1
|
Lechien JR, Vaezi MF, Chan WW, Allen JE, Karkos PD, Saussez S, Altman KW, Amin MR, Ayad T, Barillari MR, Belafsky PC, Blumin JH, Johnston N, Bobin F, Broadhurst M, Ceccon FP, Calvo-Henriquez C, Eun YG, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Crevier-Buchman L, Clarke JO, Dapri G, Eckley CA, Finck C, Fisichella PM, Hamdan AL, Hans S, Huet K, Imamura R, Jobe BA, Hoppo T, Maron LP, Muls V, O'Rourke AK, Perazzo PS, Postma G, Prasad VMN, Remacle M, Sant'Anna GD, Sataloff RT, Savarino EV, Schindler A, Siupsinskiene N, Tseng PH, Zalvan CH, Zelenik K, Fraysse B, Bock JM, Akst LM, Carroll TL. The Dubai Definition and Diagnostic Criteria of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The IFOS Consensus. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:1614-1624. [PMID: 37929860 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this work was to gather an international consensus group to propose a global definition and diagnostic approach of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) to guide primary care and specialist physicians in the management of LPR. METHODS Forty-eight international experts (otolaryngologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and physiologists) were included in a modified Delphi process to revise 48 statements about definition, clinical presentation, and diagnostic approaches to LPR. Three voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 8/10. Votes were anonymous and the analyses of voting rounds were performed by an independent statistician. RESULTS After the third round, 79.2% of statements (N = 38/48) were approved. LPR was defined as a disease of the upper aerodigestive tract resulting from the direct and/or indirect effects of gastroduodenal content reflux, inducing morphological and/or neurological changes in the upper aerodigestive tract. LPR is associated with recognized non-specific laryngeal and extra-laryngeal symptoms and signs that can be evaluated with validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires and clinical instruments. The hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing can suggest the diagnosis of LPR when there is >1 acid, weakly acid or nonacid hypopharyngeal reflux event in 24 h. CONCLUSION A global consensus definition for LPR is presented to improve detection and diagnosis of the disease for otolaryngologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care practitioners. The approved statements are offered to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated diagnostic approaches to LPR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5 Laryngoscope, 134:1614-1624, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology (Anatomy Department), EpiCURA Hospital, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Research Committee of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Polyclinic of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Michael F Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Walter W Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jacqueline E Allen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Petros D Karkos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Thessaloniki Medical School, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Sven Saussez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology (Anatomy Department), EpiCURA Hospital, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
| | - Kenneth W Altman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Milan R Amin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tareck Ayad
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Montreal Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Maria R Barillari
- Division of Phoniatrics and Audiology, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, L. Vanvitelli University, Naples, Italy
| | - Peter C Belafsky
- Department of Otolaryngology, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Joel H Blumin
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Nikki Johnston
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Francois Bobin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Polyclinic of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | | - Fabio P Ceccon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Christian Calvo-Henriquez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Young-Gyu Eun
- Department of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Biomedical Science and Technology, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Lise Crevier-Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Research Committee of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
| | - John O Clarke
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USA
| | - Giovanni Dapri
- International School Reduced Scar Laparoscopy, Minimally Invasive General and Oncologic Surgery Center, Humanitas Gavazzeni University Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Claudia A Eckley
- Divisão de Otorrinolaringologia, Fleury Medicina e Saúde Laboratórios de Diagnóstico, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Camille Finck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | | | - Abdul-Latif Hamdan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Stephane Hans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Research Committee of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
| | - Kathy Huet
- Department of Metrology and Langage Science, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium
| | - Rui Imamura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Clinical Hospital, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Blair A Jobe
- Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Toshitaka Hoppo
- Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lance P Maron
- Netcare Park Lane Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Vinciane Muls
- Department of gastroenterology, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels
| | - Ashli K O'Rourke
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Paulo S Perazzo
- Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, São Paulo Federal University, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gregory Postma
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Vyas M N Prasad
- ENT Centre and Singapore Medical Specialist Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marc Remacle
- Department of Otolaryngology, Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Geraldo D Sant'Anna
