Anti-p200 pemphigoid

Laminin β4 is a constituent of the cutaneous basement membrane zone and additional autoantigen of anti-p200 pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

Anti-p200 pemphigoid is a subepidermal autoimmune blistering disease (AIBD) characterized by autoantibodies against a 200 kDa protein. Laminin γ1 has been described as target antigen in 70% to 90% of patients. No diagnostic assay is widely available for anti-p200 pemphigoid, which might be due to the unclear pathogenic relevance of anti-laminin γ1 autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVE

To identify a target antigen with higher clinical and diagnostic relevance.

METHODS

Immunoprecipitation, mass spectrometry, and immunoblotting were employed for analysis of skin extracts and sera of patients with anti-p200 pemphigoid (n = 60), other AIBD (n = 33), and healthy blood donors (n = 29). To localize the new antigen in skin, cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence microscopy were performed.

RESULTS

Laminin β4 was identified as target antigen of anti-p200 pemphigoid in all analyzed patients. It was located at the level of the basement membrane zone of the skin with predominant expression in keratinocytes.

LIMITATIONS

A higher number of sera needs to be tested to verify that laminin β4 is the diagnostically relevant antigen of anti-p200 pemphigoid.

CONCLUSION

The identification of laminin β4 as an additional target antigen in anti-p200 pemphigoid will allow its differentiation from other AIBD and as such, improve the management of these rare disorders.

Anti-α6β4 integrin autoantibodies inhibit the binding of laminins to α6β4 integrin in patients with pemphigoid and affect the gastrointestinal tract

BACKGROUND

Anti-α6β4 integrin autoantibodies can be observed in some patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid. We have previously identified anti-α6β4 integrin extracellular domain autoantibodies together with anti-BP180 NC16A antibodies in a patient with DPP-4 inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid. However, the significance and impact of anti-α6β4 integrin antibodies are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize anti-α6β4 integrin extracellular domain autoantibodies in pemphigoid patients, to determine whether these antibodies inhibit laminin-α6β4 integrin binding and to observe their systemic effects.

METHODS

Anti-α6β4 integrin autoantibodies were analysed by staining cells expressing the extracellular region of α6β4 integrin with sera from 20 patients with pemphigoid. The anti-α6β4 integrin autoantibodies were characterized using different transfectants. The binding of laminins to α6β4 integrin was studied using cells expressing the activated conformation of α6β4 integrin and the inhibitory effect of the autoantibodies on the binding of laminins to α6β4 integrin was tested. Trends in antibody titres and clinical symptoms were quantified and analysed.

RESULTS

IgG autoantibodies against the extracellular domain of anti-α6β4 integrin were found in some patients with pemphigoid. Laminin binding to α6β4 integrin was observed in the active conformation of α6β4 integrin, and serum from a patient with a high titre of anti-α6β4 integrin antibodies inhibited the binding of both laminin-511 and laminin-332 to α6β4 integrin. α6β4 integrin is expressed on the basement membrane of both skin and small intestine, and exfoliation was observed in the patient's epidermis and small intestinal epithelium. A reduction in the titre of the anti-α6β4 integrin antibody was associated with improvement in both skin and gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the presence of anti-α6β4 integrin extracellular domain-specific autoantibodies in some patients with pemphigoid. In addition, these autoantibodies showed inhibitory activity on α6β4 integrin-laminin binding. Anti-α6β4 integrin antibodies can affect the gastrointestinal tract as well as the skin and oral mucosa.

Autoimmune bullous diseases in pregnancy: an overview of pathogenesis, clinical presentations, diagnostics and available therapies

Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) are rare organ-specific diseases characterized by the appearance of blisters and erosions on the skin and mucous membranes. These dermatoses are marked by the development of autoantibodies targeting the autoantigens located in intercellular junctions, i.e., between keratinocytes or in the basement membrane area. Therefore, the fundamental division of AIBDs into the pemphigus and pemphigoid groups exists. Although AIBDs are uncommon in the general population, their overall incidence is somewhat higher in women of all ages, for which a pregnant women can be likely affected too. While the pemphigoid gestationis is exclusive bullous dermatosis of pregnancy, the other AIBDs can also start or worsen during this period. The appearance of AIBDs in childbearing women is a particularly sensitive situation requiring exceptional clinicians' caution due to the possibility of pregnancy complications with adverse effects and risks to the mother and the child. Also, there are numerous management difficulties in the period of pregnancy and lactation related to the drugs' choice and safety. This paper aimed to outline the pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach and therapy of the most commonly recognized AIBDs in pregnancy.

Utility of the pattern-based approach using BIOCHIP-indirect immunofluorescence in the evaluation of subepidermal bullous disorders

BACKGROUND

Subepidermal bullous disorders (SEBD) are a heterogeneous group of vesiculobullous diseases because of antibody-mediated destruction of proteins of the dermo-epidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is the gold standard for diagnosis. BIOCHIP-indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is a novel serological test that combines multiple target antigens in a single field. The present study aimed to evaluate the utility of the pattern-based approach in BIOCHIP-IIF for the diagnosis of SEBD.

METHODS

Seventy cases of BIOCHIP-IIF that showed clinical, histopathological, and/or DIF features favoring SEBD were included in the study. The interpretation in the BIOCHIP was categorized into one of the following patterns. Pattern I: basement membrane zone (BMZ) staining in monkey esophagus (ME), primate salt-split skin (SSS)-roof staining, BP180+ and/or BP230+; Pattern II: roof staining in SSS, BP180- and BP230- with or without BMZ staining in ME; Pattern III: floor staining in SSS, BP180- and BP230-; and pattern IV: negative in SSS and other substrates. The findings were correlated with histopathology and/or DIF.

