Mucosal defect closure is often performed endoscopically with a clip. Recently, reopenable clips and large-teeth clips have also been developed. The over-the-scope clip enables complete defect closure by withdrawing the endoscope once and attaching the clip. Other methods involve attaching the clip-line or a ring with an anchor to appose the edges of the mucosal defect, followed by the use of an additional clip for defect closure. Since clips are limited by their grasping force and size, other methods, such as endoloop closure, endoscopic ligation with O-ring closure, and the reopenable clip over-the-line method, have been developed. In recent years, techniques often utilized for full-thickness ER of submucosal tumors have been widely used in full-thickness defect closure. Specialized devices and techniques for defect closure have also been developed, including the curved needle and line, stitches, and an endoscopic tack and suture device. These clips and suture devices are applied for defect closure in emergency endoscopy, accidental perforations, and acute and chronic fistulas. Although endoscopic defect closure with clips has a high success rate, endoscopists need to simplify and promote endoscopic closure techniques to prevent adverse events after ER.

A case of pyloric gland adenoma with high-grade dysplasia in the duodenum arising from heterotopic gastric mucosa observed over 5 years

Pyloric gland adenoma (PGA) in the duodenum is a rare gastric phenotype duodenal neoplasm. Although heterotopic gastric mucosa in the duodenum has been recognized as a benign lesion, it is a potential precursor of PGA and gastric phenotype adenocarcinoma. Herein, we present a case follow-up of endoscopic and histological changes in the PGA in the duodenum from low-grade to high-grade dysplasia. PGA was considered to arise from the heterotopic gastric mucosa, because the heterotopic gastric mucosa was observed in the initial examination. It is difficult to distinguish heterotopic gastric mucosa from PGAs, both endoscopically and histologically. This increase in size may be useful for their differentiation. Therefore, endoscopists should not underestimate the growth of the heterotopic gastric mucosa compared to that in the previous examination.

Current status and perspectives for endoscopic diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

In recent years, there have been significant advances in the endoscopic resection (ER) procedures of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs). A preoperative endoscopic diagnosis is thus deemed necessary in determining the indication for subsequent ER. For the histologic and endoscopic diagnosis of SNADETs, understanding the mucin phenotype is inevitable. Recently, two diagnostic algorithms for the differential diagnosis of SNADETs from nonneoplastic lesions under magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging have been proposed. In addition, various endoscopic approaches have been proposed to differentiate low- and high-grade adenomas/carcinomas, including white light endoscopy, magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy, and endocytoscopy. These methods, however, have not been standardized with respect to the classification of their findings and the validation of their diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, there are still concerns with respect to the histologic criteria required to establish a SNADETs diagnosis. Standardization in the histologic and endoscopic diagnosis of SNADETs is needed.

The Journey from Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection to Third Space Endoscopy

With the advent of endoscopic submucosal dissection, a variety of endoscopic devices including knives and high-frequency electrosurgical unit have become available. In addition, the concept of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery pushed flexible endoscopic surgery ahead. In this review, the birth of peroral endoscopic myotomy and its expansion into the field of submucosal endoscopy are reviewed.

Rapid and chronological expression of angiogenetic genes is a major mechanism involved in cell sheet transplantation in a rat gastric ulcer model

Introduction

Cell sheet technology has been applied in the treatment of patients with severe cardiac failure. Although the paracrine effect of cell sheets accelerating angiogenesis is thought to be the intrinsic mechanism for improvement of cardiac function, little is known about how a cell sheet would function in the abdomen.

Methods

We used acetic acid-induced gastric ulcer rat model to elucidate the mechanisms of myoblast sheet transplantation in the abdomen. Myoblast sheet was implanted onto the serosal side of the gastric ulcer and the effect of sheet transplantation was analyzed. The maximal diameter of the ulcer and the changes in the gene expression of various growth factors in transplanted site was analyzed. The progenitor marker CD34 was also examined by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Cell sheet transplantation accelerated the ulcer healing. qPCR showed that angiogenic growth factors were significantly upregulated around the ulcer in the transplantation group. In addition, at first, HIF-1a and SDF-1 continued to increase from 3 h after transplantation to 72 h, then VEGF increased significantly after 24 h with a slight delay. An immunohistochemical analysis showed a statistically significant increase in CD34 positivity in the tissue around the ulcer in the transplantation group.

Conclusion

Myoblast sheet secreted various growth factors and cytokines immediately after transplantation onto the serosal side of artificial ulcer in the abdomen. Autonomous secretion, resulting in the time-dependent and well-orchestrated gene expression of various growth factors, plays a crucial role in the cell sheet function. Cell sheet transplantation is expected to be useful to support angiogenesis of the ischemic area in the abdominal cavity.

