1
|
Horst F, Bodenstein E, Brand M, Hans S, Karsch L, Lessmann E, Löck S, Schürer M, Pawelke J, Beyreuther E. Dose and dose rate dependence of the tissue sparing effect at ultra-high dose rate studied for proton and electron beams using the zebrafish embryo model. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110197. [PMID: 38447870 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE A better characterization of the dependence of the tissue sparing effect at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) on physical beam parameters (dose, dose rate, radiation quality) would be helpful towards a mechanistic understanding of the FLASH effect and for its broader clinical translation. To address this, a comprehensive study on the normal tissue sparing at UHDR using the zebrafish embryo (ZFE) model was conducted. METHODS One-day-old ZFE were irradiated over a wide dose range (15-95 Gy) in three different beams (proton entrance channel, proton spread out Bragg peak and 30 MeV electrons) at UHDR and reference dose rate. After irradiation the ZFE were incubated for 4 days and then analyzed for four different biological endpoints (pericardial edema, curved spine, embryo length and eye diameter). RESULTS Dose-effect curves were obtained and a sparing effect at UHDR was observed for all three beams. It was demonstrated that proton relative biological effectiveness and UHDR sparing are both relevant to predict the resulting dose response. Dose dependent FLASH modifying factors (FMF) for ZFE were found to be compatible with rodent data from the literature. It was found that the UHDR sparing effect saturates at doses above ∼ 50 Gy with an FMF of ∼ 0.7-0.8. A strong dose rate dependence of the tissue sparing effect in ZFE was observed. The magnitude of the maximum sparing effect was comparable for all studied biological endpoints. CONCLUSION The ZFE model was shown to be a suitable pre-clinical high-throughput model for radiobiological studies on FLASH radiotherapy, providing results comparable to rodent models. This underlines the relevance of ZFE studies for FLASH radiotherapy research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Horst
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Bodenstein
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Brand
- Center for Regenerative Therapies TU Dresden and Cluster of Excellence 'Physics of Life', Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Hans
- Center for Regenerative Therapies TU Dresden and Cluster of Excellence 'Physics of Life', Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Leonhard Karsch
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Lessmann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Schürer
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden (NCT/UCC), Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Desorgher L, Veres I, Bratel A, Landström E, Engwall E, Herrera FG, Ozsahin EM, Bourhis J, Bochud F, Moeckli R. Very high-energy electron therapy as light-particle alternative to transmission proton FLASH therapy - An evaluation of dosimetric performances. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110177. [PMID: 38378075 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical translation of FLASH-radiotherapy (RT) to deep-seated tumours is still a technological challenge. One proposed solution consists of using ultra-high dose rate transmission proton (TP) beams of about 200-250 MeV to irradiate the tumour with the flat entrance of the proton depth-dose profile. This work evaluates the dosimetric performance of very high-energy electron (VHEE)-based RT (50-250 MeV) as a potential alternative to TP-based RT for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect. METHODS Basic physics characteristics of VHEE and TP beams were compared utilizing Monte Carlo simulations in water. A VHEE-enabled research treatment planning system was used to evaluate the plan quality achievable with VHEE beams of different energies, compared to 250 MeV TP beams for a glioblastoma, an oesophagus, and a prostate cancer case. RESULTS Like TP, VHEE above 100 MeV can treat targets with roughly flat (within ± 20 %) depth-dose distributions. The achievable dosimetric target conformity and adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing is consequently driven for both modalities by their lateral beam penumbrae. Electron beams of 400[500] MeV match the penumbra of 200[250] MeV TP beams and penumbra is increased for lower electron energies. For the investigated patient cases, VHEE plans with energies of 150 MeV and above achieved a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of 250 MeV TP plans. For the glioblastoma and the oesophagus case, although having a decreased conformity, even 100 MeV VHEE plans provided a similar target coverage and OAR sparing compared to TP. CONCLUSIONS VHEE-based FLASH-RT using sufficiently high beam energies may provide a lighter-particle alternative to TP-based FLASH-RT with comparable dosimetric plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Izabella Veres
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Franciosini G, Carlotti D, Cattani F, De Gregorio A, De Liso V, De Rosa F, Di Francesco M, Di Martino F, Felici G, Pensavalle JH, Leonardi MC, Marafini M, Muscato A, Paiar F, Patera V, Poortmans P, Sciubba A, Schiavi A, Toppi M, Traini G, Trigilio A, Sarti A. IOeRT conventional and FLASH treatment planning system implementation exploiting fast GPU Monte Carlo: The case of breast cancer. Phys Med 2024; 121:103346. [PMID: 38608421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Partial breast irradiation for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients can be performed by means of Intra Operative electron Radiation Therapy (IOeRT). One of the main limitations of this technique is the absence of a treatment planning system (TPS) that could greatly help in ensuring a proper coverage of the target volume during irradiation. An IOeRT TPS has been developed using a fast Monte Carlo (MC) and an ultrasound imaging system to provide the best irradiation strategy (electron beam energy, applicator position and bevel angle) and to facilitate the optimisation of dose prescription and delivery to the target volume while maximising the organs at risk sparing. The study has been performed in silico, exploiting MC simulations of a breast cancer treatment. Ultrasound-based input has been used to compute the absorbed dose maps in different irradiation strategies and a quantitative comparison between the different options was carried out using Dose Volume Histograms. The system was capable of exploring different beam energies and applicator positions in few minutes, identifying the best strategy with an overall computation time that was found to be completely compatible with clinical implementation. The systematic uncertainty related to tissue deformation during treatment delivery with respect to imaging acquisition was taken into account. The potential and feasibility of a GPU based full MC TPS implementation of IOeRT breast cancer treatments has been demonstrated in-silico. This long awaited tool will greatly improve the treatment safety and efficacy, overcoming the limits identified within the clinical trials carried out so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Franciosini
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - D Carlotti
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitatio Campus-Bio Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - F Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A De Gregorio
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Physics, Rome, Italy
| | - V De Liso
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy
| | - F De Rosa
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy
| | | | - F Di Martino
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisa (AOUP), Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - G Felici
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy
| | - J Harold Pensavalle
- S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A, Aprilia, Italy; Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M C Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M Marafini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche "E. Fermi", Rome, Italy
| | - A Muscato
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy; Specialty School of Medical Physics, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - F Paiar
- Centro Pisano Multidisciplinare sulla Ricerca e Implementazione Clinica della Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR), Pisa, Italy; Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisa (AOUP), Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy
| | - V Patera