RESULTS

Fifty (71.5%) cases showed pattern I or the typical bullous pemphigoid (BP) pattern. Eight (11.4%) cases showed pattern II. Patterns III and IV were observed in seven (10%) and five (7.1%) cases, respectively. BP was the most common diagnosis in patterns I and II, while anti-p200 pemphigoid was most common in pattern III, as confirmed by immunoblotting. The sensitivity of pattern I in the diagnosis of BP was 96%.

CONCLUSION

BIOCHIP-IIF showed a good correlation with DIF and histopathology in the diagnosis of SEBD. This can be used as a first-line investigation in case of bullous disorders.

Case Report of a Novel Association between Anti-p200 Pemphigoid and Acquired Haemophilia A

Anti-p200 pemphigoid is an uncommon subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease that, unlike many other autoimmune bullous diseases, has not previously been associated with hematological diseases. The diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid in a patient with congruent clinical features requires the demonstration of subepidermal blistering, with linear deposition of immunoglobulin (Ig) G and/or C3 at the dermoepidermal junction on direct immunofluorescence, and a floor-binding pattern on indirect immunofluorescence. In addition, the detection of antibodies against p200 antigen via immunoblotting is ideal but not readily accessible in many facilities, leading to a potential under-recognition and under-diagnosis of this condition. In this case report, we describe a 53-year-old gentleman with recently diagnosed acquired hemophilia A who developed a concurrent vesiculobullous eruption and was evaluated to have anti-p200 pemphigoid. Both of his conditions were controlled with immunosuppression via prednisolone and cyclophosphamide. While we acknowledge the contemporaneous occurrence of both diseases in this patient may be a mere coincidence, it is important to recognize the possibility of this association given the potential clinical significance. Whether the activity of one disease parallels the other will require further evaluation.

Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita-Current and Emerging Treatments

Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is a rare chronic autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease of the skin and mucous membranes, usually beginning in adulthood. EBA is induced by autoantibodies to type VII collagen, a major component of anchoring fibrils in the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ). The binding of autoantibodies to type-VII collagen subsequently leads to the detachment of the epidermis and the formation of mucocutaneous blisters. EBA has two major clinical subtypes: the mechanobullous and inflammatory variants. The classic mechanobullous variant presentation consists of skin fragility, bullae with minimal clinical or histological inflammation, erosions in acral distribution that heal with scarring, and milia formation. The inflammatory variant is challenging to differentiate from other autoimmune bullous diseases, most commonly bullous pemphigoid (BP) but also mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), Brunsting-Perry pemphigoid, and linear IgA dermatosis. Due to its recalcitrance conventional treatment of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita is shown to be demanding. Here we discuss novel therapeutic strategies that have emerged and which could potentially improve the quality of life in patients with EBA.

Annular bullous diseases

Annular bullous dermatoses represent an etiologically diverse group of cutaneous phenomena that present with a figurate morphology in association with vesicles and bullae. This group of diverse conditions consists of bullous pemphigoid; pemphigoid gestationis; epidermolysis bullosa simplex, Dowling-Meara type; linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatosis; chronic bullous disease of childhood; anti-p200 pemphigoid; subcorneal pustular dermatosis; and immunoglobulin A pemphigus. Astute examination of clinical, histopathologic, and serologic features is crucial in distinguishing these bullous dermatoses. We review the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, histopathology, and treatments for each bullous annular disease to aid physicians in their recognition, diagnosis, and management.

Histopathology of autoimmune bullous dermatoses: What's new?

Autoimmune bullous dermatoses are characterized by the presence of tissue-bound and often circulating pathogenic autoantibodies targeting structural components of the skin and/or mucous membranes. The diagnostic workup for this heterogeneous group of disorders consists of a multi-step process, of which the light microscopic examination is a crucial component. This review is organized following a classification scheme that is based on two main histopathologic features, namely level of intraepithelial split and composition of the inflammatory infiltrate. Overall, we aim to place emphasis on the histopathologic clues that can assist pathologists in differential diagnosis and review the updates in the literature.

Current and Innovated Managements for Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorders: An Overview

Autoimmune bullous skin disorders are a group of disorders characterized by the formation of numerous blisters and erosions on the skin and/or the mucosal membrane, arising from autoantibodies against the intercellular adhesion molecules and the structural proteins. They can be classified into intraepithelial or subepithelial autoimmune bullous dermatoses based on the location of the targeted antigens. These dermatoses are extremely debilitating and fatal in certain cases, depending on the degree of cutaneous and mucosal involvement. Effective treatments should be implemented promptly. Glucocorticoids serve as the first-line approach due to their rapid onset of therapeutic effects and remission of the acute phase. Nonetheless, long-term applications may lead to major adverse effects that outweigh the benefits. Hence, other adjuvant therapies are mandatory to minimize the potential harm and ameliorate the quality of life. Herein, we summarize the current therapeutic strategies and introduce promising therapies for intractable autoimmune bullous diseases.

Coexistence of Anti-p200 Pemphigoid and Psoriasis: A Systematic Review

Background

A close association between psoriasis and anti-p200 pemphigoid has been demonstrated by numerous studies. However, the clinical characteristics of patients suffering from these two entities have not yet been well-elucidated.

