Phase II Trial of Single Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Delivered by Trilogy Linear Accelerator for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

Cost-effectiveness of modern radiotherapy techniques in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy may improve the outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer but at an increased cost. In this study, the authors evaluated the cost-effectiveness of modern radiotherapy techniques in the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

A Markov decision-analytic model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of 4 treatment regimens: gemcitabine alone, gemcitabine plus conventional radiotherapy, gemcitabine plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT); and gemcitabine with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Patients transitioned between the following 5 health states: stable disease, local progression, distant failure, local and distant failure, and death. Health utility tolls were assessed for radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatments and for radiation toxicity.

RESULTS

SBRT increased life expectancy by 0.20 quality-adjusted life years (QALY) at an increased cost of $13,700 compared with gemcitabine alone (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] = $69,500 per QALY). SBRT was more effective and less costly than conventional radiotherapy and IMRT. An analysis that excluded SBRT demonstrated that conventional radiotherapy had an ICER of $126,800 per QALY compared with gemcitabine alone, and IMRT had an ICER of $1,584,100 per QALY compared with conventional radiotherapy. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the probability of cost-effectiveness at a willingness to pay of $50,000 per QALY was 78% for gemcitabine alone, 21% for SBRT, 1.4% for conventional radiotherapy, and 0.01% for IMRT. At a willingness to pay of $200,000 per QALY, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 73% for SBRT, 20% for conventional radiotherapy, 7% for gemcitabine alone, and 0.7% for IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results indicated that IMRT in locally advanced pancreatic cancer exceeds what society considers cost-effective. In contrast, combining gemcitabine with SBRT increased clinical effectiveness beyond that of gemcitabine alone at a cost potentially acceptable by today's standards.

A dosimetric model of duodenal toxicity after stereotactic body radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer

INTRODUCTION

Dose escalation for pancreas cancer is limited by the tolerance of adjacent normal tissues, especially with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The duodenum is generally considered to be the organ at greatest risk. This study reports on the dosimetric determinants of duodenal toxicity with single-fraction SBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventy-three patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received 25 Gy in a single fraction. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) endpoints evaluated include V(5) (volume of duodenum that received 5 Gy), V(10), V(15), V(20), V(25), and D(max) (maximum dose to 1 cm(3)). Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was evaluated with a Lyman model. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The median time to Grade 2-4 duodenal toxicity was 6.3 months (range, 1.6-11.8 months). The 6- and 12-month actuarial rates of toxicity were 11% and 29%, respectively. V(10)-V(25) and D(max) all correlated significantly with duodenal toxicity (p<0.05). In particular, V(15)≥9.1 cm(3) and V(15)<9.1 cm(3) yielded duodenal toxicity rates of 52% and 11%, respectively (p=0.002); V(20)≥3.3 cm(3) and V(20)<3.3 cm(3) gave toxicity rates of 52% and 11%, respectively (p=0.002); and D(max)≥23 Gy and D(max)<23 Gy gave toxicity rates of 49% and 12%, respectively (p=0.004). Lyman NTCP model optimization generated the coefficients m=0.23, n=0.12, and TD(50)=24.6 Gy. Only the Lyman NTCP model remained significant in multivariate analysis (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple DVH endpoints and a Lyman NTCP model are strongly predictive of duodenal toxicity after SBRT for pancreatic cancer. These dose constraints will be valuable in future abdominal SBRT studies.