Impact of an opioid stewardship program on opioid exposure for pediatric appendectomy postsurgical pain

Opioid stewardship program implementation in rural and critical access hospitals in Arizona

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine rural hospitals' status in implementing opioid stewardship program (OSP) elements and assess differences in implementation in emergency department (ED) and acute inpatient departments.

DESIGN

Health administrator survey to identify the number and type of OSP elements that each hospital has implemented.

SETTING

Arizona critical access hospitals (CAHs).

PARTICIPANTS

ED and acute inpatient department heads at 17 Arizona CAHs (total of 34 assessments).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Implementation of 11 OSP elements, by department (ED vs inpatient) and prevention orientation (primary vs tertiary).

RESULTS

The percentage of implemented elements ranged from 35 to 94 percent in EDs and 24 to 88 percent in acute care departments. Reviewing the prescription drug monitoring program database and offering alternatives to opioids were the most frequently implemented. Assessing opioid use disorder (OUD) and prescribing naloxone were among the least. The number of implemented elements tended to be uniform across departments. We found that CAHs implemented, on average, 67 percent of elements that prevent unnecessary opioid use and 54 percent of elements that treat OUD.

CONCLUSIONS

Some OSP elements were in place in nearly every Arizona CAH, while others were present in only a quarter or a third of hospitals. To improve, more attention is needed to define and standardize OSPs. Equal priority should be given to preventing unnecessary opioid initiation and treating opioid misuse or OUD, as well as quality control strategies that provide an opportunity for continuous improvement.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pain Management After Ambulatory Pediatric General and Urologic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Many studies evaluating opioid stewardship interventions' effects on postoperative pain rely on emergency department (ED) visits or readmissions, but patient-reported pain scores represent a more complete picture of the postoperative experience. This study compares patient-reported pain scores after ambulatory pediatric and urologic procedures and the effect of an opioid stewardship intervention that nearly eliminated the use of outpatient narcotics.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study including 3173 pediatric patients who underwent ambulatory procedures from 2015 to 2019, during which there was an intervention to reduce narcotic prescriptions. Postoperative day one phone calls assessed pain levels using a four-point scale (no pain, mild pain, moderate pain controlled with medication, or severe pain uncontrolled with medication). We quantified the proportion of patients prescribed opioids pre-versus post-intervention and compared pain scores for patients receiving opioid versus non-opioid regimens.

RESULTS

Opioid prescription rates demonstrated a 6.5-fold reduction after opioid stewardship efforts. The majority of patients (2838) received non-opioids, with only 335 patients receiving opioids. Opioid patients reported moderate/severe pain slightly more than non-opioid patients (14.1% vs. 10.4%, p = 0.04). On by-procedure analyses, there were no subgroups in which non-opioid patients reported significantly higher pain scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-opioid postoperative pain regimens appear to be effective, with only 10.4% of patients reporting moderate/severe pain after ambulatory procedures. Future studies assessing patient-reported outcomes are necessary to optimize pain control for all patients and to determine whether there is ever an indication for opioid prescription after ambulatory general pediatric or urologic surgery.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective comparative study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Tiered Guidelines in a Pediatric Orthopaedic Practice Reduce Opioids Prescribed at Discharge

BACKGROUND

Data regarding opioid prescribing patterns following pediatric orthopaedic procedures is limited. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of tiered guidelines for discharge opioid prescriptions following common pediatric orthopaedic procedures.

METHODS

Quality improvement project conducted at a single academic institution. Guidelines for discharge opioid prescriptions were implemented January 2018 and established 4 tiers of increasing invasiveness for 28 common pediatric orthopaedic procedures. Patients who underwent these procedures in 2017 comprised the preguideline cohort (N=258), while patients treated in 2019 comprised the postguideline cohort (N=212). Opioid prescriptions were reported as oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Univariate tests were performed to assess statistically significant differences before and after implementation of the guidelines.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in OME prescribed between preguideline and postguideline cohorts (median OME 97.5 vs. 37.5). When analyzed according to procedure tiers, tiers 1, 2, and 4 showed significant decreases in OME prescribed between 2017 and 2019. The rate of no opioids prescribed at discharge increased from 13% to 23% between preguideline and postguideline cohorts. The 30-day refill rate did not significantly change. After implementation of guidelines, 91% of all prescriptions were within the guideline parameters, and there was a significant reduction in prescription variability. In tier 4 procedures, median OME prescribed decreased from 375 preguideline to 188 postguideline, but was associated with greater opioid refills within 30 days of discharge (10.2% preguideline vs. 28.8% postguideline).

CONCLUSIONS

Tiered guidelines for discharge opioid prescriptions following pediatric orthopaedic procedures can significantly decrease the quantity of opioids prescribed. Furthermore, we noted excellent adherence and no overall increase in the rates of narcotic refills. Such guidelines may improve pediatric orthopaedists' ability to responsibly treat postoperative pain while limiting the distribution of unneeded opioids.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-quality improvement project.