Objective

This study aimed to review the case reports and case series, summarizing clinical features and therapeutic strategies in patients suffering from anti-p200 pemphigoid and psoriasis.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for studies published in English involving patients with psoriasis and anti-p200 pemphigoid on 6 September 2021. All case reports and case series reporting patients diagnosed with anti-p200 pemphigoid and psoriasis were included in this systematic review.

Results

A total of 21 eligible studies comprising 26 anti-p200 pemphigoid patients with preceding psoriasis were included in the qualitative synthesis. The average age at blisters eruption was 62.5 years, and the mean duration between the two entities was 15.6 years. Twenty-four percent of patients developed bullous lesions during UV therapy. Clinical manifestation of bullae and/or vesicles was recorded in all patients, and the trunk (94.7%) was most frequently involved, with only 15.8% reporting mucosal involvement. Epitope spreading was detected by immunoblotting in 33.3% of patients. All the patients reached completed remission during the course of disease, with 36.8% experiencing at least one relapse. Monotherapy of prednisolone was the leading therapeutic approach (n=6, 31.6%) required for disease control, but 5 (83.3%) of them suffered from blister recurrence after tapering or ceasing corticosteroid.

Conclusion

Most of the clinical aspects of patients with anti-p200 pemphigoid and psoriasis were similar to what was demonstrated in previous articles on anti-p200 pemphigoid. Nevertheless, compared with other anti-p200 pemphigoid cases without psoriasis, a clinical manifestation pattern with more frequent involvement of the trunk and less mucosal involvement was illustrated in those with psoriasis. Generally, monotherapy is sufficient for a complete remission for such patients. However, one or more relapses have been recorded in a considerable portion of patients, especially those prescribed with prednisolone. It reminded us to be more cautious during a tapering of medication.

Serration pattern analysis as a practical adjunct tool for categorization of subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases

BACKGROUND

Serration pattern analysis helps in the classification of subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders; more precisely, it helps to differentiate epidermolysis bullosa acquisita from other subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders. Most of the published reports of this tool have come from a single center.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to study the utility of serration pattern analysis in classifying subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders.

METHODS

Seventy five cases of subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders were enrolled in this prospective study. A three millimeter punch biopsy was taken from the perilesional skin or mucosa for direct immunofluorescence; indirect immunofluorescence was carried out using salt-split skin. Subclassification of subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders was done based on direct immunofluorescence, indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin, indirect immunofluorescence using knockout skin and serration pattern analysis findings.

RESULTS

Indirect immunofluorescence was positive in 68 cases; 14 cases showed a dermal staining pattern while the rest showed either an epidermal or a combined pattern. All patients with epidermal or combined staining patterns showed "n" serrated pattern on direct immunofluorescence. Nine patients with dermal staining on indirect immunofluorescence also revealed an "n" serration pattern on direct immunofluorescence indicating the diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid, and the rest showed a "u" serrated pattern. Three patients with negative indirect immunofluorescence showed "u" serration on direct immunofluorescence while the rest showed "n" serration.

LIMITATIONS

ELISA and immunoblotting could not be performed due to resource constraints.

CONCLUSION

Based on indirect immunofluorescence and serration pattern analysis, classification of the majority of patients with subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders was possible in our study. Pattern recognition is a cost-effective tool and can be easily learnt. It is recommended to be practiced in all laboratories where facilities for advanced immunological diagnosis are unavailable.

Bullous Autoimmune Dermatoses

BACKGROUND

Bullous autoimmune dermatoses are a clinically and immunopatho - logically heterogeneous group of diseases, characterized clinically by blisters or erosions of the skin and/or mucous membranes. In Germany, their prevalence is approximately 40 000 cases nationwide, and their incidence approximately 20 new cases per million people per year.

METHODS

This review is based on publications that were retrieved by a selective search of the literature focusing on the current German and European guidelines.

RESULTS

Recent years have seen the publication of guidelines, controlled prospective clinical trials, and multicenter diagnostic studies improving both diagnosis and therapy. Specific monovalent and multivariate serological test systems and pattern analysis of tissue-bound autoantibodies allow identification of the target antigens in 80-90% of patients. This enables the precise classification of disease entities, with implications for treatment selection and disease outcome. In 2019, the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab was approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of moderate and severe pemphigus vulgaris, with an ensuing marked improvement in the care of the affected patients. To treat mild and moderate bullous pemphigoid, topical clobetasol proprionate is recommended, in severe disease, combined with systemic treatment, i.e. usually (a) prednisolone p.o. at an initial dose of 0.5mg/kg/d , (b) an immunomodulant, e.g. dapsone or doxycycline, or (c) prednisolone plus an immunomodulant.

CONCLUSION

The early recognition and precise diagnostic evaluation of bullous autoimmune dermatoses now enables improved, often interdisciplinary treatment, in accordance with the available guidelines. Current research projects are focused on new treatment approaches, an improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, and further refinements of diagnostic techniques.

Anti-P 200 pemphigoid - The most common floor binding subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease in a tertiary care center in south India

BACKGROUND

The pemphigoid group of diseases may present clinically and immunologically in a very similar fashion. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy with readily available salt-split human skin in a BIOCHIP™ helps to classify these conditions as those with either with roof binding or floor binding of immunoreactants. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, anti-laminin 332 pemphigoid and anti-p200 pemphigoid show floor binding, while in the most frequent type of pemphigoid disease, bullous pemphigoid, epidermal side staining pattern is seen on salt-split skin Aims: The aim of the study was to detect the target antigens in sub-epidermal bullous diseases.

