Profile changes after conventional and chin shield genioplasty

Gender Affirming Facial Surgery-Anatomy and Procedures for Facial Masculinization

For some patients, feminine facial features may cause significant gender dysphoria. Multiple nonsurgical and surgical techniques exist to masculinize facial features. Nonsurgical techniques include testosterone supplementation and dermal fillers. Surgical techniques include soft tissue manipulation, synthetic implants, regenerative scaffolding, or bony reconstruction. Many techniques are derived from experience with cisgender patients, but are adapted with special considerations to differing anatomy between cisgender and transgender men and women. Currently, facial masculinization is less commonly sought than feminization, but demand is likely to increase as techniques are refined and made available.

Biomechanical validation of a modified genioplasty distractor

PURPOSE

Genioplasty is a surgical procedure that is used to enhance the shape and appearance of the chin. It can be performed alone or in combination with other jaw-related surgeries either for medical or cosmetic purposes. Recently many studies have been reported for mandibular reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis. However, these distractors can cause some complications such as incorrect prolongation of hard tissues due to the lack of guiding section. The purpose of this study is to manufacture a novel genioplasty distractor and measure its biomechanical stability and reliability for different activation lengths in mandibular bone.

METHODS

The modified genioplasty distractor was manufactured from grade 2 and grade 5 (Ti6AI4V) titanium alpha + beta alloy which was biocompatible and adequately rigid for possible in situ application in the future and a sample holder was manufactured for compressive strength testing.

RESULTS

Test results showed that our modified genioplasty distractors withstood 300 N compression force for activation lengths from 0 to 11 mm. Recorded stress values were in the range of 0.110 MPa to 0.389 MPa.

CONCLUSION

The modified genioplasty distractor developed and tested here is a promising surgical tool that has the potential to reduce genioplasty related complications especially in demanding cases.

[Aesthetic success in genioplasties procedures criteria]

Maxillomandibular dysmorphia may be associated with structural chin pathologies. Three-dimensional jaws displacements have limits. Specific genioplasty is an additional surgical mean for soft tissues profile normalization. Osteotomy line is examined according an incline angle and a possible lateral extension, as chin wing technique, improves facial shape. Cephalometric set-up with R line analyzes surgical chin movements and impact of lower incisors labial inclination on lower lip and mentolabial fold after advancement genioplasty. Micro-implant anchorage is a precious help to find lower incisors good position and optimum lower occlusal plane frontal shift in asymmetric facial pattern. Orthodontics criteria are essential factors to access an aesthetic success in genioplasties procedures.

Bimaxillary Orthognathic Approach to Correct Skeletal Facial Asymmetry of Hemifacial Microsomia in Adults

BACKGROUND

Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is the second most common congenital craniofacial deformity after cleft lip and palate. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is regarded as an alternative and efficient treatment option for patients with HFM. However, DO was not proven effective for all cases, and the results of long-term follow-up were not satisfactory as expected. Compared with DO, the orthognathic surgery approach may offer more stable clinical outcomes for this kind of disease. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcome of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in the treatment of adult HFM.

METHODS

Eight patients with HFM who had undergone bimaxillary orthognathic surgery between 2008 and 2012 were included in the study. The surgical procedures included Le Fort I osteotomy, inverted-L osteotomy, sagittal split ramus osteotomy, genioplasty, and iliac bone grafting. Pre- and postoperative orthodontic treatments were performed, respectively. Clinical and radiographic examinations were carried out to assess postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

No obvious complications appeared postoperatively and no recurrences occurred during follow-up. All patients obtained satisfactory aesthetic results. Marked improvement in facial contour and occlusion were observed. Plain radiographs showed that the height ratios between the affected and unaffected ramus were ameliorated significantly.

CONCLUSION

The bimaxillary orthognathic approach to correct the deformity of adult HFM can obtain stable results in the long-term follow-up, and should be considered as a priority method for the treatment of adult patients with dentofacial deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .