1
|
Abdul Rahim K, Shaikh NQ, Lakhdir MPA, Afzal N, Merchant AAH, Mahmood SBZ, Bakhshi SK, Ali M, Samad Z, Haider AH. No healthcare coverage, big problem: lack of insurance for older population associated with worse emergency general surgery outcomes. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2024; 9:e001165. [PMID: 38616789 PMCID: PMC11015297 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Older populations, being a unique subset of patients, have poor outcomes for emergency general surgery (EGS). In regions lacking specialized medical coverage for older patients, disparities in healthcare provision lead to poor clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify factors predicting index admission inpatient mortality from EGS among sexagenarians, septuagenarians, and octogenarians. Methods Data of patients aged >60 years with EGS conditions defined by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma at primary index admission from 2010 to 2019 operated and non-operated at a large South Asian tertiary care hospital were analyzed. The primary outcome was primary index admission inpatient 30-day mortality. Parametric survival regression using Weibull distribution was performed. Factors such as patients' insurance status and surgical intervention were assessed using adjusted HR and 95% CI with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results We included 9551 primary index admissions of patients diagnosed with the nine most common primary EGS conditions. The mean patient age was 69.55±7.59 years. Overall mortality and complication rates were 3.94% and 42.29%, respectively. Primary index admission inpatient mortality was associated with complications including cardiac arrest and septic shock. Multivariable survival analysis showed that insurance status was not associated with mortality (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.79, 1.61) after adjusting for other variables. The odds of developing complications among self-paid individuals were higher (adjusted OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.02, 1.35). Conclusion Lack of healthcare coverage for older adults can result in delayed presentation, leading to increased morbidity. Close attention should be paid to such patients for timely provision of treatment. There is a need to expand primary care access and proper management of comorbidities for overall patient well-being. Government initiatives for expanding insurance coverage for older population can further enhance their healthcare access, mitigating the risk of essential treatments being withheld due to financial limitations. Level of evidence III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maryam Pyar Ali Lakhdir
- Department of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Noreen Afzal
- Medical College, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | | - Saqib Kamran Bakhshi
- Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University, Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Mushyada Ali
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Zainab Samad
- Department of Medicine, The Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Adil H Haider
- Department of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
- Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University, Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cioffi SPB, Altomare M, Podda M, Spota A, Granieri S, Reitano E, Zamburlini B, Virdis F, Bini R, Gupta S, Torzilli G, Mingoli A, Chiara O, Cimbanassi S. The burden of the knowledge-to-action gap in acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9617-9632. [PMID: 37884735 PMCID: PMC10709474 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10449-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of emergency general surgery (EGS) is higher compared to elective surgery. Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most frequent diseases and its management is dictated by published international clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Adherence to CPG has been reported as heterogeneous. Barriers to clinical implementation were not studied. This study explored barriers to adherence to CPG and the clinico-economic impact of poor compliance. METHODS Data were extracted from the three-year data lock of the REsiDENT-1 registry, a prospective resident-led multicenter trial. We identified 7 items from CPG published from the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) and the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). We applied our classification proposal and used a five-point Likert scale (Ls) to assess laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) difficulty. Descriptive analyses were performed to explore compliance and group comparisons to assess the impact on outcomes and related costs. We ran logistic regressions to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of CPG. RESULTS From 2019 to 2022, 653 LA were included from 24 centers. 69 residents performed and coordinated data collection. We identified low compliance with recommendations on peritoneal irrigation (PI) (25.73%), abdominal drains (AD) (34.68%), and antibiotic stewardship (34.17%). Poor compliance on PI and AD was associated to higher infectious complications in uncomplicated AA. Hospitalizations were significantly longer in non-compliance except for PI in uncomplicated AA, and costs significantly higher, exception made for antibiotic stewardship in complicated AA. The strongest barriers to CPG implementation were complicated AA and technically challenging LA for PI and AD. Longer operative times and the use of PI negatively affected antibiotic stewardship in uncomplicated AA. Compliance was higher in teaching hospitals and in emergency surgery units. CONCLUSIONS We confirmed low compliance with standardized items influenced by environmental factors and non-evidence-based practices in complex LA. Antibiotic stewardship is sub-optimal. Not following CPG may not influence clinical complications but has an impact in terms of logistics, costs and on the non-measurable magnitude of antibiotic resistance. Structured educational interventions and institutional bundles are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi
- Advanced Technologies in Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy.