METHODS

Forty patients with bullous pemphigoid diagnosed by lesional histopathology and direct immunofluorescence microscopy were re-evaluated by a BIOCHIP™ mosaic containing both tissue substrates and recombinant target antigens. Sera with floor pattern staining on salt-split skin were further evaluated by immunoblotting with dermal extract.

RESULTS

Five patients with floor staining had anti-p200 pemphigoid.

LIMITATIONS

We could not perform serration pattern analysis of direct immunofluorescence in our patients.

CONCLUSION

Histopathology and direct immunofluorescence microscopy cannot differentiate between various entities of pemphigoid diseases. A multivariant approach using a BIOCHIP™ mosaic including salt-split skin followed by immunoblotting with dermal extract helps to identify the target antigen.

Subepithelial autoimmune bullous dermatoses disease activity assessment and therapy

Subepidermal (subepithelial) autoimmune blistering dermatoses are a group of rare skin disorders characterized by the disruption of the dermal-epidermal junction through the action of autoantibodies. The fourth article in this continuing medical education series presents the current validated disease activity scoring systems, serologic parameters, treatments, and clinical trials for bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, bullous systemic lupus erythematosus, anti-p200 pemphigoid, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, and dermatitis herpetiformis.

Subepithelial autoimmune blistering dermatoses: Clinical features and diagnosis

Subepithelial autoimmune blistering dermatoses are a group of rare skin disorders that are characterized by the disruption of the dermal-epidermal junction through the action of autoantibodies. The third article in this continuing medical education series explores the background, epidemiology, clinical features, and diagnostic criteria of each of the major subepithelial autoimmune blistering dermatoses, including bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, lichen planus pemphigoides, mucous membrane pemphigoid, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, and dermatitis herpetiformis.

Incidence of pemphigoid diseases in Northern Germany in 2016 - first data from the Schleswig-Holstein Registry of Autoimmune Bullous Diseases

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD) are rare disorders characterized by autoantibody formation against components of adhesion molecules; in pemphigoid diseases (PD), these are proteins of hemidesmosomes and basement membrane, important for cell-matrix adhesion in skin and/or mucous membranes. Incidences of these diseases vary considerably between different populations.

OBJECTIVES

To establish a registry prospectively recruiting all AIBD patients in a geographically well-defined region in Northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein).

METHODS

Only patients with verified disease (by clinical presentation, histology, direct and/or indirect immunofluorescence and /or ELISA) living in Schleswig-Holstein were included. Incidences of PD were estimated based on the total number of inhabitants in Schleswig-Holstein, stratified by birth year and sex.

RESULTS

Of 67 patients with PD [35 male, 32 female, mean age 75 (standard deviation 14.3 years)], 83% were patients with bullous pemphigoid [n = 56, 28 male, 28 female, mean age 78 (SD 9.9)]. The resulting crude incidences were 23.4 patients/million/year for all pemphigoid patients, 19.6 patients/million/year for bullous pemphigoid (age-standardized 16.9 patients/million/year) with a strong increase in bullous pemphigoid patients in the age group of 85-90 years with 262 patients/million/year. Incidences for bullous pemphigoid were higher in urban compared to rural areas. Other PD (mucous membrane pemphigoid, linear IgA disease, anti-p200 pemphigoid) were less frequent with crude incidences of 2.1, 1.0 and 0.7 patients/million/year, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study prospectively analyses the incidence of PD in a carefully defined geographical area. The highest incidence among PD patients was found for bullous pemphigoid. The incidence of bullous pemphigoid is considerably increased compared to previous reports and reveals regional differences. Further studies are needed in order to clarify these findings.

Multicenter prospective study on multivariant diagnostics of autoimmune bullous dermatoses using the BIOCHIP technology

BACKGROUND

The current standard in the serologic diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBD) is a multistep procedure sequentially applying different assays. In contrast, the BIOCHIP Mosaic technology combines multiple substrates for parallel analysis by indirect immunofluorescence.

METHODS

Sera from 749 consecutive, prospectively recruited patients with direct immunofluorescence-positive AIBD from 13 international study centers were analyzed independently and blinded by using (1) a BIOCHIP Mosaic including primate esophagus, salt-split skin, rat bladder, monkey liver, monkey liver with serosa, recombinant BP180 NC16A, and gliadin GAF3X, as well as HEK293 cells expressing recombinant desmoglein 1, desmoglein 3, type VII collagen, and BP230 C-terminus and (2) the conventional multistep approach of the Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck.

RESULTS

In 731 of 749 sera (97.6%), specific autoantibodies could be detected with the BIOCHIP Mosaic, similar to the conventional procedure (725 cases, 96.8%). The Cohen κ for both serologic approaches ranged from 0.84 to 1.00. In 6.5% of sera, differences between the 2 approaches occurred and were mainly attributed to autoantigen fragments not present on the BIOCHIP Mosaic.

LIMITATIONS

Laminin 332 and laminin γ1 are not represented on the BIOCHIP Mosaic.

CONCLUSIONS

The BIOCHIP Mosaic is a standardized time- and serum-saving approach that further facilitates the serologic diagnosis of AIBD.

