1
|
Lee A, Yuan Y, Eccles L, Chitkara A, Dalén J, Varol N. Treatment patterns for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the US: A systematic review of observational studies. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 33:100648. [PMID: 36270164 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The advent of immunotherapies (I-O) and targeted therapies has transformed the treatment landscape in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, adoption of new treatment guidelines and evolving treatment patterns in clinical practice are largely unknown. The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to capture real-world first-line treatment patterns in advanced (staged IIIB-IV) or recurrent NSCLC patients in the US. METHODS Electronic databases were systematically searched for observational studies published 2012-2020 that reported on adult patients receiving first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC. Included studies were reviewed and treatment patterns were summarized descriptively. RESULTS Eighteen studies were included. Platinum-doublet (PD) chemotherapy and unspecified chemotherapy regimens were the most commonly used first-line treatments (up to 71% and 96%, respectively). Chemotherapy as monotherapy was mainly utilized in patients ≥65 years. While chemotherapy use was continuously high, I-O became the preferred front-line treatment in 2018 (32.9%). I-O monotherapy was more prevalent among patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, compared to patients with lower levels. First-line use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bevacizumab-based therapies was common in 2010 (33.4% and 21.7%, respectively), but gradually declined to <1% in 2018. CONCLUSION Consistent with the evolving first-line NSCLC treatment landscape in the US, this SLR captures the increasing use of I-O in recent years. While the brief lag in I-O use from the time of authorization may be attributable to an initial resistance to treatment adoption or publication delays, continued use of chemotherapy regimens may reflect an unmet treatment need, which warrants further research.
Collapse
|
2
|
Rich P, Mitchell RB, Schaefer E, Walker PR, Dubay JW, Boyd J, Oubre D, Page R, Khalil M, Sinha S, Boniol S, Halawani H, Santos ES, Brenner W, Orsini JM, Pauli E, Goldberg J, Veatch A, Haut M, Ghabach B, Bidyasar S, Quejada M, Khan W, Huang K, Traylor L, Akerley W. Real-world performance of blood-based proteomic profiling in first-line immunotherapy treatment in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2021-002989. [PMID: 34706885 PMCID: PMC8552188 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy has improved patient outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but better biomarkers are needed. A clinically validated, blood-based proteomic test, or host immune classifier (HIC), was assessed for its ability to predict ICI therapy outcomes in this real-world, prospectively designed, observational study. Materials and methods The prospectively designed, observational registry study INSIGHT (Clinical Effectiveness Assessment of VeriStrat® Testing and Validation of Immunotherapy Tests in NSCLC Subjects) (NCT03289780) includes 35 US sites having enrolled over 3570 NSCLC patients at any stage and line of therapy. After enrolment and prior to therapy initiation, all patients are tested and designated HIC-Hot (HIC-H) or HIC-Cold (HIC-C). A prespecified interim analysis was performed after 1-year follow-up with the first 2000 enrolled patients. We report the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV) NSCLC treated in the first-line (ICI-containing therapies n=284; all first-line therapies n=877), by treatment type and in HIC-defined subgroups. Results OS for HIC-H patients was longer than OS for HIC-C patients across treatment regimens, including ICI. For patients treated with all ICI regimens, median OS was not reached (95% CI 15.4 to undefined months) for HIC-H (n=196) vs 5.0 months (95% CI 2.9 to 6.4) for HIC-C patients (n=88); HR=0.38 (95% CI 0.27 to 0.53), p<0.0001. For ICI monotherapy, OS was 16.8 vs 2.8 months (HR=0.36 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.58), p<0.0001) and for ICI with chemotherapy OS was unreached vs 6.4 months (HR=0.41 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.67), p=0.0003). HIC results were independent of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). In a subgroup with PD-L1 ≥50% and performance status 0–1, HIC stratified survival significantly for ICI monotherapy but not ICI with chemotherapy. Conclusion Blood-based HIC proteomic testing provides clinically meaningful information for immunotherapy treatment decision in NSCLC independent of PD-L1. The data suggest that HIC-C patients should not be treated with ICI alone regardless of their PD-L1 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Rich
- Lung Cancer, Piedmont Physicians Group, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Eric Schaefer
- Highlands Oncology Group, Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA
| | - Paul R Walker
- Leo W Jenkins Cancer Center, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - John W Dubay
- Lewis and Faye Manderson Cancer Center at DCH Regional Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA
| | - Jason Boyd
- Southeastern Medical Oncology Center, Goldsboro, North Carolina, USA
| | - David Oubre
- Pontchartrain Cancer Center, Covington, Louisiana, USA
| | - Ray Page
- The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Mazen Khalil