Clinical practice guidelines for duodenal cancer 2021

Duodenal cancer is considered to be a small intestinal carcinoma in terms of clinicopathology. In Japan, there are no established treatment guidelines based on sufficient scientific evidence; therefore, in daily clinical practice, treatment is based on the experience of individual physicians. However, with advances in diagnostic modalities, it is anticipated that opportunities for its detection will increase in future. We developed guidelines for duodenal cancer because this disease is considered to have a high medical need from both healthcare providers and patients for appropriate management. These guidelines were developed for use in actual clinical practice for patients suspected of having non-ampullary duodenal epithelial malignancy and for patients diagnosed with non-ampullary duodenal epithelial malignancy. In this study, a practice algorithm was developed in accordance with the Minds Practice Guideline Development Manual 2017, and Clinical Questions were set for each area of epidemiology and diagnosis, endoscopic treatment, surgical treatment, and chemotherapy. A draft recommendation was developed through a literature search and systematic review, followed by a vote on the recommendations. We made decisions based on actual clinical practice such that the level of evidence would not be the sole determinant of the recommendation. This guideline is the most standard guideline as of the time of preparation. It is important to decide how to handle each case in consultation with patients and their family, the treating physician, and other medical personnel, considering the actual situation at the facility (and the characteristics of the patient).

Red dichromatic imaging reduces bleeding and hematoma during submucosal injection in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Bleeding and hematoma formation during submucosal injection in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) reduce the visibility of the submucosa. Red dichromatic imaging (RDI) is an endoscopic technique that provides better visualization of the deep submucosal blood vessels. We speculated that blood vessel injury could be avoided with RDI. This pilot study evaluated the role of RDI in preventing bleeding and hematoma formation during esophageal ESD.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective observational study. We examined 60 patients who underwent ESD with white light imaging (WLI) and RDI. A single endoscopist reviewed all of the surgical videos to document the incidence and severity of bleeding episodes. Eighteen videos provided adequate quality and detail, and the number of blood vessels traversing the mucosal incision lines of the lesions in these videos was evaluated under WLI and RDI.

RESULTS

The WLI group had a significantly higher incidence of hematomas per unit area compared to the RDI group (0.18/cm² [range 0-0.38] vs. 0 [0-0.18]/cm², p = 0.024). The WLI group also had a significantly higher incidence of total bleeding episodes compared to the RDI group (42.9% [range 21.7-60.4] vs 16.7% [range 13.8-22.9], p < 0.001). Significantly more blood vessels were visible under RDI compared to WLI (5 [range 4-8] vs. 2 [range 1-5], p = 0.0020).

CONCLUSION

RDI reduced the incidence of bleeding and hematoma formation during submucosal injection in esophageal ESD. It was assumed that the improvement of blood vessel visibility by RDI might have contributed to the result.

Learning curve analysis for duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A single-operator experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Superficial duodenal epithelial tumors are emerging targets for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, it is unknown how competence is achieved in duodenal ESD. This study aimed to elucidate the learning curve for duodenal ESD.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent duodenal ESD by a single endoscopist between March 2014 and September 2021. The primary outcome was to define the learning curve for duodenal ESD by an endoscopist with sufficient non-duodenal ESD experience. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) curve analysis was used to assess the learning curve in terms of procedural speed. Comparative analyses of phases identified using the CUSUM method were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 98 patients were included in the analysis. Evaluation of the cumulative sum curve revealed four distinct phases in the graph: phase I, cases 1-25 (learning phase); phase II, cases 26-47 (proficiency phase); phase III, cases 48-72 (mastery phase); and phase IV, cases 73-98 (after introduction of general anesthesia). The median procedural speed was significantly faster in phase II than in phase I (11.1 mm² /min vs 7.0 mm² /min, P = .002). Clinically significant intraoperative perforation tended to decrease through phase II to phase IV (22.7%, 12.0%, and 3.8% in phases II, III, and IV, respectively). Delayed perforation occurred only in phases I and II.

CONCLUSIONS

Duodenal ESD requires 25 cases to gain proficiency and 50 to achieve mastery even for an endoscopist with extensive non-duodenal ESD experience.

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors: A case series pilot study (with video)

INTRODUCTION

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UW-EMR) has been recently introduced as an effective technique for rectal third layer subepithelial tumors. Therefore, we aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and procedure time of UW-EMR for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (SETs) originating from the deep mucosal and/or submucosal layers.

METHODS

Between August 2018 to July 2022, a total of 17 SETs (7 duodenal SETs, 6 gastric SETs, and 4 esophageal SETs) were included in this study. On endoscopic ultrasound examinations, the tumors were found to be embedded in the submucosa without muscularis propria invasion. All SETs were resected successfully using UW-EMR. The characteristics of the tumors and their R0 resection rate, adverse event rate, and recurrence rate were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean tumor size was 0.9 cm (range, 0.3-1.5 cm). En bloc resection and complete resection rates were 100%, respectively. The patients showed no complications such as perforation or bleeding. Histologic assessments of the resected tumors revealed 9 neuroendocrine tumors (7 on the duodenum, 2 on the stomach), 2 gastric cystica profunda, 1 gastric follicular lymphoma, 1 gastric fibromyxoma, 3 esophageal granular cell tumors, and 1 esophageal adenoid cystic carcinoma. The mean procedural time was 3.2 min (range, 1.3-8.7 minutes). The overall en bloc and complete resection rates were 100%, respectively. No recurrence was observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

UW-EMR is a safe and effective treatment for upper gastrointestinal SETs embedded in the submucosal layer. Further studies are needed to compare other endoscopic resection techniques.