Oral Lesions in Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: An Overview of Clinical Characteristics and Diagnostic Algorithm

Autoimmune bullous diseases are a group of chronic inflammatory disorders caused by autoantibodies targeted against structural proteins of the desmosomal and hemidesmosomal plaques in the skin and mucosa, leading to intra-epithelial or subepithelial blistering. The oral mucosa is frequently affected in these diseases, in particular, in mucous membrane pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. The clinical symptoms are heterogeneous and may present with erythema, blisters, erosions, and ulcers localized anywhere on the oral mucosa, and lead to severe complaints for the patients including pain, dysphagia, and foetor. Therefore, a quick and proper diagnosis with adequate treatment is needed. Clinical presentations of autoimmune bullous diseases often overlap and diagnosis cannot be made based on clinical features alone. Immunodiagnostic tests are of great importance in differentiating between the different diseases. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy shows depositions of autoantibodies along the epithelial basement membrane zone in mucous membrane pemphigoid subtypes, or depositions on the epithelial cell surface in pemphigus variants. Additional immunoserological tests are useful to discriminate between the different subtypes of pemphigoid, and are essential to differentiate between pemphigus and paraneoplastic pemphigus. This review gives an overview of the clinical characteristics of oral lesions and the diagnostic procedures in autoimmune blistering diseases, and provides a diagnostic algorithm for daily practice.

Anti-p200 Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review

The many clinical aspects of anti-p200 pemphigoid are not well-characterized. We aimed to analyze and correlate known existing data on the epidemiological, clinical, histological, and immunological features of anti-p200 pemphigoid. We performed a review using Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases (1900–2018). Case reports and series of patients were included. A total of 68 eligible studies that comprised 113 anti-p200 pemphigoid patients were included in the qualitative analysis, where there was a mean age of onset of 65.5 years. All patients presented with bullae/vesicles, and 54.3% had urticarial plaques. A similarity to bullous pemphigoid was reported in 66.1% of cases, but palmoplantar (51.4%), cephalic (40.3%), and mucosal (38.5%) involvement, besides frequent development of scars/milia (15.7%), were reported. Autoantibodies against recombinant laminin γ1 were detected in the sera of 73.1% of patients. Psoriasis was present in 28.3% of anti-p200 pemphigoid patients, particularly among Japanese patients (56.4%). The incidence of pustular psoriasis in this subgroup, was significantly greater than in the normal population. In conclusion, the diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid may be suspected when a subepidermal autoimmune blistering disease develops in a younger age group, along with significant acral and cephalic distribution and mucosal involvement.

Diagnosis of autoimmune bullous diseases

Autoimmune bullous disorders (AIBDs) are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases clinically characterized by erosions and/or blisters on the skin and mucous membranes. AIBDs can be categorized into two groups: pemphigus diseases, characterized by intraepidermal blistering and autoantibodies against desmosomal proteins such as desmoglein (Dsg) 1, Dsg3, members of the plakin family, and subepidermal AIBDs, comprised of pemphigoid diseases and dermatitis herpetiformis. Autoantibodies in dermatitis herpetiformis target transglutaminases 2 and 3, while in pemphigoid disease, autoantibodies are directed against structural proteins of the dermal-epidermal junction. Although analysis of a perilesional biopsy with direct immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy is still the diagnostic gold standard, several assays have become widely available that allow serological diagnosis in the majority of patients. Standard serological diagnosis includes indirect IF on monkey esophagus and salt-split human skin. Assays to further characterize autoantibody specificity include ELISA systems based on recombinant forms of the immunodominant regions of the target antigens as well as multivariant indirect IF microscopy tests with several miniature substrates. These serological assays are complemented by various in-house assays using immunoblotting and ELISA, which are only available in specialized laboratories. Here we review new developments in the diagnosis of AIBDs and describe state-of-the-art diagnostic procedures for this group of diseases.

Genetics and Omics Analysis of Autoimmune Skin Blistering Diseases

Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs) of the skin are characterized by autoantibodies against different intra-/extracellular structures within the epidermis and at the basement membrane zone (BMZ). Binding of the antibodies to their target antigen leads to inflammation at the respective binding site and degradation of these structures, resulting in the separation of the affected skin layers. Clinically, blistering, erythema and lesions of the skin and/or mucous membranes can be observed. Based on the localization of the autoantigen, AIBDs can be divided into pemphigus (intra-epidermal blistering diseases) and pemphigoid diseases (sub-epidermal blistering diseases), respectively. Although autoantigens have been extensively characterized, the underlying causes that trigger the diseases are still poorly understood. Besides the environment, genetic factors seem to play an important role in a predisposition to AIBDs. Here, we review currently known genetic and immunological mechanisms that contribute to the pathogenesis of AIBDs. Among the most commonly encountered genetic predispositions for AIBDs are the HLA gene region, and deleterious mutations of key genes for the immune system. Particularly, HLA class II genes such as the HLA-DR and HLA-DQ alleles have been shown to be prevalent in patients. This has prompted further epidemiological studies as well as unbiased Omics approaches on the transcriptome, microbiome, and proteome level to elucidate common and individual genetic risk factors as well as the molecular pathways that lead to the pathogenesis of AIBDs.

