The Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French and the Voice Handicap Index

The Minimal Important Difference of Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Treatment of Voice Disorders

OBJECTIVES

The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) is a reliable tool that objectively assesses dysphonia levels using six acoustic parameters. Despite its high criterion-related concurrent validity, diagnostic accuracy, and minimal detectable change derived from test-retest reliability, the minimal important difference (MID) of the AVQI has not been tested before. This study aimed to estimate the MIDs of AVQI for improvement audibly perceived by clinicians and self-reported improvement by patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 110 patients who received treatment for voice disorders. Patients completed AVQI and Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) questionnaires before and after the therapy. The MIDs of the AVQI were estimated using the anchor of either auditory-perceptual judgment of total dysphonia levels by clinicians or the VHI-10 questionnaire by patients. A distribution-based approach was also used to complement the results.

RESULTS

First, using the auditory-perceptual anchor, a decrease of 0.95 in the AVQI was estimated as the MID for clinicians' perception, as a result of the receiver operating curve. Then, using the patient-reported anchor, an improvement of 1.36 in the AVQI was estimated as the MID for patients' voice-related disability. The distribution-based approach also ensured the anchor-based results of both the MIDs.

CONCLUSIONS

The AVQI is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating voice quality, and a 0.95 decrease in the AVQI represents a meaningful improvement for clinicians' perception, whereas a 1.36 decrease in the AVQI influences patients' self-reported disability. This study contributes to understanding the minimal change necessary for clinicians to make informed decisions and ensure patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:2805-2811, 2024.

Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments

OBJECTIVE

There are different parts of a battery of voice assessments to assess voice functions and voice quality. The objective assessment of voice quality using acoustics is recommended and two measurements such as the Acoustic Voice Quality index, 03.01 (AVQI) and the Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) are leading in this domain. The purpose of this study was to verify the validity between these two acoustic measurements and other dimensions of the voice assessments (the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and the laryngeal imaging evaluation of the larynx and vocal folds).

METHODS

We used a retrospective database of 150 participants (37 vocally healthy participants and 113 dysphonic patients). To test the validity between the acoustic measurements and the other voice assessments the concurrent validity and diagnostic precision were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistics with likelihood ratios.

RESULTS

The VHI-10 score presented moderate-significant correlations with the AVQI and the ABI, r= 0.477, P < 0.001 (r2= 0.228) and r= 0.426, P < 0.001 (r2=0.181), respectively. The larynx alteration presented low-significant correlations with the AVQI (r= 0.362, P < 0.001, r2= 0.131), and ABI (r= 0.371, P < 0.001, r2= 0.138), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of ROC was almost reasonable ranging from 0.701 to 0.737; except between ABI and VHI-10 (AUC= 0.689). The highest AUC was between the AVQI and VHI-10 at a threshold of 2.10; the highest specificity was between the ABI and VHI-10 at a threshold of 3.77. However, the lowest sensitivity was between ABI and VHI-10 while the lowest specificity was between the laryngeal diagnosis and the ABI.

CONCLUSION

AVQI and ABI presented significantly lower concurrent validity and diagnostic precision when the reference is not the auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality. However, AVQI seems to be for some validity aspects a more reasonable classifier of vocal handicap and laryngeal alteration than ABI. Both AVQI and ABI values can broaden their range of assessment for the clinical user, thus showing more relationships between the individual voice examination methods.

The Efficacy of the NHS Waterpipe in Superficial Hydration for People With Healthy Voices: Effects on Acoustic Voice Quality, Phonation Threshold Pressure and Subjective Sensations

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the efficacy of the NHS waterpipe as a superficial hydration treatment in voice production in healthy young women.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a prospective, single-blind, within- and between-subject experimental design.

METHODS

Thirty six female university students (mean age 24.6 years, range 19-45 years) were recruited to the study. Participants were randomized to two experimental groups (E1 and E2) and a control group. E1 underwent hydration treatment with the NHS waterpipe filled with 0.9% saline that was immersed in a cup of heated water. E2 underwent a similar treatment but without heated immersion. The control group received no treatment. Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI v03.01) and its subparameters, phonation threshold pressure, self-perceived phonatory effort and sensation of throat dryness was measured at three time points (before the intervention and immediately and 15 minutes after it).

