A better definition of the anti-DFS70 antibody screening by IIF methods

A novel magnetic bead-based immunoprecipitation method for anti-dense fine speckled 70 antibodies

The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) on HEp-2 cells has been widely used for screening anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) that are associated with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). Sera containing ANA display multiple distinct fluorescence patterns on HEp-2 cells. Among them, a dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern caused by anti-DFS70 antibodies has been reported to have higher prevalence in healthy individuals than in patients with SARD. This DFS pattern is often difficult to distinguish amongst other SARD-associated ANA patterns, in particular a mixed homogeneous and speckled pattern. Furthermore, a strong DFS pattern can mask other SARD-associated patterns. Hence, we developed a novel immunoprecipitation method using magnetic beads to remove anti-DFS70 antibodies in serum prior to running IIFA. We also aimed to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 and to uncover any SARD-associated ANA patterns masked by a strong DFS pattern. The sera used in our study were from 70 individuals who had routine ANA screen, of which 35 sera had an isolated DFS pattern with monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies confirmed by a complementary assay, and 35 were control sera without a DFS pattern. An immunoprecipitation method using magnetic beads coated with recombinant human full length DFS70 protein was developed. The performance of this new method was evaluated in comparison to an immunoadsorption method using the same DFS70 protein. Our newly developed immunoprecipitation method demonstrated excellent sensitivity (91.4%) and specificity (100%) in confirming the DFS pattern associated with anti-DFS70 in sera. Additionally, our method was able to remove anti-DFS70 and uncover SARD-associated ANA patterns masked by a strong DFS pattern. It also showed a clearer background on IIFA than that of the immunoadsorption method. The novel magnetic bead-based immunoprecipitation method demonstrated satisfactory performance in removing anti-DFS70 without interfering with the detection of other antibodies. It can be easily integrated with IIFA to confirm anti-DFS70 associated DFS pattern. Additionally, it can simultaneously unmask other ANA patterns, which cannot be achieved by a conventional protocol that requires a complementary anti-DFS70 specific assay to be performed. Therefore, the novel method provides a more effective and accurate solution for ANA screening.

The Nuclear Dense Fine Speckled (DFS) Immunofluorescence Pattern: Not All Roads Lead to DFS70/LEDGFp75

The monospecific dense fine speckled (DFS) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) pattern is considered a potential marker to aid in exclusion of antinuclear antibody (ANA)-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD). This pattern is typically produced by autoantibodies against transcription co-activator DFS70/LEDGFp75, which are frequently found in healthy individuals and patients with miscellaneous inflammatory conditions. In AARD patients, these antibodies usually co-exist with disease-associated ANAs. Previous studies reported the occurrence of monospecific autoantibodies that generate a DFS-like or pseudo-DFS IFA pattern but do not react with DFS70/LEDGFp75. We characterized this pattern using confocal microscopy and immunoblotting. The target antigen associated with this pattern partially co-localized with DFS70/LEDGFp75 and its interacting partners H3K36me2, an active chromatin marker, and MLL, a transcription factor, in HEp-2 cells, suggesting a role in transcription. Immunoblotting did not reveal a common protein band immunoreactive with antibodies producing the pseudo-DFS pattern, suggesting they may recognize diverse proteins or conformational epitopes. Given the subjectivity of the HEp-2 IFA test, the awareness of pseudo-DFS autoantibodies reinforces recommendations for confirmatory testing when reporting patient antibodies producing a putative DFS pattern in a clinical setting. Future studies should focus on defining the potential diagnostic utility of the pseudo-DFS pattern and its associated antigen(s).

Investigation of dense fine speckled pattern and anti-dense fine speckled 70 antibody by a single step assay

The indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method is the gold standard for identifying anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs). It is recommended that ANA, including the dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern, should be verified with a highly specific confirmatory test after a sensitive screening test. Although methods such as ELISA and LIA are often used to confirm the presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies, new IIF methods have been developed in recent years to prevent the difficulties in the recognition of the DFS pattern and to carry out the confirmatory test in a single step. In this study, we evaluated CytoBead (Generic Assays, Germany) test, which contained both HEp-2 cell substrate and beads coated with DFS70 antigen in one well, in comparison to the routine two-step test strategy. Five hundred forty-one samples were studied by conventional IIF assay, LIA, and CytoBead assay; 264 samples were studied by ELISA. The Bead component of the CytoBead test was found to be reliable as a confirmational test when compared with ELISA and LIA (total agreement values were 85.6% and 87.6%, respectively). The CytoBead ANA DFS70 might be a promising test in the future, allowing both screening and confirmation in a single step, saving time and being easier than two-step testing.

