1
|
Mankarious MM, Eng NL, Portolese AC, Deutsch MJ, Lynn P, Kulaylat AS, Scow JS. Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy reduces superficial surgical site infections after open colon surgery: an NSQIP Colectomy Study. J Hosp Infect 2024; 145:187-192. [PMID: 38272123 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) has increased in the last decade across surgical fields, including colectomy. AIM To compare postoperative outcomes associated with use of iNPWT following open colectomy from a large national database. METHODS A retrospective review of patients who underwent operations from 2015 to 2020 was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Targeted Colectomy Database. Intraoperative placement of iNPWT was identified in patients undergoing open abdominal operations with closure of all wound layers including skin. Propensity score matching was performed to define a control group who underwent closure of all wound layers without iNPWT. Patients were matched in a 1:4 (iNPWT vs control) ratio and postoperative rates of superficial, deep and organ-space surgical site infection (SSI), wound disruption, and readmission. FINDINGS A matched cohort of 1884 was selected. Patients with iNPWT had longer median operative time (170 (interquartile range: 129-232) vs 161 (114-226) min; P<0.05). Compared to patients without iNPWT, patients with iNPWT experienced a lower rate of 30-day superficial incisional SSI (3% vs 7%; P<0.05) and readmissions (10% vs 14%; P<0.05). iNPWT did not decrease risk of deep SSI, organ-space SSI, or wound disruption. CONCLUSION Although there is a slightly increased operative time, utilization of iNPWT in open colectomy is associated with lower odds of superficial SSI and 30-day readmission. This suggests that iNPWT should be routinely utilized in open colon surgery to improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Mankarious
- Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - N L Eng
- Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - A C Portolese
- Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - M J Deutsch
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - P Lynn
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - A S Kulaylat
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - J S Scow
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tendeiro D, Mestre T, Martins H, Carmo A. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients with closed surgical wound: An integrative review. Turk J Surg 2023; 39:283-292. [PMID: 38694521 PMCID: PMC11057936 DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
Surgical site infection is the leading healthcare-associated infection and a major contributor to rising healthcare costs. Implementation of measures to reduce this problem, particularly the prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy, may be an effective and promising method to reduce the risk of surgical site infection in patients with closed surgical wounds. The aim of the study was to identify the effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy as a prophylactic measure in reducing the risk of surgical site infection in patients with a closed surgical wound. Whittemore and Knafl's five-step integrative review framework was carried out using three electronic databases. MEDLINE with Full-text, CINAHL with Full-text and Academic Search Complete were searched through the EBSCOhost Web platform. Articles search publication date was between 2018 and 2022. Nine studies were identified that addressed the effectiveness of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in reducing the risk of surgical site infection in the patient with a closed surgical wound. There was also evidence of effectiveness in reducing surgical wound dehiscence, drainage output and drainage time, as well as reducing the incidence of hospital readmissions and the need for wound debridement. Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy can be an effective treatment option, among others, in reducing the risk of surgical site infection in patients with a closed surgical wound. This evidence promotes improved clinical practice regarding the management of the closed surgical wound, promoting health gains for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Tendeiro
- Department of Infectiology, University Hospital Centre of Algarve, Faro, Portugal
| | - Teresa Mestre
- Department of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Beja, Beja, Portugal
| | - Helga Martins
- Department of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Beja, Beja, Portugal
| | - André Carmo
- Department of Surgery, Local Health Unit of Baixo Alentejo, Beja, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Groenen H, Jalalzadeh H, Buis DR, Dreissen YE, Goosen JH, Griekspoor M, Harmsen WJ, IJpma FF, van der Laan MJ, Schaad RR, Segers P, van der Zwet WC, de Jonge SW, Orsini RG, Eskes AM, Wolfhagen N, Boermeester MA. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site infection: an up-to-date meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 62:102105. [PMID: 37538540 PMCID: PMC10393772 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The evidence on prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy on primary closed incisional wounds (iNPWT) for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) is confusing and ambiguous. Implementation in daily practice is impaired by inconsistent recommendations in current international guidelines and published meta-analyses. More recently, multiple new randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been published. We aimed to provide an overview of all meta-analyses and their characteristics; to conduct a new and up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment; and to explore the additive value of new RCTs with a trial sequential analysis (TSA). Methods PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from database inception to October 24, 2022. We identified existing meta-analyses covering all surgical specialties and RCTs studying the effect of iNPWT compared with standard dressings in all types of surgery on the incidence of SSI, wound dehiscence, reoperation, seroma, hematoma, mortality, readmission rate, skin blistering, skin necrosis, pain, and adverse effects of the intervention. We calculated relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. We assessed publication bias with a comparison-adjusted funnel plot. TSA was used to assess the risk of random error. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 (RoB2) tool and GRADE approach. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022312995. Findings We identified eight previously published general meta-analyses investigating iNPWT and compared their results to present meta-analysis. For the updated systematic review, 57 RCTs with 13,744 patients were included in the quantitative analysis for SSI, yielding a RR of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.59-0.76, I2 = 21%) for iNPWT compared with standard dressing. Certainty of evidence was high. Compared with previous meta-analyses, the RR stabilised, and the confidence interval narrowed. In the TSA, the cumulative Z-curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit, confirming the robustness of the summary effect estimate from the meta-analysis. Interpretation In this up-to-date meta-analysis, GRADE assessment shows high-certainty evidence that iNPWT is effective in reducing SSI, and uncertainty is less than in previous meta-analyses. TSA indicated that further trials are unlikely to change the effect estimate for the outcome SSI; therefore, if future research is to be conducted on iNPWT, it is crucial to consider what the findings will contribute to the existing robust evidence. Funding Dutch Association for Quality Funds Medical Specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Groenen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
| | - Hasti Jalalzadeh
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
| | - Dennis R. Buis
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yasmine E.M. Dreissen
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jon H.M. Goosen
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Netherlands
| | - Mitchel Griekspoor
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wouter J. Harmsen
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Frank F.A. IJpma
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Maarten J. van der Laan
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Roald R. Schaad
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- Dutch Association of Anesthesiology (NVA), Netherlands
| | - Patrique Segers
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Wil C. van der Zwet
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Stijn W. de Jonge
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ricardo G. Orsini
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Anne M. Eskes
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Niels Wolfhagen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
| | - Marja A. Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Dutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cooper HJ, Singh DP, Gabriel A, Mantyh C, Silverman R, Griffin L. Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy versus Standard of Care in Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11:e4722. [PMID: 36936465 PMCID: PMC10019176 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000004722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been utilized to help manage closed incisions across many surgical specialties. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of ciNPT on postsurgical and health economic outcomes. Methods A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT to standard-of-care dressings between January 2005 and August 2021. Study participant characteristics, surgical procedure, dressings used, treatment duration, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Risk ratios summarized dichotomous outcomes. Difference in means or standardized difference in means was used to assess continuous variables reported on the same scale or outcomes reported on different scales/measurement instruments. Results The literature search identified 84 studies for analysis. Significant reductions in surgical site complication (SSC), surgical site infection (SSI), superficial SSI, deep SSI, seroma, dehiscence, skin necrosis, and prolonged incisional drainage were associated with ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Reduced readmissions and reoperations were significant in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05). Patients receiving ciNPT had a 0.9-day shorter hospital stay (P < 0.0001). Differences in postoperative pain scores and reported amounts of opioid usage were significant in favor of ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Scar evaluations demonstrated improved scarring in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05). Discussion For these meta-analyses, ciNPT use was associated with statistically significant reduction in SSCs, SSIs, seroma, dehiscence, and skin necrosis incidence. Reduced readmissions, reoperation, length of hospital stay, decreased pain scores and opioid use, and improved scarring were also observed in ciNPT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. John Cooper
- From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, N.Y
| | - Devinder P. Singh
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Miami Health System and Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Fla
| | | | | | - Ronald Silverman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
- Medical Solutions Division, 3M, St Paul, Minn
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meyer J, Roos E, Davies RJ, Buchs NC, Ris F, Toso C. Does Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Laparotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled trials. World J Surg 2023; 47:1464-1474. [PMID: 36658232 PMCID: PMC10156868 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06908-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) may prevent surgical site infection (SSI) after laparotomy, but existing meta-analyses pooling only high-quality evidence have failed to confirm this effect. Recently, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to determine if pNPWT reduces the incidence of SSI after laparotomy. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched on the 25.08.2021 for RCTs reporting on the incidence of SSI in patients who underwent laparotomy with and without pNPWT. The systematic review was compliant with the AMSTAR2 recommendation and registered into PROSPERO. Risk ratios (RR) for SSI in patients with pNPWT, and risk difference (RD) between control and pNPWT patients, were obtained using random effects models. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 value, and investigated using subgroup analyses, funnel plots and bubble plots. Risk of bias of included RCTs was assessed using the RoB2 tool. RESULTS Eleven RCTs were included, representing 973 patients who received pNPWT and 970 patients who received standard wound dressing. Pooled RR and RD between patients with and without pNPWT were of, respectively, 0.665 (95% CI 0.49-0.91, I2: 38.7%, p = 0.0098) and -0.07 (95% CI -0.12 to -0.03, I2: 53.6%, p = 0.0018), therefore demonstrating that pNPWT decreases the incidence of SSI after laparotomy. Investigation of source of heterogeneity identified a potential small-study effect. CONCLUSION The protective effect of pNPWT against SSI after laparotomy is confirmed by high-quality pooled evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Meyer
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland.