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - A Sciubba
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Frascati National Laboratories (LNF), Rome, Italy
| | - A Schiavi
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - M Toppi
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - G Traini
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy
| | - A Trigilio
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Physics, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Frascati National Laboratories (LNF), Rome, Italy
| | - A Sarti
- Sapienza, University of Rome, Department of Scienze di Base e Applicate all'Ingegneria, Rome, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, INFN, Section of Rome I, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dai T, Sloop AM, Rahman MR, Sunnerberg JP, Clark MA, Young R, Adamczyk S, Von Voigts-Rhetz P, Patane C, Turk M, Jarvis L, Pogue BW, Gladstone DJ, Bruza P, Zhang R. First Monte Carlo beam model for ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy with a compact electron LINAC. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38493501 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND FLASH radiotherapy based on ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) is actively being studied by the radiotherapy community. Dedicated UHDR electron devices are currently a mainstay for FLASH studies. PURPOSE To present the first Monte Carlo (MC) electron beam model for the UHDR capable Mobetron (FLASH-IQ) as a dose calculation and treatment planning platform for preclinical research and FLASH-radiotherapy (RT) clinical trials. METHODS The initial beamline geometry of the Mobetron was provided by the manufacturer, with the first-principal implementation realized in the Geant4-based GAMOS MC toolkit. The geometry and electron source characteristics, such as energy spectrum and beamline parameters, were tuned to match the central-axis percentage depth dose (PDD) and lateral profiles for the pristine beam measured during machine commissioning. The thickness of the small foil in secondary scatter affected the beam model dominantly and was fine tuned to achieve the best agreement with commissioning data. Validation of the MC beam modeling was performed by comparing the calculated PDDs and profiles with EBT-XD radiochromic film measurements for various combinations of applicators and inserts. RESULTS The nominal 9 MeV electron FLASH beams were best represented by a Gaussian energy spectrum with mean energy of 9.9 MeV and variance (σ) of 0.2 MeV. Good agreement between the MC beam model and commissioning data were demonstrated with maximal discrepancy < 3% for PDDs and profiles. Hundred percent gamma pass rate was achieved for all PDDs and profiles with the criteria of 2 mm/3%. With the criteria of 2 mm/2%, maximum, minimum and mean gamma pass rates were (100.0%, 93.8%, 98.7%) for PDDs and (100.0%, 96.7%, 99.4%) for profiles, respectively. CONCLUSIONS A validated MC beam model for the UHDR capable Mobetron is presented for the first time. The MC model can be utilized for direct dose calculation or to generate beam modeling input required for treatment planning systems for FLASH-RT planning. The beam model presented in this work should facilitate translational and clinical FLASH-RT for trials conducted on the Mobetron FLASH-IQ platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyuan Dai
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology Physics and Technology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Austin M Sloop
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | - Jacob P Sunnerberg
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Megan A Clark
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Ralph Young
- IntraOp Medical Corporation, Sunnyvale, California, USA
| | | | | | - Chris Patane
- IntraOp Medical Corporation, Sunnyvale, California, USA
| | - Michael Turk
- IntraOp Medical Corporation, Sunnyvale, California, USA
| | - Lesley Jarvis
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Brian W Pogue
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Medical Physics, Wisconsin Institutes for Medical Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - David J Gladstone
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Petr Bruza
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Radiation Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Poulsen PR, Johansen JG, Sitarz MK, Kanouta E, Kristensen L, Grau C, Sørensen BS. Oxygen Enhancement Ratio-Weighted Dose Quantitatively Describes Acute Skin Toxicity Variations in Mice After Pencil Beam Scanning Proton FLASH Irradiation With Changing Doses and Time Structures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00358-4. [PMID: 38462015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this work was to investigate the ability of a biological oxygen enhancement ratio-weighted dose, DOER, to describe acute skin toxicity variations observed in mice after proton pencil beam scanning irradiations with changing doses and beam time structures. METHODS AND MATERIALS In five independent experiments, the right hind leg of a total of 621 CDF1 mice was irradiated previously in the entrance plateau of a pencil beam scanning proton beam. The incidence of acute skin toxicity (of level 1.5-2.0-2.5-3.0-3.5) was scored for 47 different mouse groups that mapped toxicity as function of dose for conventional and FLASH dose rate, toxicity as function of field dose rate with and without repainting, and toxicity when splitting the treatment into 1 to 6 identical deliveries separated by 2 minutes. DOER was calculated for all mouse groups using a simple oxygen kinetics model to describe oxygen depletion. The three independent model parameters (oxygen-depletion rate, oxygen-recovery rate, oxygen level without irradiation) were fitted to the experimental data. The ability of DOER to describe the toxicity variations across all experiments was investigated by comparing DOER-response curves across the five independent experiments. RESULTS After conversion from the independent variable tested in each experiment to DOER, all five experiments had similar MDDOER50 (DOER giving 50% toxicity incidence) with standard deviations of 0.45 - 1.6 Gy for the five toxicity levels. DOER could thus describe the observed toxicity variations across all experiments. CONCLUSIONS DOER described the varying FLASH-sparing effect observed for a wide range of conditions. Calculation of DOER for other irradiation conditions can quantitatively estimate the FLASH-sparing effect for arbitrary irradiations for the investigated murine model. With appropriate fitting parameters DOER also may be able to describe FLASH effect variations with dose and dose rate for other assays and endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Rugaard Poulsen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Jacob Graversen Johansen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mateusz Krzysztof Sitarz
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eleni Kanouta
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Line Kristensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Cai Grau
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schoenauen L, Stubbe FX, Van Gestel D, Penninckx S, Heuskin AC. C. elegans: A potent model for high-throughput screening experiments investigating the FLASH effect. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100712. [PMID: 38125649 PMCID: PMC10731598 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
This study explores the effects of UHDR irradiation on Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. UHDR proton and electron beams demonstrate a sparing effect, aligning with literature findings. This highlights C. elegans suitability as a screening model for studying the LET impact on the FLASH effect, reinforcing its potential in radiation research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Schoenauen
- NAmur Research Insitute for Life Sciences, University of Namur, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sébastien Penninckx