Interkit Reproducibility of the Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay on HEp-2 Cells Depends on the Immunofluorescence Reactivity Intensity and Pattern

Introduction

The indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2/IFA) is used worldwide for screening for autoantibodies to cellular antigens. Cell culture and fixation methods influence the cell distribution of autoantigens and the preservation of epitopes. Therefore, discrepancy of results obtained using different HEp-2/IFA kits (interkit nonreproducibility) is a common phenomenon in the clinical laboratory routine.

Objective

This study evaluated the interkit nonreproducibility of HEp-2/IFA results using samples from patients with systemic autoimmune disease (SAD), nonautoimmune diseases (NAD), and healthy blood donors (HBD).

Methods

Serum from 275 SAD patients, 293 NAD patients, and 300 HBD were processed at 1:80 dilution using four HEp-2 kits according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Interkit reproducibility was determined for positive/negative results and patterns. The agreement of positive/negative results among kits for each sample was determined as the reactivity agreement score (RAS). The pattern reproducibility score (PRS) in each sample was calculated as a function of the number of kits showing equivalent patterns. Qualitative variables and ordinal variables were analyzed by the Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively.

Results

A total of 402 samples were nonreactive in all kits and were considered devoid of autoantibodies. Further analysis included the 466 reactive samples (238 SAD, 119 NAD, 109 HBD). Reactivity to the nucleus had the highest interkit reproducibility (RAS = 83.6), followed by the metaphase plate (RAS = 78.9), cytoplasm (RAS = 77.4), and nucleolus (RAS = 72.4). Interkit reproducibility was higher in SAD (RAS = 78.0) than in NAD (RAS = 70.6) and HBD (RAS = 71.3) groups. Samples with strong reactivity (++++/4 and +++/4) had higher interkit reproducibility than those with weak reactivity (+/4). In the SAD group, RAS for nuclear reactivity was 87.5% for strongly reactive samples as opposed to 4.4% for weakly reactive samples, and the same was observed for NAD and HBD samples. The most robust patterns were the centromere AC-3 (PRS = 78.4), multiple nuclear dots AC-6 (PRS = 73.6), nuclear coarse speckled AC-5 (PRS = 71.3), nuclear homogeneous AC-1 (PRS = 67.9), and the reticular cytoplasmic AC-21 (PRS = 68.6).

Conclusion

Interkit nonreproducibility in HEp-2/IFA is prevalent and occurs with the highest frequency with weakly reactive samples. International initiatives with the engagement of in vitro diagnostic industry are encouraged to promote the harmonization of the properties and performance of HEp-2/IFA commercial kits.

Low Prevalence of Anti-DFS70 Antibodies in Children With ANA-Associated Autoimmune Disease

INTRODUCTION

Anti-DFS70 antibodies occur in healthy individuals with various medical conditions. Unlike other anti-nuclear autoantibodies (ANA), they are not associated with systemic autoimmune disease in adult patients. To date, only a few studies have addressed the prevalence and/or clinical relevance of anti-DFS70 autoantibodies in children with and without autoimmune disease.

METHODS

Included in this retrospective cross-sectional mono-centric study were 308 pediatric patients with suspected or known autoimmune conditions who had a positive ANA in indirect immune fluorescence (IIF) screening and who were screened for anti-DFS70 antibodies by extractable nuclear antigen antibodies (ENA) immunoblot. Patients were assigned to four different diagnostic categories according to their diagnosis in the corresponding medical record: (a) absence of autoimmune or rheumatic disease (noARD, n = 116); (b) suspected autoimmunity without definitive diagnosis (sAI, n = 48); (c) other rheumatic disease (ORD) (n = 115); and (d) ANA-associated autoimmune disease (AARD, n = 29).

RESULTS

The prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in the overall cohort was 33.8%. Among children without ARD (46.6%, 54/116), prevalence was significantly higher than among children with ORD (23.7%, 27/115, p = 0.0003) or AARD (17.2%, 5/29, p = 0.0054). Among all of the anti-DFS70 positive patients with AARD, other autoantibodies were found in the ENA immunoblot. In contrast, among anti-DFS70 positive patients with ORD (11.5%, 4/27), sAI (33.3%, 6/18) and noARD (16.7%, 9/54), other autoantibodies infrequently were detected (p = 0.0005). Patients with uveitis rarely were positive for anti-DFS70 antibodies (7.7%, 1/13). No association was found between anti-DFS70 antibodies and a history of allergic conditions (p = 0.51). The concordance between a typical DFS pattern in IIF and the detection of anti-DFS70 antibodies by immunoblot was 59.3%.