- Disciplina de Otorrinolaringologia, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Robert T Sataloff
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edoardo V Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Antonio Schindler
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Nora Siupsinskiene
- Department of Otolaryngology, Academy of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Klaipeda university, Klaipeda, Lithuania
| | - Ping-Huei Tseng
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Craig H Zalvan
- Department of Otolaryngology-New York Medical College, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY; Institute for Voice and Swallowing Disorders, Sleepy Hollow, NY, USA
| | - Karol Zelenik
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
| | | | - Jonathan M Bock
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Lee M Akst
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Thomas L Carroll
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng X, Chen Z, Chen T, Zhou L, Liu C, Zheng J, Hu R. Assessing the role of dryness and burning sensation in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4542. [PMID: 38402357 PMCID: PMC10894288 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55420-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a condition characterized by the regurgitation of stomach and duodenal contents into the laryngopharynx, with variable and non-specific symptoms. Therefore, developing an accurate symptom scale for different regions is essential. Notably, the symptoms of "dryness and burning sensation in the laryngopharynx or mouth" are prevalent among the Chinese population but are often omitted from conventional symptom assessment scales, such as the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) scales. To address this gap, our study incorporated the symptoms into the RSI and RSS-12 scales, developing the RSI-10/RSS-13 scales. Afterward, we assessed the role of the new scale's reliability (Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability), construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis), and diagnostic efficiency. Our study encompassed 479 participants (average = 39.5 ± 13.4 years, 242 female) and 91 (average = 34.01 ± 13.50 years, 44 female) completed 24 h MII-pH monitoring. The Cronbach's α values of 0.80 and 0.82 for the RSI-10 and RSS-13 scales, respectively. RSI-10 and RSS-13 exhibited strong test-retest reliability (ICCs = 0.82-0.96) and diagnostic efficacy (AUC = 0.84-0.85). Furthermore, the factor analysis identified the RSS-13 and its three sub-scales (ear-nose-throat, digestive tract, respiratory tract) exhibited good to excellent structural validity (χ2/df = 1.95, P < 0.01; CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.05). The AUC optimal thresholds for the RSI-10 and RSS-13 in the Chinese population were 13 and 36, respectively. Besides, the inclusion of the new item significantly improved the diagnostic efficiency of the RSI scale (P = 0.04), suggesting that RSI-10 holds promise as a more effective screening tool for LPRD, and global validation is needed to demonstrate the impact of this new symptom on the diagnosis of LPRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaowei Zheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Zhiwei Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Ting Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chaofeng Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jingyi Zheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, 134 Dong Jie, Gulou District, Fuzhou City, 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Renyou Hu
- Chongqing Jinshan Science and Technology (Group) Co Ltd, Chongqing, 401120, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ha NY, Kim JW, Kim J. Clinical efficacy of Yukgunja-tang combined with a proton pump inhibitor for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: study protocol for randomized, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial. BMC Complement Med Ther 2023; 23:444. [PMID: 38062418 PMCID: PMC10704821 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-023-04283-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Yukgunja-tang (YGJ) is an herbal prescription used to treat the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although many preclinical and clinical studies on YGJ have been conducted on GERD, there is a lack of evidence from blinded studies to exclude placebo effects. Therefore, this protocol proposes a clinical trial that is single-centered, randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy to objectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of co-administered YGJ and rabeprazole (RPZ) in patients with GERD previously treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and still experiencing symptoms. METHODS A total of 86 participants with refractory GERD (rGERD) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the treatment [YGJ and RPZ (10 mg/d)] and control groups [double-dose RPZ (20 mg/d)] for 4 weeks of treatment (weeks 0-4) followed by 4 weeks of follow-up (weeks 4-8). The Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD will be analyzed for the primary endpoint. Reflux Disease Questionnaire, Reflux Symptom Score, GERD-Health Related Quality of Life, Overall Treatment Evaluation, Spleen Qi Deficiency Questionnaire, Damum Questionnaire, and dyspepsia Visual Analogue Scale will be used to evaluate treatment effects on GERD related symptoms and quality of life and to compare treatment effects by subgroups. Safety tests will be analyzed by investigating adverse events. DISCUSSION This clinical trial will be the first rigorous double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study to precisely evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of YGJ and PPIs in the treatment of rGERD. The results of this study will provide a reliable clinical basis for selecting botanical drug treatments for patients with rGERD. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Research Information Service (registration number: KCT0008600, July 13, 2023, https://cris.nih.go.kr ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na-Yeon Ha
- Department of Digestive Diseases, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Korean Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Wook Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Jinsung Kim