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Hopital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kinj R, Gaide O, Jeanneret-Sozzi W, Dafni U, Viguet-Carrin S, Sagittario E, Kypriotou M, Chenal J, Duclos F, Hebeisen M, Falco T, Geyer R, Gonçalves Jorge P, Moeckli R, Bourhis J. Randomized phase II selection trial of FLASH and conventional radiotherapy for patients with localized cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or basal cell carcinoma: A study protocol. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100743. [PMID: 38362466 PMCID: PMC10867306 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are the most prevalent skin cancers in western countries. Surgery is the standard of care for these cancers and conventional external radiotherapy (CONV-RT) with conventional dose rate (0.03-0.06 Gy/sec) represents a good alternative when the patients or tumors are not amenable to surgery but routinely generates skin side effects. Low energy electron FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) is a new form of radiotherapy exploiting the biological advantage of the FLASH effect, which consists in delivering radiation dose in milliseconds instead of minutes in CONV-RT. In pre-clinical studies, when compared to CONV-RT, FLASH-RT induced a robust, reproducible and remarkable sparing of the normal healthy tissues, while the efficacy on tumors was preserved. In this context, we aim to prospectively evaluate FLASH-RT versus CONV-RT with regards to toxicity and oncological outcome in localized cutaneous BCC and SCC. Methods This is a randomized selection, non-comparative, phase II study of curative FLASH-RT versus CONV-RT in patients with T1-T2 N0 M0 cutaneous BCC and SCC. Patients will be randomly allocated to low energy electron FLASH-RT (dose rate: 220-270 Gy/s) or to CONV-RT arm. Small lesions (T1) will receive a single dose of 22 Gy and large lesions (T2) will receive 30 Gy in 5 fractions of 6 Gy over two weeks.The primary endpoint evaluates safety at 6 weeks after RT through grade ≥ 3 toxicity and efficacy through local control rate at 12 months. Approximately 60 patients in total will be randomized, considering on average 1-2 lesions and a maximum of 3 lesions per patients corresponding to the total of 96 lesions required. FLASH-RT will be performed using the Mobetron® (IntraOp, USA) with high dose rate functionality.LANCE (NCT05724875) is the first randomized trial evaluating FLASH-RT and CONV-RT in a curative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémy Kinj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Olivier Gaide
- Service of Dermatology, CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Wendy Jeanneret-Sozzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Urania Dafni
- Laboratory of Biostatistics School of Health Sciences University of Athens, Greece
| | - Stéphanie Viguet-Carrin
- Center of Experimental Therapeutics (CTE), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Enea Sagittario
- Center of Experimental Therapeutics (CTE), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Magdalini Kypriotou
- Center of Experimental Therapeutics (CTE), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Julie Chenal
- Center of Experimental Therapeutics (CTE), Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Frederic Duclos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marine Hebeisen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Teresa Falco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Reiner Geyer
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Patrik Gonçalves Jorge
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, CHUV, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Clements N, Esplen N, Bateman J, Robertson C, Dosanjh M, Korysko P, Farabolini W, Corsini R, Bazalova-Carter M. Mini-GRID radiotherapy on the CLEAR very-high-energy electron beamline: collimator optimization, film dosimetry, and Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:055003. [PMID: 38295408 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad247d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Spatially-fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) delivered with a very-high-energy electron (VHEE) beam and a mini-GRID collimator was investigated to achieve synergistic normal tissue-sparing through spatial fractionation and the FLASH effect.Approach.A tungsten mini-GRID collimator for delivering VHEE SFRT was optimized using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs), depths of convergence (DoCs, PVDR ≤ 1.1), and peak and valley doses in a water phantom from a simulated 150 MeV VHEE source were evaluated. Collimator thickness, hole width, and septal width were varied to determine an optimal value for each parameter that maximized PVDR and DoC. The optimized collimator (20 mm thick rectangular prism with a 15 mm × 15 mm face with a 7 × 7 array of 0.5 mm holes separated by 1.1 mm septa) was 3D-printed and used for VHEE irradiations with the CERN linear electron accelerator for research beam. Open beam and mini-GRID irradiations were performed at 140, 175, and 200 MeV and dose was recorded with radiochromic films in a water tank. PVDR, central-axis (CAX) and valley dose rates and DoCs were evaluated.Main results.Films demonstrated peak and valley dose rates on the order of 100 s of MGy/s, which could promote FLASH-sparing effects. Across the three energies, PVDRs of 2-4 at 13 mm depth and DoCs between 39 and 47 mm were achieved. Open beam and mini-GRID MC simulations were run to replicate the film results at 200 MeV. For the mini-GRID irradiations, the film CAX dose was on average 15% higher, the film valley dose was 28% higher, and the film PVDR was 15% lower than calculated by MC.Significance.Ultimately, the PVDRs and DoCs were determined to be too low for a significant potential for SFRT tissue-sparing effects to be present, particularly at depth. Further beam delivery optimization and investigations of new means of spatial fractionation are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Clements
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Nolan Esplen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Joseph Bateman
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Manjit Dosanjh
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Korysko
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fu J, Yang Z, Melemenidis S, Viswanathan V, Dutt S, Manjappa R, Lau B, Soto LA, Ashraf MR, Skinner L, Yu SJ, Surucu M, Casey KM, Rankin EB, Graves E, Lu W, Loo BW, Gu X. Exploring Deep Learning for Estimating the Isoeffective Dose of FLASH Irradiation From Mouse Intestinal Histological Images. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(23)08306-2. [PMID: 38171387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultrahigh-dose-rate (FLASH) irradiation has been reported to reduce normal tissue damage compared with conventional dose rate (CONV) irradiation without compromising tumor control. This proof-of-concept study aims to develop a deep learning (DL) approach to quantify the FLASH isoeffective dose (dose of CONV that would be required to produce the same effect as the given physical FLASH dose) with postirradiation mouse intestinal histology images. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty-four healthy C57BL/6J female mice underwent 16 MeV electron CONV (0.12 Gy/s; n = 41) or FLASH (200 Gy/s; n = 43) single fraction whole abdominal irradiation. Physical dose ranged from 12 to 16 Gy for FLASH and 11 to 15 Gy for CONV in 1 Gy increments. Four days after irradiation, 9 jejunum cross-sections from each mouse were hematoxylin and eosin stained and digitized for histological analysis. CONV data set was randomly split into training (n = 33) and testing (n = 8) data sets. ResNet101-based DL models were retrained using the CONV training data set to estimate the dose based on histological features. The classical manual crypt counting (CC) approach was implemented for model comparison. Cross-section-wise mean squared error was computed to evaluate the dose estimation accuracy of both approaches. The validated DL model was applied to the FLASH data set to map the physical FLASH dose into the isoeffective dose. RESULTS The DL model achieved a cross-section-wise mean squared error of 0.20 Gy2 on the CONV testing data set compared with 0.40 Gy2 of the CC approach. Isoeffective doses estimated by the DL model for FLASH doses of 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 Gy were 12.19 ± 0.46, 12.54 ± 0.37, 12.69 ± 0.26, 12.84 ± 0.26, and 13.03 ± 0.28 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our proposed DL model achieved accurate CONV dose estimation. The DL model results indicate that in the physical dose range of 13 to 16 Gy, the biologic dose response of small intestinal tissue to FLASH irradiation is represented by a lower isoeffective dose compared with the physical dose. Our DL approach can be a tool for studying isoeffective doses of other radiation dose modifying interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Zi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Stavros Melemenidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Vignesh Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Suparna Dutt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Rakesh Manjappa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Brianna Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Luis A Soto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - M Ramish Ashraf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Lawrie Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Shu-Jung Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Murat Surucu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Kerriann M Casey
