TCT CONNECT-407 Optical Coherence Tomography Influences Procedure and Vessel Preparation Decisions During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the LightLab Initiative

Intravascular Imaging During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Coronary angiography has historically served as the gold standard for diagnosis of coronary artery disease and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Adjunctive use of contemporary intravascular imaging (IVI) technologies has emerged as a complement to conventional angiography-to further characterize plaque morphology and optimize the performance of PCI. IVI has utility for preintervention lesion and vessel assessment, periprocedural guidance of lesion preparation and stent deployment, and postintervention assessment of optimal endpoints and exclusion of complications. The role of IVI in reducing major adverse cardiac events in complex lesion subsets is emerging, and further studies evaluating broader use are underway or in development. This paper provides an overview of currently available IVI technologies, reviews data supporting their utilization for PCI guidance and optimization across a variety of lesion subsets, proposes best practices, and advocates for broader use of these technologies as a part of contemporary practice.

Improving efficiency and operator proficiency during percutaneous coronary interventions utilizing a standardized optical coherence tomography workflow

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to compare efficiency and quality metrics between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures using optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided by a variable workflow versus a standardized workflow in a real-world population.

BACKGROUND

The LightLab (LL) Initiative was designed to evaluate the impact of a standardized OCT workflow during PCI to address barriers to adoption.

METHODS

The LL Initiative was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. PCI efficiency data were collected from 1/21/19 to 1/8/21 from 45 physicians at 17 US centers. OCT-guided PCIs were compared between baseline phase (variable workflow; N = 383) and the LL workflow utilization phase (N = 447). The LL workflow uses OCT to assess lesion Morphology, Length and Diameter, and then optimize outcomes by correcting for Medial dissection, stent mal-Apposition, and under-eXpansion (MLD MAX). Matching based on propensity scores was used to control for differences between PCIs.

RESULTS

After propensity matching, 291 paired procedures were included. Integration of the LL versus variable workflow resulted in no difference in procedure time (51 min vs. 51 min, p = 0.93). There was a reduction in radiation exposure (1124 mGy vs. 1493 mGy, p < 0.0001) and contrast volume (160 cc vs. 172 cc, p < 0.001). The LL workflow decreased the proportion of underexpanded lesions (34% vs. 54%, p < 0.0001) and improved minimum stent expansion (85% vs. 79%, p < 0.0001). Number of noncompliant balloons used was reduced with the LL workflow. (2.0 vs. 1.7, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that standardizing imaging with the LL workflow may overcome barriers to imaging and improve PCI outcomes without prolonging procedures.

Optimising PCI by Intracoronary Image-guidance

Evidence to support the use of intracoronary imaging (ICI) in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is growing, with observational and randomized controlled trials demonstrating a benefit in acute procedural and clinical outcomes. ICI provides an opportunity to guide PCI, detailing the nature of the coronary disease, potentially influencing lesion preparation and stent selection. Following stent deployment, ICI offers a detailed assessment of lesion coverage, associated vessel trauma and stent expansion. Consensus statements have emphasized the role of ICI and detailed the parameters of stent optimization. However, intracoronary imaging is not adopted widely yet. Significant global differences in the uptake of ICI have been reported, with the vast majority of PCI being angiographically-guided. The three major barriers to the implementation of ICI include, in order of impact, prohibitive cost, prolongation of procedure time and local regulatory issues for use. However, it is our belief that a lack of education and the associated challenges of ICI interpretation provide the greatest barrier to adoption. We hope that this review of the role of ICI in PCI optimization will provide a platform for PCI operators to gain confidence in the utilization of ICI to enhance outcomes for their patients.

Impact of intracoronary optical coherence tomography in routine clinical practice: A contemporary cohort study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Guidelines recommend intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) to assess stent failure and guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) but OCT may be useful for other indications in routine clinical practice.

METHODS/MATERIALS

We conducted an international registry of OCT cases at two large tertiary care centers to assess clinical indications and the potential impact on decision making of OCT in clinical routine. Clinical indications, OCT findings, and their impact on interventional or medical treatment strategy were retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

OCT was performed in 810 coronary angiography cases (1928 OCT-pullbacks). OCT was used for diagnostic purposes in 67% (N = 542) and OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in 50% (N = 404, 136 cases with prior diagnostic indication). Most frequent indications for diagnostic OCT were culprit lesion identification in suspected ACS (29%) and stent failure assessment (28%). OCT findings in the diagnostic setting influenced patient management in 74%. OCT-guided PCIs concerned ACS patients in 45%. Among the 55% with chronic coronary syndrome, long lesions >28 mm (19%), left main PCI (16%), and bifurcation PCI with side-branch-stenting (5%) were the leading indications for PCI-guidance. Post-procedural OCT findings led to corrective measures in 52% (26% malapposition, 14% underexpansion, 6% edge dissection, 3% intrastent mass, 3% geographic plaque miss).

CONCLUSIONS

OCT was most frequently performed to identify culprit lesions in suspected ACS, for stent failure assessment, and PCI-guidance. OCT may impact subsequent treatment strategies in two out of three patients.