Endometrial Polyp Size and the Risk of Malignancy in Asymptomatic Postmenopausal Women

Effect of Hysteroscopic Polypectomy Combined with Mirena Placement on Postoperative Adverse Reactions and Recurrence Rate of Endometrial Polyps: Based on a Large-Sample, Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective. To investigate the effect of hysteroscopy surgery combined with Mirena on postoperative adverse reactions and recurrence rate of endometrial polyps (EP). Methods. A total of 312 patients who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy of EP in our hospital from June 2017 to November 2020 were enrolled retrospectively. Among them, 42 patients did not take any treatment after the operation (control group), 156 patients were treated with levonorgestrel intrauterine birth control system (Mirena group), and 114 patients were treated with oral spironolone ethinylestradiol tablets (oral group). The clinical data of 312 patients were recorded and followed up regularly. All patients were followed up through an outpatient clinic or telephone to 12 months after the operation. The patients’ age, disease course, number of pregnancies, clinical manifestations, endometrial thickness before the operation, duration of operation, amount of bleeding during the operation, and number and size of polyps were analyzed. The recurrence and postoperative side effects of EP in the three groups were followed up within 12 months after the operation. Results. There was no significant difference in endometrial thickness among the three groups before treatment ( $P>0.05$ ). After 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months of treatment, the endometrial thickness of the three groups decreased, while the decrease in the Mirena group and the oral group was better compared to the control ( $P<0.05$ ). The decrease in the Mirena group was better than that in the oral group ( $P<0.05$ ). There was no significant difference in hemoglobin levels among the three groups before treatment ( $P>0.05$ ). After 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment, the hemoglobin levels of the three groups increased to varying degrees, while the levels of the Mirena group and oral group were better compared to the control ( $P<0.05$ ). Three months after the operation, the improvement of clinical symptoms was similar in the three groups, and there was no significant difference among the three groups ( $P>0.05$ ). At 6 and 12 months after the operation, the improvement of clinical symptoms in the oral group and Mirena group was better compared to the control group ( $P<0.05$ ), but there was no significant difference between the oral group and Mirena group ( $P>0.05$ ). After the operation, some patients had complications such as lower abdominal pain, breast distension pain, irregular vaginal bleeding, and abnormal liver function. There was no significant difference in the number of complications among the three groups ( $P>0.05$ ). During the follow-up to 12 months after the operation, the recurrence rate in the oral group and Mirena group was lower compared to the control ( $P<0.05$ ), and the recurrence rate in the Mirena group was lower than that in the oral group ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. Placing Mirena immediately after hysteroscopic polypectomy of EP can reduce the recurrence rate of endometrial polyps, increase the level of hemoglobin, and reduce the thickness of the endometrium, which can be employed and popularized according to the condition of patients in clinical work.

The clinical importance of polyp size measurement through two-dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography prior to hysteroscopic resection in predicting premalignant and malignant endometrial lesions

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical importance of endometrial polyp size measured using saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) before performing a hysteroscopic resection in predicting premalignant/malignant lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study analysis was conducted of 365 patients, who underwent SIS, in a reference hospital. The longest plane of the polyp size was taken as base. Polyps were classified as benign, premalignant, or malignant.

RESULTS

The rates of premalignant and malignant lesions were 7.4% and 0.9%, respectively. The mean polyp size was 17.7 ± 0.5 mm in benign patients and 23.7 ± 1.8 mm in premalignant/malignant individuals (P < 0.001). In the group of polyps that were 0-10, 10-20, 20-30, and >30 mm, premalignancy/malignancy rates were 0.0%, 4.8%, 13.3%, and 18.8%, respectively. The cut-off value for polyp size to be able to predict lesions was calculated as 22.5 mm (sensitivity: 63%, specificity: 80%) on receiver operating characteristics curve analysis (P = 0.001, area under the curve 0.732). The power of the study was calculated as 90.86%.

CONCLUSION

During the female reproductive years, endometrial polyps smaller than 10 mm, as measured in SIS, can be followed. However, when the polyp size is 22.5 mm or more, especially in postmenopausal women, treatment should be planned.

The diagnosis of endometrial cancer in women with asymptomatic endometrial polyp does not increase survival rates: an israel gynecologic oncology group study

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic women with endometrial cancer and a preoperative diagnosis of an endometrial polyp.

