1
|
Heydarian S, Shakiba A, Rostam Niakan Kalhori S. The Minimum Feature Set for Designing Mobile Apps to Support Bipolar Disorder-Affected Patients: Proposal of Essential Functions and Requirements. J Healthc Inform Res 2023; 7:254-276. [PMID: 37377634 PMCID: PMC10290972 DOI: 10.1007/s41666-023-00134-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Research conducted on mobile apps providing mental health services has concluded that patients with mental disorders tend to use such apps to maintain mental health balance technology may help manage and monitor issues like bipolar disorder (BP). This study was conducted in four steps to identify the features of designing a mobile application for BP-affected patients including (1) a literature search, (2) analyzing existing mobile apps to examine their efficiency, (3) interviewing patients affected with BP to discover their needs, and 4) exploring the points of view of experts using a dynamic narrative survey. Literature search and mobile app analysis resulted in 45 features, which were later reduced to 30 after the experts were surveyed about the project. The features included the following: mood monitoring, sleep schedule, energy level evaluation, irritability, speech level, communication, sexual activity, self-confidence level, suicidal thoughts, guilt, concentration level, aggressiveness, anxiety, appetite, smoking or drug abuse, blood pressure, the patient's weight and the side effects of medication, reminders, mood data scales, diagrams or charts of the collected data, referring the collected data to a psychologist, educational information, sending feedbacks to patients using the application, and standard tests for mood assessment. The first phase of analysis should consider an expert and patient view survey, mood and medication tracking, as well as communication with other people in the same situation are the most features to be considered. The present study has identified the necessity of apps intended to manage and monitor bipolar patients to maximize efficiency and minimize relapse and side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeedeh Heydarian
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Floor 3, No. 17, Fare-Danesh Alley, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alia Shakiba
- Department of Psychiatry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sharareh Rostam Niakan Kalhori
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Floor 3, No. 17, Fare-Danesh Alley, Tehran, Iran
- Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, 38106 Brunswick, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mavragani A, Gouw SC, Beestrum M, Cronin RM, Fijnvandraat K, Badawy SM. Patient-Centered Digital Health Records and Their Effects on Health Outcomes: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e43086. [PMID: 36548034 PMCID: PMC9816956 DOI: 10.2196/43086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND eHealth tools such as patient portals and personal health records, also known as patient-centered digital health records, can engage and empower individuals with chronic health conditions. Patients who are highly engaged in their care have improved disease knowledge, self-management skills, and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE We aimed to systematically review the effects of patient-centered digital health records on clinical and patient-reported outcomes, health care utilization, and satisfaction among patients with chronic conditions and to assess the feasibility and acceptability of their use. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycINFO databases between January 2000 and December 2021. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Eligible studies were those evaluating digital health records intended for nonhospitalized adult or pediatric patients with a chronic condition. Patients with a high disease burden were a subgroup of interest. Primary outcomes included clinical and patient-reported health outcomes and health care utilization. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, feasibility, and acceptability. Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used for quality assessment. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Associations between health record use and outcomes were categorized as beneficial, neutral or clinically nonrelevant, or undesired. RESULTS Of the 7716 unique publications examined, 81 (1%) met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 1,639,556 participants across all studies. The most commonly studied diseases included diabetes mellitus (37/81, 46%), cardiopulmonary conditions (21/81, 26%), and hematology-oncology conditions (14/81, 17%). One-third (24/81, 30%) of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Of the 81 studies that met the eligibility criteria, 16 (20%) were of high methodological quality. Reported outcomes varied across studies. The benefits of patient-centered digital health records were most frequently reported in the category health care utilization on the "use of recommended care services" (10/13, 77%), on the patient-reported outcomes "disease knowledge" (7/10, 70%), "patient engagement" (13/28, 56%), "treatment adherence" (10/18, 56%), and "self-management and self-efficacy" (10/19, 53%), and on the clinical outcome "laboratory parameters," including HbA1c and low-density lipoprotein (LDL; 16/33, 48%). Beneficial effects on "health-related quality of life" were seen in only 27% (4/15) of studies. Patient satisfaction (28/30, 93%), feasibility (15/19, 97%), and acceptability (23/26, 88%) were positively evaluated. More beneficial effects were reported for digital health records that predominantly focus on active features. Beneficial effects were less frequently observed among patients with a high disease burden and among high-quality studies. No unfavorable effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS The use of patient-centered digital health records in nonhospitalized individuals with chronic health conditions is potentially associated with considerable beneficial effects on health care utilization, treatment adherence, and self-management or self-efficacy. However, for firm conclusions, more studies of high methodological quality are required. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42020213285; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=213285.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samantha C Gouw
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Molly Beestrum
- Galter Health Sciences Library at Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Robert M Cronin
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Karin Fijnvandraat
- Department of Pediatric Hematology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development, Public Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Molecular Cellular Hemostasis, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sherif M Badawy
