Ranolazine: Drug overview and possible role in primary microvascular angina management

Pharmacotherapy in patients with vasomotor disorders

Background

Anginal symptoms in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease are frequently related to vasomotor disorders of the coronary circulation. Although frequently overlooked, a distinct diagnosis of different vasomotor disorders can be made by intracoronary function testing. Early detection and treatment seems beneficial, but little evidence is available for the medical treatment of these disorders. Nevertheless, there are several pharmacotherapeutic options available to treat these patients and improve quality of life.

Methods & findings

We performed an extensive yet non-systematic literature search to explore available pharmacotherapeutic strategies for addressing vasomotor disorders in individuals experiencing angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. This article presents a comprehensive overview of therapeutic possibilities for patients exhibiting abnormal vasoconstriction (such as spasm) and abnormal vasodilation (like coronary microvascular dysfunction).

Conclusion

Treatment of vasomotor disorders can be very challenging, but a general treatment algorithm based on the existing evidence and the best available current practice is feasible.

Practical Approach for Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A State-of-the-Art Review

Anginal symptoms are frequently encountered in patients without the presence of significant obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). It is increasingly recognized that vasomotor disorders, such as an abnormal vasodilatory capacity of the coronary microcirculation or coronary vasospasm, are the dominant pathophysiological substrate in these patients. Although the evidence with respect to angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary arteries is accumulating, the diagnosis and treatment of these patients remains challenging. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview regarding the pathophysiological origins of angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries disorders and its diagnostic and therapeutic considerations. Hereby, we provide a practical approach for the management of patents with angina and non-obstructive CAD.

Conductance Changes of Na+ Channels during the Late Na+ Current Flowing under Action Potential Voltage Clamp Conditions in Canine, Rabbit, and Guinea Pig Ventricular Myocytes

Late sodium current (I_Na,late) is an important inward current contributing to the plateau phase of the action potential (AP) in the mammalian heart. Although I_Na,late is considered as a possible target for antiarrhythmic agents, several aspects of this current remained hidden. In this work, the profile of I_Na,late, together with the respective conductance changes (G_Na,late), were studied and compared in rabbit, canine, and guinea pig ventricular myocytes using the action potential voltage clamp (APVC) technique. In canine and rabbit myocytes, the density of I_Na,late was relatively stable during the plateau and decreased only along terminal repolarization of the AP, while G_Na,late decreased monotonically. In contrast, I_Na,late increased monotonically, while G_Na,late remained largely unchanged during the AP in guinea pig. The estimated slow inactivation of Na⁺ channels was much slower in guinea pig than in canine or rabbit myocytes. The characteristics of canine I_Na,late and G_Na,late were not altered by using command APs recorded from rabbit or guinea pig myocytes, indicating that the different shapes of the current profiles are related to genuine interspecies differences in the gating of I_Na,late. Both I_Na,late and G_Na,late decreased in canine myocytes when the intracellular Ca²⁺ concentration was reduced either by the extracellular application of 1 µM nisoldipine or by the intracellular application of BAPTA. Finally, a comparison of the I_Na,late and G_Na,late profiles induced by the toxin of Anemonia sulcata (ATX-II) in canine and guinea pig myocytes revealed profound differences between the two species: in dog, the ATX-II induced I_Na,late and G_Na,late showed kinetics similar to those observed with the native current, while in guinea pig, the ATX-II induced G_Na,late increased during the AP. Our results show that there are notable interspecies differences in the gating kinetics of I_Na,late that cannot be explained by differences in AP morphology. These differences must be considered when interpreting the I_Na,late results obtained in guinea pig.

Traditional chinese medicine in coronary microvascular disease

Coronary microvascular disease (CMVD) is common in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Although the study of CMVD in modern medicine is ongoing, there is still no effective treatment for it. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has some clinical advantages based on syndrome differentiation and individualized treatment. In this review, we review the clinical significance, pathogenesis, and current treatments of CMVD and systematically summarize the clinical efficacy and potential action mechanisms of TCM for CMVD. In addition, the scientific problems that need to be solved urgently and the research strategy of TCM for CMVD are described. CMVD has great clinical significance, but there are still many gaps in the related research. This review aims to attract the attention of clinicians to CMVD and promote research on CMVD in TCM.