RESULTS

The Tilt of the AVQI's subparameters increased significantly in the E1 (P = 0.027) and E2 groups (P = 0.027) after the intervention. Furthermore, the E1 group had significantly lower harmonics-to-noise-ratio values at the third measurement point compared to the E2 group (P = 0.023). These findings may result from fluid transported to the vocal fold level. The sensations of throat dryness decreased in the E1 (P = 0.001) and E2 groups (P < 0.0005) after the intervention. Perceived phonatory effort decreased statistically significantly at the final measurement point in the E1 (P = 0.002) and E2 (P = 0.031) groups. No variables changed in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The waterpipe seems to be efficient in hydrating vocal folds on single use. It seems to be more efficient when employed with a hot water bath, albeit slightly impairing some acoustic values in the short term. Without the heated fluid, it still seems to decrease sensations of throat dryness and affect acoustic voice quality. The waterpipe does not seem to have an effect on phonation threshold pressure, and it seems to lower self-perceived effort just as efficiently whether the waterpipe is employed using a hot water bath or not. Further research is needed to prove the efficacy of long-term usage and usage with voice patients.

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) in the Measurement of Voice Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a multiparametric construct of voice quality recognized for its clinical and research applications around the globe. This study aimed to review the validity and diagnostic accuracy of AVQI (v02&03) and determine the effects of age and gender.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis registered with the PROSPERO registry. The authors searched two databases (PubMed and Cochrane Library database) for relevant studies. Studies selected for the systematic review were grouped based on study objectives. To determine the quality of the selected studies, the authors utilized the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis of seven studies on AVQIv02 revealed a diagnostic threshold ranging from 2.72 to 3.33 for AVQIv02. In comparison, eight studies investigating AVQIv03 suggested a diagnostic threshold ranging from 1.33 to 3.15 for AVQIv03. Altogether, these studies demonstrated a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.85 and 0.92 for AVQIv02 and 0.82 and 0.92 for AVQIv03. The Area under the Curve was slightly better for AVQIv03 (0.94) than AVQIv02 (0.92). Three studies investigating the effect of age and gender on AVQI had a consensus that AVQI is independent of gender. However, findings were contradictory about the impact of age on AVQI.

CONCLUSIONS

AVQI is found to be a valid tool for the assessment of voice quality. AVQIv03 is slightly better than AVQIv02 in its diagnostic accuracy. AVQI is independent of gender. Because of the contradictory evidence, additional research on the effects of age on AVQI is necessary.

Does the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) Correlate with Perceived Creak and Strain in Normophonic Young Adult Finnish Females?

BACKGROUND

The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a correlate of dysphonia. It has been found to differentiate between dysphonic and normophonic speakers and to indicate the effects of voice therapy. This study investigates how the AVQI reacts towards creak and strain, which are common in normophonic speakers.

METHODS

The material was obtained from an earlier study on 104 Finnish female university students (mean age 24.3 years, SD 6.3 years) with no known pathology of voice or hearing and a perceptually normal voice (G = 0 in GRBAS), who were recorded while reading aloud a standard text and sustaining the vowel [a:]. Perceptual analysis for the amount of creak and strain was carried out by 2 expert listeners. In this study, the AVQI v03.01 was analyzed and correlated with perceptual evaluations. Samples with low and high amounts of creak and strain were compared with t tests.

RESULTS

On average, the AVQI was below the threshold value of dysphonia in the Finnish population. The AVQI (ρ = 0.35, p = 0.000) and its subparameters, smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS; ρ = -0.35, p = 0.000) and harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR; ρ = -0.30, p = 0.002) showed low but significant correlations with creak. Strain had low but significant correlations with spectral Slope (ρ = 0.38, p = 0.000) and Tilt (ρ = -0.40, p = 0.009). The AVQI was lower (better) in samples that were evaluated as having a high amount of strain, but the difference was not significant. Only CPPS differentiated significantly between low and high amounts of creak.

CONCLUSION

The AVQI does not seem to differentiate between high and low amounts of creak and strain in normophonic speakers.