- Department of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Erinn B Rankin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Edward Graves
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Billy W Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - Xuejun Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mascia A, McCauley S, Speth J, Nunez SA, Boivin G, Vilalta M, Sharma RA, Perentesis JP, Sertorio M. Impact of Multiple Beams on the FLASH Effect in Soft Tissue and Skin in Mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:253-261. [PMID: 37541394 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE FLASH proton pencil beam scanning (p-PBS) showed a reduction in mouse skin toxicity and fibrosis when delivered as a single, uninterrupted, high-dose fraction. Clinical p-PBS treatment usually requires multiple beams to achieve good conformality, and these beams are separated by minutes to allow patient and equipment repositioning. We evaluate the impact of multibeam versus single-beam proton radiation on the FLASH sparing effect on skin toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS The right hind leg of 10-week-old female C57Bl/6j mice was irradiated using a Varian ProBeam proton beam scanning gantry system at conventional (1 Gy/s) or FLASH (100 Gy/s) average field dose rate. We scored the skin toxicity after different doses for 7 weeks. The treatment was delivered as 1, 2, or 3 equal beams with an interruption of 2 minutes. For each beam delivery, the equipment remained in the same position so that there was a full overlap of beams administered. RESULTS Single-beam delivery confirmed a benefit for p-PBS FLASH in this model at 30, 35, and 40 Gy. At 30 and 35 Gy, a single beam interruption of 2 minutes (2 × 15 Gy or 2 × 17.5 Gy) reduced the FLASH sparing effect, which remained significant (P < .001). However, 2 interruptions (3 × 10 Gy or 3 × 11.6 Gy) abrogated the normal tissue sparing effect. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that the FLASH sparing effect in areas of beam overlap can be compromised by interruptions in delivery time. Time gap between overlapping beams and spatial arrangement of the delivered beams are important parameters for FLASH studies. The effect of multibeam needs to be studied on different organs of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Mascia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Shelby McCauley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Joseph Speth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Stefanno Alarcon Nunez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Gael Boivin
- Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, California
| | - Marta Vilalta
- Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, California
| | - Ricky A Sharma
- Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, California
| | | | - Mathieu Sertorio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Harrison N, Kang M, Liu R, Charyyev S, Wahl N, Liu W, Zhou J, Higgins KA, Simone CB, Bradley JD, Dynan WS, Lin L. A Novel Inverse Algorithm To Solve the Integrated Optimization of Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer of Proton FLASH Therapy With Sparse Filters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)08187-7. [PMID: 38104869 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.11.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The recently proposed Integrated Physical Optimization Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IPO-IMPT) framework allows simultaneous optimization of dose, dose rate, and linear energy transfer (LET) for ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) treatment planning. Finding solutions to IPO-IMPT is difficult because of computational intensiveness. Nevertheless, an inverse solution that simultaneously specifies the geometry of a sparse filter and weights of a proton intensity map is desirable for both clinical and preclinical applications. Such solutions can reduce effective biologic dose to organs at risk in patients with cancer as well as reduce the number of animal irradiations needed to derive extra biologic dose models in preclinical studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS Unlike the initial forward heuristic, this inverse IPO-IMPT solution includes simultaneous optimization of sparse range compensation, sparse range modulation, and spot intensity. The daunting computational tasks vital to this endeavor were resolved iteratively with a distributed computing framework to enable Simultaneous Intensity and Energy Modulation and Compensation (SIEMAC). SIEMAC was demonstrated on a human patient with central lung cancer and a minipig. RESULTS SIEMAC simultaneously improves maps of spot intensities and patient-field-specific sparse range compensators and range modulators. For the patient with lung cancer, at our maximum nozzle current of 300 nA, dose rate coverage above 100 Gy/s increased from 57% to 96% in the lung and from 93% to 100% in the heart, and LET coverage above 4 keV/µm dropped from 68% to 9% in the lung and from 26% to <1% in the heart. For a simple minipig plan, the full-width half-maximum of the dose, dose rate, and LET distributions decreased by 30%, 1.6%, and 57%, respectively, again with similar target dose coverage, thus reducing uncertainty in these quantities for preclinical studies. CONCLUSIONS The inverse solution to IPO-IMPT demonstrated the capability to simultaneously modulate subspot proton energy and intensity distributions for clinical and preclinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ruirui Liu
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Niklas Wahl
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wei Liu
- Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jun Zhou
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Petersson K, Ozsahin EM, Herrera FG, Bailat C, Bochud F, Bourhis J, Moeckli R, Adrian G. Effect of Conventional and Ultrahigh Dose Rate FLASH Irradiations on Preclinical Tumor Models: A Systematic Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:1007-1017. [PMID: 37276928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Compared with conventional dose rate irradiation (CONV), ultrahigh dose rate irradiation (UHDR) has shown superior normal tissue sparing. However, a clinically relevant widening of the therapeutic window by UHDR, termed "FLASH effect," also depends on the tumor toxicity obtained by UHDR. Based on a combined analysis of published literature, the current study examined the hypothesis of tumor isoefficacy for UHDR versus CONV and aimed to identify potential knowledge gaps to inspire future in vivo studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search identified publications assessing in vivo tumor responses comparing UHDR and CONV. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed, including combined analyses of tumor growth and survival data. RESULTS We identified 66 data sets from 15 publications that compared UHDR and CONV for tumor efficacy. The median number of animals per group was 9 (range 3-15) and the median follow-up period was 30.5 days (range 11-230) after the first irradiation. Tumor growth assays were the predominant model used. Combined statistical analyses of tumor growth and survival data are consistent with UHDR isoefficacy compared with CONV. Only 1 study determined tumor-controlling dose (TCD50) and reported statistically nonsignificant differences. CONCLUSIONS The combined quantitative analyses of tumor responses support the assumption of UHDR isoefficacy compared with CONV. However, the comparisons are primarily based on heterogeneous tumor growth assays with limited numbers of animals and short follow-up, and most studies do not assess long-term tumor control probability. Therefore, the assays may be insensitive in resolving smaller response differences, such as responses of radioresistant tumor subclones. Hence, tumor cure experiments, including additional TCD50 experiments, are needed to confirm the assumption of isoeffectiveness in curative settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Carlson N, House CD, Tambasco M. Toward a Transportable Cell Culture Platform for Evaluating Radiotherapy Dose Modifying Factors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:15953. [PMID: 37958936 PMCID: PMC10648285 