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.,Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplant, Ann and Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geerling B, Kelders SM, Kupka RW, Stevens AWMM, Bohlmeijer ET. How to make online mood-monitoring in bipolar patients a success? A qualitative exploration of requirements. Int J Bipolar Disord 2021; 9:39. [PMID: 34851456 PMCID: PMC8636552 DOI: 10.1186/s40345-021-00244-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Life-Chart Method (LCM) is an effective self-management treatment option in bipolar disorder (BD). There is insufficient knowledge about the consumers’ needs and desires for an e-monitoring solution. The first step towards a new mood monitoring application is an extended inventory among consumers and professionals. Methods The aim of the current study was: to identify opinions about online mood monitoring of patients with BD and professionals and to identify preferences on design, technical features and options facilitating optimal use and implementation of online mood monitoring. This study used a qualitative design with focus-groups. Participants were recruited among patients and care providers. Three focus-groups were held with eight consumers and five professionals. Results The focus-group meetings reveal a shared consciousness of the importance of using the Life-Chart Method for online mood monitoring. There is a need for personalization, adjustability, a strict privacy concept, an adjustable graphic report, and a link to early intervention strategies in the design. Due to the fact that this is a qualitative study with a relative small number of participants, so it remains unclear whether the results are fully generalizable. We can’t rule out a selection bias. Conclusions This study demonstrates the importance of involving stakeholders in identifying a smartphone-based mood charting applications’ requirements. Personalization, adjustability, privacy, an adjustable graphic report, and a direct link to early intervention strategies are necessary requirements for a successful design. The results of this value specification are included in the follow-up of this project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Geerling
- Dimence Mental Health Institute, Centre for Bipolar Disorder, SCBS Bipolaire Stoonissen, Pikeursbaan 3, 7411 GT, Deventer, The Netherlands. .,Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - S M Kelders
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.,Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
| | - R W Kupka
- Department Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A W M M Stevens
- Dimence Mental Health Institute, Centre for Bipolar Disorder, SCBS Bipolaire Stoonissen, Pikeursbaan 3, 7411 GT, Deventer, The Netherlands
| | - E T Bohlmeijer
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toni E, Pirnejad H, Makhdoomi K, Mivefroshan A, Niazkhani Z. Patient empowerment through a user-centered design of an electronic personal health record: a qualitative study of user requirements in chronic kidney disease. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:329. [PMID: 34819050 PMCID: PMC8611831 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01689-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To improve chronic disease outcomes, self-management is an effective strategy. An electronic personal health record (ePHR) is a promising tool with the potential to support chronic patient’s education, counseling, and self-management. Fitting ePHRs within the daily practices of chronic care providers and chronic patients requires user-centered design approaches. We aimed to understand users’ needs and requirements in chronic kidney disease (CKD) care to consider in the design of an ePHR to facilitate its implementation, adoption, and use. Methods A qualitative study was conducted in a major Iranian nephrology center including inpatient and outpatient settings in 2019. We conducted 28 semi-structured interviews with CKD patients, nurses, and adult nephrologists. To confirm or modify the requirements extracted from the interviews, a focus group was also held. Data were analyzed to extract especially those requirements that can facilitate implementation, adoption, and sustained use based on the PHR adoption model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Results Participants requested an ePHR that provides access to up to date patient information, facilitates patient-provider communication, and increases awareness about patient individualized conditions. Participants expected a system that is able to cater to low patient e-health literacy and high provider workload. They requested the ePHR to include purposeful documentation of medical history, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, tailored educational content, and scheduled care reminders. Messaging function, tailored educational content to individual patients’ conditions, and controlled access to information were highly valued in order to facilitate its implementation, adoption, and use. Conclusions We focused on the ePHR’s content and functionalities in the face of facilitators and/or barriers envisioned for its adoption in nephrology care. Designers and implementers should value CKD patients’ needs and requirements for self-management such as providing personalized education and counseling (on the basis of their condition and risk factors), health literacy, and disease progression levels. The socio-technical aspects of care also need further attention to facilitate ePHR’s adoption. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01689-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmaeel Toni
- Student Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.,Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Habibollah Pirnejad
- Patient Safety Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.,Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Khadijeh Makhdoomi
- Department of Adult Nephrology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.,Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Azam Mivefroshan
- Department of Adult Nephrology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Zahra Niazkhani