Diagnostik blasenbildender Autoimmundermatosen

Blasenbildende Autoimmundermatosen (BAIDs) sind eine heterogene Gruppe seltener Erkrankungen, die klinisch durch Erosionen und/oder Blasen an Haut und Schleimhäuten charakterisiert sind. BAIDs können in zwei Gruppen eingeteilt werden: Pemphigus-Erkrankungen, die durch intraepidermale Blasenbildung und Autoantikörper gegen desmosomale Proteine wie Desmoglein (Dsg) 1, Dsg3 und Mitglieder der Plakin-Familie charakterisiert sind, sowie subepidermale BAIDs, die Pemphigoid-Erkrankungen und die Dermatitis herpetiformis umfassen. Bei der Dermatitis herpetiformis greifen die Autoantikörper die Transglutaminasen 2 und 3 an, während sie bei Pemphigoid-Erkrankungen gegen Strukturproteine der dermoepidermalen Junktionszone gerichtet sind. Die Analyse einer periläsionalen Biopsie mittels direkter Immunfluoreszenzmikroskopie (IF-Mikroskopie) stellt zwar nach wie vor den diagnostischen Goldstandard dar, mittlerweile sind jedoch verschiedene Tests allgemein verfügbar, die eine serologische Diagnosefindung für den Großteil der Patienten ermöglichen. Zur serologischen Standarddiagnostik gehört die indirekte IF auf Affenösophagus und NaCl-separierter Spalthaut. Die Spezifität der Autoantikörper kann mit ELISA-Systemen, die auf rekombinanten Formen der immundominanten Regionen der Zielantigene basieren, sowie indirekter IF-Mikroskopie anhand multivarianter Tests mit mehreren multivariate näher charakterisiert werden. Diese serologischen Tests werden durch verschiedene hauseigene Immunoblotting- und ELISA-Systeme ergänzt, die nur in spezialisierten Laboratorien verfügbar sind. In diesem Review geben wir einen Überblick über neue Entwicklungen bei der Diagnose von BAIDs und beschreiben moderne Diagnoseverfahren für diese Krankheitsgruppe.

[Anti-p200 pemphigoid: clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects]

Anti-p200 pemphigoid is a rare autoimmune blistering dermatosis. The clinical course is heterogeneous. Typically, immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies are found on the floor of salt-split skin, which differentiates p200 pemphigoid from bullous pemphigoid. It is necessary to perform immunoblotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to confirm the diagnosis. Small amounts of dapsone are often sufficient for disease control. The clinical and diagnostic characteristics of anti-p200 pemphigoid and the principles of treatment are presented exemplified by two case reports.

Rituximab in autoimmune pemphigoid diseases: Indications, optimized regimens, and practice gaps

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20 on B cells with proven efficacy for pemphigus vulgaris, now an FDA-approved indication. Other autoimmune bullous diseases can be challenging to treat and have significant associated morbidity and mortality, but data supporting the use of rituximab in pemphigoid group diseases remain limited. Although rituximab demonstrates efficacy for clinical improvement and remission in pemphigoid, concern for adverse events may also limit the use of this medication. We review the current evidence fo rthe use of rituximab in pemphigoid diseases, pertinent dosing schedules and laboratory monitoring, and the associated common and rare adverse events. Review of the literature to date not only supports consideration of rituximab for treatment of refractory pemphigoid group diseases but also reflects tolerability and an acceptable safety profile.

[Mucous membrane pemphigoid]

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a pemphigoid disease defined by the presence of autoantibodies against the dermal-epidermal junction and predominant involvement of mucous membranes. Diagnosis is made by the clinical presentation and linear deposits of IgG and/or IgA and/or C3 at the dermal-epidermal junction by direct immunofluorescence microscopy of a perilesional biopsy. Circulating autoantibodies can be detected in most patients by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on salt-split human skin as well as ELISA and immunoblotting with recombinant and cell-derived target antigens. For systemic treatment of MMP, corticosteroids, dapsone, mycophenolates, and azathioprine are applied. In severe cases and in cases with rapid disease progression cyclophosphamide, rituximab, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins, and immunoadsorption are used. For the successful management of MMP patients, close cooperation with dentists, ophthalmologists, ENT specialists, gynecologists, and gastroenterologists is essential.

[Anti-p200 pemphigoid]

Anti-p200 pemphigoid is a rare autoimmune blistering disease. It belongs to the group of pemphigoid diseases and was first described in 1996. The diagnostic gold standard is the combination of (1) linear deposits of immunoreactants at the dermal epidermal junction by direct immunofluorescence microscopy of a perilesional skin biopsy, (2) detection of circulating autoantibodies binding to the dermal side (blister floor) of human salt split skin by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, and reactivity with a 200 kDa protein (p200) in extract of human dermis by immunoblotting. In 2009, laminin γ1 was described as an additional target antigen in 90% of anti-p200 pemphigoid patients. Since ex vivo and in vivo studies have shown no direct pathogenic relevance for laminin γ1 antibodies and the preadsorption of patient sera against laminin γ1 does not reduce their reactivity with p200, the molecular identity of p200 still remains to be elucidated. The clinical phenotype of the disease is heterogeneous; in most cases, however, it resembles bullous pemphigoid. Anti-p200 patients are younger and skin lesions more often appear on palms of the hands and soles of the feet than in bullous pemphigoid. Therapy consists of topical and systemic corticosteroids. In addition, the use of daspone and immunosuppressants has been reported.

Subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases: overview, epidemiology, and associations

Subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases of the skin and mucosae comprise a large group of chronic diseases, including bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, mucous membrane pemphigoid, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and anti-p200 pemphigoid. These diseases are characterized by an antibody response toward structural components of the basement membrane zone, resulting in subepidermal blistering. The epidemiological features of these diseases vary substantially in different regions of the world. Observational studies investigating comorbidities and associations among patients with these diseases are inconsistent and sometimes inconclusive. This review provides a brief overview regarding each one of the subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases. In addition, it summarizes the most recent understanding of the epidemiological features and associations of this group of organ-specific autoimmune diseases.

A sensitive and specific assay for the serological diagnosis of antilaminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid

BACKGROUND

Antilaminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease with predominant mucosal involvement and autoantibodies against laminin 332. Malignancies have been associated with this disease; however, no standardized detection system for antilaminin 332 serum antibodies is widely available.