SNTA1-deficient human cardiomyocytes demonstrate hypertrophic phenotype and calcium handling disorder

Background

α-1-syntrophin (SNTA1), a protein encoded by SNTA1, is highly expressed in human cardiomyocytes. Mutations in SNTA1 are associated with arrhythmia and cardiomyopathy. Previous research on SNTA1 has been based on non-human cardiomyocytes. This study was designed to identify the phenotype of SNTA1-deficiency using human cardiomyocytes.

Methods

SNTA1 was knocked out in the H9 embryonic stem cell line using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. H9SNTA1KO cells were then induced to differentiate into cardiomyocytes using small molecule inhibitors. The phenotypic discrepancies associated with SNTA1-deficient cardiomyocytes were investigated.

Results

SNTA1 was truncated at the 149th amino acid position of PH1 domain by a stop codon (TGA) using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. SNTA1-deficiency did not affect the pluripotency of H9SNTA1KO, and they retain their in vitro ability to differentiate into cardiomyocytes. However, H9SNTA1KO derived cardiomyocytes exhibited hypertrophic phenotype, lower cardiac contractility, weak calcium transient intensity, and lower level of calcium in the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Early treatment of SNTA1-deficient cardiomyocytes with ranolazine improved the calcium transient intensity and cardiac contractility.

Conclusion

SNTA1-deficient cardiomyocytes can be used to research the etiology, pathogenesis, and potential therapies for myocardial diseases. The SNTA1-deficient cardiomyocyte model suggests that the maintenance of cardiac calcium homeostasis is a key target in the treatment of myocardial-related diseases.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13287-022-02955-4.

Ranolazine rescues the heart failure phenotype of PLN-deficient human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

Phospholamban (PLN) is a key regulator that controls the function of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and is required for the regulation of cardiac contractile function. Although PLN-deficient mice demonstrated improved cardiac function, PLN loss in humans can result in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or heart failure (HF). The CRISPR-Cas9 technology was used to create a PLN knockout human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) line in this study. PLN deletion hiPSCs-CMs had enhanced contractility at day 30, but proceeded to a cardiac failure phenotype at day 60, with decreased contractility, mitochondrial damage, increased ROS production, cellular energy metabolism imbalance, and poor Ca²⁺ handling. Furthermore, adding ranolazine to PLN knockout hiPSCs-CMs at day 60 can partially restore Ca²⁺ handling disorders and cellular energy metabolism, alleviating the PLN knockout phenotype of HF, implying that the disorder of intracellular Ca²⁺ transport and the imbalance of cellular energy metabolism are the primary mechanisms for PLN deficiency pathogenesis.

Stereoselective quantitative analysis of ranolazine in plasma and tissue samples: application in pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution studies

This study aimed to develop a rapid and sensitive reversed-phase mode high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of ranolazine enantiomers in rat plasma and tissues.

Use of Ranolazine for the Treatment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is defined as a mismatch of myocardial blood supply and oxygen consumption due to a dysfunction of the coronary microvessels. Up to 20-30% of patients with CMD have progressive worsening of symptoms with significant impairment of quality of life. Large-scale randomized studies of the pharmacologic treatment of CMD are lacking. Classic anti-ischemic drugs are the initial form of treatment, but efficacy is often limited. Ranolazine has a unique mechanism of action that does not affect blood pressure or heart rate. When added to existing anti-anginal agents, ranolazine improved at least one domain in eight of ten studies in which a questionnaire was used to assess patient health status. Five studies evaluated coronary arterial flow reserve (CFR), reporting that patients with low values had significant improvement in CFR and suggesting that those with more severe CMD respond more favorably to ranolazine. In two studies, exercise duration and time to myocardial ischemia were significantly increased after treatment with ranolazine. Data are lacking for ranolazine use as the sole agent for CMD treatment. Some questions remain to be answered regarding ranolazine use for CMD. Larger studies of longer duration are needed to verify the effectiveness of ranolazine in the treatment of CMD.