Issues and Prospects of Current Endoscopic Treatment Strategy for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors

An increasing number of duodenal tumors are being diagnosed over the years, leading to increased confusion regarding the choice of treatment options. Small-to-large tumors and histological types vary from adenoma to carcinoma, and treatment methods may need to be selected according to lesion characteristics. Because of its anatomic characteristics, complications are more likely to occur in the duodenum than in other gastrointestinal organs. Several reports have described the outcomes of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, cold snare polypectomy, underwater endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic full-thickness resection, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for duodenal tumors. However, even in the guidelines set out by various countries, only the treatment methods are listed, and no clear treatment strategies are provided. Although there are few reports with a sufficiently high level of evidence, considering the currently available treatment options is essential. In this report, we reviewed previous reports on each treatment strategy, discussed the current issues and prospects, and proposed the best possible treatment strategy.

Outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for large superficial non-ampullary duodenal adenomas

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the recommended treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors larger than 6 mm. This endoscopic technique carries a high risk of adverse events. Our aim was to identify the risk factors for adverse events following EMR for non-ampullary duodenal adenomatous lesions. We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected database of consecutive endoscopic resections for duodenal lesions at a tertiary referral center for therapeutic endoscopy. We analyzed patients with non-ampullary duodenal adenomatous lesions ≥ 10 mm resected by EMR, and searched for factors associated with adverse events after EMR. 167 duodenal adenomatous lesions, with a median size of 25 (25–40) mm, were resected by EMR between January 2015 and December 2020. Adverse events occurred in 37/167 (22.2%) after endoscopic resection, with 29/167 (17.4%) delayed bleeding, 4/167 (2.4%) immediate perforation and 4/167 (2.4%) delayed perforation. In logistic regression, the size of the lesion was the only associated risk factor of adverse events (OR = 2.81, 95% CI [1.27; 6.47], p = 0.012). Adverse events increased mean hospitalization time (7.7 ± 9 vs. 1.9 ± 1 days, p < 0.01). None of the currently recommended preventive methods, particularly clips, affected the adverse event rate. EMR of centimetric and supracentimetric duodenal adenomatous lesions carries a high risk of adverse events, increasing with the size of the lesion and with no benefit from any preventive method. These results suggest that these procedures should be performed in expert centers, and underline the need for novel endoscopic tools to limit the rate of adverse events.

Endoscopic resection via antral submucosal tunneling for en bloc removal of tumors in the duodenal bulb

To overcome difficulties in the removal of duodenal bulb lesions, especially those in anatomically challenging locations, we developed the endoscopic resection via antral submucosal tunneling (ERAST) technique. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of ERAST for the removal of superficial and subepithelial lesions in the duodenal bulb. This was a single-center retrospective study of 10 patients with lesions in the bulb. Submucosal tunneling from the gastric antrum to the duodenum was performed to facilitate en bloc tumor resection in the bulb. The en bloc resection rate, postoperative bleeding, and perforation were the primary endpoints. Ten lesions (four superficial and six subepithelial), with an average size of 19.1 ± 9.2 mm, were resected en bloc by ERAST. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy follow-up after 2 months indicated complete wound healing in all patients. In our primary experience, ERAST was found to be a feasible and safe endoscopic resection technique for the removal of lesions in the duodenal bulb, especially those that are difficult to access.

Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal tumors: 10 years' experience in 18 Japanese high volume centers

BACKGROUND

Data on endoscopic resection (ER) for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs) are insufficient owing to their rarity. There are two main ER techniques for SDETs: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In addition, modified EMR techniques, such as underwater EMR (UEMR) and cold polypectomy, are becoming popular. We conducted a large-scale retrospective multicenter study to clarify the detailed outcomes of duodenal ER.

METHODS

Patients with SDETs who underwent ER at 18 institutions from January 2008 to December 2018 were included. The rates of en bloc resection and delayed adverse events (AEs; defined as delayed bleeding or perforation) were analyzed. Local recurrence was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In total, 3107 patients (including 1017 undergoing ESD) were included. En bloc resection rates were 79.1 %, 78.6 %, 86.8 %, and 94.8 %, and delayed AE rates were 0.5 %, 2.2 %, 2.8 %, and 6.8 % for cold polypectomy, UEMR, EMR and ESD, respectively. The delayed AE rate was significantly higher in the ESD group than in non-ESD groups for lesions < 19 mm (7.4 % vs. 1.9 %; P < 0.001), but not for lesions > 20 mm (6.1 % vs. 7.1 %; P = 0.64). The local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the ESD group than in the non-ESD groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, for lesions > 30 mm, the cumulative local recurrence rate at 2 years was 22.6 % in the non-ESD groups compared with only 1.6 % in the ESD group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ER outcomes for SDETs were generally acceptable. ESD by highly experienced endoscopists might be an option for very large SDETs.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022

