Sorafenib-induced erythema multiforme

Sorafenib-Induced Erythema Multiforme Major and Severe Hepatic Failure in Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Case Report

Sorafenib, a kinase inhibitor, is known to cause skin toxicity, which sometimes leads to treatment interruption or drug dose reduction. Erythema multiforme (EM) is one of these dermatologic toxicities induced by sorafenib. We report the case of a 28-year-old male with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Two months after surgery, the patient presented with multiple metastases to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes and lungs. Therefore, systemic therapy with sorafenib was indicated. While receiving the medication, the patient presented signs compatible with EM. The signs occurred on the torso and then spread to the rest of the body. Sorafenib treatment was interrupted the same day when skin lesions appeared and moisturizers with topical steroids and oral antihistamines were prescribed. The skin lesions decreased in size but without significant cutaneous improvement. The patient showed biologically severe liver failure and radiological progression. Because of the severe hepatic failure, initiation of intravenous steroids and establishment of another line of chemotherapy following tumor progression were contraindicated. The decision of the multidisciplinary staff with patient consent was to proceed with the best supportive care. The patient died in ambulatory care 12 days after discharge and local treatment. This report highlights the possibility of developing severe EM while receiving sorafenib. Patients with HCC who have liver resection without liver dysfunction should not be administered sorafenib, or it must be used with caution at very low doses and accompanied by close and regular follow-ups to avoid disease progression and deaths.

Evaluation of Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity to Antineoplastic Drugs-An Overview

Nowadays, clinical practice encounters the problem of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) induced by several drugs. Antineoplastic treatments are among the drugs which show an elevated proportion of DHT reactions, leading to the worsening of patients' quality of life. The range of symptoms in DHT reactions can vary from mild, such as self-limiting maculopapular eruptions, to severe, such as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. The development of these reactions supposes a negative impact, not only by limiting patients' quality of life, but also leading to economic loss due to market withdrawal of the affected drugs and high hospitalization costs. However, despite this problem, there are no available standard in vitro or in vivo methods that allow for the evaluation of the sensitizing potential of drugs in the preclinical phase. Therefore, the aim of this review is to summarize the skin reactions caused by the different antineoplastic families, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of the in vitro and in vivo methods used to detect DTHs and that could be suitable to test antineoplastic hypersensitivity reactions.

Anti-angiogenic effect of the combination of low-dose sorafenib and EGCG in HCC-induced Wistar rats

Background:  Sorafenib is a standard drug used for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma but is often resistant and toxic. Its combination with epigallo-3-catechin gallate leads to reduced resistance and toxicity but an equally effective anti-angiogenic effect.Therefore, this study aims to assess the anti-angiogenic effect of standard-dose Sorafenib compared to the combination of low-dose Sorafenib and epigallo-3-catechin gallate. Methods:  We conducted an animal study and double-blind, randomized controlled trials. A total of 25 male Wistar rats (7-weeks-old) were randomly divided into four groups, namely Sham (K), Control (O), a combination of low-dose Sorafenib and epigallo-3-catechin gallate group (X1), and standard-dose Sorafenib group (X2). All groups were injected with N-Nitrosodiethylamine 70 mg/kg body weight (BW) intraperitoneally for ten weeks, except the Sham group. After the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, X1 and X2 were treated for two weeks. Subsequently, liver tissues were examined for vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level and microvascular density expression. Results: There was a significant difference (p=0.007) in the level of VEGF between group X1 (low dose Sorafenib + EGCG) and X2 (Standard dose Sorafenib). However, the differences in VEGF levels of group X1 and X2 compared to group O(Control) were significantly lower, with values p=0.000136 and p=0.019, respectively. The expression of microvascular density between groups X1 and X2  was not entirely different. Meanwhile, a significant difference (p<0.05) was discovered when both groups were compared with the control group. Conclusion: The combination of low-dose Sorafenib with epigallo-3-catechin gallate is superior in reducing the level of VEGF compared to standard-dose Sorafenib and is better than the control. Standard-dose Sorafenib and the combination of low-dose Sorafenib and epigallo-3-catechin gallate have similar effectivity in reducing the expression of microvascular density and could prevent resistance and lower toxicity effects.