An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group

This consensus document, a summary of the views of an expert panel organized by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), appraises the importance of ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Angina pectoris affects approximately 112 million people globally. Up to 70% of patients undergoing invasive angiography do not have obstructive coronary artery disease, more common in women than in men, and a large proportion have INOCA as a cause of their symptoms. INOCA patients present with a wide spectrum of symptoms and signs that are often misdiagnosed as non-cardiac leading to under-diagnosis/investigation and under-treatment. INOCA can result from heterogeneous mechanism including coronary vasospasm and microvascular dysfunction and is not a benign condition. Compared to asymptomatic individuals, INOCA is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular events, repeated hospital admissions, as well as impaired quality of life and associated increased health care costs. This consensus document provides a definition of INOCA and guidance to the community on the diagnostic approach and management of INOCA based on existing evidence from research and best available clinical practice; noting gaps in knowledge and potential areas for further investigation.

An EAPCI Expert Consensus Document on Ischaemia with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries in Collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group

This consensus document, a summary of the views of an expert panel organized by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), appraises the importance of ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA). Angina pectoris affects approximately 112 million people globally. Up to 70% of patients undergoing invasive angiography do not have obstructive coronary artery disease, more common in women than in men, and a large proportion have INOCA as a cause of their symptoms. INOCA patients present with a wide spectrum of symptoms and signs that are often misdiagnosed as non-cardiac leading to under-diagnosis/investigation and under-treatment. INOCA can result from heterogeneous mechanism including coronary vasospasm and microvascular dysfunction and is not a benign condition. Compared to asymptomatic individuals, INOCA is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular events, repeated hospital admissions, as well as impaired quality of life and associated increased health care costs. This consensus document provides a definition of INOCA and guidance to the community on the diagnostic approach and management of INOCA based on existing evidence from research and best available clinical practice; noting gaps in knowledge and potential areas for further investigation.

Efficacy of Ranolazine for Treatment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Background

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a common cause of angina and exercise intolerance in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. The efficacy of ranolazine, a late sodium channel blocker, in patients with symptomatic obstructive coronary artery disease is well established. To evaluate the efficacy of ranolazine in CMD, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and conference abstracts were searched from January 1975 to March 2020. Randomized trials evaluating ranolazine in patients with CMD were screened. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. End points of interest included a change in angina measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and clinical outcomes. Data were combined using random-effects models.

Results

Of 836 citations, 6 randomized studies (318 patients) were included. Median follow-up was 4 weeks. When pooling the 6 trials analyzing ranolazine, we found that patients treated with ranolazine had a higher SAQ value regarding physical functioning (mean difference, 6.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.41; 10.42) quality of life (10.07; 95% CI, 3.4; 16.74), and angina stability (20.14; 95% CI, 10.12; 30.17), as well as improved CFR (0.27; 95% CI, 0.09; 0.45) compared with placebo/control therapy. A high heterogeneity was observed (range I², 30%-84%).

Conclusions

In CMD, ranolazine may be associated with improvements in CFR and some of the SAQ domains, including angina stability, physical functioning, and quality of life. However, it does not seem to beneficially impact angina frequency and treatment satisfaction. It is also unknown if it improves prognosis of afflicted patients.

Ranolazine for Symptomatic Management of Microvascular Angina

BACKGROUND

Ranolazine is approved in the United States and Europe for chronic stable angina. Microvascular angina (MVA) is defined as angina with no obstructive coronary artery disease.

STUDY QUESTION

Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of ranolazine at improving angina scores and quality of life in a Canadian cohort with severe refractory angina due to MVA.

STUDY DESIGN

We administered questionnaires to 31 patients at baseline and after at least 6 weeks of ranolazine treatment.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

Validated, clinically significant changes for each Seattle Angina Questionnaire domain and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form were obtained from the literature. Score changes between baseline and postranolazine use were analyzed using sign test.

RESULTS

Patients were mostly female (27 of 31 patients) with a median age of 57 years. After initiation of ranolazine treatment, patients experienced improvements in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form scores (80.6%; P < 0.01) and in 3 of the 4 domains of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (physical limitation: 73.3%; P = 0.02; treatment satisfaction: 80.6%; P < 0.01; and disease perception: 77.4%; P < 0.01). Patients were less likely to have interactions with the health care system after ranolazine treatment as compared with before (35.5% vs. 93.5%; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ranolazine significantly improves symptom control and quality of life in patients with MVA and severe refractory angina and reduces their interaction with the health care system. Given the potentially debilitating effect of chronic angina in MVA, ranolazine may be an effective treatment option.

