Diffusion weighted imaging with trace diffusion weighted imaging, the apparent diffusion coefficient and exponential images in the diagnosis of spinal cord infarction

A spinal cord infarction that occurred after laparoscopic gastrectomy performed under general anesthesia and epidural analgesia

Background

Spinal cord infarction (SCI) after epidural anesthesia is quite rare. Although most cases of perioperative SCI are associated with aortic, cardiac, or spinal surgery, and/or abnormal preoperative conditions, such as spinal stenosis or hypercoagulopathy, intraoperative events, such as severe hypotension or epidural puncture and catheterization, can be contributory factors.

Case presentation

A 52-year-old male was underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy. Before induction of general anesthesia, an epidural catheter was placed without any problems. The patient had no pain and no complaint just after the operation, but suddenly complained of back pain and anuria, and could not move either of his lower limbs 30 h after the operation. As we thought that the incident would be caused by the migration of the epidural catheter into the subarachnoid space, we removed the catheter, but there was no recovery of the symptoms even 20 h later. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed no hematoma in the epidural space but an abnormal signal within the spinal cord, extending from the Th3 to Th8 levels, which was consistent with the SCI. Unfortunately, the patient’s recovery from the paraplegia and abnormal sensation was poor.

Conclusions

When a patient complains of lower limb muscle weakness and/or abnormal sensations, it is important to perform an MRI examination and treatment as early as possible to avoid permanent paraplegia, especially after epidural puncture and catheterization.

[Time course of diffusion weighted image and apparent diffusion coefficient in acute spinal cord infarction: A case report and review of the literature]

An 80-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with acute onset of flaccid paraplegia and sensory and urinary disturbances that developed soon after acute pain in her lower back and leg. Neurological examination revealed, severe flaccid paraplegia, bladder and rectal disturbances and dissociated sensory loss below the level of L1 spinal cord segment. MR imaging with T2 weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) on day 2 showed hyper signal intensity in the spinal cord at the vertebral level of L1 while initial apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) showed decreased signal intensity in the lesion. We diagnosed spinal cord infarction, and anticoagulant and neuroprotective agents were administrated. Serial MRI findings revealed that the DWI signal of the lesion attenuated with time, and pseudo-normalization of the ADC occurred approximately 1 month after onset. These findings were similar to those seen in brain infarction. Our patient demonstrated serial MRI changes of spinal cord infarction showing anterior spinal cord syndrome.

Exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in evaluating prostate cancer at 3 T: preliminary experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of exponential apparent diffusion coefficient (eADC) derived from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in evaluating prostate cancers at 3 T.

METHODS

74 consecutive patients with surgically confirmed single peripheral zone (PZ) prostate cancer ≥0.5 cm(3) who underwent pre-operative DWI at 3 T were retrospectively selected. Based on radiological-pathological correlation, eADC and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (×10(-3) mm(2) s(-1)) for the cancers and benign PZ were measured by two independent readers. Tumour eADC or ADC was correlated with Gleason score. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to differentiate between Gleason score 6 and 7 or higher, by eADC and ADC. Lesion-to-background contrast ratio was compared between eADC and ADC.

RESULTS

Mean tumour eADC (0.48-0.50) and ADC (0.72-0.75) were significantly different from those of benign PZ (eADC, 0.20-0.27; ADC, 1.34-1.66), respectively (p < 0.001). A moderate correlation between tumour eADC or ADC and Gleason score was seen. For differentiating between Gleason score 6 and 7 or higher, eADC (0.818-0.883) showed a similar area under the curve with ADC (0.840-0.889) (p > 0.05). Lesion-to-background contrast ratio of eADC (Reader 1, 2.43; Reader 2, 2.23) was significantly greater than that of ADC (Reader 1, 2.21; Reader 2, 2.12) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The eADC may offer similar diagnostic utility with ADC in the differentiation of the cancer from benign prostate tissue. Moreover, the eADC appears to allow improved tissue contrast.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The eADC may be a comparable alternative to ADC for evaluating prostate cancer, with removing T2 shine-through effects from DWI.