ESGE recommends that the evaluation of superficial gastrointestinal (GI) lesions should be made by an experienced endoscopist, using high definition white-light and chromoendoscopy (virtual or dye-based).ESGE does not recommend routine performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT prior to endoscopic resection.ESGE recommends endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as the treatment of choice for most superficial esophageal squamous cell and superficial gastric lesions.For Barrett's esophagus (BE)-associated lesions, ESGE suggests the use of ESD for lesions suspicious of submucosal invasion (Paris type 0-Is, 0-IIc), for malignant lesions > 20 mm, and for lesions in scarred/fibrotic areas.ESGE does not recommend routine use of ESD for duodenal or small-bowel lesions.ESGE suggests that ESD should be considered for en bloc resection of colorectal (but particularly rectal) lesions with suspicion of limited submucosal invasion (demarcated depressed area with irregular surface pattern or a large protruding or bulky component, particularly if the lesions are larger than 20 mm) or for lesions that otherwise cannot be completely removed by snare-based techniques.ESGE recommends that an en bloc R0 resection of a superficial GI lesion with histology no more advanced than intramucosal cancer (no more than m2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma), well to moderately differentiated, with no lymphovascular invasion or ulceration, should be considered a very low risk (curative) resection, and no further staging procedure or treatment is generally recommended.ESGE recommends that the following should be considered to be a low risk (curative) resection and no further treatment is generally recommended: an en bloc R0 resection of a superficial GI lesion with superficial submucosal invasion (sm1), that is well to moderately differentiated, with no lymphovascular invasion, of size ≤ 20 mm for an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or ≤ 30 mm for a stomach lesion or of any size for a BE-related or colorectal lesion, and with no lymphovascular invasion, and no budding grade 2 or 3 for colorectal lesions.ESGE recommends that, after an endoscopically complete resection, if there is a positive horizontal margin or if resection is piecemeal, but there is no submucosal invasion and no other high risk criteria are met, this should be considered a local-risk resection and endoscopic surveillance or re-treatment is recommended rather than surgery or other additional treatment.ESGE recommends that when there is a diagnosis of lymphovascular invasion, or deeper infiltration than sm1, or positive vertical margins, or undifferentiated tumor, or, for colorectal lesions, budding grade 2 or 3, this should be considered a high risk (noncurative) resection, and complete staging and strong consideration for additional treatments should be considered on an individual basis in a multidisciplinary discussion.ESGE recommends scheduled endoscopic surveillance with high definition white-light and chromoendoscopy (virtual or dye-based) with biopsies of only the suspicious areas after a curative ESD.

Risk Factors of Non-en Bloc Resection and Non-R0 Resection During Endoscopic Resection in the Treatment of Superficial Duodenal Epithelial Lesions

Background

Superficial duodenal epithelial lesions are precancerous lesions of duodenal carcinoma. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has been widely used in the screening and treatment of this disease. This article will collect the data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection of superficial duodenal epithelial lesions in our hospital from 2010 to 2021, aiming to describe the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection, as well as to explore the risk factors of non-en bloc resection and non-R0 resection.

Methods

Patients who underwent endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal epithelial lesions in our hospital from January 2010 to September 2021 were selected. The curative effect was expressed by the en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate. The safety was expressed by intra- or postoperative complications, such as bleeding and perforation. The potential risk factors of curative effect were analyzed by logistic regression.

Results

A total of 137 patients were included. The en bloc resection rate was 95.62% (131/137), R0 resection rate was 91.97% (126/137), the postoperative bleeding rate was 2.19% (3/137), and no postoperative perforation was found. The histology result of ectopic gastric mucosa was the risk factor of non-en bloc resection (OR: 8.86, 95% CI: 1.38-56.92); the lesion size ≥2 cm was the risk factor of non-R0 resection (OR: 12.55, 95% CI: 2.95-53.38).

Conclusion

Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective method for the treatment of superficial duodenal epithelial lesions. The histology result of ectopic gastric mucosa was the risk factor of non-en bloc resection and the lesion size ≥2 cm was the risk factor of non-R0 resection.

Clinical Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for the Treatment of Duodenal Lesions in Terms of Operative Technique and Management of Complications

Background and Aims: Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been considered to be the most challenging because of its high incidence of complications, which has hindered the development of duodenal ESD. The aim of this study is to discuss operation tips for duodenal ESD and to assess the efficacy and safety of duodenal ESD. Patients and Methods: Eighty-two patients who underwent ESD in the digestive endoscope center for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs) from January 2017 to June 2021 were studied. Patients were divided into three groups according to the occurrence of complications, and the clinical characteristics and surgical efficacy of each group were compared. Results: SDETs in 82 patients were completely removed by ESD, with a 97.5% R0 resection rate. The average size of resected lesions was 23.8 ± 6.5 mm. There were significant differences in lesion size and operation time between the normal and intraprocedural complication groups (P < .05). Similarly, between the normal and delayed complication groups, significant differences were noted in lesion location, size, operation time, occupied circumference, and postoperative hospitalization duration (P < .05). Conclusion: Duodenal ESD is prone to complications that increase the complexity of the procedure. By improving the necessary technique and skills, duodenal ESD remains safe and effective.

Nonrecurrence Rate of Underwater EMR for ≤20-mm Nonampullary Duodenal Adenomas: A Multicenter Prospective Study (D-UEMR Study)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic resection of nonampullary duodenal adenoma is often challenging, and its technique has not yet been standardized. To overcome the practical difficulty of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection, underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) was recently developed; therefore, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of UEMR for nonampullary duodenal adenoma.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted at 21 institutions in Japan. We enrolled patients with no more than 2 nonampullary duodenal adenomas ≤20 mm in size, who were planned to undergo UEMR. After UEMR, follow-up endoscopies were scheduled at 2 and 12 months after the procedure, and biopsy specimens were taken from the post-UEMR scars. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with histologically proven nonrecurrence at follow-up endoscopy and biopsy.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients with 166 lesions underwent UEMR. One patient with a non-neoplastic lesion in the resected specimen and 10 patients with 10 lesions who were lost to follow-up were excluded. Finally, 144 patients with 155 lesions who received all follow-up endoscopies were analyzed for the primary endpoint. The proportion of patients with proven nonrecurrence was 97.2% (n = 140 of 144; 95% confidence interval, 92.8%-99.1%) which exceeded the predefined threshold value (92%). Two cases of delayed bleeding (1.2%) occurred and they were successfully managed by clips. All recurrences were successfully treated by additional endoscopic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter, prospective cohort study demonstrated effectiveness and safety of UEMR for nonampullary duodenal adenomas ≤20 mm in size. (University Hospital Medical Network Clinical Trials Registry, Number: UMIN000030414).