Evaluation of Antineoplastic Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Skin Reactions In Vitro

Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) is caused by a broad number of drugs used in clinic, and antineoplastic drugs show an elevated proportion of DTH, which potentially affects the quality of life of patients. Despite the serious problem and the negative economic impact deriving from market withdrawal of such drugs and high hospitalization costs, nowadays, there are no standard validated methods in vitro or in vivo to evaluate the sensitizing potential of drugs in the preclinical phase. Enhanced predictions in preclinical safety evaluations are really important, and for that reason, the aim of our work is to adapt in vitro DPRA, ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSens^TM, and hCLAT assays for the study of the sensitizing potential of antineoplastic agents grouped by mechanism of action. Our results reveal that the above tests are in vitro techniques able to predict the sensitizing potential of the tested antineoplastics. Moreover, this is the first time that the inhibition of the VEGFR1 pathway has been identified as a potential trigger of DTH.

Epidermal necrolysis in the context of immuno-oncologic medication as well as kinase inhibitors and biologics

BACKGROUND

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are severe, primarily drug-induced reactions of skin and mucosa. Since they differ in the extent of skin detachment but not in etiology, they are grouped together as epidermal necrolysis (EN). Due to nationwide registration, representative data are available at the German Center for the Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions (dZh). Here, an increasing number of case notifications in the context with new immuno-oncologic drugs, kinase inhibitors and biologics have been observed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 4,150 cases notifications between January 2003 and February 2019, 102 cases with exposure to these drug groups underwent systematic analysis, validation and causality assessment.

RESULTS

Two cases of EN to vemurafenib were confirmed and one case to afatinib and pembrolizumab, respectively. In 14 EN cases other drugs - predominantly allopurinol or cotrimoxazole - were the causative agent. Fourteen cases were EN-like reactions: six bullous lichenoid drug eruptions (DE) to pembrolizumab (2), obinutuzumab, nivolumab, rituximab, infliximab/nivolumab, and eight multiforme-like DE to rituximab (2), adalimumab, ramucirumab, bevacizumab, vemurafenib, sorafenib (2). Lichenoid DE were differentiated from EN through histopathology and by the protracted course of EN, multiforme-like DE by variable skin manifestations with only sparse epidermolysis or mucosal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

A correct diagnosis is highly relevant in terms of prognosis and use of these drugs in malignoma treatment. Re-exposure is contraindicated in EN, but possible in other DE after rigorous risk-benefit evaluation.

Erythema multiforme after treatment with sorafenib

Sorafenib, an oral chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of solid tumors, is associated with a variety of adverse cutaneous drug reactions in up to 90% of patients. Infrequently, delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions such as erythema multiforme occur. This case describes a child treated with sorafenib for a retrosternal desmoid tumor who developed widespread erythema multiforme across his extremities, trunk, face, and mucosal membranes.

Potentially life‑threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Review)

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have emerged as a new frontier of cancer therapy. These agents include inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), BRAF, mitogen‑activated protein kinase kinase (also referred to as MEK), bcr‑abl, c‑KIT, platelet‑derived growth factor (PDGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Along with the evolving applications of TKIs, there has been an increased recognition of the breadth of potential cutaneous toxicities to these agents. In this review, we provide an overview of potentially life‑threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) that may occur during therapy with TKIs. These toxicities include Stevens‑Johnson Syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP).

Anaphylaxis preceded by erythema multiforme with sorafenib: First case report

A 63-year-old female patient with recent diagnosis of hepatitis C and cirrhosis and no other comorbidities, on no medications, was found to have Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C hepatocellular carcinoma and began systemic therapy with sorafenib 400mg twice daily. Five days after starting treatment, the patient went to an emergency department with pruritic, target-shaped, erythematous papules compatible with erythema multiforme, painful oral aphthous ulcers, and fever. Sorafenib was suspended and the patient underwent oral corticosteroid treatment for 5 days, showing significant improvement of the lesions. One month after discharge, the patient was reassessed at an outpatient clinic. As she was asymptomatic and had no skin lesions, sorafenib was resumed at a lower dose (200mg daily). Three hours after ingesting a single dose of sorafenib, the patient experienced chills, fever, rash, angioedema and stridor. She immediately sought the emergency department and was diagnosed with anaphylaxis. The patient received intravenous corticosteroid therapy, which improved her respiratory and cutaneous symptoms in 72h. Sorafenib was permanently suspended, and regorafenib could not be prescribed as second-line therapy. This is the first description of anaphylaxis to sorafenib.