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harahap NC, Handayani PW, Hidayanto AN. Functionalities and Issues in the Implementation of Personal Health Records: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e26236. [PMID: 34287210 PMCID: PMC8339989 DOI: 10.2196/26236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Functionalities of personal health record (PHR) are evolving, and continued discussions about PHR functionalities need to be performed to keep it up-to-date. Technological issues such as nonfunctional requirements should also be discussed in the implementation of PHR. Objective This study systematically reviewed the main functionalities and issues in implementing the PHR. Methods This systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search is performed using the online databases Scopus, ScienceDirect, IEEE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PubMed for English journal articles and conference proceedings published between 2015 and 2020. Results A total of 105 articles were selected in the review. Seven function categories were identified in this review, which is grouped into basic and advanced functions. Health records and administrative records were grouped into basic functions. Medication management, communication, appointment management, education, and self-health monitoring were grouped into advanced functions. The issues found in this study include interoperability, security and privacy, usability, data quality, and personalization. Conclusions In addition to PHR basic and advanced functions, other supporting functionalities may also need to be developed based on the issues identified in this study. This paper provides an integrated PHR architectural model that describes the functional requirements and data sources of PHRs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Benjamins J, Haveman-Nies A, Gunnink M, Goudkuil A, de Vet E. How the Use of a Patient-Accessible Health Record Contributes to Patient-Centered Care: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e17655. [PMID: 33427683 PMCID: PMC7834934 DOI: 10.2196/17655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, patient-centered care is becoming a widely used concept in medical practice, getting more and more attention because of its proven ability to improve quality of care and reduce costs. Although several studies show that patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) influence certain aspects of patient-centered care, the possible contribution of PAEHR implementation to patient-centered care as a comprehensive concept has not, to our knowledge, been structurally evaluated to date. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to review whether and how the use of PAEHRs contributes to patient-centered care both in general and among specific population groups. METHODS We followed PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines. We identified literature in 5 databases, using the terms "patient-accessible medical records," "patient experiences," and "professional experiences" as key concepts. A total of 49 articles were included and analyzed with a charting code list containing 10 elements of patient-centered care. RESULTS Studies were diverse in design, country of origin, functionalities of the investigated PAEHR, and target population. Participants in all studies were adults. Most studies reported positive influence of PAEHR use on patient-centered care; patient accessible health records were appreciated for their opportunity to empower patients, inform patients about their health, and involve patients in their own care. There were mixed results for the extent to which PAEHRs affected the relation between patients and clinicians. Professionals and patients in mental health care held opposing views concerning the impact of transparency, where professionals appeared more worried about potential negative impact of PAEHRs on the patient-clinician relationship. Their worries seemed to be influenced by a reluctant attitude toward patient-centered care. Disadvantaged groups appeared to have less access to and make less use of patient-accessible records than the average population but experienced more benefits than the average population when they actually used PAEHRs. CONCLUSIONS The review indicates that PAEHRs bear the potential to positively contribute to patient-centered care. However, concerns from professionals about the impact of transparency on the patient-clinician relationship as well as the importance of a patient-centered attitude need to be addressed. Potentially significant benefits for disadvantaged groups will be achieved only through easily accessible and user-friendly PAEHRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Benjamins
- Icare JGZ, Meppel, Netherlands.,Chairgroup Consumption & Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Annemien Haveman-Nies
- Chairgroup Consumption & Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.,GGD NOG, Warnsveld, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Emely de Vet
- Chairgroup Consumption & Healthy Lifestyles, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alturkistani A, Qavi A, Anyanwu PE, Greenfield G, Greaves F, Costelloe C. Patient Portal Functionalities and Patient Outcomes Among Patients With Diabetes: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e18976. [PMID: 32960182 PMCID: PMC7539164 DOI: 10.2196/18976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient portal use could help improve the care and health outcomes of patients with diabetes owing to functionalities, such as appointment booking, electronic messaging (e-messaging), and repeat prescription ordering, which enable patient-centered care and improve patient self-management of the disease. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to summarize the evidence regarding patient portal use (portals that are connected to electronic health care records) or patient portal functionality use (eg, appointment booking and e-messaging) and their reported associations with health and health care quality outcomes among adult patients with diabetes. METHODS We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases and reported the review methodology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Three independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and two reviewers assessed the full texts of relevant studies and performed data extraction and quality assessments of the included studies. We used the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Study Quality Assessment Tool to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Data were summarized through narrative synthesis. RESULTS Twelve studies were included in this review. Five studies reported overall patient portal use and its association with diabetes health and health care quality outcomes. Six studies reported e-messaging or email use-associated outcomes, and two studies reported prescription refill-associated outcomes. The reported health outcomes included the associations of patient portal use with blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and BMI. Few studies reported health care utilization outcomes such as office visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. A limited number of studies reported overall quality of care for patients with diabetes who used patient portals. CONCLUSIONS The included studies mostly reported improved glycemic control outcomes for patients with diabetes who used patient portals. However, limitations of studying the effects of patient portals exist, which do not guarantee whether the outcomes reported are completely the result of patient portal use or if confounding factors exist. Randomized controlled trials and mixed-methods studies could help understand the mechanisms involved in health outcome improvements and patient portal use among patients with diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42019141131; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019141131. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/14975.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrar Alturkistani