- Department of Digestive Diseases, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Korean Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lechien JR, Geneid A, Bohlender JE, Cantarella G, Avellaneda JC, Desuter G, Sjogren EV, Finck C, Hans S, Hess M, Oguz H, Remacle MJ, Schneider-Stickler B, Tedla M, Schindler A, Vilaseca I, Zabrodsky M, Dikkers FG, Crevier-Buchman L. Consensus for voice quality assessment in clinical practice: guidelines of the European Laryngological Society and Union of the European Phoniatricians. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:5459-5473. [PMID: 37707614 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08211-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To update the European guidelines for the assessment of voice quality (VQ) in clinical practice. METHODS Nineteen laryngologists-phoniatricians of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) and the Union of the European Phoniatricians (UEP) participated to a modified Delphi process to propose statements about subjective and objective VQ assessments. Two anonymized voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 3/4. The statements with ≥ 3/4 score by 60-80% of experts were improved and resubmitted to voting until they were validated or rejected. RESULTS Of the 90 initial statements, 51 were validated after two voting rounds. A multidimensional set of minimal VQ evaluations was proposed and included: baseline VQ anamnesis (e.g., allergy, medical and surgical history, medication, addiction, singing practice, job, and posture), videolaryngostroboscopy (mucosal wave symmetry, amplitude, morphology, and movements), patient-reported VQ assessment (30- or 10-voice handicap index), perception (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain), aerodynamics (maximum phonation time), acoustics (Mean F0, Jitter, Shimmer, and noise-to-harmonic ratio), and clinical instruments associated with voice comorbidities (reflux symptom score, reflux sign assessment, eating-assessment tool-10, and dysphagia handicap index). For perception, aerodynamics and acoustics, experts provided guidelines for the methods of measurement. Some additional VQ evaluations are proposed for voice professionals or patients with some laryngeal diseases. CONCLUSION The ELS-UEP consensus for VQ assessment provides clinical statements for the baseline and pre- to post-treatment evaluations of VQ and to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated VQ evaluation approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France.
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
- Department of Laryngology and Broncho-Esophagology, EpiCURA Hospital, Anatomy Department of University of Mons, Mons, Belgium.
- Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory (UMR 7018 CNRS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle/Paris 3), Paris, France.
| | - Ahmed Geneid
- Department of Otolaryngology and Phoniatrics-Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jörg E Bohlender
- Department of Phoniatrics and Speech Pathology, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Giovanna Cantarella
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Fondazione, IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Juan C Avellaneda
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngology Service. Hospital Universitario Mayor Mederi, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Gauthier Desuter
- ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Elisabeth V Sjogren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Camille Finck
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Liege, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Stephane Hans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France
- Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory (UMR 7018 CNRS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle/Paris 3), Paris, France
| | - Markus Hess
- Medical Voice Center (MEVOC), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Haldun Oguz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Fonomer, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Marc J Remacle
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Center Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Eich, Luxembourg
| | | | - Miroslav Tedla
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comenius University, University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Antonio Schindler
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Isabel Vilaseca
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michal Zabrodsky
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Motol, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Frederik G Dikkers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lise Crevier-Buchman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, University of Paris Saclay, Paris, France
- Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory (UMR 7018 CNRS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle/Paris 3), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bruhn J, Brockmann-bauser M, Swing T, Bohlender JE, Runggaldier D. Transkulturelle deutschsprachige Übersetzung des Fragebogens Reflux Symptom Score-12. HNO. [PMID: 36239757 PMCID: PMC9691492 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-022-01233-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Bei der Diagnostik des laryngopharyngealen Refluxes (LPR) spielen neben einer anamnestischen und klinischen bzw. apparativen Beurteilung auch Fragebögen zur detaillierten Erfassung der Symptomatik eine wesentliche Rolle. Neben dem Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), dem bekanntesten LPR-Symptomfragebogen, wurde kürzlich auch ein neuer Fragebogen, „Reflux Symptom Score“ (RSS), sowie eine kürzere Version, der Reflux Symptom Score 12 (RSS-12), veröffentlicht. Letzterer ist allerdings nur in englischer, französischer und portugiesischer Sprache verfügbar, ermöglicht jedoch eine wesentlich genauere Differenzierung der Symptomatik unter Einbeziehung von Symptomstärke, Häufigkeit des Auftretens von Beschwerden sowie der refluxbezogenen Beeinträchtigung der Lebensqualität. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist daher, eine entsprechende transkulturelle deutschsprachige Übersetzung des RSS-12 (aktuell nun als G‑RSS-12 bezeichnet) mit Verständlichkeitstestung vorzustellen, um den klinischen und wissenschaftlichen Einsatz dieses Fragebogens auch im deutschsprachigen Raum zu ermöglichen.