CONCLUSION

As with adults, the higher prevalence of anti-DFS70 among children without autoimmune disease confirms the mutual exclusion for this autoantibody in the pathogenesis of ARD. Among ANA-positive children, monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies may help to discriminate between AARD and not-AARD-related conditions.

Antinuclear Autoantibodies in Health: Autoimmunity Is Not a Synonym of Autoimmune Disease

The incidence of autoimmune diseases is increasing. Antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing is a critical tool for their diagnosis. However, ANA prevalence in healthy persons has increased over the last decades, especially among young people. ANA in health occurs in low concentrations, with a prevalence up to 50% in some populations, which demands a cutoff revision. This review deals with the origin and probable physiological or compensatory function of ANA in health, according to the concept of immunological clearance, theory of autoimmune regulation of cell functions, and the concept of functional autoantibodies. Considering ANA titers ≤1:320 as a serological marker of autoimmune diseases seems inappropriate. The role of anti-DFS70/LEDGFp75 autoantibodies is highlighted as a possible anti-risk biomarker for autoimmune rheumatic disorders. ANA prevalence in health is different in various regions due to several underlying causes discussed in the review, all influencing additive combinations according to the concept of the mosaic of autoimmunity. Not only are titers, but also HEp-2 IFA) staining patterns, such as AC-2, important. Accepting autoantibodies as a kind of bioregulator, not only the upper, but also the lower borders of their normal range should be determined; not only their excess, but also a lack of them or "autoimmunodeficiency" could be the reason for disorders.

Frequency of ANA/DFS70 in Relatives of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and a Healthy Population, and its Association with Health Status

INTRODUCTION

DFS70 ANAs have attracted interest due to their frequency in individuals with no clinical evidence of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease, groups with genetic risk for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were not assessed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of ANA and DFS70 ANA in blood relatives (BR) of people with RA compared to patients with early RA (ERA), and control individuals, and its association with health status.

METHODOLOGY

A cross-sectional study with an analytical component. Sixty ERA patients, 60 BR and 120 control individuals paired by age and sex were studied. Hep2-ANA and DFS70 ANA were studied. The absolute and relative frequencies and associations were established using logistic regression models, with a significance level of 95%.

RESULTS

43% ANA in ERA, 30% in BR, and 25.8% in control individuals 1:80. The fine dense granular pattern based on conventional Hep2 was found in 12.9% of the positive samples, and 1.66% of the total samples. There was no detection of DFS70 ANAs in patients with ERA. In ERA there was an association between the presence of ANA and inflamed joints (p=.02), CRP (p=.01), DAS28CRP (p=.03) and HAQ (p=.04). There was an association between ANA and elevated CRP (p=.05) in the BR. In the control individuals, there was an association between ANA and painful joints (p=02). In DFS70 ANA individuals we observed an association between a normal ESR p=.032, BR (-), p=.044 and absence of painful joints, p=.039.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of DFS70 ANA in the groups studied was low, none of the patients with ERA was positive. The presence of DFS70 ANA was only confirmed in systemically healthy individuals.

Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey

Background

The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns.

Methods

Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians.

Results

438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories.

Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences.

Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative.

Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest.

Conclusion

This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.

Twenty years of research on the DFS70/LEDGF autoantibody-autoantigen system: many lessons learned but still many questions