Sorafenib-induced Facial Acneiform Eruption

Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor that is used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting tumor cell growth and angiogenesis. Cutaneous adverse events of sorafenib are commonly reported, with alopecia and hand-foot skin reactions most frequently encountered. Acneiform eruptions represent rare adverse events that have only been reported at high doses of sorafenib. We present a patient who started low dose sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma and subsequently developed a fulminant facial acneiform eruption in the absence of other cutaneous adverse events. Treatment included topical clindamycin and tretinoin with some improvement. Facial acneiform eruption represents a rare consequence of sorafenib that has not previously been described at low doses. Additionally, acneiform papules in the absence of other cutaneous adverse events is unusual. The cutaneous mechanism is not well understood but may be related to indirect epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition or direct cytotoxic effects on eccrine glands. Topical treatment produces only minimal improvement in patients who continue sorafenib therapy. Discontinuation of the drug is usually unwarranted except in special circumstances.

Discontinuation of sorafenib can lead to the emergence of FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia

A 69-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with unresectable papillary thyroid cancer was referred to our hospital. We initially treated her with sorafenib, but she subsequently developed erythema multiforme, which was suspected to be a drug rush due to sorafenib; therefore, sorafenib was discontinued. At the time of discontinuation, immature blast cells were detected in her peripheral blood. Approximately two weeks later, her skin rash improved substantially, but the proportion of blasts in the peripheral blood increased. We performed a bone marrow examination, and she was diagnosed with FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia. FLT3-ITD expression is found in 20-25% of AML and is a known independent poor prognostic factor. To overcome the poor prognosis associated with FLT3-ITD, molecular drugs targeting FLT3-ITD are attracting much attention. Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, also has an effect on FLT3-ITD. Although primary disease flares after tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation have been reported, this is the first report to describe discontinuation of sorafenib treatment as a potential trigger of FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia in papillary thyroid cancer.

Bullous pemphigoid-like skin blistering disease in a rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta)

Autoimmune bullous disease is very uncommon in non-human primates. We observed a bullous skin disease in a male rhesus monkey while conducting porcine islet xenotransplantation. Fifty days after the transplantation, multiple bullous skin lesions were observed. There was no mucosal involvement. Skin biopsy results demonstrated a subepidermal blister with no necrotic keratinocytes. Immunofluorescent staining showed linear IgG deposition at the roof of the blister. These skin lesions spontaneously disappeared. Considering these results, this monkey was diagnosed with bullous pemphigoid (BP). As far as we know, this is the first report of BP in non-human primates.

Cutaneous adverse effects of targeted therapies: Part I: Inhibitors of the cellular membrane

There has been a rapid emergence of numerous targeted agents in the oncology community in the last decade. This exciting paradigm shift in drug development lends promise for the future of individualized medicine. Given the pace of development and clinical deployment of targeted agents with novel mechanisms of action, dermatology providers may not be familiar with the full spectrum of associated skin-related toxicities. Cutaneous adverse effects are among the most frequently observed toxicities with many targeted agents, and their intensity can be dose-limiting or lead to therapy discontinuation. In light of the often life-saving nature of emerging oncotherapeutics, it is critical that dermatologists both understand the mechanisms and recognize clinical signs and symptoms of such toxicities in order to provide effective clinical management. Part I of this continuing medical education article will review in detail the potential skin-related adverse sequelae, the frequency of occurrence, and the implications associated with on- and off-target cutaneous toxicities of inhibitors acting at the cell membrane level, chiefly inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor, KIT, and BCR-ABL, angiogenesis, and multikinase inhibitors.

Sorafenib-associated facial acneiform eruption

INTRODUCTION

Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets tumor cell angiogenesis and proliferation. Drug-associated cutaneous adverse events, such as alopecia and hand-foot skin reaction, occur frequently. Sorafenib-related side effects affecting hair, nails, and skin are summarized and the characteristics of sorafenib-treated patients who developed acneiform facial lesions are reviewed to present the clinical features of these individuals.

CASE REPORT

A man with sorafenib-associated facial acneiform lesions mimicking those of chloracne is described.