Collapse
|
6
|
Jeon SY, Park JM, Lee YC, Ko SG, Eun YG. Differences in Diagnostic Rates After Hypopharyngeal-esophageal Impedance-pH Monitoring of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients by Age and Sex. J Voice 2022:S0892-1997(22)00215-6. [PMID: 36085096 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the differences in diagnostic rates according to the age and sex of patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms and completed the 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24h-HEMII-pH) monitoring. METHODS Patients with LPR symptoms underwent the 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring. We compared the diagnostic rates of LPR in patients with LPR symptoms according to age and sex. The number of reflux episodes and type of reflux were compared among patients who were confirmed to have LPR according to age and sex. RESULTS A total of 249 patients with suspected LPR symptoms who completed 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring were analyzed. A total of 170 patients (68.3%) were diagnosed with LPR after 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring. There were 57 (67.1%) men and 113 (68.9%) women. The old age group (older than 55 years) showed a statistically significant higher diagnostic rate than the young age group (73.5%, 60.8%, p=0.034). Women's diagnostic rate was statistically higher in the old age group than that in the young age group (75% vs. 58.3%, p=0.026). There were no specific differences in the number of refluxes in the diagnosed patients between the age groups, and there were no differences in the initial reflux symptom index. CONCLUSIONS Among those who visited the clinic with suspected LPR symptoms and performed 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring, the diagnostic rate of LPR was higher in the older age group than that in the younger age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So Young Jeon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Min Park
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Chan Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Gyu Ko
- Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Gyu Eun
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kohansal A, Khoddami SM, Ansari NN, Lechien JR, Aghazadeh K. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of Reflux Symptom Score-12 in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease. J Voice 2022:S0892-1997(22)00224-7. [PMID: 36030157 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cross cultural adaptation of the reflux symptom score-12 (RSS-12) into Persian language and to evaluate its validity and reliability in the assessment of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional and prospective cohort design. METHODS A standard forward and backward translation was followed to cross-culturally adapt the RSS-12 into Persian language. To study discriminative validity, the RSS-12p was administrated to 63 patients with LPRD (40 men and 23 women; mean age: 39.26 ± 9.79 years) and 50 healthy volunteers (31 men and 19 women; mean age: 37.24 ± 10.28 years). The patients completed the reflux symptom index (RSI) to assess construct validity. The test-retest reliability was investigated in 31 patients (time interval = 7 days). RESULTS There were no missing responses and floor or ceiling effects. The assessing of discriminative validity showed that the questionnaire was able to discriminate between patients with LPRD and healthy participants (P<0.001). Construct validity was confirmed by the Pearson correlation between the RSS-12p and the RSI (rp= 0.87; P<0.00). The internal consistency was confirmed with Cronbach α 0.85 and 0.72 for the RSS-12p and quality of life (QoL), respectively. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICCagreement = 0.98 for the RSS-12p and 0.94 for QoL). CONCLUSIONS The Persian version of RSS-12 is a valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire for assessing LPRD in Persian-speaking patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Azin Kohansal
- Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyyedeh Maryam Khoddami
- Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Research Center for War-affected People, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jerome R Lechien
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Polyclinique de Poitiers, Elsan, Poitiers, France
| | - Kayvan Aghazadeh
- Otolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nukusbekova G, Toguzbayeva D, Hashimli R, Oguz H, Taukeleva S. Reflux Symptom Index: Translation to the Kazakh Language and Validation. J Voice 2022:S0892-1997(22)00205-3. [PMID: 35933255 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This research focuses on the translation and validation of the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) in Kazakh language and the comparison of its results among patients with symptoms of Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and without LPR symptoms. OBJECTIVE This study aims to translate and validate the RSI in Kazakh language (Kz-RSI). METHODS The RSI from the original American English version has been translated according to standard procedures into Kazakh language. The study included 248 patients, 124 LPR patients, and 124 asymptomatic controls. A final version of the Kz-RSI was tested twice: on Day 0 and Day 14 for participants without LPR symptoms and on Day 0 and posttreatment for those with LPR symptoms. Reliability, validity, and internal consistency of test-retest were calculated. RESULTS The Cronbach's alpha value for Kz-RSI was 0.94, indicating excellent internal consistency. The single measurement absolute agreement of the interclass correlation coefficient was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [0.86; 0.93]), which indicates good retest reliability. The total Kz-RSI scores and each item were significantly higher in the LPR group than in the control group (P < 0.001). In the posttreatment LPR patient group, the Kz-RSI scores for each item and overall were significantly lower than the pretreatment scores (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Kz-RSI has been successfully translated and validated to identify LPR among the Kazakh-speaking population. Moreover, it is an inexpensive method with strong internal consistency, high retesting rates, reliability, and optimal clinical validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulnur Nukusbekova
