Effect of Resident Involvement on Morbidity and Mortality Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Can We Still Teach Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in The Endovascular Era? Single-Center Analysis on The Evolution of Procedural Characteristics Over 15 Years

OBJECTIVE

In many vascular centers an endovascular first policy for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has resulted in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) outnumbering open aortic repair (OAR). The declining routine in OAR raises the question whether this might influence procedural outcomes and diminish surgical expertise for current and future vascular surgeons. We aimed to analyze OAR outcomes, AAA morphology and procedural details over the past 15 years while an endovascular first approach was successively implemented.

PARTICICPANTS AND DESIGN

All patients operated for (i)ntact infra-/juxtarenal AAA between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2019 were identified. Outcome parameters were length of stay (hospital/ICU), in-hospital mortality and medical/surgical complications. Operative details were clamping zone, access and graft configuration. AAA anatomy including neck and iliac parameters was analyzed with Endosize©. Logistic regression, uni- and multivariate analysis were applied.

RESULTS

293 patients received elective OAR for iAAA. Baseline characteristics (age, sex, hypertension, smoking, occlusive disease, coronary disease, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, renal insufficiency and obesity) did not change over time. The number of OAR dropped significantly (-0.5 cases/year p = 0.02). The procedure time (2005-2007: 192.2 ± 87.5min to 2017-2019: 235.6 ± 88.2min; p = 0.0001) and the length of stay (2005-2007: 12.0 ± 7.9 to 2017-2019: 17.0 ± 23.1; p = 0.03) increased significantly, whereas the in-hospital mortality, length of ICU stay and complication rates didn't, nor did AAA anatomy. Upon multivariate analysis, annual number of OAR and any additional anastomosis significantly influenced procedure time, trainee involvement, for example, did not. Hospital length-of-stay depended on patient age (p = 0.002), complication rates (p < 0.0001) and procedure time (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Mortality and complication rates for OAR have remained low and constant. With the increase of EVAR, the absolute number of OARs has decreased significantly. However, the total procedure time has increased and depends significantly on the annual number of OARs in total and per surgeon. This might influence outcome parameters and should be implanted in future surgical education.

Real-time analysis of intraoperative delays and variations in intraoperative workflow with level of experience of the primary surgeon in small animal surgery

OBJECTIVE

To describe the causes of intraoperative delays and the changes in delays and surgical workflow with the level of training of the primary surgeon.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Seventy-three small animal surgical procedures performed at an academic teaching institution between January 17, 2018 and April 10, 2018.

METHODS

Procedures (trainee = 37, faculty = 36) totaling 103.2 h were observed and video recorded. Operative time was allocated to the surgical approach, exploration, exposure, intervention, and closure phases. Suballocations were made to specific tasks within these categories (such as cutting or hemostasis). Intraoperative delays and reasons were recorded. Differences in use of time between trainee and faculty surgeons were analyzed.

RESULTS

Delays constituted 9.2% (±4.4) of the operative time, of which 6.5%(±3.6) were surgeon controlled and 2.6% (±2.7) were non-surgeon controlled. Surgeons preparing instrumentation outside of the operative field and retrieval of equipment from supply areas were the greatest contributors to delays. Intraoperative delays did not increase when the trainee was placed in the primary surgeon role (P = .78). During the approach faculty surgeons spent proportionally less time on hemostasis (P = .02), and during closure they spent less time suturing (P = .03) than trainees.

CONCLUSION

Trainee surgeons did not have greater intraoperative delays. Delays were created when surgeons prepared their own instrumentation. Workflow differed between experts and trainees.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Advancing a trainee surgeon into the primary role is unlikely to increase intraoperative delays, which can be reduced by the inclusion of trained scrub technicians. A focus on efficient hemostasis and fluidity when suturing may improve operative efficiency for surgical trainees.

Resident Involvement Is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Complications After Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Study

PURPOSE

To investigate whether resident involvement in knee arthroscopy procedures affects postoperative complications or operative times.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was queried to identify patients who underwent common knee arthroscopy procedures between 2006 through 2012. Patients with a history of knee arthroplasty, septic arthritis or osteomyelitis of the knee, concomitant open or mini-open procedures, or without information on resident involvement were excluded. A 1:1 propensity score match was performed based on age, sex, obesity, smoking history, and American Society of Anesthesiologist classification to match cases with resident involved to nonresident cases. Fisher exact tests, Pearson's χ² tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day complications. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare operative time and length of hospital stay between the 2 groups, with statistical significance defined as P < .05.

RESULTS

After matching, 2954 cases (50% resident involvement) were included in the study with no significant differences in demographics or comorbidities between the 2 cohorts. The overall rate of 30-day complications was 1.1% in the nonresident and resident involved group (P = 1.000). There was no significant difference in postoperative surgical (nonresident vs resident involved: 0.48% vs 0.83%, P = .2498) or medical (nonresident vs resident involved: 0.62% vs 0.83%, P = .5111) complications. However, knee arthroscopy cases that residents were involved with had significantly longer operative times (69.8 vs 66.8 minutes, P = .0002), and length of hospital stay (0.85 vs 0.21 days, P = .0332) when compared with cases performed without a resident.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident involvement in knee arthroscopy procedures is not a significant risk for medical or surgical 30-day postoperative complications. Resident participation in knee arthroscopy was associated with statistically significant but likely clinically insignificant increased operative time as well as length of hospital stay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective Cohort Study.

The Impact of Resident Involvement on Postoperative Complications After Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

PURPOSE

Shoulder arthroscopy is the second most frequently performed procedure by orthopaedic surgeons taking the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery part II examination. However, the impact of resident involvement on outcomes after shoulder arthroscopy is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate whether resident involvement in shoulder arthroscopic procedures affects postoperative complication rates and surgical time using propensity score-matched cohorts.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was queried to identify patients who underwent common shoulder arthroscopic procedures between 2006 and 2012. Cases without information on resident involvement, treatment of septic arthritis or osteomyelitis of the shoulder, or concomitant open or miniopen procedures were excluded from the study. A 1:1 propensity score match was used based on demographic and comorbidity factors to match cases with resident involvement to nonresident cases. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical time, length of hospital stay, and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 15,857 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy were identified. After propensity score matching, 3474 cases (50% with resident involvement) were included. Appropriate matching was verified with no difference in demographic or health characteristics. No significant differences in the overall rate of 30-day complications was noted in resident-involved versus nonresident group (P = 0.576). No significant difference was observed in postoperative surgical or medical complications. Resident involvement was significantly longer surgical time (75.9 ± 35.9 versus 75.1 ± 40.5 minutes, P = 0.03) when compared with cases performed without a resident.

CONCLUSIONS

Resident involvement in shoulder arthroscopy is not associated with increased risk for medical or surgical 30-day postoperative complications. Resident participation in shoulder arthroscopy cases did increase surgical time; however, this finding is likely clinically insignificant.