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ambar Qavi
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Emeka Anyanwu
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Geva Greenfield
- Public Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Felix Greaves
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ceire Costelloe
- Global Digital Health Unit, Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Niazkhani Z, Toni E, Cheshmekaboodi M, Georgiou A, Pirnejad H. Barriers to patient, provider, and caregiver adoption and use of electronic personal health records in chronic care: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20:153. [PMID: 32641128 PMCID: PMC7341472 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01159-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Electronic personal health records (ePHRs) are defined as electronic applications through which individuals can access, manage, and share health information in a private, secure, and confidential environment. Existing evidence shows their benefits in improving outcomes, especially for chronic disease patients. However, their use has not been as widespread as expected partly due to barriers faced in their adoption and use. We aimed to identify the types of barriers to a patient, provider, and caregiver adoption/use of ePHRs and to analyze their extent in chronic disease care. Methods A systematic search in Medline, PubMed, Science Direct, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) database was performed to find original studies assessing barriers to ePHR adoption/use in chronic care until the end of 2018. Two researchers independently screened and extracted data. We used the PHR adoption model and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to analyze the results. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 was used to assess the quality of evidence in the included studies. Results Sixty publications met our inclusion criteria. Issues found hindering ePHR adoption/use in chronic disease care were associated with demographic factors (e.g., patient age and gender) along with key variables related to health status, computer literacy, preferences for direct communication, and patient’s strategy for coping with a chronic condition; as well as factors related to medical practice/environment (e.g., providers’ lack of interest or resistance to adopting ePHRs due to workload, lack of reimbursement, and lack of user training); technological (e.g., concerns over privacy and security, interoperability with electronic health record systems, and lack of customized features for chronic conditions); and chronic disease characteristics (e.g., multiplicities of co-morbid conditions, settings, and providers involved in chronic care). Conclusions ePHRs can be meaningfully used in chronic disease care if they are implemented as a component of comprehensive care models specifically developed for this care. Our results provide insight into hurdles and barriers mitigating ePHR adoption/use in chronic disease care. A deeper understating of the interplay between these barriers will provide opportunities that can lead to an enhanced ePHR adoption/use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Niazkhani
- Nephrology and Kidney Transplant Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.,Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Esmaeel Toni
- Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.,Student Research Committee, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Mojgan Cheshmekaboodi
- Office for Disease Registry and Health Outcomes, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Andrew Georgiou
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Habibollah Pirnejad
- Department of Health Information Technology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran. .,Patient Safety Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran. .,Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Enrique A, Duffy D, Lawler K, Richards D, Jones S. An internet-delivered self-management programme for bipolar disorder in mental health services in Ireland: Results and learnings from a feasibility trial. Clin Psychol Psychother 2020; 27:925-939. [PMID: 32445611 PMCID: PMC7754375 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic condition that requires continued care. Psychological interventions are recommended by clinical guidelines but there are treatment barriers that prevent patients to access these services. Internet-delivered self-management interventions are promising alternatives to improve treatment accessibility in patients with BD. Several studies indicate that these interventions are acceptable and beneficial for patients with BD, but no studies have been conducted in routine care settings. This trial aimed to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of implementing an internet-delivered, clinician-supported intervention for BD as an adjunct to treatment as usual at two secondary-care services in Ireland. This study used an uncontrolled design with mixed-methods evaluation. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed in terms of recruitment, use of the intervention, and satisfaction from both clinicians and patients' perspectives. Personal recovery, quality of life, and severity of symptoms were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Fifteen patients signed consent and used the programme for 10 weeks. Usage of the intervention was adequate with high frequency of tool usage. There was a significant improvement in patients' sense of personal recovery (z = 2.38, p = .017). The intervention was found acceptable and easy-to-use; however, implementation barriers will need to be overcome for scaling the intervention. This is the first study testing the feasibility of a digital intervention for patients with BD in public mental health services in Ireland. More research is needed in order to increase the understanding of how to promote the integration and the uptake of digital interventions for individuals with BD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Enrique
- E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.,Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Daniel Duffy
- E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.,Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kate Lawler
- E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.,Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Derek Richards
- E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.,Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Steven Jones
- Spectrum Centre for Mental Health Research, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|