OBJECTIVES

Development of a sensitive and specific assay for the detection of antilaminin 332 antibodies.

METHODS

An indirect immunofluorescence (IF) assay using recombinant laminin 332 was developed and probed with a large number of antilaminin 332 MMP patient sera (n = 93), as well as sera from patients with antilaminin 332-negative MMP (n = 153), bullous pemphigoid (n = 20), pemphigus vulgaris (n = 20) and noninflammatory dermatoses (n = 22), and healthy blood donors (n = 100).

RESULTS

In the novel IF assay, sensitivities with the laminin 332 heterotrimer and the individual α3, β3 and γ2 chains were 77%, 43%, 41% and 13%, respectively, with specificities of 100% for each substrate. The sensitivity for the heterotrimer increased when an anti-IgG4 enriched antitotal IgG conjugate was applied. Antilaminin 332 reactivity paralleled disease activity and was associated with malignancies in 25% of patients with antilaminin 332 MMP.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel IF-based assay will facilitate the serological diagnosis of antilaminin 332 MMP and may help to identify patients at risk of a malignancy.

[Systematic analysis of pathological changes in inflammatory dermatoses : New dermatopathological criteria and algorithms]

Standardized analysis of histological findings in a routinely stained section without knowledge of the clinical picture ("blind fashion") allows an objective assessment of the pathological changes. In inflammatory dermatoses diagnostic algorithms and criteria have been proven. They follow defined main inflammatory patterns, the composition of the inflammatory infiltrate and additional criteria. Taking into account the stage of development and the possibility of collision phenomena, this approach will give a histological diagnosis, or at least a limited number of differential diagnoses. However, the final diagnosis always results from the synopsis of the clinical picture and additional parameters. The modern development of algorithms and new histological criteria are outlined in autoimmune dermatoses, autoinflammatory syndromes, drug reactions and genodermatoses.

Diagnosis of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases

Autoimmune skin blistering diseases (AIBD) are characterized by autoantibodies that are directed against structural proteins in the skin and adjacent mucous membranes. Some clinical signs are typical for a specific AIBD, however, correct diagnosis requires the detection of tissue-bound or circulating autoantibodies. The gold standard for diagnosis of AIBD is the detection of autoantibodies or complement component 3 by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy of a perilesional biopsy. Circulating antibodies can be detected via indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) microscopy of different tissue substrates including human skin, monkey esophagus, and more recently, recombinant forms of the different target antigens. Latter are also employed in various commercial ELISA systems and by immunoblotting in in-house assays available in specialized laboratories. ELISA systems are also particularly valuable for monitoring of the disease activity during the disease course which can be helpful for treatment decisions. Exact diagnosis is essential for both treatment and prognosis, since some AIBD are associated with malign tumors such as paraneoplastic pemphigus and anti-laminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid. This review presents clinical and immunopathological features of AIBD for the state-of the art diagnosis of these disorders.

Autoimmune Subepidermal Bullous Diseases of the Skin and Mucosae: Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Management

Autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases of the skin and mucosae constitute a large group of sometimes devastating diseases, encompassing bullous pemphigoid, gestational pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and anti-p200 pemphigoid. Their clinical presentation is polymorphic. These autoimmune blistering diseases are associated with autoantibodies that target distinct components of the basement membrane zone of stratified epithelia. These autoantigens represent structural proteins important for maintenance of dermo-epidermal integrity. Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common subepidermal autoimmune blistering disease of the skin and mucosae. Although the disease typically presents with a generalized blistering eruption associated with itch, atypical variants with either localized bullous lesions or "non-bullous" presentations are observed in approximately 20% of patients. A peculiar form of BP typically associated with pregnancy is pemphigoid gestationis. In anti-p200 pemphigoid, patients present with tense blisters on erythematosus or normal skin resembling BP, with a predilection for acral surfaces. These patients have antibodies targeting the 200-kDa basement membrane protein. Epidermolysis bullosa is a rare autoimmune blistering disease associated with autoantibodies against type VII collagen that can have several phenotypes including a classical form mimicking dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, an inflammatory presentation mimicking BP, or mucous membrane pemphigoid-like lesions. Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is the term agreed upon by international consensus for an autoimmune blistering disorder, which affects one or more mucous membrane and may involve the skin. The condition involves a number of different autoantigens in the basement membrane zone. It may result in severe complications from scarring, such as blindness and strictures. Diagnosis of these diseases relies on direct immunofluorescence microscopy studies and immunoserological assays. Management of affected patients is often challenging. We will here review the clinical and immunopathological features as well as the pathophysiology of this group of organ-specific autoimmune diseases. Finally, we will discuss the diagnostic approach and the principles of management in clinical practice.

International Bullous Diseases Group: consensus on diagnostic criteria for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita

BACKGROUND

Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is a complex autoimmune bullous disease disease with variable clinical presentations and multiple possible diagnostic tests, making an international consensus on the diagnosis of EBA essential.

OBJECTIVES

To obtain an international consensus on the clinical and diagnostic criteria for EBA.

METHODS

The International Bullous Diseases Group (IBDG) met three times to discuss the clinical and diagnostic criteria for EBA. For the final voting exercise, 22 experts from 14 different countries voted on 50 different items. When > 30% disagreed with a proposal, a discussion was held and re-voting carried out.

