Addressing lung transplant with adults with cystic fibrosis: A qualitative analysis of patients' perspectives and experiences

How Would We Treat Our Own Cystic Fibrosis With Lung Transplantation?

Lung transplantation is the only therapy for patients with end-stage lung disease. In advanced lung diseases such as cystic fibrosis (CF), life expectancy increases, and it is important to recognize extrapulmonary comorbidities. Cardiovascular involvement, including pulmonary hypertension, right-heart failure, and myocardial dysfunction, are manifest in the late stages of CF disease. Besides right-heart failure, left-heart dysfunction seems to be underestimated. Therefore, an optimal anesthesia and surgical management risk evaluation in this high-risk patient population is mandatory, especially concerning the perioperative use of mechanical circulatory support. The use of an index case of an older patient with the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis demonstrates the importance of early risk stratification and strategy planning in a multidisciplinary team approach to guarantee successful lung transplantation.

Take on transplant: human-centered design of a patient education tool to facilitate informed discussions about lung transplant among people with cystic fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

Lung transplant (LTx) saves lives in cystic fibrosis (CF). However, many potential candidates express uncertainty about LTx and die before receiving this treatment. CF guidelines recommend LTx education and clinical discussions well before the need for LTx arises, but limited patient resources exist.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We engaged people with CF and CF physicians in human-centered design of "Take On Transplant" (TOT), a web-based education tool to prepare patients for LTx discussions. Across 3 phases, needs assessment, design groups, and iterative user testing of TOT, we refined TOT from wireframe prototypes, to an interactive website, to a fully functional intervention ready for clinical trials.

RESULTS

Fifty-five people with CF and 105 physicians identified information needs to prepare for LTx discussions. Design groups (n = 14 participants) then established core requirements: didactic education ("Resource Library"), patient narratives ("CF Stories"), frequently asked questions ("FAQ"), and self-assessment to tailor content ("My CF Stage"). Iterative usability testing (n = 39) optimized the design of CF Stories and prototype layout. We then developed the TOT website and demonstrated feasibility and preliminary efficacy of use through 2-week field testing (n = 9).

DISCUSSION

Our human-centered design process provided guidance for educational tools to serve the evolving needs of potential LTx candidates. Our findings support the process of patient deliberation as a foundation for shared decision-making in CF, and inform educational tools that could potentially translate beyond LTx.

CONCLUSION

TOT fills a critical gap in preparing people with CF for shared decision-making about LTx and may serve as a model for educational tools for other preference-sensitive decisions.

2022 Update of indications and contraindications for lung transplantation in France

Lung transplantation (LTx) is a steadily expanding field. The considerable developments have been driven over the years by indefatigable work conducted at LTx centers to improve donor and recipient selection, combined with multifaceted efforts to overcome challenges raised by the surgical procedure, perioperative care, and long-term medical complications. One consequence has been a pruning away of contraindications over time, which has, in some ways, complicated the patient selection process. The Francophone Pulmonology Society (Société de Pneumology de Langue Française, SPLF) set up a task force to produce up-to-date working guidelines designed to assist pulmonologists in managing end-stage respiratory insufficiency, determining which patients may be eligible for LTx, and appropriately timing LTx-center referral. The task force examined the most recent literature and evaluated the risk factors that limit patient survival after LTx. Ideally, the objectives of LTx are to prolong life while also improving quality of life. The guidelines developed by the task force apply to a limited resource and are consistent with the ethical principles described below.

Pretransplant Patient Education in Solid-organ Transplant: A Narrative Review

Education for pretransplant, solid-organ recipient candidates aims to improve knowledge and understanding about the transplant process, outcomes, and potential complications to support informed, shared decision-making to reduce fears and anxieties about transplant, inform expectations, and facilitate adjustment to posttransplant life. In this review, we summarize novel pretransplant initiatives and approaches to educate solid-organ transplant recipient candidates. First, we review approaches that may be common to all solid-organ transplants, then we summarize interventions specific to kidney, liver, lung, and heart transplant. We describe evidence that emphasizes the need for multidisciplinary approaches to transplant education. We also summarize initiatives that consider online (eHealth) and mobile (mHealth) solutions. Finally, we highlight education initiatives that support racialized or otherwise marginalized communities to improve equitable access to solid-organ transplant. A considerable amount of work has been done in solid-organ transplant since the early 2000s with promising results. However, many studies on education for pretransplant recipient candidates involve relatively small samples and nonrandomized designs and focus on short-term surrogate outcomes. Overall, many of these studies have a high risk of bias. Frequently, interventions assessed are not well characterized or they are combined with administrative and data-driven initiatives into multifaceted interventions, which makes it difficult to assess the impact of the education component on outcomes. In the future, well-designed studies rigorously assessing well-defined surrogate and clinical outcomes will be needed to evaluate the impact of many promising initiatives.