Effectiveness of clip-and-thread traction-assisted duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity score-matched study (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) remain controversial because the procedure is technically challenging. Moreover, the effectiveness of clip-and-thread traction-assisted ESD (TA-ESD) for SNADETs has not been assessed. The aim of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of duodenal TA-ESD and conventional ESD for SNADETs.

METHODS

SNADETs treated with conventional ESD or TA-ESD between April 2017 and March 2021 at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

There were 49 cases of conventional ESD and 32 cases of TA-ESD for SNADETs. Using a propensity score-matched design, we selected 26 pairs of cases with conventional ESD and TA-ESD. In the unmatched cohort, patients treated with TA-ESD were characterized by a higher R0 (no tumor identified at the lateral or vertical margins) resection rate (P = .004), more frequent poor submucosal lifting because of fibrosis (P = .014), and shorter follow-up period (P = .0004) than patients treated with conventional ESD. In the propensity score-matched pairs, patients treated with TA-ESD were characterized by a higher rate of R0 resection (P = .021) and a shorter follow-up period (P = .0061). The findings regarding R0 resection rates were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression models, which found a higher odds ratio (OR) for R0 resection in patients who underwent TA-ESD than in patients who underwent conventional ESD both in the unmatched cohort (OR, 17.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-178.8; P = .018) and in the propensity score-matched pairs (OR, 26.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-460.2; P = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest TA-ESD may increase the rate of R0 resection in patients with SNADETs in comparison with conventional ESD.

Appropriate selection of endoscopic resection for superficial nonampullary duodenal adenomas in association with recurrence

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The appropriate selection of endoscopic resection for relatively small superficial nonampullary duodenal adenomas (SNADAs) considering recurrence is not completely clarified. Therefore, this study investigated endoscopic resection utility (EMR, underwater EMR [UEMR], and cap-assisted EMR [EMRC]) for SNADAs from the viewpoint of recurrence and short-term outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with sporadic SNADAs who underwent EMR, UEMR, and EMRC at Chiba University Hospital between May 2004 and March 2020 and were observed for ≥12 months after endoscopic resection (EMR, 34 patients, 36 lesions; UEMR, 54 patients, 55 lesions; and EMRC, 45 patients, 48 lesions). Outcomes were evaluated using weighted logistic regression analysis. The logistic regression analysis was weighted using propensity scores.

RESULTS

EMRC showed significantly higher en-bloc and R0 resection rates than EMR. All techniques were equally safe. Only 1 case each of intraoperative perforation and postoperative perforation (in 2 different patients) occurred, which were associated with EMRC. UEMR resulted in higher R0 resection and lower postbleeding rates than EMR. Moreover, patients who underwent UEMR showed no perforation. Median observation period per lesion after endoscopic resection was 84 months (range, 16-199) for patients who underwent EMR, 25 months (range, 12-60) for patients who underwent UEMR, and 63 months (range, 12-180) for patients who underwent EMRC. No significant difference was observed between EMR versus UEMR and between EMR versus EMRC in terms of recurrence (odds ratio, .20 [95% confidence interval, .01-2.86; P = .24] and .78 [95% confidence interval, .09-6.84; P = .82], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence risk was not different for EMR, UEMR, and EMRC. Therefore, UEMR, a simple and safe procedure, could be the first choice for relatively small SNADAs. With larger prospective studies, UEMR data may turn out to be more robust, corroborating it as the endoscopic modality of choice for certain SNADAs.

Endoscopic excision as a viable alternative to major resection for early duodenal cancers: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Duodenal cancer presents an elusive therapeutic challenge for clinicians to treat because of its highly malignant behavior and anatomical complexity. Endoscopic excision has been administered to treat early-stage cancers of upper gastrointestinal tract, especially esophagus and stomach cancer. There is currently a scarcity of data regarding the application and efficacy of endoscopic resection for early duodenal cancer due to its rarity. This study aimed at exploring the prevalence and efficacy of endoscopic excision in treatment for early duodenal cancer in comparison with major surgery.

METHODS

This cohort study retrospectively collected patients with primary Tis/T1-N0-M0 duodenal cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2017. Prevalence of endoscopic excision in duodenal cancer treatment, overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients who received different tumor-resection procedures were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 1354 patients with Tis/T1-stage duodenal cancer were identified. Most patients (69.4%) underwent tumor resection as initial treatments. Among them, 65.7% underwent endoscopic excision, while 34.3% underwent major surgery. The multivariable Cox analyses revealed that endoscopic excision was associated with a significantly favorable OS (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.95, p = 0.02) and DSS (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.17-0.60, p < 0.001), compared to major surgery, for Tis/T1-stage cancer patients. In addition to cancer-related deaths (p < 0.001), endoscopic resection manifested significantly lower cumulative mortality rate of post-operative infectious diseases (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic resection currently accounted for approximately two-thirds of all procedures to resect Tis/T1-stage duodenal tumor. Endoscopic resection represents a viable therapeutic option in the management of Tis/T1-stage duodenal cancer for its oncological superiorities to major surgery and its capacity to reduce operative traumas and morbidities.