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242115953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The current tools for validating dose delivery and optimizing new radiotherapy technologies in radiation therapy do not account for important dose modifying factors (DMFs), such as variations in cellular repair capability, tumor oxygenation, ultra-high dose rates and the type of ionizing radiation used. These factors play a crucial role in tumor control and normal tissue complications. To address this need, we explored the feasibility of developing a transportable cell culture platform (TCCP) to assess the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of ionizing radiation. We measured cell recovery, clonogenic viability and metabolic viability of MDA-MB-231 cells over several days at room temperature in a range of concentrations of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in medium-supplemented gelatin, under both normoxic and hypoxic oxygen environments. Additionally, we measured the clonogenic viability of the cells to characterize how the duration of the TCCP at room temperature affected their radiosensitivity at doses up to 16 Gy. We found that (78±2)% of MDA-MB-231 cells were successfully recovered after being kept at room temperature for three days in 50% FBS in medium-supplemented gelatin at hypoxia (0.4±0.1)% pO2, while metabolic and clonogenic viabilities as measured by ATP luminescence and colony formation were found to be (58±5)% and (57±4)%, respectively. Additionally, irradiating a TCCP under normoxic and hypoxic conditions yielded a clonogenic oxygen enhancement ratio (OER) of 1.4±0.6 and a metabolic OER of 1.9±0.4. Our results demonstrate that the TCCP can be used to assess the RBE of a DMF and provides a feasible platform for assessing DMFs in radiation therapy applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Carlson
- Department of Physics, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA;
| | - Carrie D. House
- Biology Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA;
| | - Mauro Tambasco
- Department of Physics, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dal Bello R, von der Grün J, Fabiano S, Rudolf T, Saltybaeva N, Stark LS, Ahmed M, Bathula M, Kucuker Dogan S, McNeur J, Guckenberger M, Tanadini-Lang S. Enabling ultra-high dose rate electron beams at a clinical linear accelerator for isocentric treatments. Radiother Oncol 2023; 187:109822. [PMID: 37516362 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiotherapy delivery with ultra-high dose rates (UHDR) has consistently produced normal tissue sparing while maintaining efficacy for tumour control in preclinical studies, known as the FLASH effect. Modified clinical electron linacs have been used for pre-clinical studies at reduced source-surface distance (SSD) and novel intra-operative devices are becoming available. In this context, we modified a clinical linac to deliver 16 MeV UHDR electron beams with an isocentric setup. MATERIALS AND METHODS The first Varian TrueBeam (SN 1001) was clinically operative between 2009-2022, it was then decommissioned and converted into a research platform. The 18 MeV electron beam was converted into the experimental 16 MeV UHDR. Modifications were performed by Varian and included a software patch, thinner scattering foil and beam tuning. The dose rate, beam characteristics and reproducibility were measured with electron applicators at SSD = 100 cm. RESULTS The dose per pulse at isocenter was up to 1.28 Gy/pulse, corresponding to average and instantaneous dose rates up to 256 Gy/s and 3⋅105 Gy/s, respectively. Beam characteristics were equivalent between 16 MeV UHDR and conventional for field sizes up to 10x10cm2 and an overall beam reproducibility within ± 2.5% was measured. CONCLUSIONS We report on the first technical conversion of a Varian TrueBeam to produce 16 MeV UHDR electron beams. This research platform will allow isocenter experiments and deliveries with conventional setups up to field sizes of 10x10 cm2 within a hospital environment, reducing the gap between preclinical and clinical electron FLASH investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Dal Bello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Jens von der Grün
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Fabiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Rudolf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Natalia Saltybaeva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luisa S Stark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Md Ahmed
- Varian Medical Systems a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Manohar Bathula
- Varian Medical Systems a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Joshua McNeur
- Varian Medical Systems a Siemens Healthineers Company, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hu S, Lan X, Zheng J, Bi Y, Ye Y, Si M, Fang Y, Wang J, Liu J, Chen Y, Chen Y, Xiang P, Niu T, Huang Y. The dose-related plateau effect of surviving fraction in normal tissue during the ultra-high-dose-rate radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:185004. [PMID: 37586385 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Ultra-high-dose-rate radiotherapy, referred to as FLASH therapy, has been demonstrated to reduce the damage of normal tissue as well as inhibiting tumor growth compared with conventional dose-rate radiotherapy. The transient hypoxia may be a vital explanation for sparing the normal tissue. The heterogeneity of oxygen distribution for different doses and dose rates in the different radiotherapy schemes are analyzed. With these results, the influence of doses and dose rates on cell survival are evaluated in this work.Approach.The two-dimensional reaction-diffusion equations are used to describe the heterogeneity of the oxygen distribution in capillaries and tissue. A modified linear quadratic model is employed to characterize the surviving fraction at different doses and dose rates.Main results.The reduction of the damage to the normal tissue can be observed if the doses exceeds a minimum dose threshold under the ultra-high-dose-rate radiation. Also, the surviving fraction exhibits the 'plateau effect' under the ultra-high dose rates radiation, which signifies that within a specific range of doses, the surviving fraction either exhibits minimal variation or increases with the dose. For a given dose, the surviving fraction increases with the dose rate until tending to a stable value, which means that the protection in normal tissue reaches saturation.Significance.The emergence of the 'plateau effect' allows delivering the higher doses while minimizing damage to normal tissue. It is necessary to develop appropriate program of doses and dose rates for different irradiated tissue to achieve more efficient protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Hu
- School of Physics and Astronomy, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009, People's Republic of China
- School of Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaofei Lan
- School of Physics and Astronomy, China West Normal University, Nanchong 637009, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinfen Zheng
- Dermatology, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention of Shenzhen, Guangdong Shenzhen 518020, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuanjie Bi
- School of Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuanchun Ye
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology Campus Benjamin Franklin Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Hindenburgdamm, 30,12203, Berlin Germany
| | - Meiyu Si
- School of Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuhong Fang
- School of Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinghui Wang
- Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States of America
| | - Junyan Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, United States of America
| | - Yuan Chen
- The Institute for Advanced Studies of Wuhan University, 299, Bayi Road, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuling Chen
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China
| | - Pai Xiang
- The Institute for Advanced Studies of Wuhan University, 299, Bayi Road, Wuhan, 430072, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianye Niu
- Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongsheng Huang