- St. Bernards Hospital, Inc, Jonesboro, Arkansas, USA
| | - Suman Sinha
- Christus Saint Michael Health System, Texarkana, Texas, USA
| | - Scott Boniol
- Christus Cancer Treatment Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Hafez Halawani
- St. Frances Cabrini Hospital Cancer Center, Alexandria, Louisiana, USA
| | - Edgardo S Santos
- Florida Precision Oncology, Division of Genesis Care, Aventura, Florida, USA
| | - Warren Brenner
- Lynn Clinical Research Institute, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | | | - Emily Pauli
- Clearview Cancer Institute, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
| | - Jonathan Goldberg
- Clinical Research Alliance, Caremount Medical, Mount Kisco, New York, USA
| | - Andrea Veatch
- Northwest Medical Specialties, Puyallup, Washington, USA
| | - Mitchell Haut
- Hematology and Oncology Associates, Inc, Canton, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kan Huang
- Phelps County Regional Medical Center, Rolla, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Wallace Akerley
- Huntsman Cancer Institute Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leal TA, Argento AC, Bhadra K, Hogarth DK, Grigorieva J, Hartfield RM, McDonald RC, Bonomi PD. Prognostic performance of proteomic testing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2020; 36:1497-1505. [PMID: 32615813 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1790346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Timely assessment of patient-specific prognosis is critical to oncology care involving a shared decision-making approach, but clinical prognostic factors traditionally used in NSCLC have limitations. We examine a proteomic test to address these limitations. METHODS This study examines the prognostic performance of the VeriStrat blood-based proteomic test that measures the inflammatory disease state of patients with advanced NSCLC. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed, yielding cohorts in which the hazard ratio (HR) was reported for overall survival (OS) of patients with VeriStrat Poor (VSPoor) test results versus VeriStrat Good (VSGood). A study-level meta-analysis of OS HRs was performed in subgroups defined by lines of therapy and treatment regimens. RESULTS Twenty-four cohorts met SLR criteria. Meta-analyses in five subgroups (first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, second-line single-agent chemotherapy, first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, and second- and higher-line TKI therapy, and best supportive care) resulted in statistically significant (p ≤ .001) summary effect sizes for OS HRs of 0.42, 0.54, 0.41, 0.52, and 0.50, respectively, indicating increased OS by about two-fold for patients who test VSGood. No significant heterogeneity was seen in any subgroup (p > .05). CONCLUSIONS Advanced NSCLC patients classified VSGood have significantly longer OS than those classified VSPoor. The summary effect size for OS HRs around 0.4-0.5 indicates that the expected median survival of those with a VSGood classification is approximately 2-2.5 times as long as those with VSPoor. The robust prognostic performance of the VeriStrat test across various lines of therapy and treatment regimens has clinical implications for treatment shared decision-making and potential for novel treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ticiana A Leal
- Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Angela C Argento
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Krish Bhadra
- Rees Skillern Cancer Institute, CHI Memorial, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| | - D Kyle Hogarth
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grigorieva J, Asmellash S, Net L, Tsypin M, Roder H, Roder J. Mass Spectrometry-Based Multivariate Proteomic Tests for Prediction of Outcomes on Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy: The Modern Analytical Approach. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E838. [PMID: 32012941 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21030838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The remarkable success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has given hope of cure for some patients with advanced cancer; however, the fraction of responding patients is 15-35%, depending on tumor type, and the proportion of durable responses is even smaller. Identification of biomarkers with strong predictive potential remains a priority. Until now most of the efforts were focused on biomarkers associated with the assumed mechanism of action of ICIs, such as levels of expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and mutation load in tumor tissue, as a proxy of immunogenicity; however, their performance is unsatisfactory. Several assays designed to capture the complexity of the disease by measuring the immune response in tumor microenvironment show promise but still need validation in independent studies. The circulating proteome contains an additional layer of information characterizing tumor-host interactions that can be integrated into multivariate tests using modern machine learning techniques. Here we describe several validated serum-based proteomic tests and their utility in the context of ICIs. We discuss test performances, demonstrate their independence from currently used biomarkers, and discuss various aspects of associated biological mechanisms. We propose that serum-based multivariate proteomic tests add a missing piece to the puzzle of predicting benefit from ICIs.
Collapse
|