A Meta-Analysis of the Association Between the Voice Handicap Index and Objective Voice Analysis

Purpose Dysphonia can be evaluated by both patient-reported quality of life instruments and objective acoustic and aerodynamic analyses. However, less is known about the association between the two metrics. The goal of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the correlation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30) with the following objective parameters: fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, harmonics to noise ratio, noise to harmonic ratio, maximum phonation time, and the Dysphonia Severity Index. Method A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases. Inclusion criteria were subjects age 18 years and older with voice complaints and assessed by both VHI-30 and objective voice analysis. Results A literature search resulted in 1,297 unique articles, of which 310 underwent full-text review and 17 studies were included in quantitative analysis. Significant pooled correlation was observed for VHI-30 total with jitter (.301 [.177; .416]), shimmer (.255 [.162; .344]), noise to harmonic ratio (.200 [.111; .285]), maximum phonation time (-.227 [-.352; -.094]), and Dysphonia Severity Index (-.254[-.455; -.0286]). Significant correlations were observed in 4/7 objective parameters with the Physical subscale, 3/7 with the Functional subscale, and 2/7 with the Emotional subscale. All significant correlations were negligible (0-.3) or low (.3-.5). Conclusions Results from meta-analysis showed that correlations between objective voice parameters and the VHI-30 were negligible or low. Further study is needed to determine if correlations vary by patient demographics or specific pathology.

Influence of the Voice Sample Length in Perceptual and Acoustic Voice Quality Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the variations that different voice sample length (VSL) has on the perceived degree of voice quality deviation and on the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) accuracy.

METHODS

Voices of 71 subjects (53 dysphonic; 18 vocally health) were recorded: numbers 1-20 (42 syllables) + vowel/a/. Three different VSL were edited: VSL_long, 1-20 + 3 seconds vowel/a/; VSL_cust, customized length, were voiced-segments of the continuous speech had the same length of the vowel (mean = 18.73 syllables corresponding to 3 seconds of only-voiced segments) + 3 seconds vowel/a/; VSL_short, 1-10 (15 syllables) + 3 seconds vowel/a/. Three voice specialists perceptually judged the overall voice quality (G); 3 sessions were performed to evaluate each VSL variant. AVQI's precision and Spearman correlation were assessed.

RESULTS

The intra-rater reliability was "almost perfect" (kappa >0.826) for all evaluators in VSL_short; "substantial" (0.684) and "almost perfect" (0.897) in VSL_cust and "fair" (0.447) to "almost perfect" (1.000) in VSL_long. The inter-rater reliability was "moderate" (0.554) for VSL_long, "substantial" (0.622 and 0.618) for VSL_cust and VSL_short. The Gmean and AVQI_mean were perceived as more severe for longer samples and less severe for shorter samples. Considering the AVQI, VSL_short (r = 0.665) presented the higher correlation. VSL_cust presented the best area under the ROC curve (0.821). VSL_long and VSL_cust specificity was 100%, VSL_short specificity was 75%; higher sensitivity was observed for VSL_short (74%).

CONCLUSION

The voice quality outcomes changes for different VSLs. Longer VSLs seem to be perceived as more deviated, shorter VSLs seem to be more reliable and have better correlation with the acoustic analysis. The AVQI best accuracy was found at a customized length. Thus, to increase the voice analysis reliability, standardized procedure must be followed, including a precise speech material control allowing comparison among clinics and voice-centers.

GALP Qualifier Scale: Initial Considerations to Classify a Voice Problem

OBJECTIVE

To propose a single qualifier scale for voice problems based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) that classifies a voice problem considering its multidimensionality.

METHOD

A multicultural database was analyzed (280 subjects). The analyzed information was: the perceptual judgment of the overall voice quality (G); the acoustic analysis (A) with the Acoustic Voice Quality Index; the laryngeal diagnosis (L) and the patient self-assessment (P) using the Voice Handicap Index. The variables were categorized. A 2-step cluster analysis was performed to define groups with common characteristics.

RESULTS

A 7-point qualifier scale, the GALP, was defined to generally classify levels of voice problems considering 4 dimensions of the voice evaluation. Each level of voice problem, that is, no problem, mild, moderate, severe, or complete voice problem, has its own possible outcome for G, A, L, and P that will change, or not, the overall level of voice problem. The extremes of the scale represent "no problem" at all when all parameters are normal, and "complete problem" when all parameters are altered. The 3 levels in between were defined by the cluster analysis (mild, moderate, and severe problem) and change according to the outcome of each evaluation (G, A, L, and P). Thus, changes in one parameter alone may or not contribute to the change of the level of voice problem. Also, there are 2 categories for cases that do not fit the classification (not specified) and for which some of the variables are missing (not applicable).

CONCLUSION

The GALP scale was proposed to classify the level of voice problem. This approach considers important dimensions of voice evaluation according to the ICF. It is a potential tool to be used by different professionals, with different assessment procedures, and among different populations, clinicians, and study centers.