Myocardial ischemia and coronary disease in heart failure

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome and represents the final path of numerous heart diseases. Coronary artery disease is recognized as the primary risk factor for heart failure development, being the main etiological factor in more than 50% of heart failure patients in North America and Europe. Regardless of overt coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia is a common finding in failing hearts, likely due to structural or functional coronary circulation alterations. Ischemia is a self-propagating process which irreversibly impairs the cardiac function and negatively impacts prognosis. Thus, a better and thorough understanding of myocardial ischemia pathophysiology in heart failure would likely lead to significantly improved outcomes in these patients. This review aims to describe the mechanisms of myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease in heart failure, focusing on coronary circulation dysfunctions due to increased parietal stress or non-obstructive coronary disease, and discussing the association and management of coronary artery disease in patients with heart failure.

The Role of Ranolazine for the Treatment of Residual Angina beyond the Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization

INTRODUCTION

Despite a successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), several studies reported that the recurrence of angina after revascularization, even complete, is a particularly frequent occurrence in the first year after PCI.

METHODS

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with ranolazine in addition to conventional anti-ischemic therapy in patients who underwent coronary angiography for persistent/recurrent angina after PCI and residual ischemia only due to small branches not suitable for further revascularization. Forty-nine consecutive patients were included in our registry, adding the ranolazine (375 mg b.i.d) to optimal medical therapy (OMT). The Exercise ECG Test (EET) was performed in all patients before to start the therapy (baseline BL) and at 30 days (T1) after enrollment.

RESULTS

The average duration of the exercise was increased after the therapy with ranolazine comparing to baseline (RG 9'1'' ± 2' versus BL 8'10'' ± 2', p = 0.01). Seven (14.3%) patients after receiving ranolazine had not crossed the threshold of six minutes (75 watts) compared to 20 (40.8%) of BL (p = 0.0003). Stress angina appeared more frequently at BL than at 30 days (T1 4.1% versus BL 16.3%, p = 0.04) as well as exercise-induced arrhythmias (BL 30.6% versus T1 14.3%, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ranolazine to standard anti-ischemic therapy showed a significant improvement in EET results after one month of therapy, including reduced exercise angina, increased exercise tolerance, and reduced exercise arrhythmias.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Patients With Myocardial Ischemia With No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Half of women and 1/3 of men with angina and ischemia on stress testing have ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). These patients have quality of life (QoL) impairment comparable with patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Clinicians generally treat INOCA with traditional antianginal agents despite previous studies demonstrating variable response to these medications. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of available pharmacologic therapies for INOCA. We systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in July 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacologic agents for INOCA. The primary outcome of interest was QoL. Secondary outcomes included subjective and objective efficacy measures and safety outcomes. We included 35 RCTs from 333 identified studies. Interventions that improved QoL with moderate-quality evidence included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (±statin) and ranolazine. Low-to-very-low-quality evidence also suggests that ACE inhibitors, β blockers, calcium-channel blockers, nicorandil, ranolazine, and statins may decrease angina frequency and delay ischemia on stress testing. Other interventions, most notably nitrates, did not significantly improve any outcome. In conclusion, evidence for pharmacologic treatment of INOCA is generally poor, and higher-quality RCTs using a standardized definition of INOCA are needed. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors and ranolazine improve QoL. Other interventions had low-quality evidence or no evidence of efficacy.

Impact of ranolazine on coronary microvascular dysfunction (MICRO) study

BACKGROUND

Patients with angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction, without evidence of structural or epicardial coronary disease (Type I CMVD) remain without evidence based treatment options. Previous work has demonstrated that ranolazine can improve angina frequency and stability among patients with Type 1 CMVD; however, the mechanism remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of this pilot project was to assess the impact of ranolazine on Type I CMVD as measured using an invasive tool to measure global resistance (index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR)).

METHODS

Patients with Type 1 CMVD diagnosed using IMR were enrolled and treated with ranolazine 1000mg BID. Coronary angiography and IMR were performed at baseline and on treatment after four weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in IMR pre- and post-treatment. Secondary outcome measures, improvement in angina and activity level, were assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Metabolic equivalent for Task (MET) scores.