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
| | - Dinara Toguzbayeva
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kazakh-Russian Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Ramil Hashimli
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors named after Aziz Aliyev, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - Haldun Oguz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Fonomer, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Saule Taukeleva
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kazakh-Russian Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lechien JR, Lisan Q, Eckley CA, Hamdan A, Eun Y, Hans S, Saussez S, Akst LM, Carroll TL. Acute, Recurrent, and Chronic Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: The
IFOS
Classification. Laryngoscope 2022; 133:1073-1080. [PMID: 36250977 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical patterns and disease evolution of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients. METHODS Patients with LPR diagnosed by hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring were prospectively followed in three medical centers. Symptoms and findings were assessed with reflux symptom score (RSS) and reflux sign assessment (RSA). Patients were treated with 3-to 9-month diet and combination of proton pump inhibitors, alginate or magaldrate. Patients were followed for 3 years to determine the clinical evolution of symptoms over time. LPR that did not recur was defined as acute. Recurrent LPR consisted of reflux with one or several recurrences yearly despite successful treatment. Chronic LPR was reflux with a chronic course of symptoms. Predictive indicators of clinical evolution were investigated. RESULTS One hundred forty patients and 82 healthy individuals completed the evaluations. Among patients, 41 (29.3%), 57 (40.7%), and 42 (30.0%) had acute, recurrent, or chronic LPR respectively. Baseline quality of life-RSS (QoL-RSS) and RSS total scores were significantly higher in chronic LPR patients. The post-treatment decrease of QoL-RSS and RSS of acute LPR patients were significantly faster as compared to recurrent and chronic patients. QoL-RSS >5 reported adequate sensitivity (94.2) and specificity (75.3). QoL-RSS thresholds defined acute (QoL-RSS = 6-25), recurrent (QoL-RSS = 26-38), and chronic (QoL-RSS > 38) LPR. CONCLUSION Baseline QoL-RSS may predict the clinical course of LPR patients: acute, recurrent, or chronic. A novel classification system that groups patients according to the longevity, severity, and therapeutic response of symptoms was proposed: the International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies Classification of LPR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 133:1073-1080, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme R. Lechien
- Department of Otolaryngology Elsan Hospital Paris France
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint‐Quentin‐en‐Yvelines (Paris Saclay University) Paris France
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons) Mons Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery CHU Saint‐Pierre (CHU de Bruxelles) Brussels Belgium
| | - Quentin Lisan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint‐Quentin‐en‐Yvelines (Paris Saclay University) Paris France
| | - Claudia A. Eckley
- Divisão de Otorrinolaringologia Fleury Medicina e Saúde Laboratórios de Diagnóstico São Paulo Brazil
| | - Abdul‐Latif Hamdan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon
| | - Young‐Gyu Eun
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Seoul South Korea
| | - Stéphane Hans
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint‐Quentin‐en‐Yvelines (Paris Saclay University) Paris France
| | - Sven Saussez
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons) Mons Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery CHU Saint‐Pierre (CHU de Bruxelles) Brussels Belgium
| | - Lee M. Akst
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Baltimore Maryland U.S.A
| | - Thomas L. Carroll
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts U.S.A
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ceccon FP, Aires MM, Lechien JR, Carvalho PJ, Michel LCPF, Carvalho NS, Ceccon BH, Sartori PGF, Haddad L. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Short Version of the Reflux Symptom Score: Reflux Symptom Score-12 into Brazilian Portuguese. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2022. [PMID: 35760754 PMCID: PMC10071531 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the process of translation into Brazilian Portuguese and cross-cultural adaptation of the French Reflux Symptom Score-12 questionnaire used for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux. METHODS This was a cross-cultural translation and adaptation study of a health instrument, with a cross-sectional design. It was carried out in eight stages: translation from French into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation by a panel of experts, application of the first version (pilot test 1), adaptation by a panel of experts, application of the second version (pilot test 2), back translation, reviewing by a committee in conjunction with the author of the original instrument and, application of the final version. The Brazilian Portuguese versions of the questionnaire were applied to individuals with symptoms and signs of laryngopharyngeal reflux who underwent pHmetry and esophageal manometry at the study site. RESULTS In pilot test 1, the first version of the RSS-12 in Brazilian Portuguese was applied to 30 patients. The patients had no difficulty to understand any of the 12 symptom items, but 15 patients (50%) had difficulty interpreting the symptom frequency score. After adapting the format of the frequency score, a version 2 of the RSS-12 in Brazilian Portuguese was applied to another 23 patients, who completed the questionnaire in full without any difficulty. Along with the review committee, the author of the original RSS-12 considered the version 2 to be adequate and did not propose any changes, so it was approved as the final version of the Brazilian Portuguese RSS-12. CONCLUSION The Brazilian Portuguese version of the instrument, called Reflux Symptom Score-12 PT-BR, shows good understanding and linguistic, conceptual and content equivalence, in relation to the original Reflux Symptom Score-12.
Collapse
|