Endoscopic resection of superficial non‐ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor

Although superficial non‐ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor (SNADET) was previously considered a rare disease, in recent years, the opportunities to detect and treat SNADET are increasing. Considering the high morbidity of pancreatoduodenectomy, endoscopic resection can be a treatment option that preserves the organs and contributes maintain patients’ quality of life. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a standard treatment for relatively small lesions in gastrointestinal tracts, however, it is difficult because submucosal fibrosis frequently occurs due to the previous biopsy. Recently, some modified EMR techniques including underwater EMR (UEMR) and cold polypectomy (CP) have been proposed. In UEMR, the duodenal lumen is filled with water or saline and resected the targe lesion with a snare without injection into the submucosa. It would be a treatment option that could reduce candidates for ESD especially SNADET less than 20 mm. CP was reported as a safe and convenient means for SNADET. It would also be one of the standard treatments for diminutive lesions, though there remain some concerns on its resectability. ESD for SNADET is technically challenging, especially with an extremely high risk of adverse event (AE) with a reported bleeding rate of more than 20% and perforation rate up to about 40%. However, modified treatment techniques including the water pressure method and pocket creation method have been reported to potentially contribute to improving outcomes of ESD. Moreover, accumulated evidence shows closing the mucosal defect significantly reduces delayed adverse events after duodenal endoscopic treatments. Further studies are warranted to elucidate curative criteria, long‐term outcomes, and appropriate surveillance strategy.

Differential diagnosis of superficial duodenal epithelial tumor and non-neoplastic lesion in duodenum by magnified endoscopic examination with image-enhanced endoscopy

BACKGROUND

Differential diagnosis of superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs) and non-neoplastic lesions (NNLs) in duodenum by endoscopy is difficult. Here, we attempted to distinguish them by magnified endoscopic examination with image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE-ME).

METHODS

Various IEE-ME findings of 95 SDETs who underwent endoscopic resection and 58 NNLs who underwent biopsy were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

When we compared the IEE-ME findings of SDETs and NNLs, the presence of demarcation line (DL) (97.9% vs. 79.3%, P = 0.0002), white opaque substance (WOS) (84.2% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.0001) and light blue crest (LBC) (93.7% vs. 32.8%, P < 0.0001) and the absence of enlarged marginal epithelium (EME) (98.9% vs. 62.1%, P < 0.0001) were significantly more frequent in SDETs than NNLs. When divided into each superficial structure, it was the most effective to evaluate the combination of WOS and LBC as SDET with open-loop structure (OLS), and the combination of DL and EME as SDET with closed-loop structure (CLS). However, LBC was excluded because of low inter- and intra-observer agreements. Finally, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the diagnosis of SDETs were 88.4%, 98.3% and 92.2%, respectively, and we developed an algorithm for the differential diagnosis of duodenal lesions.

CONCLUSION

We could distinguish SDET from NNL, diagnosed SDET as presence of WOS indicated OLS of superficial structure, and presence of DL and absence of EME indicated CLS of superficial structure.

Efficacy of partial injection underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial duodenal epithelial tumor: Propensity score-matched study (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has been reported as effective endoscopic treatment for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs). However, it has been reported that a notable problem of UEMR for SDETs is that en bloc resection rate is relatively low. Therefore, we proposed a novel technique to improve en bloc resection rate: UEMR combining partial submucosal injection (PI-UEMR). The aim of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of PI-UEMR for SDETs by comparing to UEMR.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study in a single center. The patients who underwent UEMR or PI-UEMR from June 2010 to August 2020 were included in this study. Eligible patients were selected from included patients in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. The clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection (procedure time, en bloc resection rate, complication rate [immediate perforation, delayed bleeding, delayed perforation]), and histopathological diagnosis (adenoma/cancer) were compared between each group.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-eight patients were included in this study. Of included patients, 47 patients were selected in each group by propensity score matching. There were no statistical differences in procedure time (11 ± 1.2 min vs. 9 ± 1.2 min, P = 0.30), complication rate (immediate perforation [0% vs. 2%, P = 0.12], delayed bleeding [0% vs. 2%, P = 0.12], and no delayed perforation) and histopathological diagnosis (adenoma; 100% vs. 96%, P = 0.14) in each group. However, en bloc resection rate of PI-UEMR was significantly higher than UEMR (96% vs. 83%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Partial submucosal injection UEMR might be superior procedure for en bloc resection in SDETs compare to UEMR.

