Multi-Dimensional Dyspnea-Related Scales Validated in Individuals With Cardio-Respiratory and Cancer Diseases. A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties

Potential Therapeutic Role of Respiratory Muscle Training in Dyspnea Management of Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Review

Dyspnea is a disabling symptom presented in approximately half of all cancer survivors. From a clinical perspective, despite the availability of pharmacotherapies, evidence-based effective treatments are limited for relieving dyspnea in cancer survivors. Preliminary evidence supports the potential of respiratory muscle training to reduce dyspnea in cancer survivors, although large randomized controlled studies are warranted. The aims of this article were to review the relevant scientific literature on the potential therapeutic role of respiratory muscle training in dyspnea management of cancer survivor, and to identify possible mechanisms, strengths and limitations of the evidence as well as important gaps for future research directions.

Effect of opioids for breathlessness in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For the treatment of breathlessness in heart failure (HF), most textbooks advocate the use of opioids. Yet, meta-analyses are lacking.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing effects of opioids on breathlessness (primary outcome) in patients with HF. Key secondary outcomes were quality of life (QoL), mortality and adverse effects. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase were searched in July 2021. Risk of bias (RoB) and certainty of evidence were assessed by the Cochrane RoB 2 Tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria, respectively. The random-effects model was used as primary analysis in all meta-analyses.

RESULTS

After removal of duplicates, 1180 records were screened. We identified eight RCTs with 271 randomised patients. Seven RCTs could be included in the meta-analysis for the primary endpoint breathlessness with a standardised mean difference of 0.03 (95% CI -0.21 to 0.28). No study found statistically significant differences between the intervention and placebo. Several key secondary outcomes favoured placebo: risk ratio of 3.13 (95% CI 0.70 to 14.07) for nausea, 4.29 (95% CI 1.15 to 16.01) for vomiting, 4.77 (95% CI 1.98 to 11.53) for constipation and 4.42 (95% CI 0.79 to 24.87) for study withdrawal. All meta-analyses revealed low heterogeneity (I2 in all these meta-analyses was <8%).

CONCLUSION

Opioids for treating breathlessness in HF are questionable and may only be the very last option if other options have failed or in case of an emergency.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021252201.

Dyspnea in Oncological Patients: a Brain Teaser

Dyspnea is one of the most common symptoms in oncological patients with greater prevalence in lung cancer and advanced disease states. Causes of dyspnea can be directly or indirectly associated with cancer, anti-neoplastic therapies and comorbidities unrelated to cancer. Routine screening of dyspnea is suggested for all oncological patients by using unidimensional, simple scales and multidimensional tools to capture more domains affected by this symptom and to assess the effectiveness of interventions. The first step in the treatment algorithm of dyspnea is the identification of potentially reversible causes; if no specific cause is depicted, symptomatic treatment with non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions is suggested. Referral to palliative care and continuous palliative sedation are the last resort in patients with a very limited life expectancy of not more than a few days for symptomatic relief and to decrease of the distress of patients and caregivers.

Validation of the Dyspnoea-12 and Multidimensional Dyspnea profile among older Swedish men in the population

Background

The Dyspnoea-12 (D12) and Multidimensional dyspnea profile (MDP) are commonly used instruments for assessing multiple dimensions of breathlessness but have not been validated in older people in the population. The aim of this study was to validate the D12 and MDP in 73-years old men in terms of the instruments’ underlying factor structures, internal consistency, and validity.

Methods

A postal survey was sent out to a population sample of 73-years old men (n = 1,193) in southern Sweden. The two-factor structures were evaluated with confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha, and validity using Pearson´s correlations with validated scales of breathlessness, anxiety, depression, fatigue, physical/mental quality of life, body mass index (BMI), and cardiorespiratory disease.

Results

A total 684 men were included. Respiratory and cardiovascular disease were reported by 17% and 38%, respectively. For D12 and MDP, the proposed two-factor structure was not fully confirmed in this population. Internal consistency was excellent for all D12 and MDP domain scores (Cronbach's alpha scores > 0.92), and the instruments’ domains showed concurrent validity with other breathlessness scales, and discriminant validity with anxiety, depression, physical/mental quality of life, BMI, and cardiorespiratory disease.

Conclusions

In a population sample of 73-years old men, the D12 and MDP had good psychometrical properties in terms of reliability and validity, which supports that the instruments are valid for use in population studies of older men.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03166-5.

Evaluation of the Norwegian version of the Dyspnoea-12 questionnaire in patients with COPD

BACKGROUND

The Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) questionnaire is widely used and tested in patients with breathing difficulties. The objective of this study was to translate and undertake the first evaluation of the measurement properties of the Norwegian version of the D-12 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) attending a 4-week inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation programme.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity. Fit to the Rasch partial credit model and differential item functioning (DIF) were assessed in relation to age, sex and comorbidity. Based on a priori hypotheses, validity was assessed through comparisons with scores for the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) and clinical variables.

RESULTS

There were 203 (86%) respondents with a mean age (SD) of 65.2 (9.0) years, and 49% were female. The D-12 showed satisfactory structural validity including presence of physical and affective domains. There was acceptable fit to Rasch model including unidimensionality for the two domains, and no evidence of DIF. Correlations with scores for the CAT, HADS and clinical variables were as hypothesised and highest for domains assessing similar aspects of health.

CONCLUSIONS

The Norwegian version of the D-12 showed good evidence for validity and internal consistency in this group of patients with COPD, including support for two separate domains. Further testing for these measurement properties is recommended in other Norwegian patients with dyspnoea.