DISCUSSION

PubMed was used to search the following terms, separately and in combination: acne, acneiform eruption, chloracne, cutaneous adverse events, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, skin side effects, and sorafenib. Inclusion criteria for selecting papers to be reviewed included case reports and studies that described cutaneous and mucosal adverse side effects associated with sorafenib. All papers fulfilling inclusion criteria were reviewed and relevant manuscripts, along with their reference citations, were evaluated. Five patients-a woman with liver epithelioid hemangioendothelioma, three men with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and a man with hepatocellular carcinoma-have developed sorafenib-associated facial acneiform eruption. The eruption typically occurred after 4 weeks of treatment at a dose of 400 mg twice daily. The lesions presented as either papules and pustules (2 patients) or, similar in appearance and distribution to chloracne, only open and closed comedones (3 patients). The sorafenib-associated facial acneiform eruption partially improved after initiating topical antibiotics, keratolytics, and/or retinoids; however, progressive improvement or resolution occurred after lowering the daily dose or discontinuation of sorafenib.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib-associated facial acneiform eruption is a rarely occurring cutaneous adverse event that has only been observed in five individuals. The skin lesions usually presented after 4 weeks of sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) treatment. The morphology and distribution of the lesions mimicked those of chloracne in three of the patients. Two of the patients also had other drug-related skin side effects. Topical acne-directed therapy was only partially effective in clearing the lesions; lowering the dose or discontinuation of sorafenib resulted in progressive improvement or resolution of the facial acneiform eruption.

Sorafenib induces delayed-onset cutaneous hypersensitivity: a case series

Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor with clinical activity against hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and renal cell carcinoma. Administration of sorafenib carries a variety of adverse cutaneous reactions. Common adverse effects induced by sorafenib include hand-foot skin reactions, facial erythema, splinter subungual hemorrhage, and alopecia. Although erythema multiforme (EM) related to sorafenib has been reported, delayed-type cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions are rare in patients treated with sorafenib and there has been no case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) reported so far. We recently experienced 3 cases of delayed-type cutaneous hypersensitivity related to administration of sorafenib. The first case was a 47-year female had targetoid erythematous rashes on her arms 12 days after starting sorafenib for HCC. The rashes spread from the arms to the trunk rapidly except for the hands and feet, and erosive lesions developed in the oral mucosa and lips. She was diagnosed as SJS. The second case was an 81-year-old male had maculopapular eruptions with multiple targetoid lesions on the trunk, arms, and legs 10 days after starting sorafenib for his HCC. There was no evidence of mucosal involvement. He was diagnosed with EM. The last one was a 20-year-old female developed generalized maculopapular eruptions in the whole body 10 days after starting sorafenib for the treatment of HCC. All 3 patients completely recovered after discontinuation of sorafenib.

Risk factors for sorafenib-induced high-grade skin rash in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Drugs. 2013;24:310-314. [PMID: 23237922 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0b013e32835c401c]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical factors, drug-related genetic polymorphisms, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) types to determine the association with sorafenib-induced high-grade skin rash (HGSR) in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A total of 55 patients with advanced RCC treated with sorafenib were analyzed retrospectively. Of these, 33 patients were subjected to HLA typing and polymorphism analyses of CYP3A5, ABCB1, ABCC2, and UGT1A1, which are involved in the metabolism and membrane transport of sorafenib. Grade 3 or higher SR developed in 12 (22%), and a higher incidence was observed in female patients than in male patients (40 vs. 15%, P=0.046). The initial dose, initial dose per body weight, and initial dose per body surface area in patients with HGSR were significantly higher than those in patients without HGSR. Patients with the ABCC2 -24CC genotype were at a significantly higher risk of SR than those with the CT genotype (35 vs. 0%, P=0.032). HLA-A*24 was significantly associated with the occurrence of HGSR (P=0.049). Our finding suggested that women, higher initial dose per body weight or body surface area, the ABCC2 -24CC genotype, and HLA-A*24 are associated with the risk of sorafenib-induced HGSR in Japanese RCC patients.