Enhancing care for individuals with advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease

While remarkable advances in cystic fibrosis (CF) care have led to improvements in survival and quality of life, many individuals with CF are living with advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease (ACFLD) and others will face continued disease progression and its associated complex treatments and choices. This review will provide a summary of recently published guidelines for ACFLD care and lung transplant referral and highlight ongoing work to enhance the care of those with ACFLD through improvements in medical and psychosocial care, palliative care, and care around lung transplantation.

Incorporating patient and caregiver feedback into lung transplant referral guidelines for individuals with cystic fibrosis-Preliminary findings from a novel paradigm

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is a common therapeutic option for individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) and advanced lung disease, yet many individuals with CF are not appropriately referred for evaluation. The present study sought to enhance CF transplant referral guidelines by integrating patient-centered input to identify possible psychosocial barriers contributing to suboptimal referral for appropriate CF transplant candidates.

METHODS

As a component of developing the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) Lung Transplant Referral Consensus Guidelines, we convened a focus group of lung transplant recipients with CF and two spouses of CF recipients. Each session involved standardized approaches to elicit qualitative, thematic content.

RESULTS

CF patients and caregivers characterized five areas for improvement, which were integrated into formal CFF referral guidelines. These included (a) timing of transplant discussion with CF providers, (b) accuracy of transplant-related knowledge and expectations, (c) stigma associated with the need for transplantation, (d) treatment team transition issues, and (e) social support and mental health concerns. Earlier introduction of transplant, greater details regarding manageable aspects of treatment, and greater provision of social support were all associated with better psychosocial experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating patient-centered input into guideline development yielded important and previously unknown psychosocial barriers contributing to suboptimal transplant referral.

Unplanned Admission to the ICU: A Qualitative Study Examining Family Member Experiences

BACKGROUND

Transfers to the ICU from acute care are common, and it is essential to understand how family members of critically ill patients experience these transitions of care.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can we enhance our understanding of family members' experiences during hospital stays complicated by a patient's unplanned admission to the ICU?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with family members of patients were transferred from acute care to the ICU at a level I trauma center in Seattle, WA (n = 17). To organize data, we used thematic analysis, coupled with a validated conceptual model of clinician-surrogate communication.

RESULTS

Drawing from a validated conceptual model, we used two domains to frame our coding: "information processing" and "relationship building." Within information processing, we coded information disclosure, sensemaking, and expectations; within relationship building, we coded emotional support, trust, and consensus and conflict. Family members wanted timely, accurate information about the patient's condition both during and after transfer. An unplanned ICU admission was a stressful event for family members, who looked to clinicians for emotional support. Developing trust was challenging, because family members struggled to feel like integrated members of the medical team when patients transitioned from one setting to another.

INTERPRETATION

Family of patients who experience an unplanned ICU admission want high-quality communication both during and after a patient's transfer to the ICU. This communication should help family members make sense of the situation, address unmet expectations, and provide emotional support. In addition, interventions that foster family-clinician trust can help family members feel like integrated members of the care team as they face the challenge of navigating multiple different environments within the hospital.

Lung transplant referral practice patterns: a survey of cystic fibrosis physicians and general pulmonologists

BACKGROUND

Many individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) die from respiratory failure without referral for lung transplant. Physician practices that may expedite, delay, or preclude referral, are poorly understood.

METHODS

Two parallel, web-based surveys focusing on lung transplant referral triggers and barriers, as well as pre-referral evaluation, were emailed to pulmonologists practicing in the New England region. One questionnaire was sent to CF providers (n = 61), and the second to general pulmonary providers practicing at the same institutions (n = 61).

RESULTS

There were 43 (70%) responses to the CF provider survey, and 25 (41%) responses to the general pulmonary ('non-CF') provider survey. Primary reasons for CF providers to refer their patients included: rapidly declining lung function (91%) and a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) below 30% predicted (74%). The greatest barriers to referral for both CF and non-CF providers included active tobacco use (65 and 96%, respectively, would not refer), and active alcohol or other substance use or dependence (63 and 80%). Furthermore, up to 42% of CF providers would potentially delay their referral if triple-combination therapy or other promising new, disease-specific therapy were anticipated. In general, non-CF providers perform a more robust pre-referral medical work-up, while CF providers complete a psychosocial evaluation in higher numbers. Across both groups, communication with lung transplant programs was reported to be inadequate.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician-level barriers to timely lung transplant referral exist and need to be addressed. Enhanced communication between lung transplant programs and pulmonary providers may reduce these barriers.