The discovery and initial characterization 20 years ago of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) presenting a dense fine speckled (DFS) nuclear pattern with strong staining of mitotic chromosomes, detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay in HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IIFA test), has transformed our view on ANAs. Traditionally, ANAs have been considered as reporters of abnormal immunological events associated with the onset and progression of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), also called ANA-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD), as well as clinical biomarkers for the differential diagnosis of these diseases. However, based on our current knowledge, it is not apparent that autoantibodies presenting the DFS IIF pattern fall into these categories. These antibodies invariably target a chromatin-associated protein designated as dense fine speckled protein of 70 kD (DFS70), also known as lens epithelium-derived growth factor protein of 75 kD (LEDGF/p75) and PC4 and SFRS1 Interacting protein 1 (PSIP1). This multi-functional protein, hereafter referred to as DFS70/LEDGF, plays important roles in the formation of transcription complexes in active chromatin, transcriptional activation of specific genes, regulation of mRNA splicing, DNA repair, and cellular survival against stress. Due to its multiple functions, it has emerged as a key protein contributing to several human pathologies, including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), leukemia, cancer, ocular diseases, and Rett syndrome. Unlike other ANAs, "monospecific" anti-DFS70/LEDGF autoantibodies (only detectable ANA in serum) are not associated with SARD and have been detected in healthy individuals and some patients with non-SARD inflammatory conditions. These observations have led to the hypotheses that these antibodies could be considered as negative biomarkers of SARD and might even play a protective or beneficial role. In spite of 20 years of research on this autoantibody-autoantigen system, its biological and clinical significance still remains enigmatic. Here we review the current state of knowledge of this system, focusing on the lessons learned and posing emerging questions that await further scrutiny as we continue our quest to unravel its significance and potential clinical and therapeutic utility.

Only monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies aid in the exclusion of antinuclear antibody associated rheumatic diseases: an Italian experience

Background

The dense fine speckled (DFS) is one of the most common patterns that can be observed as a result of the anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) test on HEp-2 cells and is mostly caused by antibodies to DFS70 as the main antigenic target. As was recently demonstrated, isolated anti-DFS70 positivity can be used as an aid in the exclusion of ANA associated rheumatic diseases (AARD) due to the opportunity to better interpret unexplained positive IIF ANA results.

Methods

Our study included 333 subjects with AARD, 51 undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) patients, 235 disease controls and 149 healthy blood donors from an Italian cohort. All samples were tested for anti-DFS70 and anti-ENA antibodies using QUANTA Flash assays (Inova Diagnostics, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

No differences in the prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies were seen among AARD, non-AARD and UCTD (2.1% [7/333] vs. 2.3% [9/384] vs. 5.9% [3/51], respectively; p-value = 0.188). AARD patients positive for anti-DFS70 antibodies showed in all cases an accompanying anti-ENA specificity. In contrast, monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies showed a significantly different distribution with a clear trend across the main groups (AARD vs. non-AARD vs. UCTD: 0% [0/7] vs. 22% [2/9] vs. 100% [3/3], p = 0.007). Anti-DFS70 antibody levels among AARD, non-AARD and UCTD patients were not significantly different (p = 0.094). Within the anti-DFS70 antibody positive cases, AARD cohort showed a higher variability (median [min–max]: 3.2 [3.2–450.8] CU) compared to non-AARD (median [min–max]: 3.2 [3.2–75.7] CU) and UCTD patients (median [min–max]: 3.2 [3.2–59.0] CU).

Conclusions

Our preliminary data showed a similar frequency of anti-DFS70 antibodies in AARD, UCTD and non-AARD cohorts. Monospecificity of anti-DFS70 antibodies but not their mere presence is the key element in the diagnostic algorithm. Mono-specific anti-DFS70 antibodies might be a helpful biomarker to discriminate individuals with AARD from non-AARD presenting with a positive ANA.

Clinical significance of anti-DFS70 antibody in antinuclear antibody-positive samples with a dense fine speckled pattern

Background

When the dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern-antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are detected in the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assay, the presence of anti-dense fine speckles 70 (DFS70) antibodies has been suggested to facilitate the exclusion of ANA-associated rheumatic diseases (AARD). We evaluated the potential use of anti-DFS70 antibodies for verifying AARD in patients with a positive ANA result of the DFS pattern.

Methods

A total of 5509 patients who were requested ANA testing were included. The DFS pattern was confirmed using two IIF assays. Semiquantitative DFS70 ELISA (Euroimmun, Germany) was examined in samples with the DFS pattern.

Results

Among 639 ANA-positive patients, 19.6% displayed the DFS pattern. And 17.6% of patients with the DFS pattern were diagnosed with AARD. The low titer of 1:80 was more prevalent in the non-AARD group than in the AARD group (64.1% vs. 4.5%, p < 0.0001). Anti-DFS70 antibodies were positive in 60.0% of patients with the DFS pattern. The frequency of anti-DFS70 positivity was higher in the non-rheumatic disease (NRD) group (74.2%) than in the other rheumatic disease group (43.2%, p = 0.003) and the AARD group (45.5%, p = 0.019).