| | - Michele Altomare
- Advanced Technologies in Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Cagliari State University, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Andrea Spota
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Granieri
- General Surgery Unit, ASST-Brianza, Vimercate Hospital, Vimercate, Italy
| | - Elisa Reitano
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Translational Medicine, Maggiore Della Carità Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, IRCAD, Strasbourg, France
| | - Beatrice Zamburlini
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
- General Surgery Residency Program, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Virdis
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bini
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Mingoli
- Advanced Technologies in Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Cimbanassi
- General Surgery Trauma Team, ASST GOM Niguarda, Viale Ettore Majorana, 20162, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lluís N, Carbonell S, Villodre C, Zapater P, Cantó M, Mena L, Ramia JM, Lluís F. Propensity score matching analysis of laparoscopic surgery vs. open approach in 4 297 adult patients with acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis or gastrointestinal tract perforation: a prospective multicentre study of nationwide outcomes. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1603-1611. [PMID: 37060247 PMCID: PMC10389196 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Previous studies indicated that laparoscopic surgery could improve postoperative outcomes in acute appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, perforated gastroduodenal ulcer, or acute diverticulitis, but some reported opposite results or differences in the magnitude of improvement. A contemporary analysis using propensity score matching that compares outcomes is lacking. METHODS Over a 6-month period, 38 centres (5% of all public hospitals) attending emergency general surgery patients on a 24 h, 7 days a week basis, enroled all consecutive adult patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery or open approach. RESULTS The study included 2 645 patients with acute appendicitis [32 years (22-51), 44.3% women], 1 182 with acute cholecystitis [65 years (48-76); 46.7% women], and 470 with gastrointestinal tract perforation [65 years (50-76); 34% women]. After propensity score matching, hospital stays decreased in acute appendicitis [open, 2 days (2-4); lap, 2 days (1-4); P <0.001], acute cholecystitis [open, 7 days (4-12); lap, 4 days (3-6); P <0.001], and gastrointestinal tract perforation [open, 11 days (7-17); lap, 6 days (5-8.5); P <0.001]. A decrease in 30-day morbidity was observed in acute appendicitis (open, 15.7%; lap, 9.7%; P <0.001), acute cholecystitis (open, 41%; lap, 21.7%; P <0.001), and gastrointestinal tract perforation (open, 45.2%; lap, 23.5%; P <0.001). A decrease in 30-day mortality was found in acute cholecystitis (open, 8.8%; lap, 2.8%; P =0.013) and gastrointestinal tract perforation (open, 10.4%; lap, 1.7%; P =0.013). CONCLUSIONS This clinically based, multicentre study suggests that an initial laparoscopic approach could be considered not only in patients with acute appendicitis or acute cholecystitis but also in patients with a perforation of the gastrointestinal tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Núria Lluís
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Silvia Carbonell
- Departments of Surgery
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, ISABIAL
| | - Celia Villodre
- Departments of Surgery
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, ISABIAL
| | - Pedro Zapater
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, ISABIAL
| | - Miguel Cantó
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, ISABIAL
- Computing, BomhardIP, Alicante, Spain
| | - Luís Mena
- Clinical Documentation, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, ISABIAL
| | - José M. Ramia
- Departments of Surgery
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, ISABIAL
| | - Félix Lluís
- Departments of Surgery
- Institute for Health and Biomedical Research of Alicante, ISABIAL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu Y, Li S, Yuan J, Zhang H, Wang M, Zhang Z, Qin R. Benchmarking: a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons in surgery. Int J Surg 2023; 109:419-428. [PMID: 37093075 PMCID: PMC10389472 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Benchmarking, a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons, is a recent concept in surgery. The objectives of this review are to examine the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking and its application in surgery. METHODS The literature about benchmarking was reviewed through an ever-narrowing search strategy, commencing from the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking to the application of benchmarking and experiences of benchmarking in surgery. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched until 20 September 2022, in the English language according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS In the first phase of the literature search, the development of benchmarking was identified. The definitions of benchmarking evolved from a surveying term to a novel quality-improvement tool to assess the best achievable results in surgery. In the second phase, a total of 23 studies were identified about benchmarking in surgery, including esophagectomy, hepatic surgery, pancreatic surgery, rectum resection, and bariatric surgery. All studies were multicenter analyses from national, international, or global expert centers. Most studies (87.0%) adopted the definition that benchmark was the 75th percentile of the median values of centers. Performance metrics to define benchmarks were clinically relevant intraoperative and postoperative outcome indicators. CONCLUSION Benchmarking in surgery is a novel quality-improvement tool to define and measure the best achievable results, establishing a meaningful reference to evaluate surgical performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Wu
- Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Villalobos MB, Mancilla KSM, Pinzón GFR, Domínguez-Alvarado GA. A commentary on "Simplified risk-prediction for benchmarking and quality improvement in emergency general surgery. Prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study" (Int J Surg 2022; 97:106168). Int J Surg 2022; 98:106235. [PMID: 35093597 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Bravo Villalobos
- Medica General, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia Médico, Especialista Epidemiologia, Docente, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga, Grupo de Innovación e Investigación Quirúrgica (GIIQ), Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|