Erythema multiforme induced by sorafenib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Sorafenib is one of the few standard agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Although sorafenib-induced erythema multiforme is rarely reported, we evaluated the cases of erythema multiforme induced by sorafenib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

From November 2006 to November 2011, 36 eligible patients who had been treated with sorafenib were enrolled in this study. Patients received sorafenib 200 or 400 mg orally, twice daily, at 12 h intervals, on a continuous dosing schedule. All patients who experienced rash or erythema multiforme underwent a skin biopsy, and the histopathological diagnosis was confirmed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (78%) experienced a skin reaction of any toxicity grade. Hand-foot skin reactions occurred in 17 (47%), erythema multiforme in 9 (25%), rash/desquamation in 6 (17%) and alopecia in 9 (25%). Skin biopsy was performed and histopathological diagnosis was confirmed for all nine patients (25%) who experienced erythema multiforme. All nine showed a positive reaction to sorafenib on a subsequent patch test.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib-induced erythema multiforme may not be rare in Japanese patients. Patients who once showed erythema multiforme after sorafenib treatment are never to be treated with sorafenib again. Patients treated with sorafenib should be monitored carefully, with a multidisciplinary approach. Consultation with a dermatologist is critical because some cases quickly become severe.

Sorafenib-induced erythema multiforme in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Sorafenib is a new therapeutic agent being used in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. The most frequently seen cutaneous side effects due to sorafenib are erythema, exfoliative dermatitis, acne vulgaris, and flushing. Folliculitis, eczema, and erythema multiforme are other, rare side effects of sorafenib. A 59-year-old man underwent left radical nephrectomy due to renal cell carcinoma 8 months ago, and after the operation he received immunochemotherapy and then sorafenib. On the third day of sorafenib therapy his lesions occurred. His dermatologic examination revealed multiple erythematous papules on his neck, arms, and legs and bullae and iris lesions on his palms and soles. He was diagnosed as having erythema multiforme. In the literature we found only 1 other erythema multiforme case due to sorafenib. We present this interesting case to show and discuss cutaneous side effects of sorafenib, especially erythema multiforme as a very rare cutaneous side effect.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Unsatisfactory efficacy of current treatments for advanced lung cancer has prompted the search for new therapies, with sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, being one candidate drug. This phase I trial was conducted to evaluate drug safety and pharmacokinetics as well as tumor response of sorafenib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eligible patients received paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC]of 6 mg min mL(-1)) on day 1 and sorafenib (400 mg, twice daily) on days 2 through 19 of a 21-day cycle.

RESULTS

Four of the initial six patients (cohort 1) experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), resulting in amendment of the treatment protocol. An additional seven patients (cohort 2) were enrolled, two of whom developed DLTs. DLTs included erythema multiforme, hand-foot skin reaction, and elevated plasma alanine aminotransferase in cohort 1 as well as gastrointestinal perforation at a site of metastasis and pneumonia in cohort 2. Most adverse events were manageable. One complete and six partial responses were observed among the 12 evaluable patients. Coadministration of the three drugs had no impact on their respective pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSION

The present study confirmed that sorafenib at 400 mg once daily in combination with carboplatin AUC 5 mg min mL(-1) and paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) is feasible in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC. The results of this study also showed that this combination therapy had encouraging antitumor activity and was not associated with relevant pharmacokinetic interaction in Japanese NSCLC patients.

Perforating folliculitis, angioedema, hand-foot syndrome--multiple cutaneous side effects in a patient treated with sorafenib

A patient with clear cell renal cell carcinoma was treated with sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, which induced a variety of cutaneous side effects. In addition to xerosis, he developed angioedema (AE), hand-foot syndrome (HFS) and perforating folliculitis (PF). The latter three occurred in a dose-dependent manner. AE was observed at the recommended daily dose of 800 mg. Dose reduction to 400 mg prevented its recurrence. At this dose level, the patient exhibited HFS, which cleared upon further reduction of the dose. While receiving 200 mg, the patient developed PF. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of a case of PF during treatment with sorafenib.

Sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still a challenge to physicians since these patients are not candidates for surgical or ablative therapy. The disease carries a very poor prognosis with an expected survival of 4-6 months. No chemotherapeutic agent has been proven to improve the clinical outcome in such patients. A multikinase inhibitor, sorafenib, previously tested and found effective in other solid tumors recently found to significantly improve survival in patients with advanced HCC. Sorafenib exerts its action through inhibition of several kinases involved in both tumour cell proliferation and angiogenesis. It was well tolerated at a dose of 400 mg twice daily and permanent discontinuation of the drug was rarely required.