Conclusions

The DFS pattern is present in both AARD and non-AARD cases. In the DFS pattern, a low titer of 1:80 and isolated anti-DFS70 antibodies without AARD-associated antibodies represent a low likelihood of AARD. The presence of anti-DFS70 antibodies cannot exclude AARD and should be analyzed in combination with AARD-associated antibodies in the diagnostic algorithm.

Establishment of an international autoantibody reference standard for human anti-DFS70 antibodies: proof-of-concept study for a novel Megapool strategy by pooling individual specific sera

Background

International autoantibody standards, traditionally based on material obtained from plasmapheresis of single subjects, represent individual immune response and may not comprehend the heterogeneity of the general population. The anti-DFS70 autoantibody yields a characteristic dense fine speckled (DFS) nuclear pattern on indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2 IFA) and speaks against autoimmunity. We propose a novel strategy for developing autoantibody reference standards, based on stepwise pooling of serum samples from hundreds of individuals with anti-DFS70 antibodies.

Methods

Within a 2-year period, serum samples were selected from routine HEp-2 IFA according to the following criteria: DFS HEp-2 IFA pattern at titer ≥1:640; anti-DFS70 reactivity in three analyte-specific tests (Western blot [WB], enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and chemiluminescent immunoassay [CLIA]). Aliquots of individual samples were combined into progressively larger pools with stepwise validation of intermediary pools as for individual samples. Validated intermediary pools were merged into a final pool for lyophilization.

Results

A total of 741 validated samples yielded a 750 mL final pool that was lyophilized into thousands of 200 μL-aliquots. Reconstituted aliquots yielded the expected anti-DFS70 reactivity in ELISA, CLIA and WB, as well as high-titer DFS HEp-2 IFA pattern. The appropriate anti-DFS70 reactivity of the lyophilized pool was confirmed by seven international expert centers, using HEp-2 IFA, ELISA, WB and immunoprecipitation.

Conclusions

This proof-of-concept study provides an innovative and efficient strategy to build serum reference standards for autoantibody testing. The anti-DFS70 standard will integrate the panel of standards of Autoantibody Standardization Committee (ASC, www.autoab.org), contributing to education for proper assay validation and interpretation of the DFS pattern and other HEp-2 IFA patterns.

Clinical relevance of HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescent patterns: the International Consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP) perspective

The indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) on HEp-2 cells is widely used for detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA). The dichotomous outcome, negative or positive, is integrated in diagnostic and classification criteria for several systemic autoimmune diseases. However, the HEp-2 IIFA test has much more to offer: besides the titre or fluorescence intensity, it also provides fluorescence pattern(s). The latter include the nucleus and the cytoplasm of interphase cells as well as patterns associated with mitotic cells. The International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) initiative has previously reached consensus on the nomenclature and definitions of HEp-2 IIFA patterns. In the current paper, the ICAP consensus is presented on the clinical relevance of the 29 distinct HEp-2 IIFA patterns. This clinical relevance is primarily defined within the context of the suspected disease and includes recommendations for follow-up testing. The discussion includes how this information may benefit the clinicians in daily practice and how the knowledge can be used to further improve diagnostic and classification criteria.

Increased prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in young females: experience from a large international multi-center study on blood donors

Background

Isolated antibodies to DFS70 have been described in healthy individuals and are rarely found in patients with antinuclear antibody-associated autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AARD). However, no data is available on geographic differences in the prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies. We aimed to study the prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in blood donor samples from several countries representing various ethnical backgrounds and geographic regions in the world.

Methods

Sera from apparently healthy blood donors (n≥300 per site) were collected in seven countries (USA, Italy, Spain, Germany, UK, Belgium and Brazil). All samples (n=2628) were tested for anti-DFS70 antibodies by QUANTA Flash DFS70 (Inova Diagnostics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

The prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies varied from 4/321 (1.2%, Italy) to 42/497 (8.5%, USA). Consequently, the prevalence of the antibodies was significantly higher in USA compared to all other countries (p<0.05). In addition, the prevalence in the combined cohort (all sites) was higher in young blood donors (<35 years; 5.0% vs. 2.7%; p=0.0017) and among females (4.5% vs. 3.0%; p=0.0446). However, when cohorts from different countries were corrected for age and gender, no significant difference between the countries were found.

Conclusions

This is the first study to analyze the prevalence of anti-DFS70 antibodies in different geographic areas using a standardized assay. Our findings show that the antibodies are most prevalent in young females.