- Unit of Surgical Research, Medical School, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Elin Roos
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Richard Justin Davies
- Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicolas Christian Buchs
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland
- Unit of Surgical Research, Medical School, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frédéric Ris
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland
- Unit of Surgical Research, Medical School, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Christian Toso
- Division of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland
- Unit of Surgical Research, Medical School, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lakhani A, Jamel W, Riddiough GE, Cabalag CS, Stevens S, Liu DS. Prophylactic negative pressure wound dressings reduces wound complications following emergency laparotomies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2022:S0039-6060(22)00405-6. [PMID: 35779950 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wound complications are a common cause of postoperative morbidity and incur significant healthcare costs. Recent studies have shown that negative pressure wound dressings reduce wound complication rates, particularly surgical site infections, after elective laparotomies. The clinical utility of prophylactic negative pressure wound dressings for closed emergency laparotomy incisions remains controversial. This meta-analysis investigated the rates of wound complications after emergency laparotomy when a negative pressure wound dressing was applied. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, and Clinialtrials.gov databases were searched from January 1, 2005, to April 1, 2022. All studies comparing negative pressure wound dressings to standard dressings on closed emergency laparotomy incisions were included. RESULTS A total of 1,199 (negative pressure wound dressings: 566, standard dressing: 633) patients from 7 (prospective: 4, retrospective: 3) studies were identified. Overall, the surgical site infection (superficial/deep) rate was 13.6% (77/566) vs 25.1% (159/633) in the negative pressure wound dressing versus standard dressing groups, respectively (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.62). Wound breakdown (skin/fascial dehiscence) was significantly lower in the negative pressure wound dressing (7.7%) group compared to the standard dressing (16.9%) group (odds ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.72). The incidence of overall wound complications was significantly lower in the negative pressure wound dressing (15.9%) group compared to the standard dressing (30.4%) group (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.59). No significant differences were found in hospital length-of-stay and readmission rates. CONCLUSION Prophylactic negative pressure wound dressings for closed emergency laparotomy incisions were associated with a significant reduction in surgical site infections, wound breakdown, and overall wound complications, thus supporting its clinical use.
Collapse
|
7
|
Romo-Rico J, Krishna SM, Bazaka K, Golledge J, Jacob MV. Potential of plant secondary metabolite-based polymers to enhance wound healing. Acta Biomater 2022; 147:34-49. [PMID: 35649506 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
There is a global epidemic of non-healing wounds. Chronic inflammation, overexpression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress and bacterial infection are implicated in delayed wound healing. Natural extracts are a rich source of bioactive molecules called plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) that include terpenes and phenols. These molecules may facilitate wound healing through their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial activity. After briefly outlining the process of wound healing and how it is compromised in chronic wounds, this review focuses on investigating how PSMs-based polymers may improve wound healing. Best methods for incorporating PSMs into wound dressings are reviewed and critically compared. The exiting body of literature strongly suggests that PSMs-based polymers incorporated into wound dressings could have clinical value in aiding wound healing. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Chronic wounds develop by the persistence of inflammation, oxidative stress and infection. Chronic wounds affect the worldwide population, by reducing quality of life of patients with significant cost to healthcare systems. To help chronic wounds to heal and overcome this burden, materials with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antibacterial properties are required. Plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) are volatile materials that have all these properties. PSMs-based polymers can be fabricated by polymerization techniques. The present review provides an overview of the state-of-the-art of the wound healing mechanisms of PSMs. Current developments in the field of PSMs-based polymers are reviewed and their potential use as wound dressings is also covered.
Collapse
|