- School of Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Traneus E, Vallet V, Desorgher L, Ozsahin EM, Bochud F, Bourhis J, Moeckli R. 3D-conformal very-high energy electron therapy as candidate modality for FLASH-RT: A treatment planning study for glioblastoma and lung cancer. Med Phys 2023; 50:5745-5756. [PMID: 37427669 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-clinical ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron irradiations on time scales of 100 ms have demonstrated a remarkable sparing of brain and lung tissues while retaining tumor efficacy when compared to conventional dose rate irradiations. While clinically-used gantries and intensity modulation techniques are too slow to match such time scales, novel very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) radiotherapy (RT) devices using 3D-conformed broad VHEE beams are designed to deliver UHDR treatments that fulfill these timing requirements. PURPOSE To assess the dosimetric plan quality obtained using VHEE-based 3D-conformal RT (3D-CRT) for treatments of glioblastoma and lung cancer patients and compare the resulting treatment plans to those delivered by standard-of-care intensity modulated photon RT (IMRT) techniques. METHODS Seven glioblastoma patients and seven lung cancer patients were planned with VHEE-based 3D-CRT using 3 to 16 coplanar beams with equidistant angular spacing and energies of 100 and 200 MeV using a forward planning approach. Dose distributions, dose-volume histograms, coverage (V95% ) and homogeneity (HI98% ) for the planning target volume (PTV), as well as near-maximum doses (D2% ) and mean doses (Dmean ) for organs-at-risk (OAR) were evaluated and compared to clinical IMRT plans. RESULTS Mean differences of V95% and HI98% of all VHEE plans were within 2% or better of the IMRT reference plans. Glioblastoma plan dose metrics obtained with VHEE configurations of 200 MeV and 3-16 beams were either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the clinical IMRT reference plans. All OAR plan dose metrics evaluated for VHEE plans created using 5 beams of 100 MeV were either not significantly different or within 3% on average, except for Dmean for the body, Dmean for the brain, D2% for the brain stem, and D2% for the chiasm, which were significantly increased by 1, 2, 6, and 8 Gy, respectively (however below clinical constraints). Similarly, the dose metrics for lung cancer patients were also either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the reference plans for VHEE configurations with 200 MeV and 5 to 16 beams with the exception of D2% and Dmean to the spinal canal (however below clinical constraints). For the lung cancer cases, the VHEE configurations using 100 MeV or only 3 beams resulted in significantly worse dose metrics for some OAR. Differences in dose metrics were, however, strongly patient-specific and similar for some patient cases. CONCLUSIONS VHEE-based 3D-CRT may deliver conformal treatments to simple, mostly convex target shapes in the brain and the thorax with a limited number of critical adjacent OAR using a limited number of beams (as low as 3 to 7). Using such treatment techniques, a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of standard-of-care IMRT can be achieved. Hence, from a treatment planning perspective, 3D-conformal UHDR VHEE treatments delivered on time scales of 100 ms represent a promising candidate technique for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Veronique Vallet
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clements N, Esplen N, Bazalova-Carter M. A feasibility study of ultra-high dose rate mini-GRID therapy using very-high-energy electron beams for a simulated pediatric brain case. Phys Med 2023; 112:102637. [PMID: 37454482 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR, >40 Gy/s), spatially-fractionated minibeam GRID (mini-GRID) therapy using very-high-energy electrons (VHEE) was investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. Multi-directional VHEE treatments with and without mini-GRID-fractionation were compared to a clinical 6 MV volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for a pediatric glioblastoma patient using dose-volume histograms, volume-averaged dose rates in critical patient structures, and planning target volume D98s. Peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs) and dose rates in organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated due to their relevance for normal-tissue sparing in FLASH and spatially-fractionated techniques. Depths of convergence, defined where the PVDR is first ≤1.1, and depths at which dose rates fall below the UHDR threshold were also evaluated. In a water phantom, the VHEE mini-GRID treatments presented a surface (5 mm depth) PVDR of (51±2) and a depth of convergence of 42 mm at 150 MeV and a surface PVDR of (33±1) with a depth of convergence of 57 mm at 250 MeV. For a pediatric GBM case, VHEE treatments without mini-GRID-fractionation produced 25% and 22% lower volume-averaged doses to OARs compared to the 6 MV VMAT plan and 8/9 and 9/9 of the patient structures were exposed to volume-averaged dose rates >40 Gy/s for the 150 MeV and 250 MeV plans, respectively. The 150 MeV and 250 MeV mini-GRID treatments produced 17% and 38% higher volume-averaged doses to OARs and 3/9 patient structures had volume-averaged dose rates above 40 Gy/s. VHEE mini-GRID plans produced many comparable dose metrics to the clinical VMAT plan, encouraging further optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Clements
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
| | - Nolan Esplen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mannerberg A, Konradsson E, Kügele M, Edvardsson A, Kadhim M, Ceberg C, Peterson K, Thomasson HM, Arendt ML, Børresen B, Jensen KB, Ceberg S. Surface guided electron FLASH radiotherapy for canine cancer patients. Med Phys 2023. [PMID: 37190907 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During recent years FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) has shown promising results in radiation oncology, with the potential to spare normal tissue while maintaining the antitumor effects. The high speed of the FLASH-RT delivery increases the need for fast and precise motion monitoring to avoid underdosing the target. Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) uses surface imaging (SI) to render a 3D surface of the patient. SI provides real-time motion monitoring and has a large scanning field of view, covering off-isocentric positions. However, SI has so far only been used for human patients with conventional setup and treatment. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of SI as a motion management tool during electron FLASH-RT of canine cancer patients. METHODS To evaluate the SI system's ability to render surfaces of fur, three fur-like blankets in white, grey, and black were used to imitate the surface of canine patients and the camera settings were optimized for each blanket. Phantom measurements using the fur blankets were carried out, simulating respiratory motion and sudden shift. Respiratory motion was simulated using the QUASAR Respiratory Motion Phantom with the fur blankets placed on the phantom platform, which moved 10 mm vertically with a simulated respiratory period of 4 s. Sudden motion was simulated with an in-house developed phantom, consisting of a platform which was moved vertically in a stepwise motion at a chosen frequency. For sudden measurements, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 10 Hz were measured. All measurements were both carried out at the conventional source-to-surface distance (SSD) of 100 cm, and in the locally used FLASH-RT setup at SSD = 70 cm. The capability of the SI system to reproduce the simulated motion and the sampling time were evaluated. As an initial step towards clinical implementation, the feasibility of SI for surface guided FLASH-RT was evaluated for 11 canine cancer patients. RESULTS The SI camera was capable of rendering surfaces for all blankets. The deviation between simulated and measured mean peak-to-peak breathing amplitude was within 0.6 mm for all blankets. The sampling time was generally higher for the black fur than for the white and grey fur, for the measurement of both respiratory and sudden motion. The SI system could measure sudden motion within 62.5 ms and detect motion with a frequency of 10 Hz. The feasibility study of the canine patients showed that the SI system could be an important tool to ensure patient safety. By using this system we could ensure and document that 10 out of 11 canine patients had a total vector offset from the reference setup position <2 mm immediately before and after irradiation. CONCLUSIONS We have shown that SI can be used for surface guided FLASH-RT of canine patients. The SI system is currently not fast enough to interrupt a FLASH-RT beam while irradiating but with the short sampling time sudden motion can be detected. The beam can therefore be held just prior to irradiation, preventing treatment errors such as underdosing the target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Malin Kügele
- Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology- Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anneli Edvardsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Hematology- Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mustafa Kadhim
- Department of Hematology- Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Peterson
- Department of Hematology- Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Hanna-Maria Thomasson
- Department of Hematology- Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maja L Arendt
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Betina Børresen
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | | | - Sofie Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Valdés Zayas A, Kumari N, Liu K, Neill D, Delahoussaye A, Gonçalves Jorge P, Geyer R, Lin SH, Bailat C, Bochud F, Moeckli R, Koong AC, Bourhis J, Taniguchi CM, Herrera FG, Schüler E. Independent Reproduction of the FLASH Effect on the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Multi-Institutional Comparative Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072121. [PMID: 37046782 PMCID: PMC10093322 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
FLASH radiation therapy (RT) is a promising new paradigm in radiation oncology. However, a major question that remains is the robustness and reproducibility of the FLASH effect when different irradiators are used on animals or patients with different genetic backgrounds, diets, and microbiomes, all of which can influence the effects of radiation on normal tissues. To address questions of rigor and reproducibility across different centers, we analyzed independent data sets from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and from Lausanne University (CHUV). Both centers investigated acute effects after total abdominal irradiation to C57BL/6 animals delivered by the FLASH Mobetron system. The two centers used similar beam parameters but otherwise conducted the studies independently. The FLASH-enabled animal survival and intestinal crypt regeneration after irradiation were comparable between the two centers. These findings, together with previously published data using a converted linear accelerator, show that a robust and reproducible FLASH effect can be induced as long as the same set of irradiation parameters are used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anet Valdés Zayas
- Radio-Oncology Department, AGORA Cancer Research Institute, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Neeraj Kumari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Kevin Liu
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Denae Neill
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Abagail Delahoussaye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Patrik Gonçalves Jorge
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré-1, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Reiner Geyer
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré-1, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Steven H. Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré-1, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré-1, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré-1, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Radio-Oncology Department, AGORA Cancer Research Institute, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cullen M. Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Fernanda G. Herrera
- Radio-Oncology Department, AGORA Cancer Research Institute, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, Rue du Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emil Schüler
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Beyreuther E, Horst F, Brand M, Hans S, Karsch L, Lessmann E, Löck S, Schürer M, Pawelke J. In Regard to Böhlen et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1006-1007. [PMID: 36822772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elke Beyreuther
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Felix Horst
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Brand
- Center for Regenerative Therapies and Cluster of Excellence "Physics of Life", Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Hans
- Center for Regenerative Therapies and Cluster of Excellence "Physics of Life", Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Leonhard Karsch
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Lessmann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Schürer
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases Dresden (NCT/UCC), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Bochud F, Bailat C, Moeckli R, Bourhis J, Vozenin MC, Ozsahin EM. In Reply to Horst et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:1007-1009. [PMID: 36822773 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- ****Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- ****Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- ****Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- ****Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- ****Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Jean Bourhis
- **Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- **Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- **Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Liew H, Mein S, Tessonnier T, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Dokic I, Mairani A. Do We Preserve Tumor Control Probability (TCP) in FLASH Radiotherapy? A Model-Based Analysis. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:5118. [PMID: 36982185 PMCID: PMC10049554 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Reports of concurrent sparing of normal tissue and iso-effective treatment of tumors at ultra-high dose-rates (uHDR) have fueled the growing field of FLASH radiotherapy. However, iso-effectiveness in tumors is often deduced from the absence of a significant difference in their growth kinetics. In a model-based analysis, we investigate the meaningfulness of these indications for the clinical treatment outcome. The predictions of a previously benchmarked model of uHDR sparing in the "UNIfied and VERSatile bio response Engine" (UNIVERSE) are combined with existing models of tumor volume kinetics as well as tumor control probability (TCP) and compared to experimental data. The potential TCP of FLASH radiotherapy is investigated by varying the assumed dose-rate, fractionation schemes and oxygen concentration in the target. The developed framework describes the reported tumor growth kinetics appropriately, indicating that sparing effects could be present in the tumor but might be too small to be detected with the number of animals used. The TCP predictions show the possibility of substantial loss of treatment efficacy for FLASH radiotherapy depending on several variables, including the fractionation scheme, oxygen level, and DNA repair kinetics. The possible loss of TCP should be seriously considered when assessing the clinical viability of FLASH treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Liew
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stewart Mein
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6303, USA
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics Unit, National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lourenço A, Subiel A, Lee N, Flynn S, Cotterill J, Shipley D, Romano F, Speth J, Lee E, Zhang Y, Xiao Z, Mascia A, Amos RA, Palmans H, Thomas R. Absolute dosimetry for FLASH proton pencil beam scanning radiotherapy. Sci Rep 2023; 13:2054. [PMID: 36739297 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28192-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
A paradigm shift is occurring in clinical oncology exploiting the recent discovery that short pulses of ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation-FLASH radiotherapy-can significantly spare healthy tissues whilst still being at least as effective in curing cancer as radiotherapy at conventional dose rates. These properties promise reduced post-treatment complications, whilst improving patient access to proton beam radiotherapy and reducing costs. However, accurate dosimetry at UHDR is extremely complicated. This work presents measurements performed with a primary-standard proton calorimeter and derivation of the required correction factors needed to determine absolute dose for FLASH proton beam radiotherapy with an uncertainty of 0.9% (1[Formula: see text]), in line with that of conventional treatments. The establishment of a primary standard for FLASH proton radiotherapy improves accuracy and consistency of the dose delivered and is crucial for the safe implementation of clinical trials, and beyond, for this new treatment modality.