RESULTS

A total of 7 patient were enrolled and completed the study. Mean age was 57.6±7.5, 43% were female and 43% were Hispanic. Mean baseline IMR was 37.25±16.27 which decreased to 19.48±5.69 (p=0.02; (-48% Δ) after treatment with ranolazine. Four of the five SAQ domains improved on treatment with significant improvement in physical limitation (p=0.001), angina frequency (p=0.04), angina stability (p=0.05) and disease perception (p=0.001). Non-significant improvements in activity were also seen in both the DASI and MET scores.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with Type 1 CMVD, our pilot data suggest favorable changes in IMR, anginal symptoms and activity status with ranolazine treatment. These findings support further evaluation of the effects of ranolazine on microcirculatory function and angina symptoms in a larger cohort of patients with Type 1 CMVD.

Ranolazine for stable angina pectoris

BACKGROUND

Stable angina pectoris is a chronic medical condition with significant impact on mortality and quality of life; it can be macrovascular or microvascular in origin. Ranolazine is a second-line anti-anginal drug approved for use in people with stable angina. However, the effects of ranolazine for people with angina are considered to be modest, with uncertain clinical relevance.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ranolazine on cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, quality of life, acute myocardial infarction incidence, angina episodes frequency and adverse events incidence in stable angina patients, used either as monotherapy or as add-on therapy, and compared to placebo or any other anti-anginal agent.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science in February 2016, as well as regional databases and trials registers. We also screened reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which directly compared the effects of ranolazine versus placebo or other anti-anginals in people with stable angina pectoris were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Estimates of treatment effects were calculated using risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD) and standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a fixed-effect model. Where we found statistically significant heterogeneity (Chi² P < 0.10), we used a random-effects model for pooling estimates. Meta-analysis was not performed where we found considerable heterogeneity (I² ≥ 75%). We used GRADE criteria to assess evidence quality and the GRADE profiler (GRADEpro GDT) to import data from Review Manager 5.3 to create 'Summary of findings' tables.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 17 RCTs (9975 participants, mean age 63.3 years). We found very limited (or no) data to inform most planned comparisons. Summary data were used to inform comparison of ranolazine versus placebo. Overall, risk of bias was assessed as unclear.For add-on ranolazine compared to placebo, no data were available to estimate cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality. We found uncertainty about the effect of ranolazine on: all-cause mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.71; 3 studies, 2053 participants; low quality evidence); quality of life (any dose, SMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.52; 4 studies, 1563 participants; I² = 73%; moderate quality evidence); and incidence of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (1000mg twice daily, RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.07; 2 studies, 1509 participants; low quality evidence). Add-on ranolazine 1000 mg twice daily reduced the fervour of angina episodes (MD -0.66, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.35; 3 studies, 2004 participants; I² = 39%; moderate quality evidence) but increased the risk of non-serious adverse events (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; 3 studies, 2053 participants; moderate quality evidence).For ranolazine as monotherapy compared to placebo, we found uncertain effect on cardiovascular mortality (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.88; 1 study, 2604 participants; low quality evidence). No data were available to estimate non-cardiovascular mortality. We also found an uncertain effect on all-cause mortality for ranolazine (1000 mg twice daily, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.25; 3 studies, 6249 participants; low quality evidence), quality of life (1000 mg twice daily, MD 0.28, 95% CI -1.57 to 2.13; 3 studies, 2254 participants; moderate quality evidence), non-fatal AMI incidence (any dose, RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.12; 3 studies, 2983 participants; I² = 50%; low quality evidence), and frequency of angina episodes (any dose, MD 0.08, 95% CI -0.85 to 1.01; 2 studies, 402 participants; low quality evidence). We found an increased risk for non-serious adverse events associated with ranolazine (any dose, RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.00; 3 studies, 947 participants; very low quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found very low quality evidence showing that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as monotherapy had increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo. We found low quality evidence indicating that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on the risk of cardiovascular death (for ranolazine given as monotherapy), all-cause death and non-fatal AMI, and the frequency of angina episodes (for ranolazine given as monotherapy) compared to those given placebo. Moderate quality evidence indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine showed uncertain effect on quality of life compared with people who received placebo. Moderate quality evidence also indicated that people with stable angina who received ranolazine as add-on therapy had fewer angina episodes but increased risk of presenting non-serious adverse events compared to those given placebo.