Feasibility Study of Partial Submucosal Injection Technique Combining Underwater EMR for Superficial Duodenal Epithelial Tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and Underwater EMR have been reported as effective endoscopic treatment for superficial duodenal tumor (SDET). However, a notable problem of EMR for SDET is technical difficulty for the lesion with non-lifting sign, and it of UEMR is that en bloc resection rate is relatively low. Therefore, we performed partial submucosal injection combining UEMR (PI-UEMR). The aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility and safety of this technique for duodenal tumor.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study from tertiary care hospital. We performed PI-UEMR in patients with SDET that is 13-20 mm in diameter, or less than 13 mm with technical difficulty for EMR and UEMR from January 2019 to March 2020. Primary outcome was en bloc resection rate. Secondary outcomes were R0 resection rate, mean total procedure time, intra- and post-procedure complication.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included in this study. Mean age was 62 ± 12 years old. Three fourths lesions were located at anal side from major papilla. Median lesion size was 12 mm [IQR 10-16 mm]. Twenty-four cases were taken endoscopic biopsy in prior hospital and observed biopsy scar. En bloc resection rate was 97%. Ro resection rate was 83%. Mean total procedure time was 17 ± 12 min. And there was an only one case of complication, intra-procedure bleeding that was controllable endoscopically.

CONCLUSIONS

PI-UEMR might be very useful and safe technique of endoscopic resection for SDET including relatively large lesions.

Sporadic non-ampullary duodenal adenoma with low-grade dysplasia: Natural history and clinical management

Background and study aims  Management strategies for sporadic non-ampullary duodenal adenoma with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) are not well established. This study aimed to analyze progression factors and determine suitable treatment strategies for LGD lesions. Patients and methods  We retrospectively analyzed consecutive LGD lesions (n = 125) in patients followed up for ≥ 6 months (median, 45 months) and evaluated the changes in clinicopathological features during follow-up. All LGD lesions were classified into two groups: stable LGD (no increase or < 5 mm increase in tumor size, with unchanged histological dysplasia grade) and progressive LGD (≥ 5 mm increase in tumor size and/or progression to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma). Results  Eighty-six LGD were classified as stable and 39 as progressive. Location on the oral side of the papilla of Vater, large initial tumor size ( ≥ 10 mm), macroscopically complex type, red color, and nodularity were significantly frequent in progressive LGD than in stable LGD. In multivariate analysis, large initial tumor size (odds ratio [OR], 10.2; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 3.3-32.1; P  < 0.001) and location on the oral side of the papilla of Vater (OR: 1.8, 95 % CI: 1.4-12.5; P  = 0.012) were significant factors for progression. Moreover, initial tumor size < 5 mm rarely progressed (0%-3.9 %); however, initial tumor size ≥ 20 mm and 10-19 mm located on the oral side of the papilla of Vater had a high-risk progression rate (75.0-85.7 %). Conclusions  According to the risk stratification of progression factors by initial tumor size and location, we can determine suitable treatment indications for LGD lesions.

Feasibility of endoscopic resection for large pedunculated duodenal lesions (with video)

BACKGROUND

A standard treatment method for pedunculated duodenal lesions has not yet been established. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic resection (ER) for pedunculated duodenal lesions, especially for large lesions.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed cases of pedunculated duodenal lesions treated with ER at our institute between July 2010 and January 2021. We collected data on the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. In addition, the cases were divided based on the treatment provided for the lesion, i.e., the ESD and snare resection groups, and we compared the data between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight cases were included in this study. The overall en bloc resection rate was 95%. No perforation occurred in any of the cases. There were 10 cases treated with ESD, which were considered difficult to achieve en bloc resection using snare forceps, and 28 cases treated with snare resection. Although the median lesion size was significantly larger in the ESD group than in the snare resection group (27 [range 23-66] vs. 19 [range 6-55] mm, P = 0.0052), treatment outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. Among the 10 cases treated using ESD, en bloc resection was achieved in all cases, along with specimen retrieval without any perforations, despite the large size of the lesions.

CONCLUSION

ER could be performed to achieve a high en bloc resection rate without any perforations in pedunculated duodenal lesions, even in extremely large (e.g., ≧ 60 mm) lesions, suggesting that ER is feasible and may be an alternative to surgical resection for large pedunculated duodenal lesions.

Endoscopic management of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas

Duodenal polyps are found in 0.1 % to 0.8 % of all upper endoscopies. Duodenal adenomas account for 10 % to 20 % of these lesions. They can be sporadic or occur in the setting of a hereditary predisposition syndrome, mainly familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopy is the cornerstone of management of duodenal adenomas, allowing for diagnosis and treatment, primarily by endoscopic mucosal resection. The endoscopic treatment of duodenal adenomas has a high morbidity, reaching 15 % in a prospective study, consisting of bleeding and perforations, and should therefore be performed in expert centers. The local recurrence rate ranges from 9 % to 37 %, and is maximal for piecemeal resections of lesions > 20 mm. Surgical resection of the duodenum is flawed with major morbidity and considered a rescue procedure in cases of endoscopic treatment failures or severe endoscopic complications such as duodenal perforations. In this paper, we review the existing evidence on endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.

Advances in traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection: What is the best traction method and traction direction?

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed as a treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms, which can achieve en bloc resection regardless of the lesion size. However, ESD is technically difficult because endoscopists cannot bring their hand into the gastrointestinal tract, unlike surgeons in regular surgery. It is difficult to obtain sufficient tension in the dissection plane and a good field of vision. Therefore, ESD is associated with a long procedure time and a high risk of adverse events in comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection. Traction methods have been developed to provide sufficient tension for the dissection plane and a good field of vision during the ESD procedure. However, traction direction is limited in most traction methods, resulting in insufficient effect in some cases. Although traction direction is considered important, there have been few investigations of its effect. In the first half of this review, important traction methods are discussed, including traction direction. In second half, appropriate traction methods for each organ are considered. Other important considerations for traction method, such as ability to adjust traction strength, interference between traction device and endoscope, and the need for specialized devices are also discussed.