Collapse
|
24
|
Jarvis LA, Zhang R, Pogue BW. The First FLASH Clinical Trial-The Journey of a Thousand Miles Begins With 1 Step. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:69-70. [PMID: 36273321 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley A Jarvis
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Brian W Pogue
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Bourhis J, Bailat C, Bochud F, Moeckli R. The minimal FLASH sparing effect needed to compensate the increase of radiobiological damage due to hypofractionation for late-reacting tissues. Med Phys 2022; 49:7672-7682. [PMID: 35933554 PMCID: PMC10087769 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Normal tissue (NT) sparing by ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiations compared to conventional dose rate (CONV) irradiations while being isotoxic to the tumor has been termed "FLASH effect" and has been observed when large doses per fraction (d ≳ 5 Gy) have been delivered. Since hypofractionated treatment schedules are known to increase toxicities of late-reacting tissues compared to normofractionated schedules for many clinical scenarios at CONV dose rates, we developed a formalism based on the biologically effective dose (BED) to assess the minimum magnitude of the FLASH effect needed to compensate the loss of late-reacting NT sparing when reducing the number of fractions compared to a normofractionated CONV treatment schedule while remaining isoeffective to the tumor. METHODS By requiring the same BED for the tumor, we derived the "break-even NT sparing weighting factor" WBE for the linear-quadratic (LQ) and LQ-linear (LQ-L) models for an NT region irradiated at a relative dose r (relative to the prescribed dose per fraction d to the tumor). WBE was evaluated numerically for multiple values of d and r, and for different tumor and NT α/β-ratios. WBE was compared against currently available experimental data on the magnitude of the NT sparing provided by the FLASH effect for single fraction doses. RESULTS For many clinically relevant scenarios, WBE decreases steeply initially for d > 2 Gy for late-reacting tissues with (α/β)NT ≈ 3 Gy, implying that a significant NT sparing by the FLASH effect (between 15% and 30%) is required to counteract the increased radiobiological damage experienced by late-reacting NT for hypofractionated treatments with d < 10 Gy compared to normofractionated treatments that are equieffective to the tumor. When using the LQ model with generic α/β-ratios for tumor and late-reacting NT of (α/β)T = 10 Gy and (α/β)NT = 3 Gy, respectively, most currently available experimental evidence about the magnitude of NT sparing by the FLASH effect suggests no net NT sparing benefit for hypofractionated FLASH radiotherapy (RT) in the high-dose region when compared with WBE . Instead, clinical indications with more similar α/β-ratios of the tumor and dose-limiting NT toxicities [i.e., (α/β)T ≈ (α/β)NT ], such as prostate treatments, are generally less penalized by hypofractionated treatments and need consequently smaller magnitudes of NT sparing by the FLASH effect to achieve a net benefit. For strongly hypofractionated treatments (>10-15 Gy/fraction), the LQ-L model predicts, unlike the LQ model, a larger WBE suggesting a possible benefit of strongly hypofractionated FLASH RT, even for generic α/β-ratios of (α/β)T = 10 Gy and (α/β)NT = 3 Gy. However, knowledge on the isoeffect scaling for high doses per fraction (≳10 Gy/fraction) and its modeling is currently limited and impedes accurate and reliable predictions for such strongly hypofractionated treatments. CONCLUSIONS We developed a formalism that quantifies the minimal NT sparing by the FLASH effect needed to compensate for hypofractionation, based on the LQ and LQ-L models. For a given hypofractionated UHDR treatment scenario and magnitude of the FLASH effect, the formalism predicts if a net NT sparing benefit is expected compared to a respective normofractionated CONV treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lomax T, Psoroulas S. To FLASH or to Fractionate? That is the question. Z Med Phys 2022; 32:387-390. [PMID: 36328860 PMCID: PMC9948873 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
27
|
Rahman M, Trigilio A, Franciosini G, Moeckli R, Zhang R, Böhlen TT. FLASH radiotherapy treatment planning and models for electron beams. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:210-221. [PMID: 35964763 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The FLASH effect designates normal tissue sparing at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR, >40 Gy/s) compared to conventional dose rate (∼0.1 Gy/s) irradiation while maintaining tumour control and has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy (RT). UHDR high-energy electron (HEE, 4-20 MeV) beams are currently a mainstay for investigating the clinical potential of FLASH RT for superficial tumours. In the future very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) UHDR beams may be used to treat deep-seated tumours. UHDR HEE treatment planning focused at its initial stage on accurate dosimetric modelling of converted and dedicated UHDR electron RT devices for the clinical transfer of FLASH RT. VHEE treatment planning demonstrated promising dosimetric performance compared to clinical photon RT techniques in silico and was used to evaluate and optimise the design of novel VHEE RT devices. Multiple metrics and models have been proposed for a quantitative description of the FLASH effect in treatment planning, but an improved experimental characterization and understanding of the FLASH effect is needed to allow for an accurate and validated modelling of the effect in treatment planning. The importance of treatment planning for electron FLASH RT will augment as the field moves forward to treat more complex clinical indications and target sites. In this review, TPS developments in HEE and VHEE are presented considering beam models, characteristics, and future FLASH applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahbubur Rahman
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Antonio Trigilio
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaia Franciosini
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|