DESIGN

An Israel Gynecologic Oncology Group multi-center retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Of 635 patients with endometrial cancer and a preoperative diagnosis of an endometrial polyp who underwent surgery between 2002 and 2014 in one of 11 centers in Israel were divided into two groups according to the presence of bleeding symptoms. Outcome measures included recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival. Survival data were plotted according to the method of Kaplan and Meier and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

There were 513 symptomatic and 122 asymptomatic women with endometrial cancer and a preoperative diagnosis of an endometrial polyp. The median follow-up was 52 months (range 12-120 months). There were no differences between patients who experienced bleeding and those who did not in 5-year recurrence-free survival (85.2 % vs. 85.7 %; p=0.83, respectively), disease-specific survival (88.2 % vs. 89.2 %; p=0.71, respectively), or overall survival (80.2% vs. 78.4 %; p=0.97, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of endometrial cancer in patients with asymptomatic endometrial polyps is not associated with improved outcomes as compared with patients with bleeding. In the absence of factors indicating a high risk of endometrial cancer, clinical and sonographic follow-up is the advised management strategy for these patients.

Endometrial polyps. An evidence-based diagnosis and management guide

OBJECTIVE

To provide an updated practice guideline for the management of patients with endometrial polyps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A committee of six expert researchers draw the recommendations according to AGREE II Reporting Guideline. An electronic search was performed querying the following databases MEDLINE (accessed through PubMed), Scopus, PROSPERO, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), Scielo.br, Google Scholar, from inception to May 2020. A combination of text-words and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) regarding endometrial polyps, diagnosis, management and treatment was used. Trials were assessed for methodologic rigor and graded using the United States Preventive Services Task Force classification system.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) should be the imaging modality of choice for the detection of endometrial polyps in woman of fertile age (level B). Its accuracy increases when color-doppler, 3D investigation and contrast are used (level B). Dilation and Curettage (D&C) should be avoided for the diagnosis and management of polyps (level A). In office hysteroscopy showed the highest diagnostic accuracy in infertile patients with suspected endometrial polyps (level B). Polyps might alter endometrial receptivity, and embryo implantation reducing pregnancy rates (level C). Hysteroscopic polypectomy is feasible and safe with negligeble risk of intrauterine adhesion formation (level B). Polypectomy does not compromise reproductive outcomes from subsequent IVF procedures but the removal of polyps as a routine practice in sub-fertile women is not currently supported by the evidence (level B). Cost-effectiveness analysis suggest performing office polypectomy in women desiring to conceive (level B). Saline infused sonohysterography is highly accurate in detecting polyps in asymptomatic postmenopausal women (level B). Postmenopausal women with vaginal bleeding and suspected endometrial polyp should be offered diagnostic hysteroscopy with hysteroscopic polypectomy if endometrial polyps are present (level B). In-office hysteroscopy has the highest diagnostic accuracy with high cost-benefits ratio for premalignant and malignant pathologies of the uterine cavity (level B). Due to risk of malignancy, histopathological analysis of the polyp is mandatory (level B). Blind D&C should be avoided due to inaccuracy for the diagnosis of focal endometrial pathology (level A). Expectant management is not recommended in symptomatic patients especially in postmenopausal women (level B). In case of atypical hyperplasia or carcinoma on a polyp, hysterectomy is recommended in all post-menopausal patients and in premenopausal patients without desire of future fertility (level B). Asymptomatic endometrial polyps in postmenopausal women should be removed in case of large diameter (> 2 cm) or in patients with risk factors for endometrial carcinoma (level B). Excision of polyps smaller than 2 cm in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients has no impact on cost-effectiveness or survival (level B). Removal of asymptomatic polyps in premenopausal women should be considered in patients with risk factors for endometrial cancer (level B).

Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Sonography in the Detection of Endometrial Polyps

Background:

Transvaginal sonography (TVS) is considered a simple and generally accepted method for detecting uterine anomalies. With TVS, the uterus can be clearly visualized, but so far, the diagnostic accuracy of TVS varies across different studies. This retrospective study was devised to evaluate the accuracy of a sonographic diagnosis of endometrial polyps in a Ukrainian hospital.

Methods:

This was a single-center retrospective study of woman who underwent TVS and had hysteroscopy or dilation and curettage for endometrial pathology. A cohort of 156 women were included in this yearlong study. A comparative analysis was based on the preoperative diagnosis, according to TVS, compared with the postoperative histopathology results.

Results:

The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of TVS in diagnosing endometrial polyps were 69%, 51%, 73%, 46%, and 63%, respectively.

Conclusion:

This retrospective study provided data on the lack of accuracy for a sonographic diagnosis of endometrial polyps. This was based on 26% of women whose diagnosis was not confirmed by histology. A false-negative result occurred for 54% of women who had polyps that were not detected at the preoperative stage. These data raise the question of the feasibility of further invasive procedures based on a single TVS study.