Advances in traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection: What is the best traction method and traction direction?

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed as a treatment for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms, which can achieve en bloc resection regardless of the lesion size. However, ESD is technically difficult because endoscopists cannot bring their hand into the gastrointestinal tract, unlike surgeons in regular surgery. It is difficult to obtain sufficient tension in the dissection plane and a good field of vision. Therefore, ESD is associated with a long procedure time and a high risk of adverse events in comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection. Traction methods have been developed to provide sufficient tension for the dissection plane and a good field of vision during the ESD procedure. However, traction direction is limited in most traction methods, resulting in insufficient effect in some cases. Although traction direction is considered important, there have been few investigations of its effect. In the first half of this review, important traction methods are discussed, including traction direction. In second half, appropriate traction methods for each organ are considered. Other important considerations for traction method, such as ability to adjust traction strength, interference between traction device and endoscope, and the need for specialized devices are also discussed.

Utility of underwater EMR for nonpolypoid superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors ≤20 mm

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The application of underwater EMR (UEMR) for nonpolypoid superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) has not been comprehensively assessed. Therefore, the current study aimed to validate the efficacy of UEMR versus conventional EMR and cap-assisted EMR (EMRC) for SNADETs measuring ≤20 mm.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with sporadic nonpolypoid SNADETs measuring ≤20 mm undergoing EMR, EMRC, or UEMR at Chiba University Hospital between May 2004 and October 2020 (EMR, 21 patients and 23 SNADETs; UEMR, 60 patients and 61 SNADETs; EMRC, 45 patients and 48 SNADETs). A weighted logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify the predictors of RX/1 and piecemeal resection. The recurrence rate of lesions observed ≥12 months after resection was assessed.

RESULTS

Both UEMR and EMRC had a significantly higher R0 resection rate than EMR. UEMR had significantly lower multiple resection and postbleeding rates than EMR. Only 1 patient (2.1%) who underwent EMRC experienced intraoperative and postoperative perforation. EMR was involved in RX/1 and piecemeal resection. The recurrence rates of EMR, UEMR, and EMRC were 4.3%, 2.0%, and 6.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

UEMR had significantly higher R0 resection and lower postbleeding rates than EMR. Moreover, it was safer than EMRC and was associated with a lower incidence of recurrences. The significant results of the retrospective analysis suggest a randomized controlled study with adequate numbers needs to be conducted to confirm the superior efficacy of UEMR before it is recommended for primary treatment option for SNADETs measuring ≤20 mm.

Endocytoscopy Is Useful for the Diagnosis of Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) are lacking. The aim of this study was to explore the usefulness of endocytoscopy (ECS) in the duodenum.

METHODS

A total of 77 ECS images stained by methylene blue and 58 images with double staining of methylene blue and crystal violet were obtained from 20 patients. Images were classified into 3 grades based on nuclear and villi atypia: EC A, B, and C. Diagnostic performance of ECS classification to predict histology and interobserver agreement was evaluated. The performance was compared between staining methods and ×520 or ×936 zoom.

RESULTS

With methylene blue staining, high rates of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) over 90% were achieved for tumor and nontumor diagnosis as assessed by EC A versus EC B. High rates of accuracy, sensitivity, PPV, and negative predictive value over 90% were achieved for the differentiation between the diagnosis of the Vienna category 3 and 4/5 as assessed by EC B versus C. The accuracy rate of interpreting ECS images with ×936 zoom among 10 endoscopists was 82%, and the interobserver agreement rate was 0.803 (Kendall's coefficient of concordance). In the ×936 zoom group, methylene blue staining was significantly associated with higher accuracy rate (odds ratio 1.76 [1.06-2.92], p value 0.0297). No benefit was observed by double staining.

CONCLUSIONS

ECS diagnosis with methylene blue provides a high accuracy rate and good interobserver agreement to predict histology of SNADETs.

Resectability of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for duodenal tumor: A single-center, retrospective pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (U-EMR) has been attracting much attention as treatment for patients with nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs). We aim to compare treatment outcomes, including submucosal resectability, between patients undergoing U-EMR and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) for NADET.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 38 patients with NADET treated by U-EMR or C-EMR. In the resected specimens, we measured the horizontal length, the vertical distance from the muscularis mucosa to the margin at the deepest site, and the overall submucosal area. The submucosal index (SMI) was defined as the overall submucosal area divided by the largest horizontal length. These values and other treatment outcomes were compared between NADETs resected by U-EMR and C-EMR.

RESULTS

The median size of lesions was 7 mm with a range of 3-13 mm. Although the incidence of adverse events and the rates of en bloc and R0 resection were not different in the two groups, the median procedure time was significantly shorter in the U-EMR group (11 min vs 13 min; P = 0.045). The median submucosal depth at the deepest site (1.22 mm vs 1.08 mm; P = 0.38) and the median SMI (0.44 vs 0.41; P = 0.42) were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The resectability between NADETs treated by U-EMR and C-EMR was comparable. These results, together with the shorter procedure time required for U-EMR, suggest that U-EMR may have the potential to be the first choice for small to medium-sized NADET.