RESULTS

In total, 48 of 50 proposals achieved consensus after discussion. This included nine diagnostic criteria, which are summarized in a flow chart. The IBDG was unable to determine one procedure that would be applicable worldwide. A limitation of the study is that differential diagnosis of bullous systemic lupus erythematosus has not been addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

This first international consensus conference established generally agreed-upon clinical and laboratory criteria defining the clinical classification of and diagnostic testing for EBA. Holding these voting exercises in person with the possibility of discussion prior to voting has advantages in reaching consensus over Delphi exercises with remote voting.

Regulatory T-cell deficiency leads to pathogenic bullous pemphigoid antigen 230 autoantibody and autoimmune bullous disease

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune bullous diseases/dermatoses (AIBDs) are severe autoantibody-mediated skin diseases. The pathogenic relevance of autoreactive CD4⁺ T cells for the induction of autoantibody production remains to be fully evaluated. Scurfy mice lack functional regulatory T (Treg) cells, experience spontaneous activation of autoreactive CD4⁺ T cells, and display severe erosive skin lesions suggestive of AIBDs.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether AIBDs develop in Treg cell-deficient scurfy mice.

METHODS

Histology, indirect immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy, direct IF, and ELISA were used to prove the presence of AIBDs in scurfy mice. Monoclonal autoantibodies from sera of scurfy mice were screened by using indirect IF on murine skin, and immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry were used for target antigen identification, followed by confirmation in modified human embryonic kidney cells and murine keratinocytes. Pathogenicity was determined by injecting the autoantibody into neonatal mice and transferring scurfy CD4⁺ T cells into nu/nu mice.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies against different known autoantigens of AIBDs spontaneously develop in scurfy mice. Histology reveals subepidermal blisters, and direct IF of skin of scurfy mice shows a predominant linear staining pattern. The mAb 20B12 shows a linear staining pattern in indirect IF, recognizes the murine hemidesmosomal protein bullous pemphigoid antigen 230 (BP230) as the target antigen, and cross-reacts with human BP230. Purified mAb 20B12 induces subepidermal blisters in neonatal mice. Transfer of scurfy CD4⁺ T cells is sufficient to induce antibodies with reactivity to AIBD autoantigens and subepidermal blisters in the skin of recipient T cell-deficient nu/nu mice.

CONCLUSION

We show that the absence of Treg cells leads to AIBDs by pathogenic autoantibodies targeting BP230.

Structural proteins of the dermal-epidermal junction targeted by autoantibodies in pemphigoid diseases

The dermal-epidermal junction consists of a network of several interacting structural proteins that strengthen adhesion and mediate signalling events. This structural network consists of hemidesmosomal-anchoring filament complexes connecting the basal keratinocytes to the basement membrane. The anchoring filaments in turn interact with the anchoring fibrils to attach the basement membrane to the underlying dermis. Several of these structural proteins are recognized by autoantibodies in pemphigoid diseases, a heterogeneous group of clinically and immunopathologically diverse entities. Targeted proteins include the two intracellular plakins, plectin isoform 1a and BP230 (also called bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG) 1 isoform e (BPAG1e)). Plectin 1a and BP230 are connected to the intermediate filaments and to the cell surface receptor α6β4 integrin, which in turn is connected to laminin 332, a component of the anchoring filaments. Further essential adhesion proteins are BP180, a transmembrane protein, laminin γ1 and type VII collagen. Latter protein is the major constituent of the anchoring fibrils. Mutations in the corresponding genes of these adhesion molecules lead to inherited epidermolysis bullosa emphasizing the importance of these proteins for the integrity of the dermal-epidermal junction. This review will provide an overview on the structure and function of the proteins situated in the dermal-epidermal junction targeted by autoantibodies.

Serration pattern analysis for differentiating epidermolysis bullosa acquisita from other pemphigoid diseases

BACKGROUND

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy of a skin biopsy specimen is the reference standard for the diagnosis of pemphigoid diseases (PDs). Serration pattern analysis enables the differentiation of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) from other PDs using DIF microscopy alone. However, practice gaps need to be addressed in order to implement this technique in the routine diagnostic procedure.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine and optimize the technical requirements for serration pattern analysis of DIF microscopy and determine interrater conformity of serration pattern analysis.

METHODS

We compared serration pattern analysis of routine DIF microscopy from laboratories in Groningen, The Netherlands and Lübeck, Germany with 4 blinded observers. Skin biopsy specimens from 20 patients with EBA and other PDs were exchanged and analyzed. Various factors were evaluated, including section thickness, transport medium, and biopsy specimen processing.

RESULTS

The interrater conformity of our 4 observers was 95.7%. Recognition of serration patterns was comparable in samples transported in saline and in Michel's medium and with section thicknesses of 4, 6, and 8 μm.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include our small sample size and the availability of 20 samples that were compared retrospectively.

CONCLUSION

DIF serration pattern analysis is not restricted by variation in laboratory procedures, transport medium, or experience of observers. This learnable technique can be implemented as a routine diagnostic method as an extension of DIF microscopy for subtyping PD.

Utility of immunofluorescence in dermatology

Immunofluorescence (IF) tests have redefined our understanding of many immune-mediated skin diseases, especially autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs). Nomenclature of certain AIBDs (for example, linear IgA diseases and IgA pemphigus) has been done based solely on the finding of tissue-bound immunoreactants as detected by IF tests. Direct and indirect are the two major types of IF tests; they are not only useful in the diagnosis but also guide the clinician in the treatment at least in certain AIBDs, as the titer of circulating antibodies as detected by IF reflects the disease activity. In this review, we describe techniques, various types of IF, and its modification.